[08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> hello doko I'm not sure if openjdk8 in debian/ubuntu armhf is broken or not
[08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> Error: missing `server' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-armhf/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so'.
[08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> Please install or use the JRE or JDK that contains these missing components.
[08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> it is not even installable :(
[08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gdal&arch=armhf
[08:53] <Laney> what's a $ prefixed rule in a makefile? "$./KeyboardNames.pl:"
[08:58] <Laney> and, well, how do I invoke it? :-)
[09:15] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: I'll have a look
[09:15] <doko> tjaalton: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apitrace/7.1+git20170623.d38a69d6+repack-1build1   triggered by new glibc
[09:15] <doko> infinity: ^^^
[09:17] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks doko, ubuntu seems to be not affected, if this helps
[09:17] <doko> tjaalton: mesa b-d on llvm-5? are you aware that it ftbfs?
[09:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm seriously thinking about using gcc-6 for llvm and arm64/ppc64el
[09:41] <juliank> xnox: What happened to apt 1.4.6~16.10.1 in zesty-proposed? Your last comment was: "And will redo zesty upgrade test again to make sure units are started for the upgrade timer."
[09:42] <juliank> 1.4.7 entered stretch a few weeks ago, I'd like to get this over into zesty eventually :)
[10:44] <doko> jbicha, didrocks: there are glib2.0 autopkg test failures on ppc64el and s390x triggerd by glibc and elfutils
[10:44] <doko> infinity, xnox: ^^^
[10:45] <tjaalton> doko: yep, but rc2 is available
[10:46] <doko> tjaalton: sure, if you can fix bugs in this version ...
[10:48] <Unit193> Specifically 1691908 would be awesome to fix.
[11:20] <tjaalton> doko: apitrace has a bug for the ftbfs on debian too, i'll have a look
[11:24] <tjaalton> though it was due to gcc7 I think
[11:43] <fossfreedom_> hi cyphermox , Laney - I saw that the latest upload of ubiquity in artful is having a little bit of trouble building.  Just wondering - any chance of my PR sneaking in with the next upload please? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntubudgie-dev/ubiquity/fix_lp_1713662/+merge/329911
[11:46] <Laney> Probably. And I know.
[11:46] <Laney> I got 5 emails about it....
[11:46] <Laney> No, 6
[12:42] <dgadomski> hey doko, re bug #1638695, have you been doing any benchmarks of the artful builds after your changes?
[12:42] <doko> dgadomski: no
[12:43] <dgadomski> doko: ok, I'll check it out and share the results in the bug
[12:46] <doko> dgadomski: sure, but remember that pie is turned on by default in artful
[12:46] <dgadomski> doko: ack, thanks
[13:00] <xnox> infinity, dpkg -S xlocale.h -> libc6-dev:s390x: /usr/include/xlocale.h is not true with new glibc in proposed. Is that intentional, or accidental?
[13:01] <xnox> infinity, autoconf, in prelude, fails to find perl.h because conftest includes xlocale.h
[13:01] <xnox> infinity, not sure if i'm supposed to fix autoconf/perl/prelude or if libc6-dev should continue to ship xlocale.h
[13:04] <xnox> infinity, doko - found changelog saying "Don't include xlocale.h. If necessary, include locale.h instead." hence intentional.
[13:07] <xnox> i think we need perl rebuild, to drop #define I_XLOCALE from its config.h
[13:07] <xnox> testing.
[13:12] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, sync perl instead
[13:13] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg, right that could do it too. But will wait for my local test build to finish, to make sure that a rebuild of perl will resolve my issue
[13:13] <LocutusOfBorg> with perl we shoudl also sync... let me check
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> rename
[13:14] <xnox> huh? rename what?
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> I was going to sync, but autopkgtests are already fully
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> src:rename
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> if we have to rebuild, better sync instead
[13:45] <cyphermox> Laney: I'll fix ubiquity, unless you already started..
[13:46] <doko> rbasak, jamespage: there was no tomcat8 merge for a while ...
[13:55] <Laney> cyphermox: sure did
[13:56] <cyphermox> yeah I just noticed
[13:57] <cyphermox> pull, I merged fossfreedom's code
[13:57] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I would say tomcat8 needs a sync, not a merge
[13:57] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: no
[13:58] <tjaalton> tomcat8.5 breaks dogtag-pki
[13:58] <tjaalton> and tomcatjss
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, tomcat8 "can" be syncd, because the delta is useless
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> not "we should sync it right now" :)
[13:59] <tjaalton> you'd just get it stuck in proposed because of failing freeipa-server autopkgtest
[13:59] <tjaalton> so what's the point of syncing it then?
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm I still just mean, that it can be syncd, not that we should sync it
[14:00] <Laney> okey dokey
[14:02] <LocutusOfBorg> I honestly think that tomcat-8 needs to be syncd on next release cycle, are the two above useful packages?
