[06:31] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, can you please update your givaro hint?
[06:36] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: I *could*, but it would really be better if someone would fix the failing autopkgtest since it's trivial
[06:40] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, allow stderr?
[06:44] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg, slangasek: looks like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GCC7
[06:46] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't get the issue, should the package be fixed or is it a gcc bug?
[06:48] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: well with GCC 6, it was a warning of an upcoming ABI break, so allow-stderr was sufficient
[06:49] <ginggs> but now that we now have GCC 7.2, I'm not sure if we need to rename/rebuild libraries/ transition
[06:50] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: I've add givaro to the wiki
[06:51] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't think to be the right person to solve this, I'm giving up :)
[07:56] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, please kick ruby-dep-selector, needs sourceful upload, blocking geocode migration, RC buggy in debian #870306
[07:56] <ubot5`> Debian bug 870306 in src:ruby-dep-selector "ruby-dep-selector FTBFS with libgecode-dev 5.1.0-2" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/870306
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashcache [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.1.3+git20150701-2ubuntu3]
[08:02] <LocutusOfBorg> hello doko, I need some automake-1.15 fixes that are only in Debian... how do you feel about a merge?
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> or anybody else, do you foresee an issue with an automake merge? 1.15 to 1.15.1 seems a bugfix only release
[08:25]  * LocutusOfBorg open bugs
[11:01] <cpaelzer> sorry to bother you - anybody time to consider FFE in bug 1706248 for approval (hanging around 11 days now)?
[11:01] <ubot5`> bug 1706248 in slof (Ubuntu) "[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
[12:07] <ahasenack> hi, any update on glibc going through excuses and thus unblocking other packages? like bind9?
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: flake8-docstrings (artful-proposed/primary) [1.1.0-1]
[12:53] <LocutusOfBorg> this is a new leaf package, feel free to reject in case you don't like it ^^ :) it is a style checker
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.33+17.04 => 2.34+17.04] (no packageset)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.33 => 2.34] (no packageset)
[14:16] <sergiusens> sil2100 mind allowing those in? ^
[14:16] <sil2100> sergiusens: hey, on it in a minute
[14:19] <doko> ahasenack: are all autopkg tests for packages maintained by you or your team succeeding and not blocking?
[14:19] <ahasenack> doko: is that a general question, or a follow-up question to my bind9/glibc remark?
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.34+17.04]
[14:24] <sergiusens> thanks sil2100
[14:25] <doko> ahasenack: I didn't see your bind9 issue. just making sure that other packages are in good shape for the migration
[14:25] <doko> I don't know if there are any ...
[14:25] <ahasenack> doko: bind9 is stuck for a few days because of the glibc upload
[14:25]  * doko goes fixing apw's debian-installer upload ...
[14:26] <doko> ahasenack: you know update_excuses?
[14:26] <ahasenack> yes, I'm looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html
[14:26] <doko> good
[14:27] <sil2100> sergiusens: hmm, I see two uploads of snapcraft 2.34 for xenial
[14:28] <sil2100> sergiusens: one from 13 minutes ago and one 20 hours ago
[14:28] <sil2100> sergiusens: I guess the newest one is preferred?
[14:28] <acheronuk> I'm look at the kcreenlocker regression on for glibc. so far on some quick testing, the regression doesn't seem to break my screenlocker on real hardware or a VM
[14:28] <acheronuk> *looking
[14:29] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, are you ok with an automake merge?
[14:30] <LocutusOfBorg> it should be only fixes, no new features, and I'm interested in perl foo fixes and something else to fix games
[14:30] <LocutusOfBorg> (some autoreconf odering issue=
[14:31] <sergiusens> sil2100 yes, the latest one, on Sunday I asked for the one from 20 hours ago to be nuked :-)
[14:31] <sil2100> Ah ;)
[14:31] <sil2100> Ok
[14:31] <sergiusens> I guess it got lost in the stream of messages ;-)
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.34]
[14:37] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: sure, but how many autopkg tests will that trigger?
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.34]
[14:51] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, how can I find the number out?
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> queues are empty right now, this might even be a good time
[14:54]  * LocutusOfBorg uploads
[14:55] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, question: how can I find out how many autopkgtests a package foo triggers?
[14:57] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: ruby-dep-selector has reverse-build-depends which is why I hadn't kicked it out already.  What should happen to ruby-solve and berkshelf?  I don't want to trade p-m queue size for ftbfs
[14:58] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: automake 1.15.1> I absolutely see an issue with that, half the archive uses automake at build-time and that can introduce an unknown number of build failures
[15:00] <doko> slangasek: do we know which autopkg tests were ignored the last time when perl and glibc migrated?
[15:01] <slangasek> doko: I didn't skiptest anything for perl
[15:01] <slangasek> doko: oh, yes I did - but it was only systemd
[15:02] <slangasek> doko: and I don't see a recent glibc skiptest
[15:02] <doko> then this sounds like still a lot of things to do ...
[15:03] <slangasek> yes
[15:04] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I went to the 20k diff for automake, 99% is copyright updates, 0.5% is the braces escapes, one is the ubuntu patch
[15:04] <LocutusOfBorg> some new tests
[15:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I know people are using it, this is why I asked here before, and I'm pretty sure we will be fine
[15:05] <LocutusOfBorg> >What should happen to ruby-solve and berkshelf?
