=== Logan is now known as Guest50446
[03:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hddemux [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hddemux [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hddemux [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hddemux [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hddemux [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hddemux [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
=== Guest90219 is now known as RAOF
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.1+17.04]
[08:51] <apw> ^ rejecting per the uploader, a .2 is expected
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.1~14.04]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wget2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/none) [0.0.20170806-1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wget2 [s390x] (artful-proposed/none) [0.0.20170806-1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vim-airline-themes [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0+git.20170710.5d75d76-1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vim-airline [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.8-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pycryptodome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/none) [3.4.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pycryptodome [s390x] (artful-proposed/none) [3.4.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shimdandy [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wget2 [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.0.20170806-1] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wget2 [i386] (artful-proposed/none) [0.0.20170806-1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pycryptodome [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [3.4.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wget2 [armhf] (artful-proposed/none) [0.0.20170806-1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wget2 [arm64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.0.20170806-1] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pycryptodome [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.4.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pycryptodome [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.4.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pycryptodome [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.4.6-1] (no packageset)
[12:29] <coreycb> hello, can an archive admin please promote python3-oslo.service, python3-oslo.service, and python3-oslo.messaging to main?  the py2 binaries for these packages are already in main.
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[13:06] <infinity> coreycb: component-mismatches sees no reason to promote them.  If they're to be in main, they should be seeded or depended on (I'm assuming the latter is the intent).
[13:09] <jbicha> infinity: could you look into tracker/tracker-miners in artful/new (tracker-miners is just split from tracker so no new binaries there, the new src:tracker binaries are already in Debian exp.)?
[13:16] <infinity> jbicha: tracker-miners isn't in Debian?
[13:16] <coreycb> infinity: right, sorry :)
[13:16] <jbicha> infinity: not yet, it just got split from tracker a week ago
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tracker-miners [source] (artful-proposed) [1.99.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pycryptodome [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.4.6-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pycryptodome [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.4.6-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pycryptodome [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.4.6-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbytesize [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbytesize [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbytesize [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pycryptodome [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.4.6-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pycryptodome [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.4.6-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vim-airline-themes [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0+git.20170710.5d75d76-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wget2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.20170806-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wget2 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.0.20170806-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wget2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.0.20170806-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbytesize [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbytesize [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shimdandy [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wget2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.20170806-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wget2 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.0.20170806-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbytesize [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vim-airline [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.8-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pycryptodome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.4.6-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wget2 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.0.20170806-1]
[13:25] <jbicha> thank you :)
[13:29] <chrisccoulson> hi, can we stop rustc and cargo from being auto-synced from debian please?
[13:29] <chrisccoulson> this got auto-synced before there was a working 1.17 binary with which to build it on armhf - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/1.18.0+dfsg1-4
[13:29] <chrisccoulson> and now we're in a bit of a mess
[13:32] <chrisccoulson> errr
[13:34] <chrisccoulson> actually, that's not entirely true. The last 1.17 build failed (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcepub/8083193/+listing-archive-extra), but there was a successful build before that (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcepub/7936948/+listing-archive-extra) which is still published in artful-proposed
[13:35] <chrisccoulson> still, I'd like to not auto-sync this because it's too easy to get in a situation where it becomes unbuildable in the archive
[13:38] <chrisccoulson> (if debian updates rust to 1.19 and it's sync'd to ubuntu now before we have 1.18 working on arm, then we will be in a bit of a mess)
[13:39] <jbicha> chrisccoulson: the easiest way to block autosyncs is to upload a no-change -ubuntu1 revision :)
[13:40] <jbicha> or you could use the sync blacklist but that prevents syncpackage from working for that package either
[13:40] <chrisccoulson> jbicha, yes, but that's not really a long term fix. We have that before, then it got manually sync'd
[13:41] <infinity> I don't think blacklisting it is sane.
[13:41] <infinity> We can rebootstrap it if we have to.  Ideally, of course, it should be in shape so that's not required.
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
[14:00] <popey> Is Ubuntu (proper) going to participate in beta 1 in a couple of weeks?
[14:00] <popey> Given we're making significant changes this cycle, seems like it might be prudent for wider testing?
[14:02] <infinity> popey: There hadn't been plans to do so.
