| acheronuk | ok. late here. goodnight. thank you slangasek and others for the efforts here | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | slangasek, good replacement for gnucash is the new gnucash =) | 00:41 |
| xnox | gtk3+ and with webkit reports disabled | 00:42 |
| tsimonq2 | oooOOOooo | 00:42 |
| xnox | slangasek, but i have also started to use the Personal Finance Management apps. Like https://www.pocketsmith.com/ | 00:43 |
| xnox | which hooks into banks and does most of the things out of the box /o\ | 00:43 |
| slangasek | xnox: "new gnucash" sounds like a currency revaluation | 00:44 |
| xnox | slangasek, if i meant currency revaluation i would say "hard fork" like all the cool crypto kids | 00:46 |
| xnox | slangasek, what's wrong with gnucash? does it need fixing? or like disabling webkit reporting? | 01:10 |
| slangasek | xnox: don't know; it ftbfs | 01:10 |
| slangasek | but not because of old webkit dep, AFAIK | 01:10 |
| xnox | slangasek, libofx6 -> libofx7 transition affecting gnucash homebank kmymoney | 01:11 |
| slangasek | yes | 01:11 |
| slangasek | and I think we're down to where I can drop libertine + content-hub and let britney make some trades | 01:12 |
| slangasek | +ubuntu-ui-toolkit | 01:12 |
| slangasek | there we go. one more publishing run + britney run, and we should be good | 01:19 |
| slangasek | off for dinner, back in a few hours to check up | 01:19 |
| xnox | slangasek, seems like stuff regressed in release cause 2.6.15 (previous gnucash) also does not build =( | 01:21 |
| slangasek | xnox: eh, you uploaded qtubuntu *now*? I thought you were going to wait until the transition finished. | 02:00 |
| slangasek | well, NBS binaries removed. | 02:01 |
| xnox | yes | 02:01 |
| xnox | plus you can remove a lot more packages now | 02:02 |
| xnox | slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu-camera/+bug/1712955 | 02:07 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1712955 in powerd (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [Undecided,Triaged] | 02:07 |
| xnox | and i think we may be done removing all of unity touch stuff | 02:08 |
| tdaitx | slangasek, I took a quick look at libreoffice (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice) but I can't see failures due to jawt, only due to a test complaining about gcc-7 warnings, where are you seeing those? | 02:55 |
| tdaitx | the configure script does indicate that jawt was found just fine | 02:55 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: the test result from the new version of libreoffice in -proposed, libreoffice/1:5.4.0-0ubuntu2 | 03:47 |
| slangasek | qt5.9 in; phew | 04:40 |
| Mirv | congrats slangasek, tsimonq2, mitya57 and everyone! | 05:20 |
| xnox | win! | 05:24 |
| valorie | pretty encouraging to read the excuses report! | 05:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks you all for the nice transition! | 06:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | qt screwed up britney lol | 06:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | orthanc-wsi/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libdcmtk12 | 06:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | they have all migrated, but excuses shows a lot of weirdness | 06:18 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: it's because launchpad has acked the copy of the packages but they haven't been published to the archive yet, so britney's input is a bit out of sync | 06:22 |
| slangasek | things are looking pretty installable again, so the next britney run should look sane | 06:24 |
| acheronuk | \o/ | 06:33 |
| acheronuk | thank you all :) | 06:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep I got it, it was a joke :) | 06:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I remember how many cycles are needed when haskell migrates | 06:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :D | 06:34 |
| mitya57 | \o/ thanks to you all! | 08:55 |
| acheronuk | +1 | 09:16 |
| acheronuk | feels like a huge milestone overcome! | 09:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitya57, what about doing the qt merges / syncs now? :) | 14:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | e.g. we can sync qtwebkit-opensource-src and merge qtbase | 14:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) | 14:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) | 14:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) | 14:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.4+17.04] | 16:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.4] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.4~14.04] | 16:05 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please accept pcscada, it should unblock the gnat transition a little bit further (it is a package rename because it changed the gnat default), leaf package | 16:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 16:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] | 16:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] | 16:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] | 16:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] | 16:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] | 16:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] | 16:19 | |
