[06:31] slangasek, can you please update your givaro hint? [06:36] LocutusOfBorg: I *could*, but it would really be better if someone would fix the failing autopkgtest since it's trivial [06:40] slangasek, allow stderr? [06:44] LocutusOfBorg, slangasek: looks like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GCC7 [06:46] I don't get the issue, should the package be fixed or is it a gcc bug? [06:48] LocutusOfBorg: well with GCC 6, it was a warning of an upcoming ABI break, so allow-stderr was sufficient [06:49] but now that we now have GCC 7.2, I'm not sure if we need to rename/rebuild libraries/ transition [06:50] LocutusOfBorg: I've add givaro to the wiki [06:51] I don't think to be the right person to solve this, I'm giving up :) [07:56] slangasek, please kick ruby-dep-selector, needs sourceful upload, blocking geocode migration, RC buggy in debian #870306 [07:56] Debian bug 870306 in src:ruby-dep-selector "ruby-dep-selector FTBFS with libgecode-dev 5.1.0-2" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/870306 [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashcache [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.1.3+git20150701-2ubuntu3] [08:02] hello doko, I need some automake-1.15 fixes that are only in Debian... how do you feel about a merge? [08:08] or anybody else, do you foresee an issue with an automake merge? 1.15 to 1.15.1 seems a bugfix only release [08:25] * LocutusOfBorg open bugs [11:01] sorry to bother you - anybody time to consider FFE in bug 1706248 for approval (hanging around 11 days now)? [11:01] bug 1706248 in slof (Ubuntu) "[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1706248 === freyes__ is now known as freyes [12:07] hi, any update on glibc going through excuses and thus unblocking other packages? like bind9? [12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: flake8-docstrings (artful-proposed/primary) [1.1.0-1] [12:53] this is a new leaf package, feel free to reject in case you don't like it ^^ :) it is a style checker [14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.33+17.04 => 2.34+17.04] (no packageset) [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.33 => 2.34] (no packageset) [14:16] sil2100 mind allowing those in? ^ [14:16] sergiusens: hey, on it in a minute [14:19] ahasenack: are all autopkg tests for packages maintained by you or your team succeeding and not blocking? [14:19] doko: is that a general question, or a follow-up question to my bind9/glibc remark? [14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.34+17.04] [14:24] thanks sil2100 [14:25] ahasenack: I didn't see your bind9 issue. just making sure that other packages are in good shape for the migration [14:25] I don't know if there are any ... [14:25] doko: bind9 is stuck for a few days because of the glibc upload [14:25] * doko goes fixing apw's debian-installer upload ... [14:26] ahasenack: you know update_excuses? [14:26] yes, I'm looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html [14:26] good [14:27] sergiusens: hmm, I see two uploads of snapcraft 2.34 for xenial [14:28] sergiusens: one from 13 minutes ago and one 20 hours ago [14:28] sergiusens: I guess the newest one is preferred? [14:28] I'm look at the kcreenlocker regression on for glibc. so far on some quick testing, the regression doesn't seem to break my screenlocker on real hardware or a VM [14:28] *looking [14:29] doko, are you ok with an automake merge? [14:30] it should be only fixes, no new features, and I'm interested in perl foo fixes and something else to fix games [14:30] (some autoreconf odering issue= [14:31] sil2100 yes, the latest one, on Sunday I asked for the one from 20 hours ago to be nuked :-) [14:31] Ah ;) [14:31] Ok [14:31] I guess it got lost in the stream of messages ;-) [14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.34] [14:37] LocutusOfBorg: sure, but how many autopkg tests will that trigger? [14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.34] [14:51] doko, how can I find the number out? [14:52] queues are empty right now, this might even be a good time [14:54] * LocutusOfBorg uploads [14:55] Laney, question: how can I find out how many autopkgtests a package foo triggers? [14:57] LocutusOfBorg: ruby-dep-selector has reverse-build-depends which is why I hadn't kicked it out already. What should happen to ruby-solve and berkshelf? I don't want to trade p-m queue size for ftbfs [14:58] LocutusOfBorg: automake 1.15.1> I absolutely see an issue with that, half the archive uses automake at build-time and that can introduce an unknown number of build failures [15:00] slangasek: do we know which autopkg tests were ignored the last time when perl and glibc migrated? [15:01] doko: I didn't skiptest anything for perl [15:01] doko: oh, yes I did - but it was only systemd [15:02] doko: and I don't see a recent glibc skiptest [15:02] then this sounds like still a lot of things to do ... [15:03] yes [15:04] slangasek, I went to the 20k diff for automake, 99% is copyright updates, 0.5% is the braces escapes, one is the ubuntu patch [15:04] some new tests [15:04] I know people are using it, this is why I asked here before, and I'm pretty sure we will be fine [15:05] >What should happen to ruby-solve and berkshelf? [15:05] they are going out from buster too [15:07] speaking for glibc/curl, xandikos on amd64 and i386 ; casync on i386 have been regressed in release, so maybe an hint is appreciated [15:10] (that automake is in Debian testing since 2.5 months or so, the last upload merged part of the Ubuntu delta, this is also why I care, other than two bugfixes I need) [15:10] LocutusOfBorg: unless you're planning to do a rebuild test and show that the new automake doesn't regress buildability, nack on this merge during freeze, which only unblocks a single package from -proposed [15:11] how can I do in a ppa? [15:11] I tested it, but I can't rebuild the whole ubuntu archive [15:11] you'd hit a size limit doing it in a ppa [15:12] you could discuss with doko how to include this in a rebuild test [15:12] but I don't see this as a priority at all for 17.10 [15:12] so, please kick it out from proposed then [15:12] but as usual, I quickly fixup regressions [15:17] slangasek: hi. would you be able to look at bug #1716381 [15:17] bug 1716381 in plasma-framework (Ubuntu Artful) "[FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.38.0 into the Artful Archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1716381 [15:18] acheronuk, I think tsimonq2 is asking for a qtbase-* foo too, so maybe you