[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (xenial-proposed/main) [10.2.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 10.2.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (zesty-proposed/main) [10.2.7-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 10.2.9-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[10:05] <ginggs> cjwatson: you've dealt with R transitions before, right? does LP: #1719245 seem do-able?
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> btw is ben sad? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/r-api.html
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I would have expected this link to appear, I pushed the r-api ben file 15 hours ago or so
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.0-1ubuntu2]
[11:11] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: The auto-syncer is part of ubuntu-archive-tools
[11:11] <cjwatson> ginggs: It's possible I did one at some point but I don't remember what it involved ...
[11:13] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Uncaught exception: ben-specific error: parse error in file "config/monitor/planned/r-api.ben", line 6, character 0
[11:13] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: missing semicolon on the last line, I think
[11:24] <ginggs> cjwatson: ok, i think it's just going to be many many no-change rebuilds, but I'll wait for an ack from release team
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.0-2 => 3.26.0+20170925~ea214fb-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[12:15] <fossfreedom_> LocutusOfBorg: hi - need a bit of help! I'm just testing Ubuntu and Ubuntu Budgie beta 2 and I've discovered that bug 1719136 is specifically due to virtualbox (crashing gnome-session I think) - works just fine on real hardware and vmware workstation.  I need to reassign it from ubiquity to another package.  What's that package?  xorg?
[12:18] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, interesting, the "auto-trackers" generated by debian has no ending semicolon, and they worked (I see e.g. monitor/old/gdcm.ben auto-petsc.ben gsl.ben)
[12:18] <LocutusOfBorg> but maybe I'm wrong
[12:18] <LocutusOfBorg> lets see the next regeneration
[12:19] <LocutusOfBorg> fossfreedom_, do you have 3d acceleration enabled? do you have virtualbox-guest-x11 installed?
[12:19] <LocutusOfBorg> which vbox version
[12:20] <fossfreedom_> I've tried both with and without 3D acceleration. Occurs with virtualbox 5.1.26 and 5.1.28
[12:21] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: artful vbox running the artful live iso so -guest-x11 isn't installed. It might be a regression triggered by Linux 4.13
[12:21] <fossfreedom_> likely - everything was fine until 4.13 landed last week
[12:22] <jbicha> fossfreedom_: see LP: #1718679
[12:23] <jbicha> changelog for linux 4.13.0-12.13 (in artful-proposed) says that CONFIG_DRM_VBOXVIDEO=n is set now
[12:24] <fossfreedom_> ah - so its likely to be fixed when linux 4.13.0-12.13 migrates to the release pocket?  I presume after the beta?
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wxpython3.0 (artful-proposed/universe) [3.0.2.0+dfsg-4 => 3.0.2.0+dfsg-5] (edubuntu) (sync)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ettercap (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.8.2-9ubuntu1 => 1:0.8.2-10build1] (no packageset)
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> what they did do in the kernel
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> git grep DRM_VBOX
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> drivers/staging/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_VBOXVIDEO)    += vboxvideo/
[12:35] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, so, this is becoming a reality
[12:55] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, seems that someone is upstreaming your drivers, oh and they don't work :)  that one is now off in the kernel i believe
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.0-2 => 3.26.0+20170925~ea214fb-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[13:22] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, actually I followed strictly the kernel development and the binaries in the vbox-dev mail list
[13:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I just didn't know they they were already merged
[13:22] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure what fedora did to make them work, maybe some xorg/wayland changes
[13:23] <LocutusOfBorg> for sure having them mainline will make me and you happier
[13:23] <LocutusOfBorg> at least me :p
[13:23] <sforshee> LocutusOfBorg: I just had to disable the ones merged upstream because they weren't working with wayland
[13:24] <LocutusOfBorg> sforshee, this is exactly what we are talking about
[13:24] <LocutusOfBorg> but AFAIK fedora is using wayland by default
[13:24] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe we can see if they patched it?
