[14:05] Good morning [14:23] Good Morning [14:30] hey [14:49] morning [15:26] rick_h: now i'm leaning toward Olympus OM-D E-M10 [15:27] rick_h: but didn't you say you didn't like your olympus? [15:27] jrwren: good camera. I had the em5 mark ii [15:27] jrwren: I've got some m4/3 lenses still if you want them [15:27] rick_h: haha, awesome. I might! [15:28] jrwren: it's good, but I feel I outgrew it after a while. It's just tough in low light (traveling to cities at night) [15:28] but I've got some prints on the walls from images I took with it [15:28] rick_h: ah, ok, that is good to know. I have a buddy who loves his, and thewirecutter recommends it, and it seems to have everything I think I want, so I'm about to do it. [15:29] all of these are with the em5 and some rented lenses: https://www.flickr.com/photos/7508761@N03/albums/72157653908747190 [15:30] jrwren: definitely, it's a good entry level. The big thing is that when you do outgrow it you've got to get new lenses and such. That's the thing I've been doing the last year+ in my migration to sony. but I ran micro 4/3 for some 5yrs? [15:30] and really could do a lot with it and helped me learn a ton about photography [15:30] yeah, sounds perfect for what we want. Might never outgrow. Who knows? [15:31] totally [15:33] and local camera store has it same price as amazon, so I may as well support local. I htink I'll go there now. [15:34] err, oops, local camera store isn't open on Sunday. LOL [15:39] lol [18:13] hah, impulse buys harder :) [19:14] I think the problem with Olympus cameras traditionally was that their lenses only fit Olympus bodies [19:14] not sure if that's still the case or if they're all special now [19:32] m4/3 fits oly and panasonic bodies [19:32] kk