can do them together? [15:19] LocutusOfBorg: no heard anything on that, but we could coordinate if so. still would like a decision in principle on just this anyway [15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pantomime-clojure (artful-proposed/primary) [2.1.0+dfsg-1] [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ring-ssl-clojure (artful-proposed/primary) [0.3.0-1] [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-docstrings [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring-ssl-clojure [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pantomime-clojure [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0+dfsg-1] [15:25] LocutusOfBorg: and there are only a few frameworks that would require a rebuild for a Qt update, so I would perhaps rather get this through soon [15:25] acheronuk: done [15:26] slangasek: hello! Could you later review the google sdk packages at partner? [15:26] (unapproved) [15:27] sil2100: that didn't go away while I was on vacation? ;) [15:27] slangasek: thank you. :) [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pantomime-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [2.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring-ssl-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset) [15:27] slangasek: no, apparently partner is still a thing ;p [15:27] sil2100: which releases? [15:27] zesty and xenial [15:27] And trusty [15:28] sil2100: should 169 be copied from artful-proposed to artful? [15:28] slangasek: I'd say not yet, I tested it myself but maybe the google folks would like to try it as well [15:28] And I'll poke them once we have all series in -proposed [15:30] k [15:30] slangasek: thanks! [15:32] sil2100: do you want to fix the spelling of 'backport' in the zesty changelog? [15:32] slangasek: just so I don't have an unfortunate misunderstanding, is "This looks sensible to me", an ok to upload later? [15:32] slangasek: oh, did I mess up? [15:32] acheronuk: yes [15:32] slangasek: TY :) [15:32] acheronuk: the marking it 'triaged' is also what this means :) [15:32] Oh god [15:32] slangasek: yeah, let me quickly re-upload ;p [15:33] * acheronuk looks for the "doh!" emoticon [15:33] missed that [15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: flake8-polyfill (artful-proposed/primary) [1.0.1-1] [15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-cloud-sdk [source] (zesty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] [15:35] sil2100: same spelling in xenial [15:35] slangasek: yeah, I need all 3 fixed [15:35] On it now [15:36] ok [15:36] something is needed to finish the clojure flake work ^^ [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-cloud-sdk [source] (trusty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] [15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [163.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset) [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (zesty-proposed/partner) [163.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (no packageset) [15:42] slangasek: re-uploaded, sorry for the hiccup [15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (trusty-proposed/partner) [163.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (no packageset) [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pantomime-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0+dfsg-1] [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring-ssl-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-polyfill [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (zesty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] [15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] [15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (trusty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] [15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.12 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] (core) [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.12 => 1.66.13] (core) [16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] [16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.13] [16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flake8-polyfill [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset) [16:08] cyphermox: grub2/zesty on its way also? and is it possible to spell out a "how to test under pmem" test case that's less opaque? (if not, I understand) [16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.12 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] (core) [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] [16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] (core) [16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-95.118~14.04.1] (kernel) [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] === nacc_ is now known as nacc [17:41] another round of closure/flake fixes ^^, this should unblock other three packages and then finish [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring-defaults-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset) [17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-polyfill [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] [17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring-defaults-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.1-1] [17:49] slangasek: no, it's not, sadly [17:49] but yeah I'll upload the same thing for zesty [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset) [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-95.118~14.04.1] [18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flake8-docstrings [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (zesty-proposed/main) [2.441.4 => 2.441.5] (desktop-core) [19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-docstrings [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-1] === tdaitx_ is now known as tdaitx === andyrock_ is now known as andyrock === stokachu_ is now known as stokachu === LocutusO- is now known as LocutusOfBorg [20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: trapperkeeper-status-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted trapperkeeper-status-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1ubuntu1] [21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.14 => 2.408.15] (desktop-core) [22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.441.5] [22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.15] [22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppetdb [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.4.1-1] (no packageset)