[14:02] <tjaalton> next cycle is when redhat should get dogtag/tomcatjss ported over
[14:03] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm patching security stuff on old tomcat might become painful soon :)
[14:03] <tjaalton> non-lts releases still
[14:12] <tjaalton> doko: uploaded new apitrace to debian, fixes build
[14:14] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg, rebuild results in I_XLOCLAE not defined; synced perl over.
[14:21] <rbasak> tjaalton: would you mind noting that on https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html please?
[14:23] <tjaalton> rbasak: sure
[14:24] <rbasak> Thanks! As I read the scrollbackscroll I knew there was a reason but couldn't remember why, and I figure that's a good place to note it for reference the next time I'm asked :)
[14:30] <tjaalton> yeah, it's there now
[14:30] <LargePrime> juliank, regarding your gnutls patch, how can i test it?  i have to add a repo, right?  how can i pull just that one updated library?
[14:31] <juliank> LargePrime: It's all explained in the wiki page that was linked in the bug report https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
[14:32] <juliank> LargePrime: Just with zesty instead of xenial, of course
[14:32] <juliank> LargePrime: Summary: Add sources.list entry, add preferences entry, and then apt install libgnutls30/zesty-proposed
[14:32] <LargePrime> thanks again
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> interesting xnox
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg>  #   include <xlocale.h>
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg>              ^~~~~~~~~~~
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> this happens in libguestfs
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> so, I presume until perl is rebuilt, mostly everything will FTBFS?
[14:52] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg, yes.
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/336044681/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-ppc64el.libguestfs_1%3A1.34.6-7ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[14:53] <xnox> /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/perl/5.26/CORE/perl.h:738:13: fatal error: xlocale.h: No such file or directory
[14:53] <xnox> yeah, that's the badger.
[14:53] <LargePrime> juliank, from that wiki 'sudo aptitude -t zesty-proposed' gives 'sudo: aptitude: command not found'
[14:54] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for cathing it early!
[14:55] <LargePrime> i dont like pain when i cath
[15:03] <seb128> bdmurray, hey, I put some update-notifier fixes for wayland up for review on https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/update-notifier/wayland-no-pkexec/+merge/330278 https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/update-notifier/work-under-wayland/+merge/330271 , would be nice if you could review them today I would like to upload this week so we start getting more feedback about issues under wayland, atm users don't get prompted by apport to report those
[15:03] <bdmurray> seb128: I saw and will have a look today
[15:04] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks!
[15:04] <juliank> LargePrime: You don't need to do that
[15:05] <juliank> LargePrime: It would just show you what is available
[15:05] <juliank> LargePrime: Just apt install libgnutls30/zesty-proposed :D
[15:27] <doko> xnox: perl ftbfs on i386. test failure. give back?
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> "06_timed.t" yes, I would say to give back
[15:30]  * LocutusOfBorg does it, I think this happened already in the past
[15:32] <xnox> tah for monitoring
[16:00] <bdmurray> xnox: have you seen bug 1713984? I just had a very long boot myself
[16:02] <xnox> bdmurray, yes and i think i know how to fix it. but not fixed yet.
[16:03] <bdmurray> xnox: Shall I target to artful? assign to you?
[16:03] <infinity> xnox: Definitely intentional.
[16:03] <xnox> infinity, tah. fix in perl is inflight - rebuild should make perl.h sane again.
[16:03] <xnox> bdmurray, yes please.
[16:08] <LargePrime> juliank, I have it working.  patch works great!  my question about the wiki command had to do with noting some sort of error on the wiki.
[16:08] <LargePrime> also thanks
[16:17] <doko> infinity: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/glibc/+bug/1715366
[16:17] <doko> but the cross-build fails later with linker errors
[16:27] <Anticom> Hi all. Are packages published on *.ubuntu.com on topic here?
[16:28] <Anticom> It's really bugging me, that libgtest-dev is not being built in a post-install hook
[16:28] <doko> this is not Gentoo
[16:28] <Anticom> doko: ?
[16:30] <ogra_> doko, tell that to the dkms maintainers :P
[16:30] <LocutusOfBorg> Anticom, we cant bild libgtest-dev
[16:30] <LocutusOfBorg>   * control: Switch to cmake (upstream deprecated autoconf build).  Build
[16:30] <LocutusOfBorg>     only static library (remove libgtest0 package).  Install full source
[16:30] <LocutusOfBorg>     and example files.
[16:31] <LocutusOfBorg> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/g/googletest/unstable_changelog
[16:31] <LocutusOfBorg> packages depending on it should build it when needed locally
[16:31] <LocutusOfBorg> http://bugs.debian.org/662989
[16:31] <Anticom> LocutusOfBorg: Well maybe i was not precise. Afaik you're supposed to invoke cmake after installing libgtest-dev yourself to produce the *.so's etc. However the package depends on cmake already iirc and debs do support post-install triggers don't they? so why not trigger the cmake 'build' after the package has been installed?
