[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: jsonrpc-glib (artful-proposed/primary) [3.25.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: template-glib (artful-proposed/primary) [3.25.3-0ubuntu1]
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-golang-x-sync [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170317.0.5a06fca-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-multimedia [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[07:17] <tjaalton> is update_excuses.html updates somehow stuck? the timestamp seems old
[07:19] <acheronuk> might get unstuck soon? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/artful/2017-08-16/
[07:19] <acheronuk> or at least, seems to have done a recent run now
[07:19] <tjaalton> ok, cool
[07:20] <acheronuk> s/done/doing
[07:20] <apw> tjaalton, yes it was sick over night, it got kicked about 20m ago ... so is grinding now
[07:21] <tjaalton> great
[07:21] <apw> it is vomiting tests into the queues as we speak
[07:23] <tsimonq2> The Qt 5.9.1 transition in Debian Sid started a few hours ago, the autosyncer will pull in 10-15 packages within the next day that could trigger a good amount of autopkgtests...
[07:23] <apw> oh "good"
[07:23] <tsimonq2> Well, not qtbase, not unless someone merges from Debian. :P
[07:24] <tsimonq2> qtbase is the one that triggers the massive amount of tests...
[07:25] <acheronuk> leave it alone! I nearly got the tests sorted once :P
[07:25] <tsimonq2> *maybe* once everything migrates from -proposed, but ONLY if it includes useful fixess
[07:26] <tsimonq2> s/fixess/fixes/
[07:27] <acheronuk> anyone going to fix the armhf builders so they don't fail installing dbus, and regress with packaname/unknown ?
[07:29] <acheronuk> sorry. didn't mean that ^^^ to sound moany
[07:40] <mitya57> tsimonq2, if we are speaking about qt4-x11, it already has a huge delta, so one more recommends won't hurt. So jbicha's suggestion sounds good to me.
[07:44] <tsimonq2> mitya57: fair
[07:44] <tsimonq2> mitya57: But I thought we were talking about qtbase-opensource-src
[07:45] <mitya57> The original question was about dropping qt4-x11 and making sure the CJK support for qt4 is installed when qt4 is in use…
[07:45] <tsimonq2> Oh ok
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[08:24] <tjaalton> so are failures like https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/a/akonadi-calendar-tools/20170816_070642_f9d49@/log.gz caused by the ongoing kde uploads?
[08:30] <tsimonq2> tjaalton: That specifically seems like something is hardcoded for GCC 6...
[08:30] <tsimonq2> /usr/include/KF5/AkonadiCore/std_exception.h:1:10: fatal error: /usr/include/c++/6/exception: No such file or directory
[08:30] <tsimonq2>  #include "/usr/include/c++/6/exception"
[08:30] <tsimonq2>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[08:30] <tsimonq2> Soooo idk about that one specifically.
[08:31] <tjaalton> well there are many of those failing and blocking mesa
[08:31] <apw> someone really screwed-the-pooch on the c++ header API if you have to use a version in there
[08:32] <tsimonq2> acheronuk, clivejo: This is something you're aware of, right? ^^^^
[08:33] <acheronuk> needs tests run against the stuff stuck in -proposed due to Qt etc transition I think, instead of using the akonadi et al. in -release
[08:34] <acheronuk> I retried similar against those, and they passed
[08:35] <acheronuk> akonadi is one whole screwed up mess from KDE :(
[08:35] <tjaalton> agreed :P
[08:36] <acheronuk> If I could kill it with fire, I would!
[08:36]  * acheronuk heads to do chores
[08:36] <tsimonq2> The whole PIM stack is one huge security nightmare and autopkgtest killer!
[08:36] <tsimonq2> s/PIM/KDE PIM/
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (artful-proposed/primary) [1:5.0~+rc2-1]
[08:50] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, I'm really worried, why some stuff isn't autosyncd?
