/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/08/16/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: jsonrpc-glib (artful-proposed/primary) [3.25.3-0ubuntu1]00:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: template-glib (artful-proposed/primary) [3.25.3-0ubuntu1]00:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:28
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-multimedia [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)04:20
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
tjaaltonis update_excuses.html updates somehow stuck? the timestamp seems old07:17
acheronukmight get unstuck soon? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/artful/2017-08-16/07:19
acheronukor at least, seems to have done a recent run now07:19
tjaaltonok, cool07:19
acheronuks/done/doing07:20
apwtjaalton, yes it was sick over night, it got kicked about 20m ago ... so is grinding now07:20
tjaaltongreat07:21
apwit is vomiting tests into the queues as we speak07:21
tsimonq2The Qt 5.9.1 transition in Debian Sid started a few hours ago, the autosyncer will pull in 10-15 packages within the next day that could trigger a good amount of autopkgtests...07:23
apwoh "good"07:23
tsimonq2Well, not qtbase, not unless someone merges from Debian. :P07:23
tsimonq2qtbase is the one that triggers the massive amount of tests...07:24
acheronukleave it alone! I nearly got the tests sorted once :P07:25
tsimonq2*maybe* once everything migrates from -proposed, but ONLY if it includes useful fixess07:25
tsimonq2s/fixess/fixes/07:26
acheronukanyone going to fix the armhf builders so they don't fail installing dbus, and regress with packaname/unknown ?07:27
acheronuksorry. didn't mean that ^^^ to sound moany07:29
mitya57tsimonq2, if we are speaking about qt4-x11, it already has a huge delta, so one more recommends won't hurt. So jbicha's suggestion sounds good to me.07:40
tsimonq2mitya57: fair07:44
tsimonq2mitya57: But I thought we were talking about qtbase-opensource-src07:44
mitya57The original question was about dropping qt4-x11 and making sure the CJK support for qt4 is installed when qt4 is in useā€¦07:45
tsimonq2Oh ok07:45
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
tjaaltonso are failures like https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/a/akonadi-calendar-tools/20170816_070642_f9d49@/log.gz caused by the ongoing kde uploads?08:24
tsimonq2tjaalton: That specifically seems like something is hardcoded for GCC 6...08:30
tsimonq2/usr/include/KF5/AkonadiCore/std_exception.h:1:10: fatal error: /usr/include/c++/6/exception: No such file or directory08:30
tsimonq2 #include "/usr/include/c++/6/exception"08:30
tsimonq2          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~08:30
tsimonq2Soooo idk about that one specifically.08:30
tjaaltonwell there are many of those failing and blocking mesa08:31
apwsomeone really screwed-the-pooch on the c++ header API if you have to use a version in there08:31
tsimonq2acheronuk, clivejo: This is something you're aware of, right? ^^^^08:32
acheronukneeds tests run against the stuff stuck in -proposed due to Qt etc transition I think, instead of using the akonadi et al. in -release08:33
acheronukI retried similar against those, and they passed08:34
acheronukakonadi is one whole screwed up mess from KDE :(08:35
tjaaltonagreed :P08:35
acheronukIf I could kill it with fire, I would!08:36
* acheronuk heads to do chores08:36
tsimonq2The whole PIM stack is one huge security nightmare and autopkgtest killer!08:36
tsimonq2s/PIM/KDE PIM/08:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (artful-proposed/primary) [1:5.0~+rc2-1]08:47
LocutusOfBorghello, I'm really worried, why some stuff isn't autosyncd?08:50
LocutusOfBorge.g. llvm-toolchain-5.008:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-5.0 [sync] (artful-proposed) [1:5.0~+rc2-1]08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [arm64] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [i386] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [s390x] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [amd64] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [armhf] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]08:56
LocutusOfBorgapw, do you have any clue for llvm-toolchain-5.0 missed autosync?09:01
apwLocutusOfBorg, sorry no, i don't see any history for it in LP so its not that ... i can't say i am very up on the rules autosync applies09:01
LocutusOfBorgI'm a little bit worried :)09:02
* apw adds learning how that works to his long list09:02
LocutusOfBorganyhow, sorted now, I'm worried because I don't know how many packages missed the autosync09:02
Laneythe latest log is available at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/current.log09:02
apw * Trying to add llvm-toolchain-5.0 ...09:03
apwllvm-toolchain-5.0_1:5.0~+rc2-1 is trying to override modified binary clang-5.0_1:5.0~svn305653-1ubuntu1.  OK (y/N)?  n09:03
LocutusOfBorgoh09:03
LocutusOfBorgthanks!09:03
LocutusOfBorgso that old binary was probably in the snapshot package, that won't leave proposed09:06
LocutusOfBorgfine to sync, thanks09:06
LocutusOfBorgand the proposed one points to llvm 6.0 in new queue09:07
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1] (kernel)09:55
Laneys390x autopkgtesting is off currently for some maintenance10:05
apwLaney, off as in queuing i assume ?10:08
Laneyyeh10:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1]10:08
