[00:30] <mwhudson> Laney: ok that docker bug is still happening in the autopkgtests but not in an artful vm wot i have running
[01:31] <Unit193> nacc: ...Can I ping you on the above?
[06:00] <cpaelzer> Hi, on bug 1708305 - this had a Zesty and Xenial SRU portion - the Xenial one was waiting for another to fully complete
[06:00] <cpaelzer> that is now done, if one could take a look to also move the Xenial from unapproved to proposed that would be great
[06:00] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: ^^
[06:00] <cpaelzer> that is your fix
[07:38] <tjaalton> launchpad bug search doesn't seem to check the bug subject?
[07:40] <tjaalton> nevermind
[08:04] <Laney> hey mwhudson
[08:04] <Laney> same kernel?
[08:04]  * Laney zaps those dockers again
[09:53] <Unit193> I'm just going to presume http://paste.openstack.org/show/ecAlh4a45cYakljl2ktL/ for platform.artful (or platform.bodacious) isn't going to happen and I shouldn't even bother with an MP?
[11:42] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg, tsimonq2: I have uploaded pytest-qt which should fix the last autopkgtest failure and thus make Qt 5.9 candidate for migration.
[12:54] <doko> SpamapS: I rejected python3.5 to add another patch
[13:11] <niedbalski> rbasak, cpaelzer slashd any chance to get a review on the artful patch attached to LP: #1657256?
[13:14] <cpaelzer> I don't feel expertised enough on this - but it is mysql under the hood
[13:14] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: rbasak should be back tmrw - is that early enough
[13:15] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I might provide the testing on p8 while you coudl do the formal check
[13:15] <cpaelzer> rbasak: please ping me what you think on that case
[13:16] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: also this is (very) lengthy - what is the current part that is "open" review the artful debdiff?
[13:18] <niedbalski> cpaelzer, thanks for looking into this. I am sure if am getting the last question.
[13:19] <niedbalski> cpaelzer, *not sure.
[14:22] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: last question: this has so many old tasks old debdiffs, new ones ... what do you expect from sponsors right now?
[14:22] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: just the artful review and re-visit SRUs once that is done?
[14:24] <niedbalski> cpaelzer, yes, currently I am expecting for the artful patch to be reviewed, then, a follow up SRU for the all the affected series.
[14:29] <cpaelzer> ok, recommendation - reduce the scope of a single step - so for now state clearly you want "just artful reviewed and sponsored"
[14:29] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: helps to not flash people with the extra long history and multitude of changes
[14:29] <cpaelzer> niedbalski: I wait for rbasak to state his opinion for tmrw - it is a fix so not directly FF critical (which is tmrw as well)
[14:32] <niedbalski> cpaelzer, thanks for the recommendation but no other action has been requested at the moment for sponsors, just the artful task.
[14:51] <nacc> Unit193: i'll look
[15:40] <bdmurray> slangasek, doko: There is a new version of apport in artful gathering python version information and this seems curious to me. "PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7 Python 2.7.13+" from bug 1711813. My python2.7 has no + in the version output.
[15:40] <SpamapS> doko: kk. Thanks for working on it eithe rway. :-D
[15:43] <slangasek> bdmurray: so someone has tinkered with their install?
[15:44] <bdmurray> slangasek: that's my hunch
[15:44] <doko> $ python -c 'import sys; print (sys.version)'
[15:44] <doko> 2.7.13+ (default, Jul 19 2017, 18:15:03)
[15:44] <doko> [GCC 6.4.0 20170704]
[15:45] <doko> bdmurray: ?
[15:45] <bdmurray> doko: What package version is that? I have 2.7.13-2
[15:46] <doko> 2.7.13-4
[15:46] <bdmurray> oh so somebody running -proposed then?
[15:47] <doko> ohh, is this still in -proposed?
[15:47] <bdmurray> doko: yes
[15:59] <bdmurray> slangasek: So it seems like we could use a bit more info in PythonDetails then to display if python is from a package and if so which one version.
[16:04] <slangasek> bdmurray: makes sense to me
[17:06] <LocutusOfBorg> Unit193, you are listed on uploaders, why aren't you using compat level 10?
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> mitya57, <3
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> sponsored anyway
[17:08] <LocutusOfBorg> [19:08:09] -queuebot/#ubuntu-release- New source: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin (artful-proposed/primary) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:15] <jackpot51> Any thoughts about 17.10 not having New Document -> Empty Document like Unity did?
[20:15] <jackpot51> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1437502
[20:54] <ccheney> any possibly of getting the patch from lp#1703499 applied before 17.10 is released?
[21:08] <mwhudson> Laney: yeah my kernel was old i assume that was the issue but i didn't actually verify that
[21:18] <jbicha> jackpot51: that issue affects Unity too, it's not really related to the GNOME switch
[21:46] <azubieta> Hello! Can some one point me which tools sould I use to create my own linux livecd based on ubuntu ?
[23:31] <Unit193> nacc: Thanks.
[23:32] <Unit193> LocutusOfBorg: In sn-plug?  Overall pkg-xfce doesn't a whole lot, and it needs to be setup to properly use autoreconf with Xfce.
[23:37] <Unit193> LocutusOfBorg: ...I thought you weren't going to sponsor in Ubuntu?  Not that I'm complaining!