[14:03] <infinity> popey: But you might ask Will if the desktop team would like to break tradition this cycle, if you feel there's a solid argument.
[14:03] <infinity> popey: Honestly, I don't think it's the installer and ISOs that need deep testing here, it's upgrade paths.
[14:03] <infinity> popey: And betas are more about the former.
[14:06] <jbicha> popey: it's a good idea, are you interested in doing the work to sign off on the iso's that week?
[14:13] <popey> (sorry, just in a meeting, will come back to this in a moment)
[14:36] <popey> infinity: ok, I'll ping Will about it.
[14:36] <popey> jbicha: if I know how much work it is, maybe  ;)
[14:36] <Laney> We had already thought about doing early milestones, and decided against it.
[14:37] <Laney> The idea is/was to do QA independently of them.
[14:37]  * Laney is off, just wanted to say that.
[14:37] <popey> Ok, thanks
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hddemux [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hddemux [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hddemux [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgnatcoll [amd64] (artful-proposed) [17.0.2017-2ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgnatcoll [armhf] (artful-proposed) [17.0.2017-2ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgnatcoll [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [17.0.2017-2ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hddemux [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hddemux [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgnatcoll [i386] (artful-proposed) [17.0.2017-2ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hddemux [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgnatcoll [s390x] (artful-proposed) [17.0.2017-2ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgnatcoll [arm64] (artful-proposed) [17.0.2017-2ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.0.2+git20170510.3.97311d9-1ubuntu1]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asis [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2017-1] (no packageset)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asis [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2017-1] (no packageset)
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asis [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2017-1] (no packageset)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asis [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2017-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asis [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2017-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asis [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2017-1] (no packageset)
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted asis [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2017-1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted asis [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2017-1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted asis [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2017-1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted asis [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2017-1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted asis [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2017-1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted asis [i386] (artful-proposed) [2017-1]
[18:00] <xnox> apw, slangasek, doko: if you have powers, could you please demote _binaries only_ of things that are up for demotions w.r.t. qt4:
[18:00] <xnox> libavahi-qt4-1 libavahi-qt4-dev	avahi
[18:01] <xnox> libpoppler-qt4-4 libpoppler-qt4-dev	poppler
[18:01] <xnox> after that, the only remaining piece would be to somehow resolve fcitx-frontend-qt4 libfcitx-qt0 on-demand-installation / demotion.
[18:07] <teward> can a release manager / developer please take a quick peek at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcl/+bug/1704459 please?  (from #ubuntu-bugs)
[18:07] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1704459 in pcl (Ubuntu) "rebuild needed because dependency changed location of exported libmpi.so library " [Undecided,Confirmed]
[18:07] <teward> looks like it'll need looked at, and if you can give guidance to the guy in #ubuntu-bugs that'd be great
[18:12] <nacc> teward: there's a src:pcl in a-p
[18:12] <nacc> teward: so i assume it's actually fix committed for artful?
[18:12] <teward> nacc: not sure, check #u-bugs
[18:12] <teward> and relay that there :P
[18:24] <bladernr> hey, who manages the download locations for the current and old ISOs?  IOW, who decides and manages what goes to release.u.c, cdimages.u.c and old-releases.u.c?
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-93.116] (core, kernel)
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-33.37] (core, kernel)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-33.37]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-93.116]
[19:14] <apw> bladernr, that mostly falls to the release team and likely to infinity in the main
[19:15] <bladernr> apw, thanks!
[19:23] <slangasek> xnox: yep, demoting a few binaries now
[19:25] <xnox> bladernr, some of these decisions are IS driven too, w.r.t. mirrors network and what gets masqueraded with CDN.
[19:25] <xnox> with infinity as a proxy =)
[19:27] <bladernr> xnox, thanks... infinity is a busy dude :)
[19:29] <slangasek> bladernr: do you have a request to change something?
[19:33] <bladernr> slangasek, no. The Cert websites generate urls on the fly for ISO downloads based on the release that was used for testing, so we're trying to improve that process to reduce the number of broken links, and just needed to know who to throw questions at.
[19:35] <tsimonq2> infinity, mitya57: I really think something similar to this should be done in Ubuntu (maybe next cycle or the one after): https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00006.html - but certainly a first step will be getting the Qt 4 libraries off of the images... Anyways, where should I go to discuss this more with others? (just in here or on a mailing list?)
