[04:22] <mwhudson> what the heck is going on here https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/ppc64el/d/docker.io/20170905_034210_a49fd@/log.gz
[04:22] <mwhudson> (this only happens on ppc64el, maybe there's some ppc64el scalingstack problem?)
[10:01] <doko> jtaylor: online?
[10:30] <ginggs> xnox: hi, may i sync atlas? it builds fine in artful-proposed
[10:31] <ginggs> your diff was included in debian
[10:32] <xnox> ginggs, sure.
[10:32] <xnox> looks good
[10:35] <ginggs> xnox: thanks!
[10:44] <ginggs> xnox: hmm, i spoke to soon, the armhf build failed - something to do with NEON i guess
[11:11] <doko> mvo, whoever: who am I supposed to ask about snapcraft autopkg failures?
[11:18] <ogra_> doko, the snapcraft guys are on rocket.ubuntu.com in the #snapcraft channel
[11:18] <doko> ogra_: separate irc server? ohh fun!
[11:18] <ogra_> doko, or open a topic on forum.snapcraft.io
[11:18] <ogra_> no IRc
[11:18] <ogra_> its a web-chat
[11:18] <doko> pff
[11:19] <doko> and I assume you have to register for that ...
[11:20] <ogra_> indeed, for both
[11:21] <ogra_> (i'd actually recommend the forum over rocket ... there is a snapcraft category)
[11:21] <Unit193> doko: Looks like the former supports login.u.c
[11:23] <Laney> mwhudson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1715128
[11:28] <doko> Unit193: ? I don't see that sso is used
[11:44] <cjwatson> stgraber: Is there some reason why a loop-mount might fail inside the launchpad-buildd lxd setup?  I don't see anything about that in the default seccomp profile.  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/335879037/buildlog_ubuntu_artful_armhf_raspi2_cpc_BUILDING.txt.gz
[11:44] <cjwatson> Most things seem OK otherwise ...
[11:55] <tjaalton> doko: so I think doxygen was the only thing in main besides mesa that used llvm-4.0. next upload will migrate it to 5.0
[12:32] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, what is this? collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]
[12:32] <LocutusOfBorg> somebody in the infra is killing ld?
[13:05] <coreycb> jamespage: python-zunclient has dependencies on python-docker and python-websocket which are both in universe
[13:05] <coreycb> jamespage: so I moved zunclient to Suggests in heat a few weeks back for artful. I think we can move zunclient back to universe if you agree.
[13:05] <jamespage> coreycb: +1
[13:07] <coreycb> hello release team, can you please move python-zunclient to universe as it is no longer needed in main?
[13:20] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, *cough* poppler
[13:23] <xnox> cjwatson, infinity: i wonder if /usr/share/locale/all_languages from kdelibs5-data should really be shipped in like glibc or something. It's a mapping of all language names, translated. Very useful for language selection dialogs like in ubiquity.
[13:24] <cjwatson> isn't that what iso-codes is for?
[13:24] <cjwatson> (not that I care very deeply)
[13:29] <abeato> cyphermox, is there any way to override the netplan configuration from subiquity in UC16? I want to override console-conf one *and* that one
[13:31] <cyphermox> abeato: I'm not sure what you mean, it should be easy to replace /etc/netplan/*.yaml to do what you want
[13:31] <abeato> cyphermox, yeah, but I want to seed that config on first boot, and subiquity is overwriting it
[13:33] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, do you want me to upload it?
[13:34] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, you asked me to merge it, so I expected you have some intention to take care of the further process
[13:34]  * ricotz doesn't have upload rights
[13:35] <ricotz> ah 0.59...
[13:37] <LocutusOfBorg> A 0.58-2ubuntu1 is trivial, 0.59 needs some Ffe checks
[13:38] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, you mean 0.57.0-2ubuntu1
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> yep indeed
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> new soname needs talk in #-release
[13:44] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/ubuntu/
[13:47] <xnox> cjwatson, i'll check iso-codes.
[13:47] <xnox> thanks
[13:47] <xnox> also, tty1 should be unicode capable.... i wanted to write: Use ⍐ or ⍗ + ⏎ to select 🗺️
[13:47] <xnox> but i can't =(
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, .
