[04:38] <stgraber> filed an FFe for LXD 2.18, nothing too crazy in that one. We'd like it to be the LXD release for 17.10. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1718342
[06:05] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, did you demote llvm-toolchain-4.0 to universe? if so, please demote the proposed one too :)
[06:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (xenial-backports) [150-2git1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fast5 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.2-6] (no packageset)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fast5 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.6.2-6]
[09:53] <smb> sil2100, if you happen to have one (or two) more spare cycles, could you have a look at ubuntu-fan in the zesty unapproved queue?
[10:00] <sil2100> smb: hey, I can try have a look at it before going out
[10:03] <smb> sil2100, its not a urgent rush but its lingering there since 2 weeks
[10:04] <sil2100> smb: if I won't make it today (since I'm taking a half day off in the afternoon) I'll review it tomorrow for sure if no one beats me to it
[10:04] <smb> sil2100, ack that is early enough (and I am afraid I don't think there will be many trying to beat you there)
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added linux-aws to kernel in trusty
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added linux-meta-aws to kernel in trusty
[10:44] <sil2100> smb: commented on bug LP: #1714969, would be grateful for the usual SRU-annoying bits ;)
[10:46] <smb> sil2100, ok, I try to add something
[10:48] <sil2100> Thanks!
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-97.120] (core, kernel)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-36.40] (core, kernel)
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2] (kubuntu)
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2] (kubuntu)
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2] (kubuntu)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2] (kubuntu)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: wildfly-common (artful-proposed/primary) [1.2.0-1]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wildfly-common [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wildfly-common [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wildfly-common [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2] (kubuntu)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2] (kubuntu)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected opencv [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected opencv [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected opencv [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected opencv [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected opencv [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected opencv [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-1~exp2]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-36.40]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-97.120]
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: wildfly-client-config (artful-proposed/primary) [1.0.0-1]
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, this should unblock your jboss-xnio sync ^^
[13:59] <doko> ahh, one more wild fly
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> yep :)
[13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wildfly-client-config [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[14:04] <LocutusOfBorg> in the meanwhile I'm fixing sikulix
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wildfly-client-config [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[14:09] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, ^^
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.90ubuntu0.8]
[14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wildfly-client-config [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[14:28] <acheronuk> hi release team. we have had some delays getting sufficient votes for our 2017 wallpaper competition votes. so now we are there do we need a FFE to add those as a say "kubuntu-wallpaper-artful" sub package to our settings package?
[14:38] <jbicha> acheronuk: I'm not release team, but I
[14:38] <jbicha> 'm thinking UIFe not FFE https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#UserInterfaceFreeze_Exceptions
[14:41] <infinity> acheronuk: Wallpaper is very much userinterface, not feature, and if it only affects your flavour (which it does), the question isn't up to the Ubuntu release team, but just the Kubuntu folks.
[14:41] <infinity> acheronuk: ie: if you can get it in and get all your docs and slideshows updated to match, it's your call.
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg> ok no sikulinux idea
[16:24] <doko> what is an "unknown" version in autopkg tests?
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, sadness in autopkgtestsuuite
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg> sadness in infra, e.g. systemd not running correctly, container issue or something similar
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, ^^
[16:26] <Laney> look at the log
[16:26] <Laney> if it looks transient, retry
[16:26] <LocutusOfBorg> but "unknown" means autopkg didn't get some result, right?
[16:26] <Laney> it failed very early in the setup process
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-132.181 => 3.13.0-133.182+nvmemsi] (core, kernel)
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux [source] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-133.182+nvmemsi]
[18:38] <slangasek> well. figured out a fix for the gnucash build failure, and am now irritated at bad test suites.
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnucash [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnucash [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnucash [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnucash [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnucash [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnucash [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnucash [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnucash [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnucash [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnucash [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnucash [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnucash [i386] (artful-proposed) [1:2.6.17-1ubuntu1]
[20:53] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: I don't see any FFe bug references in this upload of ldc, why is this coming into artful-proposed now?
[20:55] <slangasek> Laney: did we get any more quota for autopkgtest as part of the cloud redeploy?
[21:01] <slangasek> tdaitx: do you know what this jre detection failure is during autopkgtests on armhf? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kazoo/artful/armhf
[21:15] <infinity> slangasek: If I had to guess, I'd assume it's to move up to llvm 5.0 instead of 3.9(!), which seems like a solid goal.
[21:16] <infinity> But indeed, since libphobos2-ldc72 seems to be seeded on one flavour (budgie), it does need at least a cursory nod.
[21:22] <slangasek> autopkgtest [18:19:01]: ERROR: "mkdir -p /tmp/autopkgtest.Wsh83W" failed with stderr "error: not found
[21:22] <slangasek> well ok then
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.7 => 1:17.04.8] (core)
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.9 => 1:16.04.10] (core)
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (trusty-proposed/main) [0.103ubuntu4.7 => 0.103ubuntu4.8] (core)
[23:00] <slangasek> infinity, apw: linux currently blocked in devel-proposed by a missing d-i bump?
[23:02] <infinity> slangasek: Yeahp, will do now.
[23:09] <infinity> Probably should have tested that in a PPA first, since it's a new upstream, but hey, let's be crazy.
[23:13] <slangasek> something something autopkgtests
[23:13] <infinity> slangasek: Oh, no, it's not functionality I'm worried about, just straight up FTBFS.
[23:14] <infinity> slangasek: It's actually remarkably hard to get the kernel packaging in a state where d-i builds but doesn't work.
[23:14] <infinity> (Would involve dropping some built-in modules, which I'd hope kernel tests would have caught)
[23:15] <slangasek> ah
[23:22] <infinity> Lucks like I got looky.
[23:23] <infinity> Or apw had tested previously and fixed the issues before I found them.