| mitya57 | LocutusOfBorg, there are almost no changes to merge in qtbase. Just symbols and the no-gold thing we already have here. | 16:41 |
| mitya57 | If Qt 5.9.2 is released early enough, then we may merge it this cycle. Otherwise early next cycle. | 16:42 |
| jbicha | please ignore flask-mongoengine/i386 autopkgtests since mongodb doesn't exist on i386 any more | 17:04 |
| tsimonq2 | :D | 19:21 |
| * tsimonq2 just woke up | 19:21 | |
| tsimonq2 | mitya57: I think we'll have a pretty good chance of landing 5.9.2 | 19:22 |
| tsimonq2 | \o/ Mirv xnox valorie LocutusOfBorg slangasek acheronuk mitya57 :D :D :D :D :D | 19:23 |
| mitya57 | :D | 19:23 |
| valorie | bugfixes are awesome, yeah! | 19:27 |
| mitya57 | Qt 5.9.2 does not even have a branch upstream yet. | 19:29 |
| mitya57 | So they will definitely not release it in August as planned, middle or end of September at the best. | 19:30 |
| tsimonq2 | mitya57: But since it doesn't bump ABI (not afaict) and it's a bugfix release, we shouldn't have any problem landing it now that the blocking Unity 8 packages are out of the way. | 19:32 |
| mitya57 | tsimonq2, it can break ABI, we should be careful. | 19:37 |
| === tjaalton_ is now known as tjaalton | ||
| tsimonq2 | mitya57: ack, but my general point is, it should be *much* easier than doing 5.9.1 | 19:39 |
| mitya57 | Right. | 19:39 |
| valorie | are all the other big transitions done? | 19:45 |
| valorie | like gcc, etc. | 19:45 |
| slangasek | yes | 19:46 |
| slangasek | we still have a new glibc upstream version that we need to figure out if it's going to land this cycle; but that should land only if it's not disruptive to the release and there will be build tests ahead of landing to verify this | 19:46 |
| === fossfreedom_ is now known as fossfreedom | ||
| slangasek | and that's not a "transition" in the sense of needing to upload a bunch of packages | 19:47 |
| fossfreedom | Hi - can I just confirm that we are in freeze now and universe packages like budgie-desktop will no longer sync from Debian unstable ? | 19:49 |
| valorie | I meant transition in the sense of "keeping LP busy for days or weeks" | 19:49 |
| slangasek | valorie: well, glibc will swamp the autopkgtest infra for a bit | 19:50 |
| slangasek | fossfreedom: Debian autosyncs are turned off; I'll send an email later today confirming the freeze | 19:51 |
| fossfreedom | excellent - that's good news. cheers | 19:51 |
| slangasek | fossfreedom: budgie-desktop wouldn't sync from Debian anyway, it's an Ubuntu package? | 19:51 |
| valorie | thank you so much, release team | 19:51 |
| valorie | looking forward to Beta 1 now | 19:52 |
| slangasek | now, can anyone explain to me why cantor's autopkgtests are behaving the way they do? :/ | 19:52 |
| fossfreedom | slangasek, I maintain it via Debian. Currently in artful I have a later version than in Debian unstable - I don't want that version overwritten when the sync is in play. | 19:53 |
| slangasek | difference in testbed packages between last success and first failure (not counting cantor itself): apport, cron, python3-apport, python3-problem-report, resolvconf, ubuntu-minimal | 19:53 |
| slangasek | fossfreedom: packages with an Ubuntu delta never auto-sync; and feature freeze doesn't stop an Ubuntu developer from manually merging | 19:53 |
| fossfreedom | k - that's ok. When "B" opens can I just ask for a force-sync ? | 19:54 |
| slangasek | sure | 19:54 |
| fossfreedom | cheers | 19:54 |
| slangasek | Laney: unrelated to the above question about cantor, but I notice that around the 23rd, testbed-packages seems to have gotten a lot bigger on amd64 - bunches of cloud/server-seeded packages that were previously absent have just turned up. Do you know if this is a result of a deliberate change on the autopkgtest side? | 19:57 |
| slangasek | Laney: random example: lvm2, which is not new in the cloud seed but is new in testbed-packages | 19:58 |
| slangasek | oh, and I suppose I need to be looking at testsuite-packages, not just testbed-packages, for bisecting this :P | 20:01 |
| slangasek | ah now I see, the failing results are from the 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu2 version of the test suite but the binaries installed are from 4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1 | 20:10 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: openjdk-9-jre-zero shows up on the list of uninstallable packages in artful; do you know anything about this? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful_uninst.txt | 20:28 |
