=== signed8bit_Zzz is now known as signed8bit
=== signed8bit is now known as signed8bit_Zzz
=== signed8bit_Zzz is now known as signed8bit
=== signed8bit is now known as signed8bit_Zzz
=== signed8bit_Zzz is now known as signed8bit
[06:42] <stub> Do we generate git diffs using --find-renames=XX ? Can we, with a resonably low similarly like say 30 ?
[06:44] <stub> I have a tenancy to move files around when refactoring and it is pissing off my reviewers.
[06:46] <wgrant> stub: We use the default similarity threshold of 50%, AFAIK
[06:46] <wgrant> Do you have an example where that hasn't worked?
[07:00] <stub> wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~stub/plinth/+git/plinth/+merge/328018 if you have access. Should be just renames with <50% mod
[07:11] <wgrant> stub: Hmm, weird.
[07:15] <axino> wgrant: in a MP I created a few days ago with simple rename (perhaps a few lines of diff), the code diff still showed the full file removal / file addition
[07:53] <stub> I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1712754 to track.
[07:53] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1712754 in Launchpad itself "git diffs do not track renames" [Undecided,New]
[11:33] <xnox> ..
[11:33] <xnox> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.29-6ubuntu3/+build/13288058 -> finished 13h ago
[11:33] <xnox> however rmadison says the debs are not published in the artful-proposed
[11:33] <xnox> and britney thinks they are missing too
[11:38] <cjwatson> xnox: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/s390x/binutils
[11:38] <cjwatson> doko intentionally deleted those binaries, it seems
[11:39] <cjwatson> I wonder if he intended to delete 2.29-6ubuntu3/s390x; he deleted e.g. 2.29-6ubuntu2/ppc64el
[11:39] <xnox> ah, but i thought that one was good one already. i'll ping him.
[11:39] <cjwatson> I just did
[11:39] <cjwatson> (#ubuntu-devel)
[11:39] <xnox> ok.
=== signed8bit is now known as signed8bit_Zzz
=== signed8bit_Zzz is now known as signed8bit
[13:53] <Laney> is there a way to re-publish the binaries that an archive admin deleted for a particular source on a particular arch?
[13:54] <Laney> I tried with copy-package --force-same-destination ..., but it didn't give me the deleted binaries
[13:55] <cjwatson> copy-package should do that (with -b too), even though it may give inaccurate predictions on its stdout about what it's going to do
[13:55] <cjwatson> did you actually run it or just believe its output?
[13:55] <Laney> the latter
[13:55] <Laney> not much harm in trying I guess?
[13:56] <cjwatson> should be fine.  what command line?
[13:57] <Laney> copy-package --from=ubuntu --to=ubuntu --from-suite=artful-proposed --force-same-destination --include-binaries --version=3.25.90-0ubuntu1 gnome-session
[13:58] <cjwatson> that should work; worst side-effect will probably be a stray email to -changes
[13:58]  * Laney issues the order
[13:59] <Laney> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/s390x/gnome-session-bin pending
[13:59] <tsimonq2> Hmm, that spit out a bare email to artful-changes :P
[14:03]  * Laney shrugs
[14:03] <Laney> as long as it works
[14:03] <Laney> it didn't give me any karma though :(
[14:04] <tsimonq2> I've been told Karma takes 24 hours? :P
[14:04] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: I did predict that above ...
[14:06] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: Oh, didn't read that part -- gotcha
[16:39] <nacc> cjwatson: is there a canonical url (not yet necessarily pointing anywhere) for the git repository for a given srcpkg? git://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/<srcpkg> ?
[16:40] <cjwatson> nacc: that would be the canonical URL once defaults are set
[16:41] <nacc> cjwatson: thanks!
[16:41] <cjwatson> nacc: though I'd recommend https:// rather than git://
[16:41] <cjwatson> nacc: works just as well with the git client, provides transport security, and gives you something useful in a browser
[16:43] <nacc> cjwatson: ah true, thanks
=== signed8bit is now known as signed8bit_Zzz
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc