[00:04] ok. late here. goodnight. thank you slangasek and others for the efforts here [00:41] slangasek, good replacement for gnucash is the new gnucash =) [00:42] gtk3+ and with webkit reports disabled [00:42] oooOOOooo [00:43] slangasek, but i have also started to use the Personal Finance Management apps. Like https://www.pocketsmith.com/ [00:43] which hooks into banks and does most of the things out of the box /o\ [00:44] xnox: "new gnucash" sounds like a currency revaluation [00:46] slangasek, if i meant currency revaluation i would say "hard fork" like all the cool crypto kids [01:10] slangasek, what's wrong with gnucash? does it need fixing? or like disabling webkit reporting? [01:10] xnox: don't know; it ftbfs [01:10] but not because of old webkit dep, AFAIK [01:11] slangasek, libofx6 -> libofx7 transition affecting gnucash homebank kmymoney [01:11] yes [01:12] and I think we're down to where I can drop libertine + content-hub and let britney make some trades [01:12] +ubuntu-ui-toolkit [01:19] there we go. one more publishing run + britney run, and we should be good [01:19] off for dinner, back in a few hours to check up [01:21] slangasek, seems like stuff regressed in release cause 2.6.15 (previous gnucash) also does not build =( [02:00] xnox: eh, you uploaded qtubuntu *now*? I thought you were going to wait until the transition finished. [02:01] well, NBS binaries removed. [02:01] yes [02:02] plus you can remove a lot more packages now [02:07] slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu-camera/+bug/1712955 [02:07] Ubuntu bug 1712955 in powerd (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [Undecided,Triaged] [02:08] and i think we may be done removing all of unity touch stuff [02:55] slangasek, I took a quick look at libreoffice (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice) but I can't see failures due to jawt, only due to a test complaining about gcc-7 warnings, where are you seeing those? [02:55] the configure script does indicate that jawt was found just fine [03:47] tdaitx: the test result from the new version of libreoffice in -proposed, libreoffice/1:5.4.0-0ubuntu2 [04:40] qt5.9 in; phew [05:20] congrats slangasek, tsimonq2, mitya57 and everyone! [05:24] win! [05:38] pretty encouraging to read the excuses report! [06:14] thanks you all for the nice transition! [06:18] qt screwed up britney lol [06:18] orthanc-wsi/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libdcmtk12 [06:18] they have all migrated, but excuses shows a lot of weirdness [06:22] LocutusOfBorg: it's because launchpad has acked the copy of the packages but they haven't been published to the archive yet, so britney's input is a bit out of sync [06:24] things are looking pretty installable again, so the next britney run should look sane [06:33] \o/ [06:33] thank you all :) [06:33] yep I got it, it was a joke :) [06:33] I remember how many cycles are needed when haskell migrates [06:34] :D [08:55] \o/ thanks to you all! [09:16] +1 [09:16] feels like a huge milestone overcome! [14:09] mitya57, what about doing the qt merges / syncs now? :) [14:11] e.g. we can sync qtwebkit-opensource-src and merge qtbase [14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) [14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) [14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) [14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: audacious [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.9-2~build1] (lubuntu) [16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.27.4+17.04] [16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.4] [16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.27.4~14.04] [16:09] please accept pcscada, it should unblock the gnat transition a little bit further (it is a package rename because it changed the gnat default), leaf package [16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) [16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcscada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1.1] (no packageset) [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcscada [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.7.3-1.1] [16:41] LocutusOfBorg, there are almost no changes to merge in qtbase. Just symbols and the no-gold thing we already have here. [16:42] If Qt 5.9.2 is released early enough, then we may merge it this cycle. Otherwise early next cycle. [17:04] please ignore flask-mongoengine/i386 autopkgtests since mongodb doesn't exist on i386 any more [19:21] :D [19:21] * tsimonq2 just woke up [19:22] mitya57: I think we'll have a pretty good chance of landing 5.9.2 [19:23] \o/ Mirv xnox valorie LocutusOfBorg slangasek acheronuk mitya57 :D :D :D :D :D [19:23] :D [19:27] bugfixes are awesome, yeah! [19:29] Qt 5.9.2 does not even have a branch upstream yet. [19:30] So they will definitely not release it in August as planned, middle or end of September at the best. [19:32] mitya57: But since it doesn't bump ABI (not afaict) and it's a bugfix release, we shouldn't have any problem landing it now that the blocking Unity 8 packages are out of the way. [19:37] tsimonq2, it can break ABI, we should be careful. === tjaalton_ is now known as tjaalton [19:39] mitya57: ack, but my general point is, it should be *much* easier than doing 5.9.1 [19:39] Right. [19:45] are all the other big transitions done? [19:45] like gcc, etc. [19:46] yes [19:46] we still have a new glibc upstream version that we need to figure out if it's going to land this cycle; but that should land only if it's not disruptive to the release and there will be build tests ahead of landing to verify this === fossfreedom_ is now known as fossfreedom [19:47] and that's not a "transition" in the sense of needing to upload a bunch of packages [19:49] Hi - can I just confirm that we are in freeze now and universe packages like budgie-desktop will no longer sync from Debian unstable ? [19:49] I meant transition in the sense of "keeping LP busy for days or weeks" [19:50] valorie: well, glibc will swamp the autopkgtest infra for a bit [19:51] fossfreedom: Debian