[00:00] <nacc> wgrant: thanks, I just put up a branch to test that. We've got a jenkins job that now does a few basic integration tests (incl. a from-scratch import of a known-working case), so we'll see how it goes :)
[08:11] <cpaelzer> hi, any idea why a project that has expiry enabled (https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+expirable-bugs) has bugs (https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/996798) that appear to qualify to all rules (https://help.launchpad.net/BugExpiry#Old.2C_unattended_and_incomplete.3F) but don't close?
[08:27] <wgrant> cpaelzer: It's because it has a bugwatch linked (see the bottom of the sidebar)
[08:35] <cpaelzer> interesting
[08:35] <cpaelzer> thanks wgrant
[08:35] <cpaelzer> in a discussion we also wondered, do the "people affected" matter?
[08:35] <wgrant> cpaelzer: No. https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry lists the conditions.
[08:36] <cpaelzer> I know but since bug watches were not in there ...
[08:36] <cpaelzer> ah now I get it
[08:36] <cpaelzer> bug watches actually is there
[08:36] <cpaelzer> just "after" the bullet points
[08:36] <wgrant> Not in the main list, for some reason
[08:36] <wgrant> But yeah, a bit weird
[08:36] <cpaelzer> also it is "watched in external trackers"
[08:37] <cpaelzer> with my new understanding I'd expect it to be like "Launchpad Bugs that watch external trackers are never candidates for expiry"
[08:37] <cpaelzer> th_huth: ^^
[08:43] <th_huth> ok, thanks for the explanation!
[18:06] <nacc> lplib wise, how do i get the codename of the current series? it seems like both current_series and developement_series_alias are 'devel'?
[18:13] <cjwatson> nacc: hmm?
[18:13] <cjwatson> In [2]: ubuntu.current_series
[18:13] <cjwatson> Out[2]: <distro_series at https://api.launchpad.net/devel/ubuntu/artful>
[18:14] <cjwatson> so ubuntu.current_series.name
[18:18] <nacc> cjwatson: thanks! sorry, was a bug in my code
[18:19] <cjwatson> np