[13:24] <sforshee> ah, /me needs to read backscroll
[13:25] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, it is pretty late in the day to be trying to switch drivers for that
[13:25] <LocutusOfBorg> no problem sforshee thanks for "fixing" :)
[13:25] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, for sure we need to investigate and revert once we found the issue, I'm not asking to change that now
[13:26] <LocutusOfBorg> but 18.04 with mainline kernel drivers is a nice thing
[13:26]  * LocutusOfBorg goes asking on vbox-dev
[13:26] <sforshee> LocutusOfBorg: yeah once we know what's wrong I can turn it back on, but fwiw I did try with 4.14-rc1 and saw the same problem
[13:27] <sforshee>  turn it on for the next release I mean
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> got it, thanks
[13:31] <jbicha> apw: do you know if the kernel update is likely to make it into Final Beta before release?
[13:32] <jbicha> or sforshee ^ ?
[13:32] <sil2100> jibel: hey! Will you be performing https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseValidationProcess for final beta?
[13:32] <Laney> sil2100: what's the chat regarding accepting stuff and respins?
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ettercap [source] (artful-proposed) [1:0.8.2-10build1]
[13:34]  * Laney just turned on the auto-accept cron job
[13:37]  * apw ^5 Laney
[13:37]  * sil2100 probably doesn't have th necessary backlog for that
[13:38] <sforshee> jbicha: I think we can likely make that happen
[13:38] <sil2100> Laney: thanks for furning that on, I probably didn't have the power and everyone that did was away
[13:38] <apw> jbicha, i would vote for that kernel to be in the beta, as it has a significant vbox regression fix in it
[13:38] <sil2100> apw: what's the ETA for the new kernel?
[13:39] <Laney> pew pew pew
[13:39] <apw> sil2100, it is built and in -proposed waiting on a rerun of a systemd ADT test which is expected to pass
[13:39] <sil2100> I only see a few test results submitted so I guess we could still re-spin
[13:39] <sil2100> (could someone give me the bug number for the vbox regression?)
[13:39] <Laney> the linux-meta tests are actually green
[13:39] <Laney> win
[13:41] <jbicha> sil2100: LP: #1718679
[13:41] <sil2100> jbicha: thanks!
[13:41] <sil2100> Laney: \o/
[13:41] <sil2100> So I guess we'll have the kernel promotable soonish?
[13:44] <Laney> going to accept these things out of the queue then
[13:44] <Laney> ...and unblock NM
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mutter [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.26.0+20170925~ea214fb-1]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxpython3.0 [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.0.2.0+dfsg-5]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.26.0+20170925~ea214fb-1]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.15 => 17.10.16] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:45] <sil2100> Laney: ok, makes sense, thanks
[13:45] <jibel> sil2100, I can do
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (artful-proposed/main) [2.2.4-7ubuntu1 => 2.2.4-7ubuntu2] (core)
[13:47] <sforshee> sil2100: I'm hoping so, still looking at test results but so far no red flags
[13:47] <sforshee> like apw said waiting on a systemd rerun in adt
[13:49] <juliank> Can someone force apt/1.5 to migrate from artful-proposed? It's just a version bump from ~rc4 and a comment location changed, but it's blocked because apport suddenly started failing. Probably should fix apport to, but I'd at least like to have the final apt in the final beta :)
[13:54] <tkamppeter> Hi. I have uploaded cups 2.2.4-7ubuntu2 with only a small fix in the autopkgtest, needed to let cups-filters 1.17.7 go from -proposed to the release. No regression potential as the code itself has no change.
[13:54] <tkamppeter> Can you pass this through?
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot powerpc [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Artful Final Beta] (20101020ubuntu520) has been added
[13:55] <Laney> tkamppeter: you probably need to retry the cups-filters tests now that cups has migrated
[13:55] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#cups-filters
[13:55] <Laney> click those recycle icons
[13:57] <Laney> No, it had the new cups
[13:57] <Laney> so your fix doesn't work?