[19:48] <xnox> tsimonq2, i've been looking at it. at the moment, everything is gone from main, apart from fcitx-frontend-qt4 which is pulled in, because of providing cjk support out of the box for qt4 apps.
[19:48] <xnox> tsimonq2, i am not sure what is the state of the art of installing cjk support on-demand, and ideally without shipping the qt4 portion of it by default on cds.
[19:49] <xnox> tsimonq2, do you recall where the code for cjk langauge support is? if we add fcitx-frontend-qt4 there, we can drop qt4-x11 from main.
[19:49] <xnox> (qt4-x11 & qt-at-spi)
[19:51] <tsimonq2> xnox: hm, no but I'm looking :)
[20:01] <slangasek> bladernr: if you throw the questions at the channel generally, people here can answer (myself or infinity included)
[20:04] <tsimonq2> xnox: Hmm, not sure, but I've asked in #debian-qt-kde on OFTC to see if they know
=== fossfree- is now known as fossfreedom
[20:33] <xnox> tsimonq2, they wouldn't... language packs, and language support installer / runtime installation is entirely ubuntu specific.
[20:34] <xnox> it installs dictionaries, language packs, and input methods specific to a given user chosen locales.
[20:36] <xnox> maybe bdmurray knows or e.g. setuid
[20:36] <xnox> unping setuid
[20:36] <xnox> seb128 i meant, but not in this channel.
[20:42] <jbicha> xnox: maybe you could do what I'm suggesting in LP: #1585903 and have the qt base library recommend all the addons that used to be included by default like the fcitx support
[20:42] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1585903 in Ubuntu GNOME "Make it possible to remove gtk2" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1585903
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaws [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.2.2017-1] (no packageset)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaws [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.2.2017-1] (no packageset)
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaws [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.2.2017-1] (no packageset)
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaws [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.2.2017-1] (no packageset)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaws [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.2.2017-1] (no packageset)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaws [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.2.2017-1] (no packageset)
[20:57] <xnox> jbicha, that would introduce circular deps, but it's not like we will have another qt 4.x major release.
[21:09] <jbicha> but recommends aren't too big of a problem because it's a soft dependency, right?
[21:11] <tsimonq2> Either way I'm not a fan of introducing an Ubuntu delta, the end goal after we can stop carrying transitional packages is to make qtbase et. al completely syncable.
[21:14] <jbicha> it looks like the publisher stopped publishing to artful a few hours ago ( see vala-panel-appmenu or meta-gnome3 )
[21:22] <slangasek> recommends require manual probing for us to decipher for removals (which is a bug in the scripts); and if a package recommends something removed from the archive, that recommended package doesn't get removed on upgrade unless forced out by conflicts
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volume-key [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volume-key [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directfb [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.7-4] (kubuntu)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5-2] (kubuntu)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directfb [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.7-4] (kubuntu)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5-2] (kubuntu)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directfb [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.7-4] (kubuntu)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directfb [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.7-4] (kubuntu)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volume-key [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5-2] (kubuntu)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5-2] (kubuntu)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volume-key [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5-2] (kubuntu)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volume-key [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directfb [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.7-4] (kubuntu)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directfb [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.7-4] (kubuntu)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volume-key [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5-2] (kubuntu)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poco [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poco [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poco [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poco [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poco [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[23:38] <ahoneybun> anyone know if any of the Ubuntu changes to GNOME can be reverted?
[23:38] <ahoneybun> other then this vanilla session
[23:43] <jbicha> ahoneybun: wrong channel?
[23:45] <ahoneybun> jbicha: not sure
[23:45] <ahoneybun> not sure where to ask about it
[23:47] <valorie> ahoneybun: maybe the #ubuntu+1 chan?
[23:47] <jbicha> ahoneybun: #ubuntu-desktop is where the default Ubuntu desktop is developed, or #ubuntu for support questions
[23:48] <ahoneybun> jbicha: what sorry IRC died
[23:49] <hggdh> ahoneybun: #ubuntu-desktop takes care of the default UBuntu desktop, #ubuntu+1 with experience on next Ubuntu
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poco [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)