-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: jsonrpc-glib (artful-proposed/primary) [3.25.3-0ubuntu1] | 00:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: template-glib (artful-proposed/primary) [3.25.3-0ubuntu1] | 00:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:28 | |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-multimedia [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio) | 04:20 | |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
tjaalton | is update_excuses.html updates somehow stuck? the timestamp seems old | 07:17 |
---|---|---|
acheronuk | might get unstuck soon? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/artful/2017-08-16/ | 07:19 |
acheronuk | or at least, seems to have done a recent run now | 07:19 |
tjaalton | ok, cool | 07:19 |
acheronuk | s/done/doing | 07:20 |
apw | tjaalton, yes it was sick over night, it got kicked about 20m ago ... so is grinding now | 07:20 |
tjaalton | great | 07:21 |
apw | it is vomiting tests into the queues as we speak | 07:21 |
tsimonq2 | The Qt 5.9.1 transition in Debian Sid started a few hours ago, the autosyncer will pull in 10-15 packages within the next day that could trigger a good amount of autopkgtests... | 07:23 |
apw | oh "good" | 07:23 |
tsimonq2 | Well, not qtbase, not unless someone merges from Debian. :P | 07:23 |
tsimonq2 | qtbase is the one that triggers the massive amount of tests... | 07:24 |
acheronuk | leave it alone! I nearly got the tests sorted once :P | 07:25 |
tsimonq2 | *maybe* once everything migrates from -proposed, but ONLY if it includes useful fixess | 07:25 |
tsimonq2 | s/fixess/fixes/ | 07:26 |
acheronuk | anyone going to fix the armhf builders so they don't fail installing dbus, and regress with packaname/unknown ? | 07:27 |
acheronuk | sorry. didn't mean that ^^^ to sound moany | 07:29 |
mitya57 | tsimonq2, if we are speaking about qt4-x11, it already has a huge delta, so one more recommends won't hurt. So jbicha's suggestion sounds good to me. | 07:40 |
tsimonq2 | mitya57: fair | 07:44 |
tsimonq2 | mitya57: But I thought we were talking about qtbase-opensource-src | 07:44 |
mitya57 | The original question was about dropping qt4-x11 and making sure the CJK support for qt4 is installed when qt4 is in useā¦ | 07:45 |
tsimonq2 | Oh ok | 07:45 |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
tjaalton | so are failures like https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/a/akonadi-calendar-tools/20170816_070642_f9d49@/log.gz caused by the ongoing kde uploads? | 08:24 |
tsimonq2 | tjaalton: That specifically seems like something is hardcoded for GCC 6... | 08:30 |
tsimonq2 | /usr/include/KF5/AkonadiCore/std_exception.h:1:10: fatal error: /usr/include/c++/6/exception: No such file or directory | 08:30 |
tsimonq2 | #include "/usr/include/c++/6/exception" | 08:30 |
tsimonq2 | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 08:30 |
tsimonq2 | Soooo idk about that one specifically. | 08:30 |
tjaalton | well there are many of those failing and blocking mesa | 08:31 |
apw | someone really screwed-the-pooch on the c++ header API if you have to use a version in there | 08:31 |
tsimonq2 | acheronuk, clivejo: This is something you're aware of, right? ^^^^ | 08:32 |
acheronuk | needs tests run against the stuff stuck in -proposed due to Qt etc transition I think, instead of using the akonadi et al. in -release | 08:33 |
acheronuk | I retried similar against those, and they passed | 08:34 |
acheronuk | akonadi is one whole screwed up mess from KDE :( | 08:35 |
tjaalton | agreed :P | 08:35 |
acheronuk | If I could kill it with fire, I would! | 08:36 |
* acheronuk heads to do chores | 08:36 | |
tsimonq2 | The whole PIM stack is one huge security nightmare and autopkgtest killer! | 08:36 |
tsimonq2 | s/PIM/KDE PIM/ | 08:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (artful-proposed/primary) [1:5.0~+rc2-1] | 08:47 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hello, I'm really worried, why some stuff isn't autosyncd? | 08:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | e.g. llvm-toolchain-5.0 | 08:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-5.0 [sync] (artful-proposed) [1:5.0~+rc2-1] | 08:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [arm64] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [i386] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [s390x] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2] | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [amd64] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [armhf] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1] | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] | 08:56 | |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, do you have any clue for llvm-toolchain-5.0 missed autosync? | 09:01 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, sorry no, i don't see any history for it in LP so its not that ... i can't say i am very up on the rules autosync applies | 09:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm a little bit worried :) | 09:02 |