[13:58] <sil2100> juliank: I see some apport regressions, didn't look at those yet - did you check on them?
[14:00] <juliank> sil2100: Well, I don't know why they happen. Some valgrind apport log error. There were no functional changes in the apt upload, so I don't see how it could cause that
[14:00] <juliank> As I wrote, I just moved a comment in the code around
[14:01] <sil2100> juliank: I see a change in the .service file too
[14:02] <sil2100> Ah, nvm
[14:02] <juliank> sil2100: You must be looking at the wrong diff, then, not at 1.5~rc4 to 1.5
[14:02] <sil2100> I was looking at the wrong diff
[14:02] <juliank> Which is here https://launchpadlibrarian.net/338547723/apt_1.5~rc4_1.5.diff.gz
[14:02] <sil2100> ;)
[14:02] <sil2100> ETOOMANYTABS
[14:05] <juliank> AFAICT, apport is creating some kind of sandbox, and that fails
[14:06] <juliank> Was there like a temporary uninstallability problem or something?
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-greeter (artful-proposed/universe) [17.10.0 => 17.10.2] (ubuntukylin)
[14:07] <juliank> That seems to be the issue ERROR: Cannot find package which ships ExecutablePath /bin/true
[14:07] <juliank> there's of course always the options of new compiler bugs, but then all hope is lost anyway :D
[14:07] <sil2100> Probably, I guess we'll see once autopkgtests kick in for the new version - I didn't see this failing before really, maybe just bad luck this time
[14:09] <juliank> sil2100: It also failed before that way
[14:09] <juliank> for example, 2.20.6-0ubuntu4	binutils/2.29-4ubuntu1	2017-08-08 04:38:40 UTC
[14:09] <juliank> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/amd64/a/apport/20170808_043840_306c1@/log.gz
[14:09] <Laney> tkamppeter: http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html#executing-the-test
[14:10] <juliank> I guess we could try re-running it
[14:10]  * Laney runs apport locally
[14:11] <juliank> Queues were empty, so I triggered them again
[14:12] <sil2100> juliank: ACK
[14:12] <juliank> I guess I should prepare 1.2.25 for xenial in the meantime, so 1.4.8 and 1.2.25 can be reviewed together (they're subsets)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (artful-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu520 => 20101020ubuntu521] (core)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-kylin-software-center (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.11 => 1.3.13] (ubuntukylin)
[14:20] <tkamppeter> I have seen the log of the CUPS autopkgtests and there was still something wrong. This I have fixed in the 2.2.4-7ubuntu2 upload. So this needs to get passed through to -proposed and after that the cups-filters tests be re-triggered.
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-theme (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.1 => 1.7.4] (ubuntukylin)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-control-center (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-menu (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-screensaver (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-session-manager (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[14:28] <sil2100> hmm, I see a lot of kylin-related uploads
[14:29] <sil2100> Laney: since we still have some time, maybe you could accept those ^?
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kylin-greeter [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.2]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-theme [source] (artful-proposed) [1.7.4]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-menu [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-session-manager [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-kylin-software-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1.3.13]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-screensaver [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.4-0ubuntu1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.24 => 1.2.25] (core)
[14:37] <juliank> ^ my work is done, 1.4.7+1.4.8 (-v1.4.6 essentially) is in zesty unapproved queue; and 1.2.25 is in xenial. (^ rbalint)
[14:37] <juliank> They are also in the PPA at https://launchpad.net/~deity/+archive/ubuntu/apt/+packages
[14:37] <juliank> although the 1.2.25 there has a different changelog author :D
[14:39] <rbalint> juliank: thanks!