[08:50] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. llvm-toolchain-5.0
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-5.0 [sync] (artful-proposed) [1:5.0~+rc2-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poco [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.7.8+dfsg1-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [arm64] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [i386] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [s390x] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [amd64] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directfb [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.7.7-4]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.5-2]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libaws [armhf] (artful-proposed) [17.2.2017-1]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volume-key [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[09:01] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, do you have any clue for llvm-toolchain-5.0 missed autosync?
[09:01] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, sorry no, i don't see any history for it in LP so its not that ... i can't say i am very up on the rules autosync applies
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm a little bit worried :)
[09:02]  * apw adds learning how that works to his long list
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> anyhow, sorted now, I'm worried because I don't know how many packages missed the autosync
[09:02] <Laney> the latest log is available at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/current.log
[09:03] <apw>  * Trying to add llvm-toolchain-5.0 ...
[09:03] <apw> llvm-toolchain-5.0_1:5.0~+rc2-1 is trying to override modified binary clang-5.0_1:5.0~svn305653-1ubuntu1.  OK (y/N)?  n
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> oh
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[09:06] <LocutusOfBorg> so that old binary was probably in the snapshot package, that won't leave proposed
[09:06] <LocutusOfBorg> fine to sync, thanks
[09:07] <LocutusOfBorg> and the proposed one points to llvm 6.0 in new queue
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1] (kernel)
[10:05] <Laney> s390x autopkgtesting is off currently for some maintenance
[10:08] <apw> Laney, off as in queuing i assume ?
[10:08] <Laney> yeh
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1]
[10:08] <Laney> also looking into the big armhf queue
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-92.100] (core, kernel)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-93.116~14.04.1] (kernel)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-129.178] (core, kernel)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblog4ada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed) [3.19.0-92.100]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-93.116~14.04.1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-129.178]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblog4ada [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.3-2]
[11:31] <Laney> k, armhf should be picking up again
[11:31] <Laney> ended up with tons of orphaned instances for some reason
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.26.10 => 2.27.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.26.10~14.04 => 2.27.2~14.04] (no packageset)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.26.10+17.04 => 2.27.2+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:42] <slashd> rbasak, good day, if you have some cycle could you please look at releasing "landscape-client" derived binary packages in trusty-updates ? v-t-d has been done with a detailed description including the usual landscape pkging QA testing, it's green in pending sru and has reach the 7 days.
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.7.2-14build1 => 1.7.2-14ubuntu1.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu4 => 1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu4.17.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.157.12]
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (artful-proposed/primary) [0.1]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (artful-proposed) [0.1]
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> hello doko I did retry some of the gnat failures against proposed
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> libgnatcoll seems to be a failure, but I don't know how to fix it
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> for others I prefer to wait for results
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1]
[13:25] <LocutusOfBorg> and probably the failure is just uninstallability that is fixed now
[13:38]  * LocutusOfBorg waits for an hopefully fixed insighttoolkit4 to show up
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, ^^
[13:48] <cpaelzer> polling for an AA to remove sandbox-upgrader and auto-upgrade-testing from artful as described in 1260062
[14:06] <apw> cpaelzer, hi
[14:06] <cpaelzer> hi apw
[14:06] <cpaelzer> power issues today?
[14:06] <cpaelzer> or about my AA ping?
[14:07] <apw> cpaelzer, those both appear to be ubuntu only, and maintained by us, and look dead basically ...
[14:07] <cpaelzer> exactly
[14:07] <cpaelzer> the bugholds also links to a mailing list thread where I was polling for users
[14:07] <cpaelzer> but all known ones dropped their usage
[14:08] <cpaelzer> and "maintained by us"  is a hard exaggeration, it is it more the formal status but not the truth since they were broken so long without notice or fix
[14:12] <apw> cpaelzer, in thesense "we" aree the arbitors of whether it is, as maintainers
[14:15] <cpaelzer> yeah, I agree
[14:23] <apw> cpaelzer, and done
[14:24] <cpaelzer> thank you
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:36] <rbasak> slashd: sorry, out today
[14:36] <LocutusOfBorg> hello insighttoolki4, welcome back!