[13:53] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, .?
[13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> done
[13:56] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, thanks
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks to you!
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> "ricotz doesn't have upload rights" sounds like a bug to me, a ppu might be beneficial for you
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> are you motu?
[13:59] <tseliot> Unit193: would you be available to test nvidia-304  in Ubuntu 17.10 for me?
[14:00] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, no, never went for the hassle to apply for it
[14:00] <LocutusOfBorg> ok
[14:00] <Unit193> tseliot: If it's regarding that issue, sure would later today.
[14:01] <tseliot> Unit193: yes, it's about LP: #/1711758
[14:01] <tseliot> LP: #1711758
[14:04] <slashd> Good day rbasak I see you are chairing the meeting this week (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Meeting), I won't be available today due to some personal reason, and following 2 Tuesdays as well (Conference + vacation). I'll be back for the meeting on Tues 9/26. For today, I have nothing to highlight or discuss.
[14:34] <cyphermox> abeato: subiquity doesn't run on first boot of UC16. console-conf does -- if you just remove console-conf it won't
[14:35] <cyphermox> abeato: there is no other option, I think the default "dhcp on whatever we can" is hard-coded in console-conf
[14:35] <abeato> cyphermox, I see, thanks
[14:36] <cyphermox> if you need to do otherwise; you should open a bug against the subiquity package in LP, and mention that. We should be able to move the config to some file that could then be overridden
[14:39] <tseliot> Unit193: I have just uploaded the driver here. Give it some time to build. Thanks for your help https://launchpad.net/~albertomilone/+archive/ubuntu/deleteme-nvidia
[15:35] <stgraber> cjwatson: do you have the /dev/loop* nodes (loop-control and loop* devices)?
[15:36] <cjwatson> good question - let me finish setting this up locally
[15:42] <stgraber> cjwatson: alternatively it may be caused by missing kernel modules, so you may want to make sure that any filesystem kernel module is loaded (you can list them in linux.kernel_modules)
[16:36] <doko> sil2100: about #1696686: the binutils change is limited to arm32 only. so you have to look for other things causing these "regressions".
[16:37] <doko> sil2100: and the linux/armhf failure seems to be unrelated, packaging error?
[16:37] <doko> apw: ^^^
[16:38] <sil2100> doko: leave a comment on the bug if possible
[16:41] <apw> sil2100: got a link to the Linux/armhf failure? as it passes on my sheet
[16:43] <doko> apw: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#binutils
[16:47] <apw> doko, oh i know what that is ...
[16:48] <apw> sil2100, that can be ignored
[16:54] <jtaylor> doko: yes, you should have waited a couple hours, I was just waiting for the numpy upload
[16:57] <doko> jtaylor: go ahead and override ...
[17:41] <jtaylor> doko: did you do it outside of git?
[17:47] <doko> jtaylor: yes
[18:07] <powersj> "Sep  3 03:54:38 debconf: --> INPUT critical keyboard-configuration/layout"
[18:07] <powersj> It appears this key was increased in priority from high to critical recently.
[18:07] <powersj> that's from the artful daily ISO as of sep 3.
[18:08] <powersj> slangasek: ^ bug? expected?
[18:16] <slangasek> powersj: not something I expect; I believe cyphermox was doing a console-setup merge, so he might know things
[18:21] <cyphermox> ah, it's possible this slipped through the cracks
[18:21] <cyphermox> OTOH, as I recall that key specifically has a different behavior depending on how the installer is started
[18:21] <cyphermox> powersj: by artful daily iso you mean ubuntu-server/daily/current?
[18:22] <cyphermox> (as opposed to using mini.iso)
[18:22] <powersj> cyphermox: ubuntu-server/daily/pending
[18:22] <cyphermox> ack
[18:22] <powersj> this broke the daily ISO tests
[18:22] <cyphermox> I'll have a look
[18:22] <powersj> thanks!
[18:24] <cyphermox> powersj: ok yeah, that's a mistake on my part
[18:25] <powersj> cyphermox: ok, fix via new upload?
