valorie | ooo, plasma beta, fancy! | 03:20 |
---|---|---|
valorie | has anyone tweeted that via kub. twitter, etc.? | 03:21 |
IrcsomeBot | <tsimonq2> I think it was retweeted but un-retweeted... | 03:24 |
valorie | uh | 03:25 |
valorie | ok | 03:25 |
valorie | will look in the twitter machine | 03:26 |
valorie | nope | 03:27 |
ahoneybun | valorie: Twitter and Mastodon is covered for 5.11 Beta | 09:00 |
ahoneybun | tsimonq2: I was then unsure if I was to tweet about the Beta yet | 09:26 |
valorie | I dunno if we should write about it on /news | 19:33 |
valorie | perhaps a little short story | 19:33 |
wxl | valorie: your trip was good? | 21:37 |
valorie | beyond excellent, actually | 21:39 |
valorie | strangely tired today however | 21:40 |
valorie | going for that second cuppa | 21:40 |
valorie | while the rain pours | 21:40 |
wxl | yay rain!!! | 21:40 |
wxl | sooo is it too early to bug you about the telegram bridge for #kubuntu? | 21:41 |
valorie | ha, good timing in fact | 21:52 |
wxl | yay :) | 21:52 |
wxl | let me know what you find out.. and thanks | 21:52 |
valorie | asking in #ubuntu-ops-team | 21:54 |
valorie | ahoneybun: thanks for doing that. I'm writing a short story on kub.org | 22:15 |
ahoneybun | we really need to define what we want to post officially | 22:15 |
ahoneybun | valorie: | 22:15 |
ahoneybun | sometimes we can't post prerelease software news and sometimes we can't or something | 22:16 |
valorie | ahoneybun: according to whom? | 22:34 |
ahoneybun | last time we had prerelease stuff and we posted on twitter and G+ acheronuk said we were not to do that | 22:35 |
ahoneybun | I think we need it written somewhere how to handle it | 22:35 |
valorie | I'm not sure exactly what you are referrring to? | 22:35 |
valorie | I won't publish this story until Rik thinks it is both accurate and needed | 22:36 |
ahoneybun | I didn't say story | 22:37 |
ahoneybun | I meant posting it ANYWHERE | 22:37 |
acheronuk | ahoneybun: that was pre-release tarballs. i.e. made available to packagers before going public. not the same as this | 22:38 |
ahoneybun | ahh ok | 22:38 |
ahoneybun | acheronuk: my rule of thumb is if you or clivejo post on social about it then it's safe | 22:38 |
ahoneybun | to post about | 22:38 |
acheronuk | we use to post about betas | 22:39 |
acheronuk | https://kubuntu.org/news/kde-sc-4-5-beta-2-packages-available/ | 22:39 |
ahoneybun | well I was not posting on the site and dealing with social media before | 22:39 |
ahoneybun | so | 22:39 |
acheronuk | but I'm not fussed. doesn't need to be a news item | 22:40 |
valorie | I would like there to be -- you have done the work! | 22:40 |
valorie | the plasma devels want the testing | 22:41 |
valorie | and the BRs | 22:41 |
acheronuk | true. I figured anyone running artful is already up for and invested in testing | 22:43 |
valorie | https://kubuntu.org/wp-admin/post.php?post=3385&action=edit | 22:48 |
valorie | or maybe this link is better: https://kubuntu.org/?p=3385&preview=true | 22:52 |
valorie | the reason I would like to publish this story is that it shows we are actively and directly boosting Plasma | 22:53 |
valorie | while I support the neon initiative, we shouldn't let them have ALL the limelight | 22:53 |
acheronuk | indeed. looks ok to me | 22:57 |
acheronuk | plasma 5.10.0 did not get good testing, and was a bit bug riddled on release. hopefully better testing can avoid that with 5.11 | 22:59 |
valorie | ok, I'll publish | 23:06 |
valorie | oops, you have edit powerz | 23:06 |
valorie | please publish | 23:06 |
valorie | acheronuk: ^^ | 23:07 |
valorie | I was writing an email | 23:07 |
valorie | GCi is on | 23:07 |
valorie | ok, published | 23:12 |
valorie | tada! https://kubuntu.org/news/plasma-5-11-beta-available-in-unofficial-ppa-for-testing-on-artful/ | 23:13 |
valorie | that's my prompt to get out of this chair and head to the nursery for fall flowers | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!