Laneyalso looking into the big armhf queue10:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-92.100] (core, kernel)10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-93.116~14.04.1] (kernel)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-129.178] (core, kernel)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)10:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)10:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed) [3.19.0-92.100]10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-93.116~14.04.1]10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-129.178]10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]10:56
Laneyk, armhf should be picking up again11:31
Laneyended up with tons of orphaned instances for some reason11:31
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.26.10 => 2.27.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)12:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.26.10~14.04 => 2.27.2~14.04] (no packageset)12:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.26.10+17.04 => 2.27.2+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)12:36
slashdrbasak, good day, if you have some cycle could you please look at releasing "landscape-client" derived binary packages in trusty-updates ? v-t-d has been done with a detailed description including the usual landscape pkging QA testing, it's green in pending sru and has reach the 7 days.12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.7.2-14build1 => 1.7.2-14ubuntu1.16.04.1] (no packageset)12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu4 => 1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu4.17.04.1] (no packageset)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.157.12]12:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (artful-proposed/primary) [0.1]12:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (artful-proposed) [0.1]12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)12:55
LocutusOfBorghello doko I did retry some of the gnat failures against proposed13:04
LocutusOfBorglibgnatcoll seems to be a failure, but I don't know how to fix it13:04
LocutusOfBorgfor others I prefer to wait for results13:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1]13:06
LocutusOfBorgand probably the failure is just uninstallability that is fixed now13:25
* LocutusOfBorg waits for an hopefully fixed insighttoolkit4 to show up13:38
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, ^^13:38
cpaelzerpolling for an AA to remove sandbox-upgrader and auto-upgrade-testing from artful as described in 126006213:48
apwcpaelzer, hi14:06
cpaelzerhi apw14:06
cpaelzerpower issues today?14:06
cpaelzeror about my AA ping?14:06
apwcpaelzer, those both appear to be ubuntu only, and maintained by us, and look dead basically ...14:07
cpaelzerexactly14:07
cpaelzerthe bugholds also links to a mailing list thread where I was polling for users14:07
cpaelzerbut all known ones dropped their usage14:07
cpaelzerand "maintained by us"  is a hard exaggeration, it is it more the formal status but not the truth since they were broken so long without notice or fix14:08
apwcpaelzer, in thesense "we" aree the arbitors of whether it is, as maintainers14:12
cpaelzeryeah, I agree14:15
apwcpaelzer, and done14:23
cpaelzerthank you14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:24
rbasakslashd: sorry, out today14:36
LocutusOfBorghello insighttoolki4, welcome back!14:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:36
slashdrbasak, no worries thanks14:51
jbichaI think the nbs tracker is confused about geany-plugins, the new version of the metapackage does not depend on the removed plugins15:53
naccjbicha: there are two geany-plugins in artful currently?15:55
naccjbicha: (per rmadison)15:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.2+17.04]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.2]16:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.2~14.04]16:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04.6]16:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.9]16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)17:34
slangasekseb128: it seems someone promoted gmime2.6 source to main without subscribing a team to it.  Is Desktop Team happy to be on the hook for both gmimes?17:40
slangasekseb128: sorry, correction, gmime2.6 is only in universe but its /binaries/ were still in main and are now being demoted17:41
seb128slangasek, so all good?17:42
seb128but yeah otherwise it's fine for us to subscribe to it17:42
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter
tkamppeterartful-proposed -> artful transition is still hanging on qtbase-opensource-src failing with Ubuntu Online Accounts tests. Will this get fixed soon?18:20
tkamppeterThis blocks cups-filters and probably many other packages.18:21
slangasektkamppeter: I have no eta for this being resolved; the packages which regress with new Qt are listed as being owned by the ubuntu-webapps-bugs and unity-ui-team teams, and I'm not sure either of those teams still exists; this probably falls to the Desktop Team to determine what should happen with these packages18:34
slangasekxnox, tsimonq2: ^^ have you had any conversations with anyone from the Desktop Team regarding how to unblock qt wrt ubuntu-settings-components and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts?18:38
naccsome quick digging: qtdeclarative5-gsettings1.0 depends on qtbase-abi-5-7-1 which implies it might need  a rebuild for a new ABI (5-9-1)18:38
* tsimonq2 defers to mitya57 18:38
tsimonq2nacc: 5-9-0 but yeah18:38
naccerr, yes, sorry :)18:38
tsimonq2Also, we need to look into porting packages off of ubuntu-ui-toolkit18:38
tsimonq2We need to remove it one way or another18:39
naccsimilar abi issues exist for libuntugestures5 and libuntutoolkit518:39