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (artful-proposed) [20101020ubuntu521]
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:8.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (artful-proposed/main) [0.97ubuntu1 => 0.97ubuntu2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:52] <juliank> Yay, apport passed
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.6-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] <sil2100> \o/
[14:54] <sil2100> Ok, let's stabilize what we already have in -proposed, migrate as much as we can and prep for a respin
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (artful-proposed) [2.2.4-7ubuntu2]
[14:55] <sil2100> jibel: fust FYI - we will be respinning the images in a bit
[15:01] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, unattended-upgrades please :)
[15:02] <LocutusOfBorg> it is important, because it might break upgrades
[15:02]  * LocutusOfBorg AFK
[15:02] <juliank> Oh, for 1.2.26 I need to change .travis.yml - wily is gone from archive now, and CI failed for the final "bump the version" commit.
[15:02] <juliank> (the other series already use up-to-date docker images :D)
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:8.0.4-0ubuntu1]
[15:04] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: hm, indeed
[15:05]  * sil2100 sighs
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (artful-proposed) [0.97ubuntu2]
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[15:07] <sil2100> But let's try not accept anything that we don't need now for the beta
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:10.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.middleware [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.23.1-0ubuntu1.1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20101020ubuntu521)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20101020ubuntu521)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20101020ubuntu521)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20101020ubuntu521)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20101020ubuntu521)
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (zesty-proposed) [3:11.0.3-0ubuntu2]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20101020ubuntu521)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:9.1.2-0ubuntu2]
[15:49] <sil2100> A notice to all release-team members! We only have the archive frozen this time, there is no block on britney to keep things lingering in -proposed
[15:49] <sil2100> So please only accept things into -proposed that we actually consider essential to the beta release
[15:49] <sil2100> (best not accept anything that's not critical right now)
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cairo (artful-proposed/main) [1.14.10-1 => 1.14.10-1ubuntu1] (core)
[16:02] <mparillo> Other Flavours: I see bad certificates in both FF (second tab, against Mozilla!) and in Discover Updates against Gnome and KDE when testing both 64 and 32-bit Kubuntu ISOs in a VM. Error message in FF pasted here: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/382/builds/157594/testcases/1300/results Can anybody confirm that this is not Kubuntu-specfic?
[16:27] <slangasek> mparillo: what is 'Discover Updates'? I don't see that listed in the test case and it doesn't sound like part of the desktop experience on other flavors
[16:29] <mparillo> Discover is a 'software store'. But I assume the same root cause is shared with the second tab in Firefox. Have you done a fresh install from a Beta 2 ISO and tested Firefox?
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-docs (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.5 => 17.10.6] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.16]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-check.v1 (artful-proposed/main) [0.0+git20161208.0.20d25e2-1 => 0.0+git20161208.0.20d25e2-1build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nplan (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.23~16.04.1 => 0.29~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: variety (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.4-3 => 0.6.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpng1.6 (artful-proposed/main) [1.6.32-2 => 1.6.32-3] (core) (sync)
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted variety [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.6.6-1]
[19:30] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: Ok thanks
[19:32] <tsimonq2> sil2100: So I went to publish the Call for Testing for Lubuntu... could we get some alternate images spun up please?
[19:33] <sil2100> tsimonq2: I'll be re-spinning the images once the publisher settles down
[19:34] <tsimonq2> sil2100: Ack, can you say something here when that is done? I'll hold off on the Call for Testing then.
[19:34] <sil2100> Sure, I'll also send out a quick mail to ubuntu-devel@ with some info
[19:36] <flocculant> I thought there'd not be a respin - then I woke up and the coffee was cold :p
[19:38] <sil2100> Well, we could have done without it, but there was a high kernel-related bug (noticable during testing) that got fixed so seeing that there weren't so many tests done yet, I decided to get that in
[19:39] <flocculant> :)
[19:44] <tsimonq2> sil2100: As lon as we get Lubuntu Alternate images :)
[19:44] <tsimonq2> *long
[19:51] <sil2100> tsimonq2: in the meantime I'm digging into it to figure out why we didn't have those appearing (same for beta-1 actually)
[19:52] <tsimonq2> sil2100: Well for Beta 1 they were FTBFS
[19:54] <tsimonq2> I accepted that we weren't going to have a Beta 1 with Alternates.