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:51] <slashd> rbasak, no worries thanks
[15:53] <jbicha> I think the nbs tracker is confused about geany-plugins, the new version of the metapackage does not depend on the removed plugins
[15:55] <nacc> jbicha: there are two geany-plugins in artful currently?
[15:56] <nacc> jbicha: (per rmadison)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.2+17.04]
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.2]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.2~14.04]
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04.6]
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.9]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:40] <slangasek> seb128: it seems someone promoted gmime2.6 source to main without subscribing a team to it.  Is Desktop Team happy to be on the hook for both gmimes?
[17:41] <slangasek> seb128: sorry, correction, gmime2.6 is only in universe but its /binaries/ were still in main and are now being demoted
[17:42] <seb128> slangasek, so all good?
[17:42] <seb128> but yeah otherwise it's fine for us to subscribe to it
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter
[18:20] <tkamppeter> artful-proposed -> artful transition is still hanging on qtbase-opensource-src failing with Ubuntu Online Accounts tests. Will this get fixed soon?
[18:21] <tkamppeter> This blocks cups-filters and probably many other packages.
[18:34] <slangasek> tkamppeter: I have no eta for this being resolved; the packages which regress with new Qt are listed as being owned by the ubuntu-webapps-bugs and unity-ui-team teams, and I'm not sure either of those teams still exists; this probably falls to the Desktop Team to determine what should happen with these packages
[18:38] <slangasek> xnox, tsimonq2: ^^ have you had any conversations with anyone from the Desktop Team regarding how to unblock qt wrt ubuntu-settings-components and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts?
[18:38] <nacc> some quick digging: qtdeclarative5-gsettings1.0 depends on qtbase-abi-5-7-1 which implies it might need  a rebuild for a new ABI (5-9-1)
[18:38]  * tsimonq2 defers to mitya57 
[18:38] <tsimonq2> nacc: 5-9-0 but yeah
[18:38] <nacc> err, yes, sorry :)
[18:38] <tsimonq2> Also, we need to look into porting packages off of ubuntu-ui-toolkit
[18:39] <tsimonq2> We need to remove it one way or another
[18:39] <nacc> similar abi issues exist for libuntugestures5 and libuntutoolkit5
[18:39] <tsimonq2> I've tried two times to port it to the new Qt to no avail
[18:39] <tsimonq2> I think mitya57 has tried too to no success
[18:40] <tsimonq2> So we can either: a) port packages off of it then remove it; b) remove the whole stack
[18:40] <tsimonq2> xnox was telling me some people still want some of the rdeps
[18:40] <tsimonq2> Soooo I guess we have to port things off of it, unless somebody has a working port to the new Qt
[18:40] <tsimonq2> That's the *real* blocker here.
[18:41] <slangasek> right, and that porting work should be the responsibility of the folks who want to keep it in the archive
[18:42] <tsimonq2> Sure
[18:43] <nacc> why can't src:ubuntu-settings-components be removed?
[18:43] <nacc> it produces two binary packages, one of which is a dummy and one is a unity8 package
[18:44] <nacc> or is that the "port off of it" point?
[18:45] <tsimonq2> nacc: The way I understand it from conversations with mitya57 is that packages that still use ubuntu-ui-toolkit can be ported to use Qt Quick Controls 2
[18:45] <tsimonq2> But regardless, I'm not really familiar with the packages that people want to keep
[18:45] <tsimonq2> All I know is that it's just "some of the rdeps"
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:47] <nacc> tsimonq2: sure, but i mean, at least one part of the blocked stack is removable, afaict? the only rev-dep of src:ubuntu-settings-components is ubuntu-system-settings which seems to be touch-specific (and if src:ubuntu-system-settings was removed that would fall out too)?
