| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
| RAOF | slashd: I take it the cups upload is meant to solve the upgrade problem at the same time as the autoshutdown problem? | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cups [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.3-4ubuntu0.3] | 00:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 00:05 | |
| xnox | RAOF, yes, but i don't see that upload in the queue, is there one? | 00:08 |
| xnox | oh rejected, why? | 00:09 |
| RAOF | Because it needs the 0.2 changelog in the changes file. | 00:09 |
| xnox | RAOF, and 0.1 | 00:09 |
| xnox | that is true. | 00:09 |
| RAOF | I guess that too. | 00:10 |
| xnox | RAOF, shall i reupload with correct changes? | 00:10 |
| * xnox and slashd were working together on this upload to finally fix all the things | 00:10 | |
| RAOF | xnox: Please do so. | 00:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (xenial-proposed/main) [2.1.3-4ubuntu0.2 => 2.1.3-4ubuntu0.3] (core) | 00:15 | |
| slashd | xnox, RAOF what need to be change ? | 00:18 |
| xnox | slashd, debuild -S -nc -v2.1.3-4 | 00:18 |
| xnox | the -v2.1.3-4 such that .changes includes debian/changelog with all of the failed update attempts =) | 00:19 |
| xnox | i reuploaded already, see above | 00:19 |
| slashd | xnox, ok thanks for jumping on it that quick, I just notice the irc highlight | 00:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 00:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.3-4ubuntu0.3] | 00:21 | |
| slashd | thanks a bunch xnox RAOF | 00:22 |
| RAOF | Enjoy! | 00:22 |
| RAOF | Yay! Lots of green SRUs available for release! | 00:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 00:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.16-0ubuntu2~ubuntu16.04.1 => 2.0.10-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 01:17 | |
| stgraber | ^ this one should be pretty easy to review and will fix a very annoying bug in image management for LXD 2.0.10 | 01:19 |
| stgraber | (also queuebot is confused by backports, it's actually 2.0.10-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.0.10-0ubuntu1~16.04.2) | 01:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.10-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] | 02:06 | |
| RAOF | stgraber: Enjoy. | 02:09 |
| stgraber | RAOF: thanks! | 02:23 |
| Laney | xnox: what are you asking for? | 08:02 |
| acheronuk | morning. is the reason for not being a valid candidate here the bileto "Grouped with PPA ~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2819" part? | 08:16 |
| acheronuk | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src | 08:16 |
| fossfreedom_ | any archive admins around? any chance that gir1.2-budgie-desktop-1.0 in artful proposed can be deleted - its preventing (according to excuses) budgie-desktop 10.4 from migrating. | 08:51 |
| apw | fossfreedom_ ahh nbs in -proposed, will sort that out | 09:02 |
| fossfreedom_ | cheers | 09:02 |
| fossfreedom_ | what does "nbs" mean? | 09:02 |
| apw | Not-Built-from-Source | 09:10 |
| acheronuk | could pim-storage-service-manager/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1 be deleted from artful release please? or if not, it's tests ignored? it has been removed/obsoleted from KDE applications 17.04 onwards | 09:10 |
| apw | so a package you had in the previous version that you no longer have | 09:11 |
| acheronuk | https://community.kde.org/Applications/17.04_Release_Notes | 09:11 |
| acheronuk | Tarballs that we do not ship anymore: pim-storage-service-manager | 09:11 |
| fossfreedom_ | apw - thanks for the info. jeremy uploaded a new version of ubuntu-budgie-meta - is it "nbs" the reason why it again hasn't migrated - something above s390x build in a previous ubuntu-budgie-meta version according to excuses. | 09:20 |
| apw | fossfreedom_, yeah that is what is it saying ... that s390x used to build and had not, so it is broke | 09:29 |
| apw | fossfreedom_, though it would then have the same problem with -release | 09:30 |
| === fossfreedom_ is now known as fossfreedom | ||
| apw | fossfreedom, hopefully that is all sorted out | 09:39 |
| fossfreedom | :) | 09:39 |
| acheronuk | bug #1712525 | 09:56 |
| ubot5 | bug 1712525 in pim-storage-service-manager (Ubuntu) "Please remove pim-storage-service-manager from artful" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1712525 | 09:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-regenerator-transform [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.8-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.14.18+dfsg-1] | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu1] (core) | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu1] (core) | 10:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu1] (core) | 10:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: farbfeld [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3-4] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: farbfeld [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3-4] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: farbfeld [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3-4] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: farbfeld [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3-4] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: farbfeld [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3-4] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: farbfeld [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3-4] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu1] (core) | 11:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted farbfeld [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3-4] | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted farbfeld [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3-4] | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted farbfeld [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3-4] | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted farbfeld [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3-4] | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted farbfeld [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3-4] | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted farbfeld [i386] (artful-proposed) [3-4] | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nut [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.7.2-4ubuntu1.1] | 12:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nut [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.7.1-1ubuntu1.1] | 12:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nut [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2.1] | 12:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.4] | 12:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-233-ge586fe35-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-233-ge586fe35-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] | 12:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backuppc [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.3.1-2ubuntu3.3] | 12:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.14] | 12:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (xenial-proposed/main) [5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 => 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.5] (core) | 12:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.5] | 12:39 | |
| cpaelzer | thanks for approving libvirt whoever is active on SRU atm | 12:40 |
| cpaelzer | that jeeps it in sync with zesty | 12:40 |
| cpaelzer | "keeps" even | 12:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python3.5 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.2-2ubuntu0~16.04.2] | 12:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.5 (xenial-proposed/main) [3.5.2-2ubuntu0~16.04.1 => 3.5.2-2ubuntu0~16.04.2] (core) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu1] (core) | 13:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu1] (core) | 13:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu1] | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu1] | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu1] | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu1] | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu1] | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu1] | 13:14 | |
| xnox | slangasek, xdelta3 needs promotion to main, used to be in main in xenial as a build-dep http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#lxd | 13:16 |
| xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdelta3 | 13:16 |
| doko | xnox: already done | 13:30 |
| xnox | whoop | 13:30 |
| xnox | rmadison still has it at artful/universe though :-( | 13:32 |
| * xnox twiddles thumbs, goes to do something else | 13:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: odil [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: odil [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:43 | |
| acheronuk | hi | 13:49 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: I have some more tests against s390x and ppc64el that really should never have run | 13:50 |
| acheronuk | (I did not trigger them :P) | 13:50 |
| acheronuk | akonadi-calendar/4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1 | 13:50 |
| acheronuk | libkf5gravatar/4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1 | 13:50 |
| acheronuk | libkf5mailimporter/4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1 | 13:50 |
| acheronuk | kdepim-addons/17.04.3-0ubuntu1 | 13:50 |
| acheronuk | kdepim-addons/16.12.3-0ubuntu1 | 13:51 |
| acheronuk | can those please be ignored like the others please | 13:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: odil [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (zesty-proposed/main) [2:4.5.8+dfsg-0ubuntu0.17.04.5 => 2:4.5.8+dfsg-0ubuntu0.17.04.6] (core) | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: odil [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (xenial-proposed/main) [2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.9 => 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.10] (core) | 14:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: odil [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: odil [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (trusty-proposed/main) [2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.10 => 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.11] (core) | 14:18 | |
| slangasek | acheronuk: interesting, the timing of those tests does in fact suggest it's still britney triggering them for some reason | 14:33 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: indeed. it is odd | 14:34 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: adding hints; btw the version numbers aren't needed here, the hints I add are 'force-badtest akonadi-calendar/all/ppc64el akonadi-calendar/all/s390x' | 14:34 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: yes, I realise but forgot and just pasted what I had from my parsing of excuses | 14:35 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: anything else that you think I should look at today wrt the Qt+KDE transition? | 14:37 |
| slangasek | I don't want to step on your toes or duplicate autopkgtest retries | 14:37 |
| acheronuk | not really related, but latest plasm is failing many builds with: | 14:38 |
| acheronuk | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | 14:38 |
| acheronuk | sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy : Depends: build-essential but it is not going to be installed | 14:38 |
| acheronuk | E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. | 14:38 |
| didrocks | same with others like gnome-boxes on i386 | 14:39 |
| acheronuk | amd64 seems ok. but other architectures are getting that error | 14:40 |
