[09:07] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg, well you say sad installing udev, but i am failing to reproduce that sad.
[09:07] <xnox> where do you see it?
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, grep on excuses page for "unknown: armhf: Regression"
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/armhf/k/kdelibs4support/20170814_043223_736a3@/log.gz
[09:14] <LocutusOfBorg> retrying them over and over again usually works
[09:15] <LocutusOfBorg> addgroup: The group `input' already exists as a system group. Exiting.
[09:15] <LocutusOfBorg> Job for systemd-udevd.service failed because the control process exited with error code.
[09:15] <LocutusOfBorg> See "systemctl  status systemd-udevd.service" and "journalctl  -xe" for details.
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> dpkg: error processing package udev (--configure):
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> the issue should be "Aug 14 07:32:34 autopkgtest-lxd-dstsak systemd-udevd[1380]: inotify_init failed: Too many open files
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> "
[09:18] <xnox> i think this means the host is hosed =/
[09:20] <xnox> Laney, what is the inotify max_user_instances limit on armhf hosts? https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/1044
[09:21] <xnox> and can the sysctl be bumped? e.g. sysctl -w fs.inotify.max_user_instances=8192 via a drop-in or some such
[09:21] <xnox> hm... but lxd has it bumped.
[09:21] <xnox> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1602192
[09:31] <LocutusOfBorg> is it fixed for zesty but we need the fix in xenial? which lxd version are using autopkgtests servers?
[10:10] <acheronuk> ah. was just going to ask about that dbus issue on armhf tests. thx
[10:40] <ejat> what is the best way to remove unity from 17.10 ?
[10:41] <ejat> http://paste.ubuntu.com/25311633/
[11:03] <mitya57> Most qtbase autopkgtests are fixed now, thanks LocutusOfBorg, acheronuk or whoever took care of them :)
[11:04] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks acheronuk I did mostly nothing :)
[11:05] <mitya57> Now we “just” need to remove ubuntu-ui-toolkit.
[11:05] <acheronuk> np :)
[11:05] <mitya57> (or fix it, if someone still cares about it)
[11:16] <LocutusOfBorg> sad me the new qtwebengine or whatever breaks geary :(
[11:16] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geary/0.12~20170613-0ubuntu5
[11:22] <mitya57> That looks like GTK's webkit, not Qt's webengine :)
[11:28] <LocutusOfBorg> you right thanks
[11:33] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, I blame you then for the libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 bad library :)
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, can you please  merge the geary patch upstream?
[11:44] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, which patch, although I am not geary upstream
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> this patch fixes the build https://git.gnome.org/browse/geary/commit/?id=1d0aac1dfe461bf731b022381f179c0f48923834
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> hurray!
[11:45] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, haha
[11:45] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, this patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/332741065/geary_0.12~20170613-0ubuntu3_0.12~20170613-0ubuntu4.diff.gz
[11:45] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm going to upload a new snapshot then
[11:46] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, this only happens on s390x?
[11:46] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, not sure why
[11:46] <LocutusOfBorg> :(
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> this is the failure https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geary/0.12~20170613-0ubuntu3
[11:47] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, did you compare the webkit girs with e.g. amd64?
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> (BTW I don't know about this patch)
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, I did zero debug, I don't know such things
[11:47] <ricotz> I see
[11:48] <ricotz> likely a gobject-introspection problem
[11:52] <LocutusOfBorg> fwiw it now builds, and I'm happy with gmime transition going to an end, sorry for not being too helpful, I just found you as author of the commit fixing the issue :p
[12:01] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, I see
[12:04] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, your s390x build fix looks wrong and might result in a double-free
[12:54] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, could you try to drop your patch and disable debhelpers parallel building?
[13:35] <Laney> xnox: can you remind me on wednesday please?
[15:13] <jdstrand> tyhicks, sbeattie: fyi, I'll take bug #1710487. I need to check snapd for that anyway
[15:14] <tyhicks> thanks jdstrand
[15:19] <sbeattie> jdstrand: thanks
[15:35] <tsimonq2> rbasak: Hey there! Could I get a bump on looking at bug 1133477? :)
[15:38] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: I'd like to remove (old) webkitgtk from Ubuntu soon, maybe before 17.10's release
[15:41] <jbicha> current status (except for boinc) at LP: #1710318
[15:44] <rbasak> tsimonq2: I appreciate the ping. I'm not sure I'm going to get time to hit it this week though :-/
[15:44] <rbasak> tsimonq2: I'd be happy for someone else to take over if someone else is available.
[15:45] <rbasak> tsimonq2: otherwise I will try and do it - I'm just trying to be realistic.
[15:45] <tsimonq2> rbasak: Sure, I just don't know who else to ping :P
[15:45] <rbasak> tsimonq2: anyone in ~ubuntu-sru
[15:45] <rbasak> tsimonq2: RAOF is in rotation today, though I don't see him online right now.
[15:46] <tsimonq2> rbasak: Ok. Yeah, I think he's in Australia, I'll catch him this evening maybe.
[19:03] <rbasak> !dmb-ping
[19:37] <rbasak> !dmb-ping
[19:38] <acheronuk> even the bot doesn't want to do it!
[19:38] <tsimonq2> oh snap :P
[21:38] <mwhudson> does anyone know what's going on with http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-ubuntu-make
[21:38] <mwhudson> it says it's been running for an hour but i'm preeeety sure it said that 8 hours ago