| nacc | slangasek: yep, someone reported that earlier today in #ubuntu+1 (jdk-9 being borken in general i think) | 20:29 |
| tdaitx | slangasek, is that zero only? I saw reports about -3 being uninstallable, but then matthias released a -4 right after | 20:30 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: it's only the -zero package listed as uninstallable. If this is all fixed already in -proposed, ok - in that case we have an autopkgtest regression to sort out: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#openjdk-9 | 20:31 |
| tdaitx | I didn't look into that so far, I assumed it was fixed - at the same time, it didn't seem to be related to zero, the whole package was affected... the link you send me is -2, so I don't know if this has been fixed in -4 | 20:32 |
| nacc | slangasek: fwiw, this was the report in #ubuntu+1: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25390671/ | 20:32 |
| slangasek | nacc: right, maintainer script failures aren't going to show up on the uninstallable report, which is just static analysis of the dependencies | 20:32 |
| nacc | slangasek: oh right | 20:32 |
| tdaitx | nacc, slangasek: that is indeed what is supposed to be fixed by -4 | 20:33 |
| slangasek | -3 being uninstallable, well, that was only ever in -proposed | 20:33 |
| nacc | tdaitx: thanks i'll let them know | 20:33 |
| slangasek | nacc: also tell the user not to install from -proposed :) | 20:33 |
| tdaitx | I need to take a look about zero | 20:33 |
| slangasek | oh, wait | 20:33 |
| slangasek | no, there's a mix of -2 and -3 in artful | 20:33 |
| nacc | rmadison says -jdk is at -3 in artful/universe | 20:33 |
| nacc | yeah | 20:33 |
| slangasek | openjdk-9-jre-zero | 9~b181-2 | artful/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x | 20:34 |
| slangasek | yet this package is not listed on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html | 20:34 |
| tdaitx | hmm, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-9 reports -3 as released and -4 in -proposed | 20:34 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: ^^ so this tells me we're not building the binary, but it hasn't been dropped from debian/control, therefore it's not reported as NBS. Should I just delete the openjdk-9-jre-zero binary package? | 20:35 |
| slangasek | retrying that failed munin autopkgtest | 20:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nplan (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.23~16.04.1 => 0.26~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 20:37 | |
| tdaitx | slangasek, yes, delete the zero binary packages, doko disabled those in -4 | 20:44 |
| slangasek | ok | 20:44 |
| tdaitx | sorry for the delay, it was a one line change and I missed it in the first run | 20:44 |
| jbicha | please demote prosper to universe to allow texlive-base to migrate to artful, it shows up on components-mismatches-proposed | 21:07 |
| slangasek | jbicha: done | 21:08 |
| jbicha | thanks, while you're around, could you also ignore libsecret/s390x autopkgtests since we have removed gjs/s390x which it wants for its tests | 21:09 |
| slangasek | jbicha: also done | 21:11 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379404 | 21:36 |
| ubot5 | KDE bug 379404 in maxima-backend "Cantor can't initialize session for maxima backend" [Normal,Confirmed] | 21:36 |
| slangasek | righty-o | 21:37 |
| acheronuk | and upstream they now set: https://cgit.kde.org/cantor.git/commit/?id=60cc35e0bcf01a8c718a24715ffebdb5f9210092 | 21:37 |
| acheronuk | so (a) need a fix, or (b) need to disable build and test of that backend | 21:38 |
| acheronuk | or (c) leave at 16.12 which seems to work here | 21:48 |
| valorie | debian has no fix? | 21:51 |
| acheronuk | ah. you ignored that against anything !cantor. fair enough. can wait a bit to see if a fix comes | 21:51 |
| acheronuk | valorie: debian packaging has not benn touched for 9 months | 21:53 |
| valorie | oh dear | 21:54 |
| acheronuk | others distro's may have found a non upstreamed patch. was going to check that out later | 21:54 |
| acheronuk | !info cantor unstable | 21:54 |
| ubot5 | cantor (source: cantor): interface for mathematical applications. In component main, is optional. Version 4:16.08.3-1 (unstable), package size 443 kB, installed size 1597 kB | 21:54 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: c) is not an option for release, due to analitza soname change | 22:18 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: at least, we'd need to delete the cantor currently in -proposed and reupload a no-change rebuild | 22:19 |
| acheronuk | yes, true | 22:20 |
| acheronuk | I'll do that somewhere to test over the weekend | 22:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (xenial-proposed/main) [2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6 => 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7] (core) | 23:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!