| tkamppeter | Can it be that the proposed-migration process for Artful is down? I have uploaded qpdf and cups-filters and on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html they are both a "Valid candidate" already since yesterday and they still did not arrive in the Artful release. | 14:42 |
| acheronuk | e.g: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcepub/8197998/+listing-archive-extra | 14:43 |
| acheronuk | build-essential can't be installed on anything but amd64? | 14:43 |
| slashd | rbasak, are you around ? | 14:50 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: can you give me a pointer to a specific build failure with that? | 14:53 |
| acheronuk | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcepub/8197998/+listing-archive-extra | 14:53 |
| slangasek | tkamppeter: "valid candidate" only means that there is nothing that prevents this package from being considered for migration. The system still needs to calculate a coherent set of packages that migrate together without making anything uninstallable. | 14:54 |
| acheronuk | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcepub/8198003/+listing-archive-extra | 14:54 |
| acheronuk | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcepub/8198008/+listing-archive-extra | 14:55 |
| acheronuk | and on...... | 14:55 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: and as mentioned https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-boxes/3.25.91-0ubuntu1 | 14:56 |
| tkamppeter | slangasek, thanks. So due to some complex relationships between packages the whole process is still stuck? | 14:56 |
| slangasek | tkamppeter: the relationships are not particularly complex; poppler and qpdf both have new sonames, which means their reverse-dependencies all need to be rebuilt and ready to migrate together | 14:57 |
| slangasek | tkamppeter: and since poppler builds qt bits, this all waits for Qt5.9 now | 14:59 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: ok, digging into this | 14:59 |
| slangasek | doko: do you know that you broke binutils on !amd64? | 15:00 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: thanks. apologies but I have to go for a few hrs. I may be able to answer your original question then | 15:00 |
| slangasek | doko: I'm removing from -proposed to unblock the world | 15:01 |
| doko | slangasek: ack. I only tested amd64 :-/ | 15:02 |
| slangasek | doko for reference, if you haven't already seen: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#binutils | 15:02 |
| doko | ouch | 15:03 |
| xnox | slangasek, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/stenographer/artful/ppc64el stenographer has regressed in release pocket on ppc64el, probably some dep sneaked in. | 15:10 |
| xnox | slangasek, can you bad test that version specifically on ppc64el? stenographer/0.0~git20161206.0.66a8e7e-5 it is in release pocket, and running the test in release pcoket alone fails. | 15:10 |
| xnox | this is currently blocking rsyslog migration | 15:11 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stenographer/+bug/1712573 | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1712573 in stenographer (Ubuntu) "stenographer has regressed in artful-release on ppc64el" [Undecided,New] | 15:11 |
| slangasek | xnox: hinted, thanks | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted odil [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted odil [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted odil [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted odil [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted odil [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted odil [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: console-setup [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1.166ubuntu1] (core) | 16:01 | |
| slangasek | so why was this qt5.9 transition ppa published to -proposed with packages ftbfs? (gammaray/s390x) | 16:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu2] (core) | 16:49 | |
| slangasek | xnox: do you care about the (reproducible) gammaray/s390x ftbfs? | 16:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu2] (core) | 16:54 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, actually we think we should just remove gammaray on s390x, because 1) it is rc buggy in debian too 2) it is a leaf package that shouldn't hold the transition | 17:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think tsimonq2 has an open bug about that removal | 17:01 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: done; I found no open bug | 17:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you removed it? thanks! | 17:02 |
| slangasek | yeah, removed | 17:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we want to bring qt in a close state with the Debian one, and gammaray has been source of sadness for toooooo long time :) | 17:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm pretty sure it doesn't even start correctly, if we have this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864825 | 17:03 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 864825 in gammaray "gammaray: crashes target program on attach" [Grave,Open] | 17:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin (artful-proposed/primary) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 17:08 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, qtbase is not listed as candidate for migration, but I don't see any more failed test... is that the silo grouped stuff? | 17:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu2] (core) | 17:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.12.2~r3289-1] (no packageset) | 17:24 | |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: it looked like the gammaray ftbfs was blocking the group from being considered, yes. I'm not sure how confused britney is now by the fact that gammaray was copied from the ppa, but I retried the s390x build in the main archive... update_excuses no longer lists gammaray as grouped but the packages are still not considered | 17:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but arent k* packages blockers for this transition? | 17:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was wondering about some kde+qt entanglement | 17:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it is considered now!!! | 17:29 |
