[09:20] <amano> didrocks, did you see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787940
[09:22] <amano> I guess that this will land in 3.26.1 rather than 3.28 (it is in master now, but there is no 3.26 branch for gnome shell yet).
[09:24] <amano> Maybe you will have to tweak the dock a bit one last time to adapt to this change.
[13:44] <duflu> Trevinho, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1713323
[14:01] <seb128> andyrock, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1718679
[14:02] <seb128> andyrock, try to rmmod vboxvideo
[15:12] <jamesh> kenvandine: https://github.com/jhenstridge/xdg-desktop-portal/commit/d3a243e32c20f1a29958c27fe61d2041fc4c0fac <- here's the code I was using to add snap detection to xdg-desktop-portal
[15:13] <jamesh> that's getting the label from D-Bus.  Reading it from /proc/$PID/attr/current should be just as good
[15:13] <kenvandine> Trevinho, ^^
[15:18] <Trevinho> thanks
[15:45]  * Trevinho c-lobrano: hey, did 
[15:46] <Trevinho> c-lobrano: hey, since you fixed the issue with entries borders, maybe you can also have  a look to the switcher border? Basically we've the background being outside the border
[15:46] <Trevinho> mangify it to see :)
[15:47] <c-lobrano> Trevinho: hi! Sure, is there a bug already?
[15:49] <Trevinho> c-lobrano: it's not opened yet I believe (Laney bugged me in person) :), but this one:  https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/CZYo0pdC/
[15:49] <c-lobrano> Trevinho: alright, I'll have a look a that
[15:56] <Trevinho> c-lobrano: thans
[15:56] <Trevinho> ks*
[15:56] <Trevinho> Laney: approve :) https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-themes/headerbars-as-titlebar-children-fix/+merge/331242
[16:00] <c-lobrano> Trevinho: from where does that switcher come?
[16:00] <Trevinho> c-lobrano: in gnome control center
[16:01] <Trevinho> c-lobrano: or just any switcher in an headerbar
[16:01] <c-lobrano> ook
[16:08] <ximion> Laney: I resolved LP: #1719077 at least partially - PK was still querying app-install-data and sometimes failing at that, which caused all kinds of what-provides searches to fail as well
[16:08] <ximion> not sure if this qualifies for Artful, if so, I'd file a sync request for the Debian package which resolves this
[16:09] <ximion> question is: will Artful ship with PK as default in GNOME Software?
[16:12] <c-lobrano> Trevinho: just to track it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-themes/+bug/1719355
[16:12] <Trevinho> c-lobrano: thanks a lot :)
[16:13] <c-lobrano> thank you, I was kind of bored at work today :D
[16:26] <Laney> ximion: yes
[16:26] <Laney> and hi!
[16:26] <Laney> what's new in 1.1.7?
[16:26] <Laney> if just fixes, we can sync that
[16:27] <ximion> Laney: hi :D :)
[16:27] <ximion> Laney: it's just fixes, and most of them were already cherry-picked into the 1.1.6 package anyway
[16:28] <ximion> and yes, if PK is default in Artful, you'd definitely want that release
[16:29] <ximion> FTR https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/blob/master/NEWS#L1-L30
[17:02] <jbicha> Laney: could you bump your ostree badtest hint to 2017.11-2ubuntu1 ? it's blocking gnome-builder 3.26
[18:02] <seb128> andyrock, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/938751
[18:03] <seb128> andyrock, xprop -root -remove _ICC_PROFILE
[18:03] <seb128> and try again
[18:11] <ximion> Laney: LP: #1719384 exists now
[18:11] <ximion> (the Ubuntu bug numbers got pretty high, wow!)
[18:12] <ximion> I wonder whether there are other issues that actually have a higher priority for Ubuntu, e.g. apparently PK doesn't automagically support your phased updates
[18:14] <Laney> we're not using PK for updates right now
[18:14] <Laney> at least not from GS
[18:18] <jamesh> ximion: launchpad bug numbers are global for all projects on the system.  Also, not all numbers refer to an actual bug
[18:18] <jamesh> (it's a PostgreSQL sequence, so IDs get consumed even if a transaction gets rolled back)
[18:19] <ximion> right, I forgot that they are shared by every single project
[18:25] <jibel> seb128,https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1719390
[18:30] <ximion> Laney: I wonder what you'll do when aptd is fully replaced
[18:31] <ximion> (if that is actually the plan)
[18:34] <Laney> heh
[18:34] <Laney> one day ... maybe
[18:35] <ximion> it will be offline-updates with GNOME Software vs. the updater in GNOME PackageKit, I guess
[18:35] <Laney> we could maybe impelement an online updates plugin
[18:35] <Laney> just synced PK
[18:35] <Laney> thanks for the upload!
[19:04] <flexiondotorg> Yo kenvandine
[19:09] <seb128> tkamppeter, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786077
[19:13] <casey> Laney: Hi, I reported about two weeks ago how gnome-software seemed to list OS updates and provide a "restart and install" option despite PK being disabled. I cannot seem to reproduce this systematically (it's happened only once since), and at any rate it has only happened *after* an update
[19:15] <casey> One guess would be that the updates section is somehow reading from packagekit-history
[19:15] <Laney> hi casey
[19:15] <casey> but at any rate I can't provide any definite answers at this point unfortunately
[19:15] <Laney> alright, no worries
[19:16] <Laney> you can modify /etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-software-service.desktop to add --verbose so that if it happens again we might get some logs
[19:16] <casey> ok.
