[15:45] <mup> Bug #1713094 opened: [2.2] Make maas-proxy more configurable <canonical-bootstack> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1713094>
[15:48] <mup> Bug #1713094 changed: [2.2] Make maas-proxy more configurable <canonical-bootstack> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1713094>
[15:57] <mup> Bug #1713094 opened: [2.2] Make maas-proxy more configurable <canonical-bootstack> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1713094>
[17:51] <mup> Bug #1710177 changed: curtin in-target commands do not work for ubuntu core <curtin:Incomplete> <MAAS:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1710177>
[17:51] <mup> Bug #1711416 changed: [2.3, snap] NTP not running when split rack controller is a snap <snap> <MAAS:Invalid by andreserl> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1711416>
[17:51] <mup> Bug #1713118 opened: [2.x] Provide curtin version as part of MAAS 'version' api <cdoqa> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1713118>
[18:32] <mimizone> anybody familiar with Maas + Wedge switches here? I wonder what featrues you get once ubuntu is  installed on the switch? L2 switching, L3 routing, DHCP relay etc...
[21:18] <catbus> wililupy: ^^^ MAAS + wedge
[21:20] <wililupy> mimizone: I can help you...
[21:20] <mimizone> wililupy: cool. Just wondering what we get in terms of networking capabilities in the distrib supported by Maas
[21:21] <mimizone> or should I look into installing additional features like snaproute or else
[21:21] <wililupy> mimizone: curretnly you can install Ubuntu on a Wedge and you will see the Managment port.
[21:22] <wililupy> You will still need to install some form of network control software on the wedge, like SONiC or FBOSS or FlexSwitch to manage the front panel ports and setup networking.
[21:24] <wililupy> However, once you have that setup, MAAS will autodetect the ports on the switch and then you can manage those ports via MAAS, so servers connected to those ports will get the DHCP address/VLAN and Bonding you configure for those ports
[21:25] <mimizone> So Maas can detect the port configuration but cannot configure the ports itself (with some kind of integration with FBOSS or else?)
[21:26] <roaksoax> mimizone: not yet, we are working on that towards 18.04
[21:26] <wililupy> currently the only switch that MAAS can configure out of the box is any Mellanox switch since they use SwitchDev.
[21:26] <mimizone> What control plane is preferred in the current development?
[21:27] <wililupy> But that switch has to be deployed with Zesty
[21:28] <wililupy> mimizone: I have a blog entry and link to a video of MAAS running on Zesty on a Mellanox SN2100: https://www.lucaswilliams.net/index.php/2017/05/08/switchdev-in-ubuntu-zesty/
[21:29] <mimizone> wililupy: I'll check it out. My interest on Wedge 40 and 100 that I already have.
[21:32] <mimizone> I've seen recent post on the work between Snaproute and Canonical. Does it mean it's one of the first one that will be integrated to configure the ports from MAAS?
[21:33] <wililupy> mimizone: I've done demos in the past of those configurations, Wedge 100 running MAAS and managing a rack of servers and also manageing and deploying a Wedge 40.
[21:34] <mimizone> wililupy: I guess I missed them. I've seen a video demo using those swtches and the Orange box. Most likely you on the video? :)
[21:34] <wililupy> mimizone: more than likely ;)
[21:35] <mimizone> wililupy: is there any early code in MAAS-dev already targeting FBOSS or any other control plane?
[21:36] <wililupy> roaksoax: ^^ You have any insight on this?
[21:44] <roaksoax> mimizone: right now we can only dpeloy the wedge40/100 but we are working on expanding the scope. For our next release (2.3) there will be expanded support for switches in general
[21:44] <roaksoax> mimizone: but we are working towards the auto-configuration, which is targeted to 18.04
[21:45] <mimizone> but no sense of which middleware/control plane you will be using (existing one or your own).
[21:45] <mimizone> roaksoax: I am asking to see which one I shoudl experiment with now already potentially
[21:47] <roaksoax> since we are still on the works and due to the limitations of the NOS', there's no one in particular I can tell you about yet
[21:48] <roaksoax> mimizone: but, as you said, you have seen the recent post between canonical & snaproute
[21:49] <mimizone> that was a very high level post :)