[00:04] <acheronuk> ok. late here. goodnight. thank you slangasek and others for the efforts here
[00:41] <xnox> slangasek, good replacement for gnucash is the new gnucash =)
[00:42] <xnox> gtk3+ and with webkit reports disabled
[00:42] <tsimonq2> oooOOOooo
[00:43] <xnox> slangasek, but i have also started to use the Personal Finance Management apps. Like https://www.pocketsmith.com/
[00:43] <xnox> which hooks into banks and does most of the things out of the box /o\
[00:44] <slangasek> xnox: "new gnucash" sounds like a currency revaluation
[00:46] <xnox> slangasek, if i meant currency revaluation i  would say "hard fork" like all the cool crypto kids
[01:10] <xnox> slangasek, what's wrong with gnucash? does it need fixing? or like disabling webkit reporting?
[01:10] <slangasek> xnox: don't know; it ftbfs
[01:10] <slangasek> but not because of old webkit dep, AFAIK
[01:11] <xnox> slangasek, libofx6 -> libofx7 transition affecting gnucash homebank kmymoney
[01:11] <slangasek> yes
[01:12] <slangasek> and I think we're down to where I can drop libertine + content-hub and let britney make some trades
[01:12] <slangasek> +ubuntu-ui-toolkit
[01:19] <slangasek> there we go.  one more publishing run + britney run, and we should be good
[01:19] <slangasek> off for dinner, back in a few hours to check up
[01:21] <xnox> slangasek, seems like stuff regressed in release cause 2.6.15 (previous gnucash) also does not build =(
[02:00] <slangasek> xnox: eh, you uploaded qtubuntu *now*? I thought you were going to wait until the transition finished.
[02:01] <slangasek> well, NBS binaries removed.
[02:01] <xnox> yes
[02:02] <xnox> plus you can remove a lot more packages now
[02:07] <xnox> slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu-camera/+bug/1712955
[02:08] <xnox> and i think we may be done removing all of unity touch stuff
[02:55] <tdaitx> slangasek, I took a quick look at libreoffice (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice) but I can't see failures due to jawt, only due to a test complaining about gcc-7 warnings, where are you seeing those?
[02:55] <tdaitx> the configure script does indicate that jawt was found just fine
[03:47] <slangasek> tdaitx: the test result from the new version of libreoffice in -proposed, libreoffice/1:5.4.0-0ubuntu2
[04:40] <slangasek> qt5.9 in; phew
[05:20] <Mirv> congrats slangasek, tsimonq2, mitya57 and everyone!
[05:24] <xnox> win!
[05:38] <valorie> pretty encouraging to read the excuses report!
[06:14] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks you all for the nice transition!
[06:18] <LocutusOfBorg> qt screwed up britney lol
[06:18] <LocutusOfBorg> orthanc-wsi/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libdcmtk12
[06:18] <LocutusOfBorg> they have all migrated, but excuses shows a lot of weirdness
[06:22] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: it's because launchpad has acked the copy of the packages but they haven't been published to the archive yet, so britney's input is a bit out of sync
[06:24] <slangasek> things are looking pretty installable again, so the next britney run should look sane
[06:33] <acheronuk> \o/
[06:33] <acheronuk> thank you all :)
[06:33] <LocutusOfBorg> yep I got it, it was a joke :)
[06:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I remember how many cycles are needed when haskell migrates
[06:34] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[08:55] <mitya57> \o/ thanks to you all!
[09:16] <acheronuk> +1
[09:16] <acheronuk> feels like a huge milestone overcome!
[14:09] <LocutusOfBorg> mitya57, what about doing the qt merges / syncs now? :)
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. we can sync qtwebkit-opensource-src and merge qtbase
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.4+17.04]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.4]
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.4~14.04]
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept pcscada, it should unblock the gnat transition a little bit further (it is a package rename because it changed the gnat default), leaf package
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset)
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1]
[16:41] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg, there are almost no changes to merge in qtbase. Just symbols and the no-gold thing we already have here.
[16:42] <mitya57> If Qt 5.9.2 is released early enough, then we may merge it this cycle. Otherwise early next cycle.
[17:04] <jbicha> please ignore flask-mongoengine/i386 autopkgtests since mongodb doesn't exist on i386 any more
[19:21] <tsimonq2> :D
[19:21]  * tsimonq2 just woke up
[19:22] <tsimonq2> mitya57: I think we'll have a pretty good chance of landing 5.9.2
[19:23] <tsimonq2> \o/ Mirv xnox valorie LocutusOfBorg slangasek acheronuk mitya57 :D :D :D :D :D
[19:23] <mitya57> :D
[19:27] <valorie> bugfixes are awesome, yeah!
[19:29] <mitya57> Qt 5.9.2 does not even have a branch upstream yet.
[19:30] <mitya57> So they will definitely not release it in August as planned, middle or end of September at the best.
[19:32] <tsimonq2> mitya57: But since it doesn't bump ABI (not afaict) and it's a bugfix release, we shouldn't have any problem landing it now that the blocking Unity 8 packages are out of the way.
[19:37] <mitya57> tsimonq2, it can break ABI, we should be careful.
[19:39] <tsimonq2> mitya57: ack, but my general point is, it should be *much* easier than doing 5.9.1
[19:39] <mitya57> Right.
[19:45] <valorie> are all the other big transitions done?
[19:45] <valorie> like gcc, etc.
[19:46] <slangasek> yes
[19:46] <slangasek> we still have a new glibc upstream version that we need to figure out if it's going to land this cycle; but that should land only if it's not disruptive to the release and there will be build tests ahead of landing to verify this
[19:47] <slangasek> and that's not a "transition" in the sense of needing to upload a bunch of packages
[19:49] <fossfreedom> Hi - can I just confirm that we are in freeze now and universe packages like budgie-desktop will no longer sync from Debian unstable ?
[19:49] <valorie> I meant transition in the sense of "keeping LP busy for days or weeks"
[19:50] <slangasek> valorie: well, glibc will swamp the autopkgtest infra for a bit
[19:51] <slangasek> fossfreedom: Debian autosyncs are turned off; I'll send an email later today confirming the freeze
[19:51] <fossfreedom> excellent - that's good news.  cheers
[19:51] <slangasek> fossfreedom: budgie-desktop wouldn't sync from Debian anyway, it's an Ubuntu package?
[19:51] <valorie> thank you so much, release team
[19:52] <valorie> looking forward to Beta 1 now
[19:52] <slangasek> now, can anyone explain to me why cantor's autopkgtests are behaving the way they do? :/
[19:53] <fossfreedom> slangasek, I maintain it via Debian.  Currently in artful I have a later version than in Debian unstable - I don't want that version overwritten when the sync is in play.
[19:53] <slangasek> difference in testbed packages between last success and first failure (not counting cantor itself): apport, cron, python3-apport, python3-problem-report, resolvconf, ubuntu-minimal
[19:53] <slangasek> fossfreedom: packages with an Ubuntu delta never auto-sync; and feature freeze doesn't stop an Ubuntu developer from manually merging
[19:54] <fossfreedom> k - that's ok.  When "B" opens can I just ask for a force-sync ?
[19:54] <slangasek> sure
[19:54] <fossfreedom> cheers
[19:57] <slangasek> Laney: unrelated to the above question about cantor, but I notice that around the 23rd, testbed-packages seems to have gotten a lot bigger on amd64 - bunches of cloud/server-seeded packages that were previously absent have just turned up.  Do you know if this is a result of a deliberate change on the autopkgtest side?