| slangasek | KDE should only get entangled if there are library transitions; I don't know whether there are any for Qt5.9 | 17:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | they are according to britney | 17:32 |
| slangasek | entangled != blocked on | 17:34 |
| slangasek | a versioned dep will mean qt5.9 has to migrate first before kde; only a lib transition will mean that kde has to migrate together with qt5.9 | 17:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sure | 17:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Depends: calibre pyqt5 (not considered) | 17:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but seems considered pyqt5... | 17:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | britney, how sad are you | 17:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or maybe we can just wait half an hour | 17:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, old binaries left on amd64: libmarblewidget-qt5-26 (from 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu2) | 17:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | NBS in proposed | 17:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.12.2~r3289-1] (no packageset) | 17:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hfst [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.12.2~r3289-1] (no packageset) | 17:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu2] (core) | 17:41 | |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: cleaned up, thanks | 17:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.12.2~r3289-1] | 17:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.12.2~r3289-1] | 17:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hfst [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.12.2~r3289-1] | 17:53 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | ta | 18:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sigh, again not considered | 18:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | better wait | 18:08 |
| slangasek | a few things are candidates now. and yes, kde is entangled. | 18:23 |
| slangasek | pim-storage-service-manager test failures will need sorting | 18:24 |
| slangasek | kcalutils doesn't look pretty | 18:26 |
| slangasek | pim-storage-service-manager is broken because /usr/share/ECM/kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake has wrong detection of 64-bit off_t | 19:00 |
| slangasek | xnox: why does new systemd make openssh autopkgtest time out? | 19:12 |
| slangasek | hmm, that off_t stuff may be a red herring | 19:16 |
| nacc | sbeattie: so i noticed something odd with the importer just now. It seems that `git branch -M` with the new git in 17.10 causes the new branch name to be checked out. THat wasn't the case before. And leads to changes in the working directory (it's not properly checked out as far as I can tell, but your old working tree is forcibly made the new branch's state -- all sorts of wrong). I'm looking into | 19:19 |
| nacc | the debdiff now, but do you know if that was intentional? | 19:19 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: is pim-storage-service-manager getting an update for 17.04.3? it doesn't seem to exist at all in Debian | 19:24 |
| sbeattie | nacc: hrm, it wasn't intentional by me... my part of the merge was trying to pull in the point release that addressed CVE-2017-1000117 | 19:28 |
| nacc | sbeattie: yeah, it looks like an upstream change, but i think it might be buggy. will dig | 19:30 |
| nacc | sbeattie: i'll report it upstream, i think it's a pretty obvious regression :/ | 19:42 |
| sbeattie | nacc: thanks and sorry for that. I dunno if xnox saw that in his uploads that mine superceded. | 19:43 |
| nacc | sbeattie: definitely not your fault, i was just going off TIL :) | 19:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (xenial-proposed/main) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu2 => 2:13.1.4-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 20:01 | |
| nacc | sbeattie: xnox: just an fyi, reported upstream -- this breaks the importer quite badly (we have an orphan master brannch, which apparently what is broken upstream). | 20:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu2] (core) | 20:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu2] (core) | 20:24 | |
| slangasek | acheronuk: found your bug report which you filed about pim-storage-service-manager before I asked ;P | 20:53 |
| xnox | slangasek, i do not know why yet. But it is very susspicious given that openssh by itself passes. | 21:06 |
| xnox | slangasek, it's as if networkd eats entropy and hence rsa gen fails. | 21:11 |
| slangasek | heh | 21:12 |
| slangasek | mitya57: hmm, pyqt5 had already built against Qt5.9, but it needed further patches to properly support it? | 21:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.29-6ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| doko | slangasek: if you would like to watch: ^^^ ;) | 21:28 |
| slangasek | doko: I'll try to keep an eye out, thanks | 21:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted console-setup [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.166ubuntu1] | 21:30 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, seems that the patches were the same, just added headers | 21:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/334344194/pyqt5_5.7+dfsg-5ubuntu1_5.7+dfsg-6.diff.gz | 21:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and mipsel support | 21:44 |
