[00:16] <slangasek> how do I persuade flavors to not do optional milestones, instead ;)
[00:28] <jbicha> slangasek: I don't think we need 2 Alphas, we only did 1 last cycle and it wasn't a problem
[00:28] <slangasek> doko: do you have any insights into why the lapack rebuild with current toolchain breaks python-scipy on i386?  I tried a lapack rebuild with -ffloat-store and it doesn't help
[00:41] <slangasek> ok, triggering rebuildsfor resolvconf; sorry, should've done this earlier, only just now realized that apt was lying to me locally
[01:06] <slangasek> doko: rebuilding lapack with gfortran-6 doesn't appear to help
[01:10] <Ukikie> slangasek: I don't suppose you'd look at xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin in NEW?
[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] (20170829) has been added
[01:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] (20170829) has been added
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829)
[02:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829.1)
[02:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829.1)
[03:08] <tsimonq2> jbicha: I can make a good argument for 3 on an LTS release :P
[03:09] <tsimonq2> (Alphas)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-meta (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.65.1 => 0.65.2] (lubuntu)
[05:45] <ginggs> would someone please bump 'force-badtest node-tap/8.0.0-4ubuntu4/armhf' in vorlon's hints?
[05:46] <slangasek> done
[05:47] <ginggs> slangasek: thanks!
[05:48] <slangasek> on that note, re-triggering node-tap tests for new nodejs now
[06:40] <slangasek> well, the new node-tap doesn't seem to fare any better with nodejs
[06:42] <tsimonq2> :(
[06:42] <flocculant> slangasek: re "how do I persuade flavors" - I'd not take much persuading at all ;)
[07:00] <ginggs> slangasek, tsimonq2: i'll have a look at node-tap and skipping those tests that fail with node6 with another upload, unless you want to hint it through?
[07:02] <tsimonq2> Hinting it through wfm fwiw
[08:59] <Laney> slangasek: I think I saw some questions from you, but I managed to lose them and forget what they were - mind reminding me?
[08:59] <Laney> Something about cloud images...
[09:13] <clivejo> jbicha: are you around?
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829.1)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Artful Beta 1] has been updated (20170829.1)
[11:32] <flocculant> jbicha: have you seen gnome-software seg faulting on artful 32bit iso? bug 1713344, bug 1713701
[11:34] <jbicha> I haven't been running the 32 bit iso
[11:35] <flocculant> well no - me neither for years ... but we do test it - and g-s crashes there
[11:35] <mitya57> tsimonq2, Do you upload the new version of dep or rdep?
[11:35] <mitya57> tsimonq2, nevermind
[11:35] <flocculant> jbicha: and you're the closest to some Gnome dude that I know of :)
[11:36]  * mitya57 somehow thought that the old message was at the bottom of the log
[12:35] <ginggs> would someone please bump 'force-badtest node-tap/8.0.0-4ubuntu5/armhf' in vorlon's hints? - last time today, i promise
[12:57] <apw> ginggs, looking
[12:58] <ginggs> apw, wait it might have passed
[12:59] <ginggs> lol http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-tap/artful/armhf
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sbuild (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.71.0-2ubuntu1 => 0.71.0-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[14:54] <slangasek> Laney: hi! the question was, do you know why the base images used for autopkgtest on amd64 got bigger on the 23rd (to include the full cloud seed)
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-pako [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.5+ds-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:02] <Laney> slangasek: ah right, ok - can you point me at a specific instance so we're looking at the same thing?
[15:09] <Laney> hmm
[15:12] <Laney> looks like cloud images have taken a holiday over the past few days
[15:13]  * Laney doesn't know where their build logs are
[15:30] <slangasek> Laney: where I noticed it was in the artifacts for cantor tests before/after the 23rd
[15:31] <Laney> slangasek: so I think the first task is to get cloud images for artful back in lgw01/lcy01
[15:31] <Laney> presumably comes down to getting current ones on https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/artful/current/ ?
[15:31] <slangasek> "back in"? D:
[15:31] <Laney> ubuntu@juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-3:~> nova image-list | grep artful | grep -v adt
[15:31] <Laney> 1 ubuntu@juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-3:~>
[15:32] <slangasek> wat
[15:32] <Laney> the fallback for adt is to dist-upgrade the previous one
[15:32] <Laney> so it's not terminal
[15:32] <Laney> but still
[15:32] <slangasek> ok, let me chase that
[15:32] <Laney> do you know where buildlogs are, OOI?
