[00:06] or not, sigh. [00:07] their atomics are broken on 32bit [00:07] kill i386 [00:25] doko: it seems the gnat-7 transition is still incomplete in artful-proposed; what are the rules for package naming wrt ABIs, in ada-space? e.g. is it reasonable for me to just take the patches from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872427 that do s/libanet1-dev/libanet2-dev/, s/libanet0.3.3/libanet0.3.4/? [00:25] Debian bug 872427 in src:anet "anet: please rebuild with gnat-7" [Normal,Open] [00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freerdp2 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freerdp2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freerdp2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyorb [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.11~20140418-4] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyorb [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.11~20140418-4] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyorb [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.11~20140418-4] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freerdp2 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyorb [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.11~20140418-4] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyorb [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.11~20140418-4] [00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyorb [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.11~20140418-4] [00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freerdp2 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freerdp2 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freerdp2 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freerdp2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] [00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freerdp2 [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] [00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freerdp2 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0~git20170725.1.1648deb+dfsg1-1] [00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anet [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anet [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anet [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anet [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anet [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anet [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anet [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anet [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anet [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anet [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anet [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anet [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-0ubuntu1] [01:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libalog [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] (no packageset) [01:22] is the archive now open, or is the /topic accurate? [01:22] both [01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libalog [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] (no packageset) [01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libalog [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] (no packageset) [01:22] feature freeze doesn't mean the archive is closed [01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libalog [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] (no packageset) [01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libalog [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] (no packageset) [01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libalog [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] (no packageset) [01:30] slangasek, $ apt install python python-numpy -> seems to fail in artful schroot with release & proposed enabled. And I am confused how that can be. [01:30] ah [01:30] libpython2.7-stdlib : Breaks: python-numpy (< 1:1.12.1-3.1) but 1:1.12.1-3ubuntu2 is to be installed [01:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libalog [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libalog [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libalog [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libalog [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libalog [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] [01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libalog [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu4] [02:53] slangasek: soooo Alternate amd64 looks to be FTBFS... [03:02] bdmurray: Hey, any reason why kdecoration, ksshaskpass, and polkit-kde-agent-1 weren't released to zesty-updates as part of bug 1687444? [03:02] bug 1687444 in polkit-kde-agent-1 (Ubuntu Zesty) "Zesty SRU tracking bug for KDE's Plasma 5.9.5" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687444 [03:14] tsimonq2: phased update halted: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html [03:15] oh [03:19] tsimonq2: forwarded you the emails I got [03:20] acheronuk: ack [03:20] thanks [03:21] tsimonq2: oh, different packages. that is odd [03:21] * acheronuk shouldn't even be awake [03:23] tsimonq2: no idea on kdecoration, ksshaskpass, and polkit-kde-agent-1 then [03:26] that SRU has been nothing but bother :/ [03:27] acheronuk: Maybe it stops all packages with that bug marked as being fixed [03:52] tsimonq2: I don't see any evidence that the amd64 alternate is being built. I've seen it get stuck that way before when trying to trigger from the iso tracker, I didn't manage to debug it then or now. I'll trigger one manually on the server [03:52] slangasek: Alright. [03:54] grumble, what's with the huge pile of red under init-system-helpers [03:57] * tsimonq2 scratches head [03:58] Why is nodejs not a valid candidate, Britney? [03:58] tsimonq2: 'test in progress' [03:58] All of the autopkgtests pass or are ignored failures... [03:58] slangasek: oh what where? [03:58] node-browserify-zlib/i386 [03:59] Oh [03:59] meh :| [04:01] only 10 spots down in the queue currently [04:03] Ah ok [04:03] (well it's been in proposed for two days, you think it'd be done by now...) [04:15] it triggers autopkgtests for all the node modules [04:15] takes a bit to churn through them all [04:17] ic [04:17] ok [04:43] How often does Britney run? (i.e. what's the cron entry?) [04:48] it runs more or less constantly [04:49] the interval depends on how long a given run takes, rather than on the cron setting [05:02] ah ok [05:02] nodejs migrated \o/ [05:02] (again, I merged from Debian after it migrated a few days ago) [05:06] slangasek: I'm borderline, would you consider merging this from Debian breaking Feature Freeze? https://tracker.debian.org/news/867092 [05:07] tsimonq2: nothing in that changelog stands out to me as requiring an FFe [05:08] Alright, cool. [05:41] slangasek: the gnat changes look ok [05:42] xnox: as I mentioned here earlier. sorting out today the dropping of the _fpectl