[09:28] is juju working with foreman? [09:28] if so how? [12:41] Does anyone know if "swift" + "swift-proxy" can be deployed on a single server (with lxd) I would like to try it out but I only have a single machine for it. [14:45] anyone here [14:45] is it possible to integrate juju and foreman [14:51] ybaumy: nothing that the team itself is working on atm [14:51] ybaumy: not sure if there's ways of making that work together. I've not looked into it myself. [14:52] erik_lonroth: hmm, not sure. might just give it a go and see. I'd guess that the biggest thing would be getting the proxy on the network for folks to reach out to. Might have to do something like put the proxy on the main host and the swift into a container? [17:43] rick_h: I'm doing some googling and found https://piware.de/2014/03/creating-a-local-swift-server-on-ubuntu-for-testing/ - but it seems the "setup-swift.sh" files (guy) has left the server... [17:43] (content is gone) [17:50] rick_h: Another hit on google is this: https://askubuntu.com/questions/85868/has-anyone-deployed-swift-in-an-openstack-environment-using-juju [17:51] However, its not clear to me how I should create the storage needed for the configuration of the juju deploy. [17:52] I'll try figure it out myself, but all help apprechiated [18:58] Hmm, seems lxc wont allow me per default to mount loop devices which is being created by the swift-storage charm. Any idea as how to resolve that easily? [19:16] erik_lonroth: probably something along these lines http://blog.forshee.me/2016/02/container-mounts-in-ubuntu-1604.html [19:16] bdx: I'm looking [19:19] bdx: I think id rather just turn the container into a privileged one? [19:19] after all I'm testing [19:20] totally ... open it wide up and see if you are still hitting the issue [19:26] Nope, it didnt work or perhaps a reboot of the container would be needed ? [19:30] hmmm [19:30] possibly [19:30] worth a shot [19:30] cory_fu: how's it going? [19:31] cory_fu: whats he best way to get the latest release of charms.reactive into my charm? if it isnt released to pypi yet [19:31] ?