[19:16] <casey> where would that log to?
[19:17] <Laney> to the journal
[19:18] <casey> ok, sounds good
[20:11] <jackpot51> I have added a patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1713323 - can someone take a look?
[20:13] <Laney> jackpot51: it'd be best to ask #gnome-shell IMO
[20:14] <Laney> oh you did!
[20:14] <jackpot51> I did, I hope you saw!
[20:14] <Laney> ♥
[20:14] <jackpot51> :)
[20:32] <jackpot51> Any thoughts about having my debdiff in the meantime Laney?
[20:33] <Laney> not competent enough to assess it
[20:33] <Laney> maybe Trevinho is, otherwise I prefer to wait for Jonas
[20:33] <jackpot51> Ok.
[20:33] <Trevinho> I can check
[20:35] <Laney> :>
[20:36] <jackpot51> Thanks Trevinho!
[20:37] <Trevinho> jackpot51: I've seen that there are also other fixes Jonas was working on for migrating the settings
[20:37] <Trevinho> so it might make sense to get all in that patcheset
[20:44] <jackpot51> Cool, looks like Jonas saw the bug. There was another one already fixed in upstream mutter with having to select the scale setting twice before it took in gnome-control-center
[20:45] <Laney> nice
[21:26] <jackpot51> Laney: can we get these patches into Ubuntu now?
[21:26] <jackpot51> Thanks for pushing btw!
[21:31] <jbicha> jackpot51: just mutter?
[21:32] <jbicha> jackpot51: are you aware of the release schedules? Ubuntu Final Beta is this week so we're freezing and GNOME 3.26.1 is scheduled for next week
[21:34] <jackpot51> I was not aware of GNOME's release schedule. Yes, just mutter. There is an issue fixed in upstream mutter but not in Ubuntu where the scale must be set twice in the gnome-control-center before applying
[21:36] <jackpot51> Even if it has not been officially released, I strongly believe the master mutter is an improvement over the current 3.26.0 + one cherry picked commit currently in Ubuntu
[21:36] <jbicha> I could package a git snapshot of mutter but I'd like to get someone else on the Desktop Team to approve that. Otherwise, it will be fixed next week
[21:36] <jackpot51> Sounds good
[21:38] <jbicha> btw, https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointTwentyfive
[21:38] <jbicha> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtfulAardvark/ReleaseSchedule
[21:41] <jackpot51> Thanks jbicha. The GNOME I need to look at
[21:42] <dmj_s76> jbicha: if you're packaging mutter, it would be very good to get these packages (already in upstream trunk): https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787477
[21:44] <dmj_s76> Upstream has fixed a bug in mutter that prevents gnome-control-center from setting scaling right.
[21:44] <dmj_s76> /s/packages/patches
[21:47] <seb128> Laney, list row { background-color: white }
[21:48] <jbicha> seb128: do you have an opinion on packaging a git snapshot of mutter now? ^
[21:52] <seb128> jbicha, +1
[21:52] <seb128> it might also fix the external monitor config issue
[21:52] <seb128> need to go, bbl
[21:52] <jbicha> thanks, have a good evening
[21:53] <Laney> I'd do it via exp if it were me
[21:53] <Laney> those bugs affect debian too
[21:53] <Laney> laters
[21:54] <jbicha> yes that was my plan
[21:54] <jackpot51> Sweet!
[21:55] <seb128> jbicha, thanks, have a nice evening as well
[22:15] <jbicha> jackpot51: do you happen to know of any specific LP bug #s fixed in mutter git?
[22:19] <jackpot51> No, but I could create one.
[22:19] <jackpot51> The issue I have found fixed with mutter git is changing the scale factor in gnome-control-center
[22:21] <jackpot51> It has to be changed twice before taking effect
[22:22] <jbicha> it's fine, I don't think we need a bug number now but if we had one I wanted to mention it in the debian/changelog entry
[22:22] <jackpot51> Ok, thanks
[22:22] <jackpot51> It may be useful to link to this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787477
[22:23] <jackpot51> It was also mentioned here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1713323/comments/8
[22:24] <dmj_s76> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1717272
[22:25] <dmj_s76> I believe this is a bug reporting the gnome-control-center issue that the mutter patches fix.
[22:25] <jbicha> ok, I'll mark 1717272 as fixed in this upload and y'all can reopen if it's not actually fixed
[22:25] <jackpot51> Thanks!
[22:25] <jbicha> since I don't have a hidpi screen I can't test it very well
[22:26] <jackpot51> Do you want one? Send me an email and I can see about hooking you up
[22:29] <jackpot51> This might also be fixed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1700085
[22:30] <jackpot51> There are quite a few: https://launchpad.net/+search?field.text=scale+gnome-control-center+2017&field.actions.search=Search
[22:31] <jbicha> ok, we'll try to get the new version into Ubuntu some time tomorrow (it takes several hours because it comes via Debian)
[22:32] <jbicha> I already finalized the changelog
[22:32] <jackpot51> Thanks!