* apw adds learning how that works to his long list | 09:02 | |
LocutusOfBorg | anyhow, sorted now, I'm worried because I don't know how many packages missed the autosync | 09:02 |
Laney | the latest log is available at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/current.log | 09:02 |
apw | * Trying to add llvm-toolchain-5.0 ... | 09:03 |
apw | llvm-toolchain-5.0_1:5.0~+rc2-1 is trying to override modified binary clang-5.0_1:5.0~svn305653-1ubuntu1. OK (y/N)? n | 09:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh | 09:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 09:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | so that old binary was probably in the snapshot package, that won't leave proposed | 09:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | fine to sync, thanks | 09:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | and the proposed one points to llvm 6.0 in new queue | 09:07 |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:55 | |
Laney | s390x autopkgtesting is off currently for some maintenance | 10:05 |
apw | Laney, off as in queuing i assume ? | 10:08 |
Laney | yeh | 10:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1] | 10:08 | |
Laney | also looking into the big armhf queue | 10:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset) | 10:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-92.100] (core, kernel) | 10:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset) | 10:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-93.116~14.04.1] (kernel) | 10:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset) | 10:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-129.178] (core, kernel) | 10:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset) | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset) | 10:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed) [3.19.0-92.100] | 10:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-93.116~14.04.1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-129.178] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2] | 10:56 | |
Laney | k, armhf should be picking up again | 11:31 |
Laney | ended up with tons of orphaned instances for some reason | 11:31 |
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.26.10 => 2.27.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.26.10~14.04 => 2.27.2~14.04] (no packageset) | 12:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.26.10+17.04 => 2.27.2+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:36 | |
slashd | rbasak, good day, if you have some cycle could you please look at releasing "landscape-client" derived binary packages in trusty-updates ? v-t-d has been done with a detailed description including the usual landscape pkging QA testing, it's green in pending sru and has reach the 7 days. | 12:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.7.2-14build1 => 1.7.2-14ubuntu1.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 12:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu4 => 1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu4.17.04.1] (no packageset) | 12:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.157.12] | 12:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (artful-proposed/primary) [0.1] | 12:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (artful-proposed) [0.1] | 12:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset) | 12:55 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hello doko I did retry some of the gnat failures against proposed | 13:04 |
LocutusOfBorg | libgnatcoll seems to be a failure, but I don't know how to fix it | 13:04 |
LocutusOfBorg | for others I prefer to wait for results | 13:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1] | 13:06 | |
LocutusOfBorg | and probably the failure is just uninstallability that is fixed now | 13:25 |
* LocutusOfBorg waits for an hopefully fixed insighttoolkit4 to show up | 13:38 | |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, ^^ | 13:38 |
cpaelzer | polling for an AA to remove sandbox-upgrader and auto-upgrade-testing from artful as described in 1260062 | 13:48 |
apw | cpaelzer, hi | 14:06 |
cpaelzer | hi apw | 14:06 |
cpaelzer | power issues today? | 14:06 |
cpaelzer | or about my AA ping? | 14:06 |
