cpaelzer | apw; the hint you added yesterday to make the pp6e4l vagrant-mutate test pass (testbed error) can be removed | 05:31 |
---|---|---|
cpaelzer | apw: the bug is (supposed to) be fixed | 05:31 |
slangasek | cpaelzer: it was a skiptest hint so it can be removed anyway - thanks, I'll nuke that one and a number of others I had added (and rerun the tests) | 06:05 |
cpaelzer | slangasek: ok | 06:49 |
cpaelzer | slangasek: just wanted to make sure we don't skip too much forever | 06:49 |
apw | cpaelzer, na i just skiptest'd that one package to let it go, it had done all its other tests ok so that was safe | 06:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-md5.js [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.3.4-1] | 07:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-md5.js [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.3.4-1] (no packageset) | 07:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-md5.js [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.4-1] | 07:42 | |
slangasek | jbicha: you synced a gnome-boxes which has unsatisfiable build-deps? | 08:13 |
doko | slangasek: please could you override the failing snapcraft test triggered by lxml? it's unrelated, see https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapcraft-autopkgtest-failure/2007 | 08:54 |
* LocutusOfBorg goes fixing gnome-boxes --> slangasek, jbicha | 08:57 | |
* LocutusOfBorg goes fixing gnome-dictionary and hopefully gnome-documents | 09:09 | |
LocutusOfBorg | is publisher having a sad day? | 09:33 |
cjwatson | not particularly | 09:35 |
LocutusOfBorg | maybe just slow... I waited almost one hour, and some node stuff is still "accepted" | 09:36 |
cjwatson | couple of long runs but I think that's because it ended up publishing several stable pockets | 09:37 |
cjwatson | ah, daily Contents updates, that would explain it | 09:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | seems good now, thanks | 09:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | doko, sync python3.6? | 09:42 |
doko | LocutusOfBorg: no! please stop syncing for a while unnecessary stuff so that the autopkg testers can catch up | 09:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | doko, I'm *asking* not *syncing* :) | 09:54 |
doko | well, I see your answers on artful-changes ... :-/ | 09:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | gnome-* is fixed now, and should not trigger tests | 09:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | netcdf was broken, I had to fix it | 09:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | boinc was broken by glibc | 09:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm trying only to sync stuff without testsuite or to fix broken tests (e.g. mechanicalsoup I'm working right now) | 09:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | did you really fix llvm? <3 | 09:58 |
jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: gnome-dictionary probably could have used a FFe | 10:33 |
jbicha | syncing gtranslator to match… | 10:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | I don't see new features in the diff | 10:40 |
jbicha | the problem is the removed libgdict library not added features | 10:45 |
jbicha | LP: #1715612 | 10:46 |
ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1715612 in gnome-dictionary (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync gnome-dictionary 3.25.90-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1715612 | 10:46 |
Laney | I just mass-retried all the ppc64el/artful regressions | 11:45 |
Laney | now the the images should be fixed wrt cloud-init | 11:46 |
Laney | hopefully will get one or two more passes | 11:46 |
ahasenack | hi, I don't understand why my bind9 upload is stuck in artful-proposed ( 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.6ubuntu1). All tests that pass have passed, but there is this line of text: "Invalidated by dependency". What does that mean? | 12:15 |
ahasenack | I see that present in other entries | 12:16 |
Laney | you need to wait for the listed package to become a candidate | 12:17 |
ahasenack | glibc, so nothing else will get through until glibc becomes a candidate? | 12:19 |
ahasenack | I see a few "regressions" in the glibc entry | 12:19 |
ahasenack | that's the whole archive almost? | 12:20 |
acheronuk | nothing that version depends on it | 12:25 |
acheronuk | e.g. bind9 has multiple: Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.26) | 12:26 |
xnox | ahasenack, it is weird that .deb got >=2.15 dependency but udebs got 2.26. Is the udeb build somehow build differently with much higher symbols? | 12:31 |
xnox | or shlibdeps not calculated right? | 12:31 |
ahasenack | nothing like that was touched in this upload | 12:33 |
xnox | sure, but the build is done against a new glibc. | 12:34 |
ahasenack | let me download the binaries | 12:34 |
ahasenack | xnox: built against libc from a-proposed, right? | 12:35 |
xnox | ahasenack, yes... everything is build against proposed. | 12:35 |