[18:48] <nacc> tsimonq2: altough libertine has a b-d on libsystemsettings-dev
[18:48] <nacc> geez, how much of this gunk is there because of touch?
[18:48] <nacc> "sandbox for running deb-packaged X11 apps on Ubuntu Personal"
[18:48] <nacc> 'Ubuntu "Snappy Personal" system.'
[18:49] <slangasek> it's all there as part of previous Canonical client stack development.  Not all of it is touch-specific
[18:49] <tsimonq2> nacc: Lots, it took 1.5 months (I think) for the last Qt transition because it took that long to port all of this...
[18:49] <tsimonq2> (1 month at least)
[18:49] <nacc> slangasek: ok, i was just going off the package descriptions :)
[18:49] <tsimonq2> I'd like to minimize this time to having Qt transitions take a few weeks at best
[18:49] <slangasek> nacc: "Snappy Personal" != "touch"; but it may be unity8-specific and therefore removable
[18:50]  * nacc probably isn't helping by poking at that ratking...
[18:50] <nacc> slangasek: what is "Snappy Personal"?
[18:50] <nacc> just not familiar with the term
[18:50] <tsimonq2> nacc: But yeah, I'm not intricately familiar with src:ubuntu-settings-components but that sounds sane. Don't take my word on it though. ;)
[18:51] <nacc> tsimonq2: :)
[18:52] <tsimonq2> I'd like to file a removal bug for ubuntu-ui-toolkit with all of the reverse dependencies added on the bug, giving the option to either port off of ubuntu-ui-toolkit or port off of it. Any objections to me filing that bug?
[18:52]  * tsimonq2 has never filed removal bugs before but it seems fairly straightforward :P
[18:52] <slangasek> nacc: Snappy Personal was to be a Unity8 client stack (desktop, not primarily phone) packaged as snaps
[18:53] <nacc> slangasek: ah! thank you
[18:53] <nacc> tsimonq2: given that, i do think it's reasonable
[18:54] <tsimonq2> nacc: ok
[18:56] <tkamppeter> slangasek, thanks. I only want that cups-filters uploads (no relationship at all to Qt) make it quickly into the release so that users test it.
[18:57] <slangasek> nacc: and fwiw ubuntu-system-settings itself has a revdep tree
[19:02] <nacc> slangasek: ack, some come from itself, some seem to be |'d with binaries from other pkgs, but yeah, needs a trawl
[19:03] <slangasek> reverse-depends src:$src excludes self-depends
[19:03] <slangasek> fwiw
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: insighttoolkit4 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.12.0-dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:03] <slangasek> but sadly we still don't have the | info in its output
[19:04] <nacc> slangasek: oh you're right, sorry, i was glossing ubuntu-system-settings and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts into one
[19:14] <tsimonq2> slangasek, nacc, mitya57, xnox: bug 1711204
[19:14] <ubot5> bug 1711204 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "Remove ubuntu-ui-toolkit from the archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1711204
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: menhir [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170712-1] (no packageset)
[22:16] <acheronuk> slangasek: can the tests for libkf5eventviews/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 and libkf5calendarsupport/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 on pp64el & s390x be ignored please?
[22:17] <acheronuk> this is anothjer case of test being run that shouldn't, as there are no binaries now
[22:17] <acheronuk> part of KDE PIM that is not buildable on those archs now
[22:18] <acheronuk> I thought that issue had been fixed in britney, but seems still happens in a few cases
[22:30] <slangasek> acheronuk: I suspect the problem only occurs if for some reason the tests were manually triggered, or were triggered before the britney change; yes, overridden, thanks
[22:33] <acheronuk> slangasek: thank you
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: profitbricks-sdk-python [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dehydrated-hook-ddns-tsig [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtts [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fplll [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (trusty-proposed/main) [2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1.1] (core)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6~dfsg0-1] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: radare2 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)