=== jamie_2 is now known as jamie_1
[20:33] <ricotz> jbicha, hi, what is up with the eog-plugins binary package? I assume this is suppose to pull in *all* after the split?
[20:37] <jbicha> ricotz: thanks, I'll have to fix that when I upload it to Debian this week
[20:37] <jbicha> it's supposed to be like the gedit-plugins package
[20:38] <ricotz> I se
[20:38] <ricotz> e
[20:38] <jbicha> I want to split gnome-books from gnome-documents too but the packaging is a bit odd for that
[20:40] <ricotz> jbicha, hmm, try "diff /usr/bin/gnome-documents /usr/bin/gnome-books"
[20:41] <ricotz> I see, I guess splitting those is not reasonable
[20:41] <jbicha> well I've got one proposal in Debian experimental svn but I haven't looked at it in a few months
[20:42] <ricotz> a versioned Provides: gnome-books (...) might be sufficient
[20:42] <jbicha> I think it's worth doing, it just doesn't split as easily as I would have hoped
[20:45] <ricotz> I don't see how this can be split at all
[20:46] <ricotz> I mean you really want to split this into like 3 or more packages?
[20:46] <jbicha> yes, I think users expect to be able to install the Books app separately from the Documents app
[20:47] <jbicha> the GNOME Software app doesn't handle that case very well at all now (no warning that other packages will be removed)
[20:47] <ricotz> 207583357a5b92a0195abb2ca7b37b40bdb711b2  org.gnome.Books.data.gresource
[20:48] <ricotz> 207583357a5b92a0195abb2ca7b37b40bdb711b2  org.gnome.Documents.data.gresource
[20:48] <ricotz> you want to tackle those dupes?
[20:50] <ricotz> anyway, looks like fun indeed
[20:50] <jbicha> evolution was the other package I split (for its plugins)
[20:52] <ricotz> right, gnome-documents seems special since it actually runs the same code which acts differently depending on the executable name
[20:54] <jbicha> I'm considering splitting gnome-user-docs but probably not this cycle since it's not that important at all
[20:57] <jbicha> ooh, and splitting epiphany some time like Fedora did years ago LP: #1689317
[20:57] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1689317 in epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) "[MIR] epiphany-browser-runtime" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1689317
[21:12] <jamie_1> ive noticed that when using the search from the doc it lagges for a few seconds before taking the rest of the input and then searching
[21:14] <jamie_1> is there any know issues with the dock serach on 17.04?