[00:33] Hello all! I was curious if this would be the correct location to get help with bzr and launchpad. I was attempting to tackle some things listed under one hundred papercuts. was following this guide: http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-a-bug.html and this one as well, http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/udd-getting-the-source.html#branching. No matter the syntax I try, i can't seem to check out the project. In this [00:33] case the ticket was specific to pidgin [00:34] willdeberry: Hey there! [00:34] willdeberry: Why don't you meet me in #ubuntu-motu, we can take it from there :) === JanC_ is now known as JanC [09:15] LocutusOfBorg: (Pinging you directly due to time running out) Have you or anyone else seen bug 1709733? [09:15] bug 1709733 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1709733 [09:49] Unit193, why not in Debian^ [09:50] LocutusOfBorg: As noted, it's in pkg-xfce's svn repo, not uploaded yet. [09:52] so, when they upload it, it will get autosyncd? [09:52] Well we'd have to manually sync it, but chances are. [10:04] Would very likely want to include https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin/commit/?id=21760d00c8e255f4bf83ddce1f387b1c034599f4 though. :P [10:05] LocutusOfBorg: Hrm, OK. Well thanks anyway. [10:34] I can manually sync it [10:34] just make sure it goes in debian [10:42] It won't before FF. [10:51] isn't it a leaf package? [11:02] LocutusOfBorg: Either this cycle or next we'll likely move from indicator-application+xfce4-indicator-plugin to this. [11:03] It's late, so likely next. [17:08] LocutusOfBorg, hi! thanks for abi-compliance-checker upload! do you have any idea why those KDE autopkgtests still fail on armhf? [17:09] Also, any idea why abi-compliance-checker's own autopkgtests fail? [18:13] LocutusOfBorg, re own tests: I made a new upload https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abi-compliance-checker/1.99.22-1ubuntu2, it should help [18:17] o/ mitya57 [18:17] hi tsimonq2! [21:03] <3 mitya57 :) [21:03] I saw the upload, thanks [21:03] for armhf don't know [21:03] systemd is sad (can't install udev), and xnox is aware/looking at it already [21:03] but meh, I'll have a look once queues go empty [21:11] armhf mostly needs a retry against --all-proposed, but holding off doing most of that until the queue clear to minimise spamming it with duplicates [21:14] and/or many of them failed for armhf on their 1st try, as they ran when QtWebEngine was lagging on it's armhf build, but was there for the other architectures [21:20] we should be mostly good with this transition [21:20] just worried about ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts and ubuntu-settings-components [21:20] maybe they just need a test rerun [21:21] pytest-qt needs fixes [21:21] (Debian suggests to just disable the testsuite) [21:22] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/artful/amd64 [21:22] blame: ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts [21:22] badpkg: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable. [21:22] yep I see [21:22] * acheronuk shrugs [21:22] not sure which one [21:23] we need qtbase-opensource-src, qtwebengine and qtdeclarative candidate for migration [21:23] so I can parse britney's output [21:23] but meh, late here, have a good night :) [21:24] * LocutusOfBorg goes to sleep [21:24] I'd like for us to remove all the UOA stuff LP: #1695928 [21:24] Launchpad bug 1695928 in gnome-control-center-signon (Ubuntu) "Please remove obsolete UOA packages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695928 [21:24] LocutusOfBorg: qml-module-ubuntu-components ? [21:26] urgh! from src:ubuntu-ui-toolkit-gles [22:35] Hrm, looks like kicking up a i386 artful chroot isn't going so hot for me still: http://paste.openstack.org/show/cGj8uRFD3nm0PKN3D9T8/