[18:41] <Unit193> tseliot: I confirm that version fixes that specific bug.   Specifically, 304.135-0ubuntu5~ppa1
[18:42] <Unit193> During upgrade, I did get: dpkg: error: version '-' has bad syntax: revision number is empty  however.
[18:49] <tseliot> Unit193: yes, that's ok, it won't affect anything. Thanks for testing! I am going to upload the driver in Ubuntu tomorrow.
[18:50] <Unit193> Thanks.
[18:59] <cyphermox> powersj: yeah, but I wonder why it's an issue for the automated testing, i thought that would have been preseeded?
[19:05] <powersj> cyphermox: I don't think we do since we set priority = critical
[19:08] <powersj> https://paste.ubuntu.com/25473763/ is debconf output
[21:04] <cyphermox> powersj: setting priority=critical is "preseeding". You're preseeding the minimum priority at which to prompt for things, and using defaults for everything else
[21:04] <cyphermox> that said, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/1.166ubuntu3
[21:05] <powersj> Yes, I took your comment as you expected us to preseed the keyboard config
[21:05] <cyphermox> not quite
[21:05] <cyphermox> but I would prefer if you did use some preseed file to test more than just the defaults, but that's not a big deal
[21:05] <powersj> cyphermox: go you explain that more
[21:06] <powersj> can you explain that more*
[21:06] <cyphermox> powersj: you can specify exactly how you want the install to happen, it might be useful to test in another language, or some specific partitioning scheme, etc.
[21:06] <cyphermox> but that's for your team to decide :)
[21:07] <powersj> cyphermox: we do a number of tests with different configs
[21:07] <powersj> I'm surprised you didn't know this
[21:07] <powersj> we do miss language, but we do different storage configs (e.g. lvm, raid1)
[21:07] <powersj> as well as other tasksel related items
[21:07] <powersj> so if there are other areas that are interesting I'm more than happy to hear them.
[21:07] <cyphermox> I know, but I'm surprised to see this one not pass anything other than hostname and priority
[21:08] <powersj> it does much more than that
[21:09] <powersj> here is the preseed that is used for the smoke test of each daily ISO: https://paste.ubuntu.com/25474304/
[21:09] <powersj> if it passes that it gets promoted to current
[21:09] <powersj> then the other dozen or so tests get launched
[21:10] <powersj> Yes a lot is commented out, but it is preseeding more than 2 things
[21:12] <powersj> so if there are other areas that would be good to test, it would be nice to hear, especially given how much of the installer comes from foundations
[21:16] <Unit193> rbasak: Regarding Firefox.  It's actually worse than that, as firefox is up to date in zesty but isn't even up to date in -proposed.
[21:16] <Unit193> !info firefox artful-proposed
[21:16] <Unit193> !info firefox zesty
[21:17] <Unit193> rbasak: Personally as long as it's in -proposed I don't really mind, as I've been using http://paste.openstack.org/show/620441 for the past couple cycles.
[21:24] <tsimonq2> jackpot51: ping
[21:33] <mwhudson> Laney: wtf!
[21:34] <mwhudson> Laney: at least i'm glad i didn't bother trying to work out what was going on any more than that, i'd never have guessed it was cloud-init
[21:39] <jackpot51> Hello tsimonq2
[21:41] <tsimonq2> jackpot51: Hey there, so re: bug 1699216, sorry for not getting back to you, I wasn't subscribed to the bug...
[21:41] <tsimonq2> jackpot51: Just wanted to make sure you saw my response on it :)
[21:41] <jackpot51> Yep, I saw it. I left a comment for ubuntu-release, to explain the reasoning for merging patches to accountsservice, but not to gnome-control-center and gnome-initial-setup
[21:42] <tsimonq2> Ok
[21:42] <tsimonq2> jackpot51: In any case, it would be great if you could make those diffs into debdiffs (with a changelog entry and putting your patch in debian/patches) and add a DEP-3 header to it
[21:43] <tsimonq2> s/it/them/ (last instance)
[21:44] <jackpot51> I will try. It should be really close to that
[21:44] <tsimonq2> Ok.
[21:44] <tsimonq2> (it is)