apw | cpaelzer, those both appear to be ubuntu only, and maintained by us, and look dead basically ... | 14:07 |
cpaelzer | exactly | 14:07 |
cpaelzer | the bugholds also links to a mailing list thread where I was polling for users | 14:07 |
cpaelzer | but all known ones dropped their usage | 14:07 |
cpaelzer | and "maintained by us" is a hard exaggeration, it is it more the formal status but not the truth since they were broken so long without notice or fix | 14:08 |
apw | cpaelzer, in thesense "we" aree the arbitors of whether it is, as maintainers | 14:12 |
cpaelzer | yeah, I agree | 14:15 |
apw | cpaelzer, and done | 14:23 |
cpaelzer | thank you | 14:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:24 | |
rbasak | slashd: sorry, out today | 14:36 |
LocutusOfBorg | hello insighttoolki4, welcome back! | 14:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:36 | |
slashd | rbasak, no worries thanks | 14:51 |
jbicha | I think the nbs tracker is confused about geany-plugins, the new version of the metapackage does not depend on the removed plugins | 15:53 |
nacc | jbicha: there are two geany-plugins in artful currently? | 15:55 |
nacc | jbicha: (per rmadison) | 15:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.2+17.04] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.2] | 16:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.2~14.04] | 16:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04.6] | 16:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.9] | 16:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:34 | |
slangasek | seb128: it seems someone promoted gmime2.6 source to main without subscribing a team to it. Is Desktop Team happy to be on the hook for both gmimes? | 17:40 |
slangasek | seb128: sorry, correction, gmime2.6 is only in universe but its /binaries/ were still in main and are now being demoted | 17:41 |
seb128 | slangasek, so all good? | 17:42 |
seb128 | but yeah otherwise it's fine for us to subscribe to it | 17:42 |
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
tkamppeter | artful-proposed -> artful transition is still hanging on qtbase-opensource-src failing with Ubuntu Online Accounts tests. Will this get fixed soon? | 18:20 |
tkamppeter | This blocks cups-filters and probably many other packages. | 18:21 |
slangasek | tkamppeter: I have no eta for this being resolved; the packages which regress with new Qt are listed as being owned by the ubuntu-webapps-bugs and unity-ui-team teams, and I'm not sure either of those teams still exists; this probably falls to the Desktop Team to determine what should happen with these packages | 18:34 |
slangasek | xnox, tsimonq2: ^^ have you had any conversations with anyone from the Desktop Team regarding how to unblock qt wrt ubuntu-settings-components and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts? | 18:38 |
nacc | some quick digging: qtdeclarative5-gsettings1.0 depends on qtbase-abi-5-7-1 which implies it might need a rebuild for a new ABI (5-9-1) | 18:38 |
* tsimonq2 defers to mitya57 | 18:38 | |
tsimonq2 | nacc: 5-9-0 but yeah | 18:38 |
nacc | err, yes, sorry :) | 18:38 |
tsimonq2 | Also, we need to look into porting packages off of ubuntu-ui-toolkit | 18:38 |
tsimonq2 | We need to remove it one way or another | 18:39 |
nacc | similar abi issues exist for libuntugestures5 and libuntutoolkit5 | 18:39 |
tsimonq2 | I've tried two times to port it to the new Qt to no avail | 18:39 |
tsimonq2 | I think mitya57 has tried too to no success | 18:39 |
tsimonq2 | So we can either: a) port packages off of it then remove it; b) remove the whole stack | 18:40 |
tsimonq2 | xnox was telling me some people still want some of the rdeps | 18:40 |
tsimonq2 | Soooo I guess we have to port things off of it, unless somebody has a working port to the new Qt | 18:40 |
tsimonq2 | That's the *real* blocker here. | 18:40 |
slangasek | right, and that porting work should be the responsibility of the folks who want to keep it in the archive | 18:41 |
tsimonq2 | Sure | 18:42 |
nacc | why can't src:ubuntu-settings-components be removed? | 18:43 |
nacc | it produces two binary packages, one of which is a dummy and one is a unity8 package | 18:43 |
nacc | or is that the "port off of it" point? | 18:44 |
tsimonq2 | nacc: The way I understand it from conversations with mitya57 is that packages that still use ubuntu-ui-toolkit can be ported to use Qt Quick Controls 2 | 18:45 |
tsimonq2 | But regardless, I'm not really familiar with the packages that people want to keep | 18:45 |
tsimonq2 | All I know is that it's just "some of the rdeps" | 18:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:47 | |