autosyncs are turned off; I'll send an email later today confirming the freeze [19:51] excellent - that's good news. cheers [19:51] fossfreedom: budgie-desktop wouldn't sync from Debian anyway, it's an Ubuntu package? [19:51] thank you so much, release team [19:52] looking forward to Beta 1 now [19:52] now, can anyone explain to me why cantor's autopkgtests are behaving the way they do? :/ [19:53] slangasek, I maintain it via Debian. Currently in artful I have a later version than in Debian unstable - I don't want that version overwritten when the sync is in play. [19:53] difference in testbed packages between last success and first failure (not counting cantor itself): apport, cron, python3-apport, python3-problem-report, resolvconf, ubuntu-minimal [19:53] fossfreedom: packages with an Ubuntu delta never auto-sync; and feature freeze doesn't stop an Ubuntu developer from manually merging [19:54] k - that's ok. When "B" opens can I just ask for a force-sync ? [19:54] sure [19:54] cheers [19:57] Laney: unrelated to the above question about cantor, but I notice that around the 23rd, testbed-packages seems to have gotten a lot bigger on amd64 - bunches of cloud/server-seeded packages that were previously absent have just turned up. Do you know if this is a result of a deliberate change on the autopkgtest side? [19:58] Laney: random example: lvm2, which is not new in the cloud seed but is new in testbed-packages [20:01] oh, and I suppose I need to be looking at testsuite-packages, not just testbed-packages, for bisecting this :P [20:10] ah now I see, the failing results are from the 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu2 version of the test suite but the binaries installed are from 4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1 [20:28] tdaitx: openjdk-9-jre-zero shows up on the list of uninstallable packages in artful; do you know anything about this? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful_uninst.txt [20:29] slangasek: yep, someone reported that earlier today in #ubuntu+1 (jdk-9 being borken in general i think) [20:30] slangasek, is that zero only? I saw reports about -3 being uninstallable, but then matthias released a -4 right after [20:31] tdaitx: it's only the -zero package listed as uninstallable. If this is all fixed already in -proposed, ok - in that case we have an autopkgtest regression to sort out: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#openjdk-9 [20:32] I didn't look into that so far, I assumed it was fixed - at the same time, it didn't seem to be related to zero, the whole package was affected... the link you send me is -2, so I don't know if this has been fixed in -4 [20:32] slangasek: fwiw, this was the report in #ubuntu+1: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25390671/ [20:32] nacc: right, maintainer script failures aren't going to show up on the uninstallable report, which is just static analysis of the dependencies [20:32] slangasek: oh right [20:33] nacc, slangasek: that is indeed what is supposed to be fixed by -4 [20:33] -3 being uninstallable, well, that was only ever in -proposed [20:33] tdaitx: thanks i'll let them know [20:33] nacc: also tell the user not to install from -proposed :) [20:33] I need to take a look about zero [20:33] oh, wait [20:33] no, there's a mix of -2 and -3 in artful [20:33] rmadison says -jdk is at -3 in artful/universe [20:33] yeah [20:34] openjdk-9-jre-zero | 9~b181-2 | artful/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x [20:34] yet this package is not listed on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html [20:34] hmm, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-9 reports -3 as released and -4 in -proposed [20:35] tdaitx: ^^ so this tells me we're not building the binary, but it hasn't been dropped from debian/control, therefore it's not reported as NBS. Should I just delete the openjdk-9-jre-zero binary package? [20:37] retrying that failed munin autopkgtest [20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nplan (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.23~16.04.1 => 0.26~16.04.1] (no packageset) [20:44] slangasek, yes, delete the zero binary packages, doko disabled those in -4 [20:44] ok [20:44] sorry for the delay, it was a one line change and I missed it in the first run [21:07] please demote prosper to universe to allow texlive-base to migrate to artful, it shows up on components-mismatches-proposed [21:08] jbicha: done [21:09] thanks, while you're around, could you also ignore libsecret/s390x autopkgtests since we have removed gjs/s390x which it wants for its tests [21:11] jbicha: also done [21:36] slangasek: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379404 [21:36] KDE bug 379404 in maxima-backend "Cantor can't initialize session for maxima backend" [Normal,Confirmed] [21:37] righty-o [21:37] and upstream they now set: https://cgit.kde.org/cantor.git/commit/?id=60cc35e0bcf01a8c718a24715ffebdb5f9210092 [21:38] so (a) need a fix, or (b) need to disable build and test of that backend [21:48] or (c) leave at 16.12 which seems to work here [21:51] debian has no fix? [21:51] ah. you ignored that against anything !cantor. fair enough. can wait a bit to see if a fix comes [21:53] valorie: debian packaging has not benn touched for 9 months [21:54] oh dear [21:54] others distro's may have found a non upstreamed patch. was going to check that out later [21:54] !info cantor unstable [21:54] cantor (source: cantor): interface for mathematical applications. In component main, is optional. Version 4:16.08.3-1 (unstable), package size 443 kB, installed size 1597 kB [22:18] acheronuk: c) is not an option for release, due to analitza soname change [22:19] acheronuk: at least, we'd need to delete the cantor currently in -proposed and reupload a no-change rebuild [22:20] yes, true [22:23] I'll do that somewhere to test over the weekend [23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (xenial-proposed/main) [2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6 => 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7] (core)