xnox | always. | 12:35 |
xnox | ahasenack, note previous build is similarly broken. e.g. libisccfg-export140_9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.5ubuntu1_amd64.deb depends on libc6 (>= 2.4) yet libisccfg-export140-udeb depends on libc6-udeb (>= 2.24) | 12:36 |
apw | that may be intentional of course | 12:36 |
xnox | imho, if the binaries are not built any different between .deb and .udeb cases, the dep may be bogus - or cunning. | 12:37 |
xnox | apw, right, if it is intentional, it is annoying =) | 12:37 |
xnox | hmmmm.... | 12:38 |
xnox | apw, libc6-udeb does not ship symbols file i wonder if shlibs based udeb dependencies is even a thing?! | 12:38 |
apw | if it has no symbols that probably explains the link to the latest major version | 12:51 |
=== klebers_ is now known as klebers | ||
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, I see you did some maven related work, do you have any clue for the failures? | 14:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm trying to debug it, and seems Debian is indeed fine, rebuilds work there | 14:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | some version mismatch, but I didn't find it (yet) | 14:16 |
LocutusOfBorg | I see latest maven-* uploads in Debian changed and fixed some build/runtime dependencies, so maybe this is the clue | 14:16 |
doko | maybe ask before you upload? | 14:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | I still think I can solve it | 14:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | but I don't want to do the same job twice | 14:54 |
xnox | LocutusOfBorg, do you do local test builds before syncing? | 15:04 |
xnox | you should, we are post-feature freeze and post debian import freeze thus we have stopped importing things from debian en-masse. | 15:04 |
xnox | only specific targetted fixes should be synced, not in general anything that got uploaded. | 15:05 |
xnox | LocutusOfBorg, why do we need exec-maven-plugin 1.6.0-4? | 15:05 |
xnox | the changelog is irrelevant for ubuntu, at this point in the cycle no? | 15:06 |
xnox | LocutusOfBorg, why are you syncing so many minor updates? can they wait until 18.04 is open? | 15:08 |
xnox | e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gant/1.9.11-7 is minor update, not fixing any bugs. | 15:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flashcache (xenial-proposed/universe) [3.1.3+git20150701-2ubuntu2 => 3.1.3+git20150701-2ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 15:27 | |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg, doko: no, I uploaded what I did to try to un-break the builds that were already stuck in -proposed; the packages I uploaded, if I installed the sid binaries, were enough to unbreak the build for me, but those themselves fail to build. maven is some sort of bootstrap nightmare | 15:40 |
doko | slangasek, LocutusOfBorg: yes, I was trying to resolve that for 17.10. CCed you on the last email. I hope tdaitx picks this up | 15:42 |
slangasek | ok | 15:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, I did try the bootstrap and it didn't work | 15:46 |
LocutusOfBorg | I mean, copy the debian package from debian, no change rebuild it, install and no change rebuild again | 15:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | it failed | 15:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'll have a deeper look after work | 15:51 |
tdaitx | doko, slangasek: just went through the log, yeah, I was looking into maven last night, had a late start today so I'm still picking up from yesterday | 16:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 16:06 |
SpamapS | bdmurray: weird, so somehow doing 'debuild' on a xenial box is removing that gcc build-depends from the zesty python3.6 package. No idea why | 16:29 |
* SpamapS is building a zesty chroot to try it in now | 16:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfsprogs [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.3.0+nmu1ubuntu4.1] | 16:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfsprogs [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3.0+nmu1ubuntu1.1] | 16:37 | |
SpamapS | bdmurray: Hey, I figured out the build-dep thing. The rules file added that to the synced package from Debian, but when one builds the source package in Ubuntu, that gcc build-dep is not added. It's also not needed, it's for backports. | 17:34 |
SpamapS | bdmurray: so, if you haven't rejected the other one yet... | 17:34 |
SpamapS | oh I see it was rejected | 17:35 |
* SpamapS re-uploads | 17:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.5 (zesty-proposed/main) [3.5.3-1 => 3.5.3-1ubuntu0~17.04.0] (core) | 17:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.5 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.5.3-1ubuntu0~17.04.0] | 17:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-95.118] (core, kernel) | 20:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-95.118] | 20:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!