[00:15] <tsimonq2> Oh jeez, that's right
[00:15] <tsimonq2> I was going to do that
[00:15] <tsimonq2> Doing now
[00:21] <tsimonq2> flexiondotorg: Enjoy your new budgie-desktop.
[00:37] <tsimonq2> grr
[00:37] <tsimonq2> I mean fossfreedom_
[00:37] <tsimonq2> flexiondotorg: You can enjoy budgie-desktop too :P
[04:55] <tsimonq2> fossfreedom_: I forget, what's the holdup irt bug 1712047 being uploaded to Zesty?
[06:38] <spuente> hello
[06:39] <spuente> somebody
[06:46] <fossfreedom_> spuente, o/
[06:47] <fossfreedom_> tsimonq2, I presume we are waiting on the new 2.18 series of webkit2gtk to be officially backported to 16.04 and 17.04 so that we can test against.
[18:43] <jbicha> fossfreedom: does the proposed budgie-welcome SRU work with current webkit2gtk 2.16?
[18:52] <gswain> hi im using the 16.04 remix upgraded to 10.4 and I cant seem to 1. pin apps to the budgie top bar, or 2 minimize apps and have them show up in the budgie top bar. Can someone help with that?
[18:53] <gswain> im not using plank because I came from solus and find the budgie dock / bar very functional, its part of my work flow
[18:53] <gswain> in solus you would just right click the apps title bar and click pin to task bar
[18:54] <gswain> and the open apps  were just there
[20:34] <tsimonq2> fossfreedom: But that's for backports, am I wrong?
[21:06] <fossfreedom> tsimonq2, don't think so - jbicha - please can you clarify the proposed webkit2git v2.18 for 16.04 and 17.04.  Is this for backports or is this part of the security uplift for 16.04 and 17.04.  Thanks.
[21:11] <fossfreedom> jbicha, yeah - the SRU version for zesty works for 2.16 as well as the "2.18" version (or at least the rebuilt version 2.17 version I tested with last week)
[21:20] <jbicha> fossfreedom: then you should do the SRU now
[21:21] <jbicha> you can try webkit2gtk 2.18 in a PPA if you want a test case using something like:
[21:22] <jbicha> backportpackage -s artful -d zesty -u ppa:fossfreedom/webkit webkit2gtk
[21:22] <jbicha> be aware that webkit2gtk takes a lot of space so maybe you just want to build it for amd64 only
[21:23] <fossfreedom> oh - nice - I haven't seen that way to backport stuff before.  I took the recent 2.17 version source and rebuilt it in our PPA.  Does "backportpackage" do something similar?
[21:24] <jbicha> yes but it's probably easier :)
[21:24] <fossfreedom> lol
[21:24] <jbicha> I usually add --suffix= as part of the command to get rid of an extra suffix
[22:35] <jbicha> you can have "add this ppa" as part of your test plan. I did that for an SRU once for Firefox compatibility