extension [05:53] * slangasek grumbles at the nfs-utils racey autopkgtets [05:53] no, 'sync' does not guarantee that the nfs client sees the removal of a file :P [05:54] (it has to then read the changes that have been synced after the sync is done, maybe an API call or something before it tries to do it (what I assume by race condition)? idk what I'm talking about, carry on :P) [05:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stunnel4 (xenial-proposed/universe) [3:5.30-1 => 3:5.30-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbusada [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbusada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbusada [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbusada [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbusada [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] [06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbusada [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] [06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbusada [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] [06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbusada [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] [06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbusada [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbusada [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbusada [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] [06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbusada [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1] [06:33] * tsimonq2 thinks package changelog urgency should have an effect on triggered autopkgtests in the queue... [06:35] (maybe it does and I'm not seeing it, idk) [06:47] it does not [06:47] we don't have very involved queue management of autopkgtests generally [06:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted insighttoolkit4 [i386] (artful-proposed) [4.12.1-dfsg1-1ubuntu1] [07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-94.117~14.04.1] [08:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flashcache (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1.3+git20150701-5 => 3.1.3+git20150701-5ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset) [08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:6.0~svn311834-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1:6.0~svn311834-2ubuntu1] [09:08] upgrade to launchpad-buildd 148 in progress [09:11] * apw holds his breath [09:19] WCPGW [09:20] I mean it's only a 6000+-line diff [09:20] heh, what indeed ... [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashcache [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.1.3+git20150701-5ubuntu0.17.04.1] [11:30] slangasek, I'm going to upload dbusada in debian, with all the patches in the bug tracker [11:30] it will go in new queue, and I'll sync after [11:30] (after the transition is finished) [11:34] LocutusOfBorg: please ping the debian-ada ML [11:36] I'm uploading in deferred/10 [11:36] and pinging then [11:42] done, replied on the bug and cc'd debian-ada [11:43] We're rolling back launchpad-buildd 148 due to some unexpected networking issues with LXD [11:46] doko, do you plan to promote llvm-5.0 to main? [11:46] when it would build ... [11:46] oh already done [11:46] yep, I'm looking at the failures [11:47] hopefully sylvestre will sort them out soon [11:48] lets see gnat migrate in some minutes [12:17] gnat still has some failing autopkg tests [12:17] doko, where [12:18] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnat [12:18] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html [12:18] yes, but all the failures are fixed [12:19] just running autopkgtests queues are full [12:19] I already retried them [12:19] unless you know something I'm not aware of [12:43] llvm-* uploaded [13:00] doko, why did you break borgbackup? :p bugs.debian.org/873921 [13:16] LocutusOfBorg: why do you reassign without rebuilding? it will stay broken this way [13:16] how can I rebuild it since pybuild is broken? [13:17] I: pybuild base:184: python3.5 setup.py config [13:17] ImportError: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/Cython/Compiler/Code.cpython-35m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: PyFPE_jbuf [13:22] because you don't use the built version [13:23] sure, no dinstall yet [13:25] buildds use incoming, not just since today [13:25] I did test rebuild on my laptop, I don't use builders as testbed [13:32] LocutusOfBorg: http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd/ is open to the public, you can add it to your unstable/experimental build chroots sources.list. [13:33] infinity, but if cython is broken, 100 reverse-dependencies needs rebuilds/binNMUs why the hell should I do a sourceful NMU? [13:33] I can do it in Ubuntu, but we don't do no change sourceful uploads in Debian [13:34] I know how to grab incoming, but the point is another, not changing SONAME breaks partial upgrades [13:34] I really dislike it :p [13:34] LocutusOfBorg: I was only responding to your issues that your local test rebuild wouldn't match what would happen in the archive, not what you should or shouldn't upload. [13:35] infinity, yes, the answer was not directed to you :) thanks! [13:36] btw, what the hell happened to ghostscript? not installable on ppc64el and s390x, breaking ettercap build-dependencies... can anybody please help me? [13:38] so where are these 100 reverse-dependencies breaking? [13:39] reverse-depends -r artful -b src:cython |wc -l [13:39] 235 [13:39] LocutusOfBorg: Probably just poor timing of arch:all and arch:any binaries being published. [13:40] and every one of these referencing the _PyFPE symbol? [13:40] sorry doko I had a long week (see debian private), I'm just back to work, please do the NMUs/rebuilds as necessary, I have some pressing stuff to do now [14:03] doko, i think we simply want cython to migrate soon [14:04] xnox: tell that the autopkg testers ... current tests are all green [14:05] python-numpy autopkg tests might be a problem [14:08] slangasek, math.c fails to compile with comments (-C -O2) on i386 only. hence i think this is a valid reason to just kill i386. =) [14:08] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jemalloc/+bug/1714514 [14:08] Ubuntu bug 1714514 in glibc (Ubuntu) "math.c broken on i386, when compiling with -O2 -C" [High,Triaged] [14:12] doko, that symbol is used not only by borgbackup [14:12] curl -s https://codesearch.debian.net/results/8896aabe2a135a21/packages.json | jq -r '.Packages[]' |wc -l reports 43 [14:12] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=PyFPE&perpkg=1 [14:13] xnox: Why on earth would anyone expect -C to do reasonable things? [14:14] infinity, it seems like they do annotations in comments and preserve them and then do instrumentation with it. it sounds and looks crazy. [14:14] infinity, and something is borked in the i386 code path for it. [14:15] i've touched frama-c before, and I do remember drinking cider afterwords. [14:18] LocutusOfBorg: your "analysis" is flawed. See Include/pyfpe.h [14:19] xnox: send a diff compared to GCC 6, and we can forward it [14:20] in any case, we can find these with the next test rebuild [14:21] I don't understand sorry, but I trust you doing the needed stuff to make things good again [14:23] if it was a long week, end it early ;-) [14:25] :-) [15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (zesty-proposed/main) [2:15.0.6-0ubuntu1 => 2:15.0.6-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:6.0~svn311834-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (xenial-proposed/main) [2:13.1.4-0ubuntu3 => 2:13.1.4-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: hyperlink (artful-proposed/primary) [17.3.1-2] [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hyperlink [sync] (artful-proposed) [17.3.1-2] [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [i386] (artful-proposed) [1:6.0~svn311834-2ubuntu2] [16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hyperlink [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [17.3.1-2] (no packageset) [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hyperlink [amd64] (artful-proposed) [17.3.1-2] [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: caja-admin (artful-proposed/primary) [0.0.1-1] [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: caja-rename (artful-proposed/primary) [17.3.28~bzr14+repack1-2] [16:35] doko: ^ since you rejected the last caja-admin upload yesterday [16:35] I don't think a FFe is required for caja-admin since it was in the new queue before Feature Freeze [16:36] Debian FTP Team was ok with those being Python2; the Debian and Ubuntu MATE devs are pushing MATE to convert more stuff away from python2 [16:37] it's needed to replace caja-gksu (from caja-extensions source) [16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-34.38~16.04.1] (kernel) [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu4 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-certbot-apache [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-certbot [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-certbot-nginx [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-certbot [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) [17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-letsencrypt [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.4.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-letsencrypt-apache [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.4.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-34.38~16.04.1] [17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-foreground-child [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.6-3] (no packageset) [18:28] someone want to fix the pcs autopkgtest to not freak out about a proxy being set in the environment? [18:29] (that would help ruby-json and python2.7 be migratable) [18:40] doko, i don't think it is gcc-6 vs 7 related; as gcc-6 -std=gnu11 -C -O2 also bombs out in a same manner. -std=c11 does not. [18:41] doko, so will bisect math.h to possibly locate when/where incompatibility with -O2 -C gnu11 started [18:43] slangasek, enough of ocaml migrated right? there are some dubious NEW things [18:43] xnox: it migrated? hurray! [18:48] slangasek, well check if you are happy with things. cause you said before "too much of proposed is ocaml". not sure if enough of it is resolved. [18:49] 19 packages migrated together [18:49] xnox: yes, the remaining stuff in -proposed seems to be just leaf packages that are stuck [19:17] * amd64: adabrowse, adacgi3, gnat-gps, libadasockets6-dev [19:17] four packages left to clear gnat 7 [19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adacgi [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adacgi [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adacgi [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adacgi [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adacgi [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adacgi [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adacgi [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adacgi [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adacgi [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adacgi [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adacgi [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] [19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adacgi [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.6-19.1ubuntu1] [19:59] slangasek, one new language per release. I've never done ocaml before, so i'm not touching ada. [20:00] :) [20:30] Can someone please reject fuse-umfuse-ext2 from Trusty Unapproved? [22:05] slangasek, I did sync adasockets from experimental [22:05] and uploading gnat-gps [22:05] this should (modulo somebody accepting from new queue) finally make things migrate [22:05] LocutusOfBorg: oh excellent, I ignored the problems long enough that they've gone away [22:05] LocutusOfBorg: thanks! [22:06] :) thanks to you for caring and pushing the transition [22:06] I want now to push the changes in debian too [22:06] LocutusOfBorg: you've gotten gnat-gps to build? I kept running into one build failure or another (the upload I did was a mis-upload) [22:06] slangasek, I did merge it from unstable [22:06] there was a new release [22:07] did you forget to check unstable? :) [22:08] apparently so [22:09] I only checked for open bugs, which is where I found the patches for most of them ;) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adasockets [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0.1] (no packageset) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adasockets [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0.1] (no packageset) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adasockets [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0.1] (no packageset) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adasockets [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0.1] (no packageset) [22:10] I honestly didn't check to build, it takes one hour or so [22:10] but I'm mostly sure it will build correctly, the new release is the usual "gnat-7 release" [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adasockets [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.10.1-0.1] [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adasockets [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.10.1-0.1] [22:11] in case, tomorrow morning I'll fixup [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adasockets [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0.1] (no packageset) [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adasockets [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.10.1-0.1] [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adasockets [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.10.1-0.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adasockets [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.10.1-0.1]