tsimonq2I've tried two times to port it to the new Qt to no avail18:39
tsimonq2I think mitya57 has tried too to no success18:39
tsimonq2So we can either: a) port packages off of it then remove it; b) remove the whole stack18:40
tsimonq2xnox was telling me some people still want some of the rdeps18:40
tsimonq2Soooo I guess we have to port things off of it, unless somebody has a working port to the new Qt18:40
tsimonq2That's the *real* blocker here.18:40
slangasekright, and that porting work should be the responsibility of the folks who want to keep it in the archive18:41
tsimonq2Sure18:42
naccwhy can't src:ubuntu-settings-components be removed?18:43
naccit produces two binary packages, one of which is a dummy and one is a unity8 package18:43
naccor is that the "port off of it" point?18:44
tsimonq2nacc: The way I understand it from conversations with mitya57 is that packages that still use ubuntu-ui-toolkit can be ported to use Qt Quick Controls 218:45
tsimonq2But regardless, I'm not really familiar with the packages that people want to keep18:45
tsimonq2All I know is that it's just "some of the rdeps"18:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:47
nacctsimonq2: sure, but i mean, at least one part of the blocked stack is removable, afaict? the only rev-dep of src:ubuntu-settings-components is ubuntu-system-settings which seems to be touch-specific (and if src:ubuntu-system-settings was removed that would fall out too)?18:47
nacctsimonq2: altough libertine has a b-d on libsystemsettings-dev18:48
naccgeez, how much of this gunk is there because of touch?18:48
nacc"sandbox for running deb-packaged X11 apps on Ubuntu Personal"18:48
nacc'Ubuntu "Snappy Personal" system.'18:48
slangasekit's all there as part of previous Canonical client stack development.  Not all of it is touch-specific18:49
tsimonq2nacc: Lots, it took 1.5 months (I think) for the last Qt transition because it took that long to port all of this...18:49
tsimonq2(1 month at least)18:49
naccslangasek: ok, i was just going off the package descriptions :)18:49
tsimonq2I'd like to minimize this time to having Qt transitions take a few weeks at best18:49
slangaseknacc: "Snappy Personal" != "touch"; but it may be unity8-specific and therefore removable18:49
* nacc probably isn't helping by poking at that ratking...18:50
naccslangasek: what is "Snappy Personal"?18:50
naccjust not familiar with the term18:50
tsimonq2nacc: But yeah, I'm not intricately familiar with src:ubuntu-settings-components but that sounds sane. Don't take my word on it though. ;)18:50
nacctsimonq2: :)18:51
tsimonq2I'd like to file a removal bug for ubuntu-ui-toolkit with all of the reverse dependencies added on the bug, giving the option to either port off of ubuntu-ui-toolkit or port off of it. Any objections to me filing that bug?18:52
* tsimonq2 has never filed removal bugs before but it seems fairly straightforward :P18:52
slangaseknacc: Snappy Personal was to be a Unity8 client stack (desktop, not primarily phone) packaged as snaps18:52
naccslangasek: ah! thank you18:53
nacctsimonq2: given that, i do think it's reasonable18:53
tsimonq2nacc: ok18:54
tkamppeterslangasek, thanks. I only want that cups-filters uploads (no relationship at all to Qt) make it quickly into the release so that users test it.18:56
slangaseknacc: and fwiw ubuntu-system-settings itself has a revdep tree18:57
naccslangasek: ack, some come from itself, some seem to be |'d with binaries from other pkgs, but yeah, needs a trawl19:02
slangasekreverse-depends src:$src excludes self-depends19:03
slangasekfwiw19:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)19:03
slangasekbut sadly we still don't have the | info in its output19:03
naccslangasek: oh you're right, sorry, i was glossing ubuntu-system-settings and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts into one19:04
tsimonq2slangasek, nacc, mitya57, xnox: bug 171120419:14
ubot5bug 1711204 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "Remove ubuntu-ui-toolkit from the archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/171120419:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: menhir [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170712-1] (no packageset)21:33
acheronukslangasek: can the tests for libkf5eventviews/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 and libkf5calendarsupport/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 on pp64el & s390x be ignored please?22:16
acheronukthis is anothjer case of test being run that shouldn't, as there are no binaries now22:17
acheronukpart of KDE PIM that is not buildable on those archs now22:17
acheronukI thought that issue had been fixed in britney, but seems still happens in a few cases22:18
slangasekacheronuk: I suspect the problem only occurs if for some reason the tests were manually triggered, or were triggered before the britney change; yes, overridden, thanks22:30
acheronukslangasek: thank you22:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: profitbricks-sdk-python [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-1] (no packageset)23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)23:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)23:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)23:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dehydrated-hook-ddns-tsig [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtts [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (trusty-proposed/main) [2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1.1] (core)23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)23:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!