[19:58] <slangasek> Laney: random example: lvm2, which is not new in the cloud seed but is new in testbed-packages
[20:01] <slangasek> oh, and I suppose I need to be looking at testsuite-packages, not just testbed-packages, for bisecting this :P
[20:10] <slangasek> ah now I see, the failing results are from the 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu2 version of the test suite but the binaries installed are from 4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1
[20:28] <slangasek> tdaitx: openjdk-9-jre-zero shows up on the list of uninstallable packages in artful; do you know anything about this? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful_uninst.txt
[20:29] <nacc> slangasek: yep, someone reported that earlier today in #ubuntu+1 (jdk-9 being borken in general i think)
[20:30] <tdaitx> slangasek, is that zero only? I saw reports about -3 being uninstallable, but then matthias released a -4 right after
[20:31] <slangasek> tdaitx: it's only the -zero package listed as uninstallable.  If this is all fixed already in -proposed, ok - in that case we have an autopkgtest regression to sort out: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#openjdk-9
[20:32] <tdaitx> I didn't look into that so far, I assumed it was fixed - at the same time, it didn't seem to be related to zero, the whole package was affected... the link you send me is -2, so I don't know if this has been fixed in -4
[20:32] <nacc> slangasek: fwiw, this was the report in #ubuntu+1: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25390671/
[20:32] <slangasek> nacc: right, maintainer script failures aren't going to show up on the uninstallable report, which is just static analysis of the dependencies
[20:32] <nacc> slangasek: oh right
[20:33] <tdaitx> nacc, slangasek: that is indeed what is supposed to be fixed by -4
[20:33] <slangasek> -3 being uninstallable, well, that was only ever in -proposed
[20:33] <nacc> tdaitx: thanks i'll let  them know
[20:33] <slangasek> nacc: also tell the user not to install from -proposed :)
[20:33] <tdaitx> I need to take a look about zero
[20:33] <slangasek> oh, wait
[20:33] <slangasek> no, there's a mix of -2 and -3 in artful
[20:33] <nacc> rmadison says -jdk is at -3 in artful/universe
[20:33] <nacc> yeah
[20:34] <slangasek>  openjdk-9-jre-zero     | 9~b181-2 | artful/universe          | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
[20:34] <slangasek> yet this package is not listed on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html
[20:34] <tdaitx> hmm, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-9 reports -3 as released and -4 in -proposed
[20:35] <slangasek> tdaitx: ^^ so this tells me we're not building the binary, but it hasn't been dropped from debian/control, therefore it's not reported as NBS.  Should I just delete the openjdk-9-jre-zero binary package?
[20:37] <slangasek> retrying that failed munin autopkgtest
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nplan (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.23~16.04.1 => 0.26~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:44] <tdaitx> slangasek, yes, delete the zero binary packages, doko disabled those in -4
[20:44] <slangasek> ok
[20:44] <tdaitx> sorry for the delay, it was a one line change and I missed it in the first run
[21:07] <jbicha> please demote prosper to universe to allow texlive-base to migrate to artful, it shows up on components-mismatches-proposed
[21:08] <slangasek> jbicha: done
[21:09] <jbicha> thanks, while you're around, could you also ignore libsecret/s390x autopkgtests since we have removed gjs/s390x which it wants for its tests
[21:11] <slangasek> jbicha: also done
[21:36] <acheronuk> slangasek: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379404
[21:37] <slangasek> righty-o
[21:37] <acheronuk> and upstream they now set: https://cgit.kde.org/cantor.git/commit/?id=60cc35e0bcf01a8c718a24715ffebdb5f9210092
[21:38] <acheronuk> so (a) need a fix, or (b) need to disable build and test of that backend
[21:48] <acheronuk> or (c) leave at 16.12 which seems to work here
[21:51] <valorie> debian has no fix?
[21:51] <acheronuk> ah. you ignored that against anything !cantor. fair enough. can wait a bit to see if a fix comes
[21:53] <acheronuk> valorie: debian packaging has not benn touched for 9 months
[21:54] <valorie> oh dear
[21:54] <acheronuk> others distro's may have found a non upstreamed patch. was going to check that out later
[21:54] <acheronuk> !info cantor unstable
[22:18] <slangasek> acheronuk: c) is not an option for release, due to analitza soname change
[22:19] <slangasek> acheronuk: at least, we'd need to delete the cantor currently in -proposed and reupload a no-change rebuild
[22:20] <acheronuk> yes, true
[22:23] <acheronuk> I'll do that somewhere to test over the weekend
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (xenial-proposed/main) [2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6 => 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7] (core)