[15:05] <LocutusOfBorg> they are going out from buster too
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> speaking for glibc/curl, xandikos on amd64 and i386 ; casync on i386 have been regressed in release, so maybe an hint is appreciated
[15:10] <LocutusOfBorg> (that automake is in Debian testing since 2.5 months or so, the last upload merged part of the Ubuntu delta, this is also why I care, other than two bugfixes I need)
[15:10] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: unless you're planning to do a rebuild test and show that the new automake doesn't regress buildability, nack on this merge during freeze, which only unblocks a single package from -proposed
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> how can I do in a ppa?
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I tested it, but I can't rebuild the whole ubuntu archive
[15:11] <slangasek> you'd hit a size limit doing it in a ppa
[15:12] <slangasek> you could discuss with doko how to include this in a rebuild test
[15:12] <slangasek> but I don't see this as a priority at all for 17.10
[15:12] <LocutusOfBorg> so, please kick it out from proposed then
[15:12] <LocutusOfBorg> but as usual, I quickly fixup regressions
[15:17] <acheronuk> slangasek: hi. would you be able to look at bug #1716381
[15:17] <ubot5`> bug 1716381 in plasma-framework (Ubuntu Artful) "[FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.38.0 into the Artful Archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1716381
[15:18] <LocutusOfBorg> acheronuk, I think tsimonq2 is asking for a qtbase-* foo too, so maybe you can do them together?
[15:19] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: no heard anything on that, but we could coordinate if so. still would like a decision in principle on just this anyway
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pantomime-clojure (artful-proposed/primary) [2.1.0+dfsg-1]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ring-ssl-clojure (artful-proposed/primary) [0.3.0-1]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-docstrings [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring-ssl-clojure [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pantomime-clojure [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0+dfsg-1]
[15:25] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: and there are only a few frameworks that would require a rebuild for a Qt update, so I would perhaps rather get this through soon
[15:25] <slangasek> acheronuk: done
[15:26] <sil2100> slangasek: hello! Could you later review the google sdk packages at partner?
[15:26] <sil2100> (unapproved)
[15:27] <slangasek> sil2100: that didn't go away while I was on vacation? ;)
[15:27] <acheronuk> slangasek: thank you. :)
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pantomime-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [2.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring-ssl-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[15:27] <sil2100> slangasek: no, apparently partner is still a thing ;p
[15:27] <slangasek> sil2100: which releases?
[15:27] <sil2100> zesty and xenial
[15:27] <sil2100> And trusty
[15:28] <slangasek> sil2100: should 169 be copied from artful-proposed to artful?
[15:28] <sil2100> slangasek: I'd say not yet, I tested it myself but maybe the google folks would like to try it as well
[15:28] <sil2100> And I'll poke them once we have all series in -proposed
[15:30] <slangasek> k
[15:30] <sil2100> slangasek: thanks!
[15:32] <slangasek> sil2100: do you want to fix the spelling of 'backport' in the zesty changelog?
[15:32] <acheronuk> slangasek: just so I don't have an unfortunate misunderstanding, is "This looks sensible to me", an ok to upload later?
[15:32] <sil2100> slangasek: oh, did I mess up?
[15:32] <slangasek> acheronuk: yes
[15:32] <acheronuk> slangasek: TY :)
[15:32] <slangasek> acheronuk: the marking it 'triaged' is also what this means :)
[15:32] <sil2100> Oh god
[15:32] <sil2100> slangasek: yeah, let me quickly re-upload ;p
[15:33]  * acheronuk looks for the "doh!" emoticon
[15:33] <acheronuk> missed that
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: flake8-polyfill (artful-proposed/primary) [1.0.1-1]
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-cloud-sdk [source] (zesty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]
[15:35] <slangasek> sil2100: same spelling in xenial
[15:35] <sil2100> slangasek: yeah, I need all 3 fixed
[15:35] <sil2100> On it now
[15:36] <slangasek> ok
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> something is needed to finish the clojure flake work ^^
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-cloud-sdk [source] (trusty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [163.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (zesty-proposed/partner) [163.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (no packageset)
[15:42] <sil2100> slangasek: re-uploaded, sorry for the hiccup
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (trusty-proposed/partner) [163.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (no packageset)
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pantomime-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0+dfsg-1]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring-ssl-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-polyfill [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (zesty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (trusty-proposed) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.12 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] (core)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.66.12 => 1.66.13] (core)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13]
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.13]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flake8-polyfill [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:08] <slangasek> cyphermox: grub2/zesty on its way also?  and is it possible to spell out a "how to test under pmem" test case that's less opaque?  (if not, I understand)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.12 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] (core)
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13] (core)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-95.118~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.13]
[17:41] <LocutusOfBorg> another round of closure/flake fixes ^^, this should unblock other three packages and then finish
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring-defaults-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-polyfill [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring-defaults-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[17:49] <cyphermox> slangasek: no, it's not, sadly
[17:49] <cyphermox> but yeah I'll upload the same thing for zesty
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-95.118~14.04.1]
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flake8-docstrings [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (zesty-proposed/main) [2.441.4 => 2.441.5] (desktop-core)
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flake8-docstrings [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-1]
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: trapperkeeper-status-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted trapperkeeper-status-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1ubuntu1]
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.14 => 2.408.15] (desktop-core)
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.441.5]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.15]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppetdb [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.4.1-1] (no packageset)