[15:32] <Laney> (slightly absent; desktop team meeting)
[15:40] <slangasek> Laney: I've got philroche helping me track it down
[15:42]  * Laney nod
[15:50] <slangasek> Laney: it looks like the previous image build failures are resolved and should propagate soon-ish
[15:52] <slangasek> Laney: images themselves were building but the pipeline for publishing them broke.  anyway, build logs if you can read them: https://launchpad.net/~cloudware/+livefs/ubuntu/artful/cpc/
[15:52] <Laney> nope
[16:19] <slangasek> Laney: k.  known bug that they're not public :/
[16:22] <Laney> slangasek: ho hum
[16:23] <Laney> well, I'll keep an eye out for them turning back up in ScalingStack at least
[16:24] <slangasek> philroche: ^^ do you mind updating us here (or passing the baton to whoever takes it over EOD) once the cloud images are published again?
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-chokidar [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[16:44] <philroche> slangasek: Ack. I'm EOD now but I have passed baton to rcj
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-chokidar [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.25.91-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.25.91-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.25.91-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.25.91-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.25.91-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.25.91-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:05] <flexiondotorg> tsimonq2 Ping
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-34.38] (core, kernel)
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-watchpack [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[19:37] <slangasek> at some point, the answer to a flavor coming in two days before a beta saying "we're participating in the milestone" needs to be "no, you aren't"...
[19:53] <coreycb> bdmurray: hi, can you take a look at releasing nova to zesty-updates for this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1706297
[20:00] <bdmurray> coreycb: bug 1697610 part of the same nova upload seems unverified
[20:02] <coreycb> bdmurray: ah right, ok. that's going to be tested soon.
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-34.38]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uwsgi (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.12-5ubuntu3 => 2.0.12-5ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[21:05] <LocutusOfBorg> fossfreedom, syncing ubuntu-budgie
[21:06] <fossfreedom> LocutusOfBorg, syncing?
[21:11] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: I think there's still some Ubuntu delta
[21:13] <LocutusOfBorg> fossfreedom, I remember some little change
[21:13] <LocutusOfBorg> I asked you a while ago
[21:13] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: the changes from 10.4-0ubuntu3 at least
[21:13] <LocutusOfBorg> why are them still relevant?
[21:14] <LocutusOfBorg> - libmutter-0-dev (>= 3.24) | libmutter-1-dev (>= 3.25.90),
[21:14] <LocutusOfBorg> -# libmutter-dev (>= 3.18) | libmutter-0-dev (>= 3.24) | libmutter-1-dev (>= 3.25.90),
[21:14] <LocutusOfBorg> + libmutter-dev (>= 3.18) | libmutter-0-dev (>= 3.24) | libmutter-1-dev (>= 3.25.90),
[21:14] <LocutusOfBorg> this isn't to me
[21:14] <jbicha> they were added after 10.4-1
[21:14] <LocutusOfBorg> you mean the change in debian/budgie-desktop.gsettings-override?
[21:14]  * LocutusOfBorg looks at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/335083873/budgie-desktop_10.4-0ubuntu3_10.4-1.diff.gz
[21:14] <jbicha> yes
[21:15] <LocutusOfBorg> ack, readding them as delta
[21:17] <LocutusOfBorg> why isn't it in Debian? fossfreedom I asked you around 10 times, I was pretty sure the mentors package was "ready to be syncd"
[21:17] <LocutusOfBorg> anyhow, uploaded, please check again :)
[21:19] <fossfreedom> sorry - its late, and I'm tired :(  I'm confused with the discussion we are having.  What am I looking at?
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Artful Beta 1] (20170829) has been added
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Artful Beta 1] (20170829) has been added
[21:24] <LocutusOfBorg> look at this upload https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/10.4-1ubuntu1
[21:24] <LocutusOfBorg> this is debian, plus one change in gsettings-override
[21:24]  * LocutusOfBorg goes to sleep
[21:26] <tsimonq2> flexiondotorg: Pong.
[21:34] <fossfreedom> LocutusOfBorg, night.  I hadn't requested a re-upload any additional changes to Debian due to lots of other project priority matters.  sorry about that.  That sync/merge is fine.  cheers.
[21:36] <fossfreedom> jbicha ... though I'm worried - mutter has been updated today but launchpad says "pending publication" - does this mean that budgie-desktop will compile against the older libmutter-0-dev rather than the newer libmutter-1-dev ?
[21:41] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/335085015/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-amd64.budgie-desktop_10.4-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[21:41] <LocutusOfBorg> buildlog shows -0-dev
[21:41] <LocutusOfBorg> fortunately :)
[21:41] <LocutusOfBorg> (so it can migrate)
[21:57] <jbicha> fossfreedom: mutter is still in the new queue so it's fine
[21:59] <fossfreedom> jbicha, ah - that explains it.  cheers.  I presume a no change rebuild to budgie-desktop is then required once mutter is then released from the new queue?
[22:01] <jbicha> fossfreedom: I don't think a no-change rebuild will work because both mutters will be in the archive during the transition, but it will be ok :)
[22:02] <fossfreedom> ta - fingers and toes have now been uncrossed
[22:39] <rcj> slangasek, Laney: artful build is in progress.  I'll be checking on it throughout my evening