nacc | tsimonq2: sure, but i mean, at least one part of the blocked stack is removable, afaict? the only rev-dep of src:ubuntu-settings-components is ubuntu-system-settings which seems to be touch-specific (and if src:ubuntu-system-settings was removed that would fall out too)? | 18:47 |
nacc | tsimonq2: altough libertine has a b-d on libsystemsettings-dev | 18:48 |
nacc | geez, how much of this gunk is there because of touch? | 18:48 |
nacc | "sandbox for running deb-packaged X11 apps on Ubuntu Personal" | 18:48 |
nacc | 'Ubuntu "Snappy Personal" system.' | 18:48 |
slangasek | it's all there as part of previous Canonical client stack development. Not all of it is touch-specific | 18:49 |
tsimonq2 | nacc: Lots, it took 1.5 months (I think) for the last Qt transition because it took that long to port all of this... | 18:49 |
tsimonq2 | (1 month at least) | 18:49 |
nacc | slangasek: ok, i was just going off the package descriptions :) | 18:49 |
tsimonq2 | I'd like to minimize this time to having Qt transitions take a few weeks at best | 18:49 |
slangasek | nacc: "Snappy Personal" != "touch"; but it may be unity8-specific and therefore removable | 18:49 |
* nacc probably isn't helping by poking at that ratking... | 18:50 | |
nacc | slangasek: what is "Snappy Personal"? | 18:50 |
nacc | just not familiar with the term | 18:50 |
tsimonq2 | nacc: But yeah, I'm not intricately familiar with src:ubuntu-settings-components but that sounds sane. Don't take my word on it though. ;) | 18:50 |
nacc | tsimonq2: :) | 18:51 |
tsimonq2 | I'd like to file a removal bug for ubuntu-ui-toolkit with all of the reverse dependencies added on the bug, giving the option to either port off of ubuntu-ui-toolkit or port off of it. Any objections to me filing that bug? | 18:52 |
* tsimonq2 has never filed removal bugs before but it seems fairly straightforward :P | 18:52 | |
slangasek | nacc: Snappy Personal was to be a Unity8 client stack (desktop, not primarily phone) packaged as snaps | 18:52 |
nacc | slangasek: ah! thank you | 18:53 |
nacc | tsimonq2: given that, i do think it's reasonable | 18:53 |
tsimonq2 | nacc: ok | 18:54 |
tkamppeter | slangasek, thanks. I only want that cups-filters uploads (no relationship at all to Qt) make it quickly into the release so that users test it. | 18:56 |
slangasek | nacc: and fwiw ubuntu-system-settings itself has a revdep tree | 18:57 |
nacc | slangasek: ack, some come from itself, some seem to be |'d with binaries from other pkgs, but yeah, needs a trawl | 19:02 |
slangasek | reverse-depends src:$src excludes self-depends | 19:03 |
slangasek | fwiw | 19:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:03 | |
slangasek | but sadly we still don't have the | info in its output | 19:03 |
nacc | slangasek: oh you're right, sorry, i was glossing ubuntu-system-settings and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts into one | 19:04 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek, nacc, mitya57, xnox: bug 1711204 | 19:14 |
ubot5 | bug 1711204 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "Remove ubuntu-ui-toolkit from the archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1711204 | 19:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: menhir [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170712-1] (no packageset) | 21:33 | |
acheronuk | slangasek: can the tests for libkf5eventviews/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 and libkf5calendarsupport/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 on pp64el & s390x be ignored please? | 22:16 |
acheronuk | this is anothjer case of test being run that shouldn't, as there are no binaries now | 22:17 |
acheronuk | part of KDE PIM that is not buildable on those archs now | 22:17 |
acheronuk | I thought that issue had been fixed in britney, but seems still happens in a few cases | 22:18 |
slangasek | acheronuk: I suspect the problem only occurs if for some reason the tests were manually triggered, or were triggered before the britney change; yes, overridden, thanks | 22:30 |
acheronuk | slangasek: thank you | 22:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: profitbricks-sdk-python [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dehydrated-hook-ddns-tsig [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtts [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset) | 23:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (trusty-proposed/main) [2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1.1] (core) | 23:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset) | 23:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset) | 23:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!