| slangasek | ah | 21:44 |
| slangasek | so that wasn't an autosync | 21:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | a forcesync yes | 21:45 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: aha. thanks for picking up that removal bug on pim-storage-service-manager. thought there was something, but it escaped me earlier | 21:46 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: n/p | 21:46 |
| slangasek | sadly, bugs are always the last place I look :P | 21:46 |
| slangasek | kcalutils> I've retriggered all the autopkgtests | 21:47 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: bu**er. I just did as well :( | 21:47 |
| slangasek | heh | 21:48 |
| slangasek | libkgapi, I guess needs ppc64el/s390x removals | 21:48 |
| acheronuk | could do with a way of cancelling tests you triggered in cases like that where duplication is caused by a collision of good intentions | 21:48 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: yep. it started requiring QtWebEngine as well. so can only build on arches where that builds | 21:49 |
| doko | slangasek: I removed the binary packages again. but I think they will be published for one cycle | 22:01 |
| doko | I fixed the issue for binutils-for-host, but not for binutils itself | 22:02 |
| slangasek | heh, k | 22:02 |
| doko | new ones are building | 22:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sigh, lots of s390x sadness due to build-essential not installable | 22:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu3] (core) | 22:04 | |
| valorie | possibly silly question, but is there any idea of when Qt5.9 will be released for artful, and thus our Kpackages can also get through? | 22:06 |
| * valorie is the release manager for Kubuntu and I'd like to know whether we should bother with beta1 or not | 22:06 | |
| valorie | without most of our new stuff, there seems little point | 22:06 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: these need give-backs. naming the packages would help | 22:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu3] (core) | 22:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [2.29-6ubuntu3] (core) | 22:45 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, I already have a list and a sleep with a retry ready | 22:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sleep 3600 && ubuntu-build --batch --retry nss hfst mediawiki2latex sunpy s390-tools console-setup kdeplasma-addons khotkeys kmenuedit oxygen plasma-desktop plasma-workspace powerdevil pcb-rnd gnuplot 389-ds-base libosmium net-snmp | 22:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is the list :) | 22:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but as said, already pending | 22:51 |
| * LocutusOfBorg goes to sleep | 22:51 | |
| nacc | LocutusOfBorg: thanks for the net-snmp catch | 22:51 |
| nacc | ahasenack: --^ | 22:51 |
| ahasenack | tl;dr? | 22:52 |
| nacc | ahasenack: LocutusOfBorg will retrigger the build once build-essential gets through | 22:53 |
| ahasenack | build-essential | 22:55 |
| ahasenack | ops | 22:55 |
| ahasenack | that was meant for a search box | 22:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyremote [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jimtcl [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.77-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyosmo [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jimtcl [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.77-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jimtcl [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.77-1] (no packageset) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jimtcl [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.77-1] (no packageset) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: commando [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0.2] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.06.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.06.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | they should be in place now | 23:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.06.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jimtcl [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.77-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros-rosdep [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.8-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyosmo [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jimtcl [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.77-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyremote [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyosmo [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.06.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyremote [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-pathval [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-check-error [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-syntax-error [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-subarg [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyosmo [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyremote [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-acorn-jsx [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-shell-quote [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.1+20160617-git72fb5a8ce29b-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.06.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyosmo [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyremote [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyremote [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [17.06.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soapyosmo [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| xnox | not my idea uploading partial upload | 23:45 |
| xnox | three times | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!