[00:15] Oh jeez, that's right [00:15] I was going to do that [00:15] Doing now [00:21] flexiondotorg: Enjoy your new budgie-desktop. === bluesabre_ is now known as bluesabre [00:37] grr [00:37] I mean fossfreedom_ [00:37] flexiondotorg: You can enjoy budgie-desktop too :P [04:55] fossfreedom_: I forget, what's the holdup irt bug 1712047 being uploaded to Zesty? [04:55] bug 1712047 in budgie-welcome (Ubuntu Zesty) "SRU: Budgie-Welcome to support 2.18 series of webkit2gtk" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1712047 [06:38] hello [06:39] somebody [06:46] spuente, o/ [06:47] tsimonq2, I presume we are waiting on the new 2.18 series of webkit2gtk to be officially backported to 16.04 and 17.04 so that we can test against. === fossfreedom_ is now known as fossfreedom [18:43] fossfreedom: does the proposed budgie-welcome SRU work with current webkit2gtk 2.16? [18:52] hi im using the 16.04 remix upgraded to 10.4 and I cant seem to 1. pin apps to the budgie top bar, or 2 minimize apps and have them show up in the budgie top bar. Can someone help with that? [18:53] im not using plank because I came from solus and find the budgie dock / bar very functional, its part of my work flow [18:53] in solus you would just right click the apps title bar and click pin to task bar [18:54] and the open apps were just there [20:34] fossfreedom: But that's for backports, am I wrong? [21:06] tsimonq2, don't think so - jbicha - please can you clarify the proposed webkit2git v2.18 for 16.04 and 17.04. Is this for backports or is this part of the security uplift for 16.04 and 17.04. Thanks. [21:11] jbicha, yeah - the SRU version for zesty works for 2.16 as well as the "2.18" version (or at least the rebuilt version 2.17 version I tested with last week) [21:20] fossfreedom: then you should do the SRU now [21:21] you can try webkit2gtk 2.18 in a PPA if you want a test case using something like: [21:22] backportpackage -s artful -d zesty -u ppa:fossfreedom/webkit webkit2gtk [21:22] be aware that webkit2gtk takes a lot of space so maybe you just want to build it for amd64 only [21:23] oh - nice - I haven't seen that way to backport stuff before. I took the recent 2.17 version source and rebuilt it in our PPA. Does "backportpackage" do something similar? [21:24] yes but it's probably easier :) [21:24] lol [21:24] I usually add --suffix= as part of the command to get rid of an extra suffix [22:35] you can have "add this ppa" as part of your test plan. I did that for an SRU once for Firefox compatibility