[16:31] <LocutusOfBorg> no, a package you maintain, that needs libgtest-dev should just include its cmake file, and live happy
[16:32] <Anticom> LocutusOfBorg: So you mean adding gtest via cmake's add_subdirectory in order to build it as a target before linking against it?
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> that one, yes
[16:33] <Anticom> hm, doesn't sound very convenient. However as i said i don't understand why everyone should build libgtest themselves anyway
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> because providing a system shared library failed
[16:34] <LocutusOfBorg> and google told us to remove it because it can't work
[16:34] <LocutusOfBorg> even the static one
[16:34] <LocutusOfBorg> you will find references to google/debian bugs if you search
[16:34] <Anticom> Yea I get that, i've read that myself (in the google docs). However i'm suggesting to invoke cmake after the sources have been installed in a post-install trigger
[16:35] <Anticom> Or wouldn't that work either?
[16:35] <LocutusOfBorg> nope, this is not Gentoo :)
[16:35] <LocutusOfBorg> the latter, it wouldn't work
[16:35] <Anticom> Bc this is typically what i do. I just sudo cmake where it's installed
[16:35] <Anticom> and with my projects i didn't have any issues
[16:35] <infinity> I suspect the concern here is that you need gtest built with the same compiler/linker options as your project.
[16:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't remember the exact issue, maybe some ABI
[16:36] <Anticom> Hm well, too bad
[16:36] <Anticom> Thank you guys for the elaboration :)
[16:36] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, probably, the ABI is not stable, building with different CFLAGS/LDFLAGS/GCC and so on changes the gtest library
[16:36] <infinity> Compiling it at install time would give the same results as us delivering a binary package to you -- it would have defaults that might be wrong.
[16:36] <LocutusOfBorg> exactly, but again, too much time has been since I looked at gtest
[16:36] <LocutusOfBorg> now it is googletest btw
[16:37] <Anticom> LocutusOfBorg: nope, still libgtest-dev
[16:37] <LocutusOfBorg> the source package is src:googletest that provides the libgtest-dev libraru
[16:37] <Anticom> ah i see
[16:38] <Anticom> okay thanks guys
[16:38] <LocutusOfBorg> you are welcome
[16:39] <LocutusOfBorg> hello perl, welcome back on i386
[16:39] <LocutusOfBorg> publisher run and FUN
[17:24] <juliank> infinity: LocutusOfBorg: I must say though that not shipping the library is a bit annoying. Other distributions do ship it, and the CMake plugin for gtest relies on the library, so you end up with ugly workarounds like the first 22 lines here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/tree/test/libapt/CMakeLists.txt
[17:24] <juliank> (re gtest)
[17:24] <juliank> Although if everyone else would just switch over that would work as well
[17:44] <doko> infinity: any idea about https://launchpadlibrarian.net/336065945/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-amd64.cross-toolchain-base_18ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz ?
[17:44] <doko> not architecture specific
[17:50] <doko> argh, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/5.4.1-12ubuntu3/+build/13343450 ... SIGSEGV now undefined. header moved?
[18:23] <infinity> doko: Probably a side-effect of 9e78f6f6e7134a5f299cc8de77370218f8019237
[18:25] <infinity> Though, how it manifests only in our cross builds is something to look into.
[19:35] <jackpot51> tsimonq2: I have added a debdiff file here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1699216
[19:35] <jackpot51> Let me know if that is what you need
[20:10] <LocutusOfBorg> juliank, http://sources.debian.net/src/pcl/1.8.1%2Bdfsg1-2/cmake/Modules/FindGtest.cmake/?hl=27#L27
[20:12] <LocutusOfBorg> you are probably right: https://gist.github.com/oneamtu/3734295
[20:28] <juliank> LocutusOfBorg: The offiical FindGTest.cmake shipped with CMake is different: https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/blob/master/Modules/FindGTest.cmake
[20:32] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe we should make it smarter and submit the patch upstream
[20:34] <juliank> LocutusOfBorg: Probably
[20:35] <juliank> but it's work and it takes time
[20:35] <LocutusOfBorg> the cmake module maintainer might want to do it
[20:35] <juliank> might have migrated to meson by the time it's widely available :)
[21:08] <tsimonq2> jackpot51: ack, I'll look in a few hours. Thanks!
[21:13] <catbus> jsalisbury: Hi, could you please advise what other kernel to test for bug 1646277?
[22:24] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, are you aware of missing xlocale.h ? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/336088033/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-ppc64el.boinc_7.9.0+dfsg~git20170906+r23843~r10~ubuntu17.10.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[22:24] <LocutusOfBorg> this smells like a glibc regression
[22:26] <jsalisbury> catbus, sorry for the delay on that bug.  I'll review it and see what the next steps should be.
[22:26] <catbus> jsalisbury: thank you!