[03:20] ooo, plasma beta, fancy! [03:21] has anyone tweeted that via kub. twitter, etc.? [03:24] I think it was retweeted but un-retweeted... [03:25] uh [03:25] ok [03:26] will look in the twitter machine [03:27] nope [09:00] valorie: Twitter and Mastodon is covered for 5.11 Beta [09:26] tsimonq2: I was then unsure if I was to tweet about the Beta yet [19:33] I dunno if we should write about it on /news [19:33] perhaps a little short story [21:37] valorie: your trip was good? [21:39] beyond excellent, actually [21:40] strangely tired today however [21:40] going for that second cuppa [21:40] while the rain pours [21:40] yay rain!!! [21:41] sooo is it too early to bug you about the telegram bridge for #kubuntu? [21:52] ha, good timing in fact [21:52] yay :) [21:52] let me know what you find out.. and thanks [21:54] asking in #ubuntu-ops-team [22:15] ahoneybun: thanks for doing that. I'm writing a short story on kub.org [22:15] we really need to define what we want to post officially [22:15] valorie: [22:16] sometimes we can't post prerelease software news and sometimes we can't or something [22:34] ahoneybun: according to whom? [22:35] last time we had prerelease stuff and we posted on twitter and G+ acheronuk said we were not to do that [22:35] I think we need it written somewhere how to handle it [22:35] I'm not sure exactly what you are referrring to? [22:36] I won't publish this story until Rik thinks it is both accurate and needed [22:37] I didn't say story [22:37] I meant posting it ANYWHERE [22:38] ahoneybun: that was pre-release tarballs. i.e. made available to packagers before going public. not the same as this [22:38] ahh ok [22:38] acheronuk: my rule of thumb is if you or clivejo post on social about it then it's safe [22:38] to post about [22:39] we use to post about betas [22:39] https://kubuntu.org/news/kde-sc-4-5-beta-2-packages-available/ [22:39] well I was not posting on the site and dealing with social media before [22:39] so [22:40] but I'm not fussed. doesn't need to be a news item [22:40] I would like there to be -- you have done the work! [22:41] the plasma devels want the testing [22:41] and the BRs [22:43] true. I figured anyone running artful is already up for and invested in testing [22:48] https://kubuntu.org/wp-admin/post.php?post=3385&action=edit [22:52] or maybe this link is better: https://kubuntu.org/?p=3385&preview=true [22:53] the reason I would like to publish this story is that it shows we are actively and directly boosting Plasma [22:53] while I support the neon initiative, we shouldn't let them have ALL the limelight [22:57] indeed. looks ok to me [22:59] plasma 5.10.0 did not get good testing, and was a bit bug riddled on release. hopefully better testing can avoid that with 5.11 [23:06] ok, I'll publish [23:06] oops, you have edit powerz [23:06] please publish [23:07] acheronuk: ^^ [23:07] I was writing an email [23:07] GCi is on [23:12] ok, published [23:13] tada! https://kubuntu.org/news/plasma-5-11-beta-available-in-unofficial-ppa-for-testing-on-artful/ [23:14] that's my prompt to get out of this chair and head to the nursery for fall flowers