[19:54] <tsimonq2> But dailies should be fine?
[19:57] <sil2100> tsimonq2: well, there are no dailies for alternates ;p I now see through cdimage logs that there's some error
[19:58] <sil2100> Which explains why I didn't see them appearing in cdimage even though I kicked them
[19:58] <sil2100> Digging into that
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxmlada (artful-proposed/universe) [17.1.2017-4 => 17.1.2017-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:06] <sil2100> tsimonq2: I see things migrated so I'll kick all images and then look into what's up with alternate
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlada [sync] (artful-proposed) [17.1.2017-5]
[20:11] <sil2100> Notice: new image builds for final beta have been started!
[20:21] <tsimonq2> sil2100: slangasek might know more
[20:26] <sil2100> He's on meetings right now
[20:26] <sil2100> I'll figure this out, no worries - in case this takes too long I have them all at one place here in NY
[20:27] <sil2100> I think I know what it might be
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (artful-proposed/main) [234-2ubuntu10 => 234-2ubuntu11] (core)
[20:34] <tsimonq2> sil2100: Oh you're in NYC, cool :D
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Artful Final Beta] (20170926) has been added
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:3.26.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sweethome3d (artful-proposed/universe) [5.5+dfsg-1 => 5.5.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sweethome3d [sync] (artful-proposed) [5.5.2+dfsg-1]
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gradle-debian-helper (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.1 => 1.6] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gradle-debian-helper [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.6]
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: joda-convert (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-1 => 1.9.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mina2 (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.16-1 => 2.0.16-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-base (artful-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2 => 3.4.1.20170921-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted joda-convert [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.9.2-1]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-base [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.4.1.20170921-1]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mina2 [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.0.16-2]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.26.0-0ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[21:06] <slangasek> tsimonq2, sil2100: if it's just that you're looking for new lubuntu alternate dailies and there aren't any, that's because the cronjob has lubuntu all in one line
[21:06] <slangasek> so it's all commented out
[21:07] <sil2100> slangasek: no no, I was building them but they're failing on the debian-cd step
[21:08] <sil2100> slangasek: so it's funny, the reason they fail is because at one step the whole process is failing because of libustr-1.0-1 not being installed but it's required by debootstrap
[21:08] <sil2100> slangasek: before Sept the 20th it was found and recognized, now it is not pulled in during the CD creation
[21:09] <sil2100> slangasek: looking at cdimage I see in the rawlist.debootstrap output it's there but the rawlist that's actually being used doesn't have it, not sure how it's generated
[21:09] <sil2100> slangasek: the seeds show the libustr-1.0-1 is pulled in through the libustr-dev -> libsemanage1-dev chain
[21:10] <sil2100> I don't know what could have caused it, checked both the lubuntu and ubuntu seeds and even though there were some changes on the 19th, none of them look like they could be responsible
[21:10] <slangasek> sil2100: ok, if it's required by debootstrap then it's a priorities mismatch issue in the archive; but why would any -dev be pulled in by the bootstrap set?
[21:10] <sil2100> There was a new libsemanage upload from do_ko on the 19th as well, but the diff doesn't seem to be messing with the deps
[21:11] <slangasek> -dev packages shouldn't be part of the debootstrap set
[21:11] <sil2100> Well, not sure, I just checked here to learn how this ustr lib is pulled in the first place: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/lubuntu.artful/supported
[21:11] <slangasek> sil2100: 'supported' is not the stuff that's pulled into the image
[21:13] <slangasek> and libustr-1.0-1 shows no interesting revdeps
[21:14] <sil2100> Yeah, might be that something moved it to supported
[21:15] <sil2100> But I didn't see any changes that could have caused that
[21:15] <cyphermox> Priority: required.
[21:15] <cyphermox> ^ this is important.
[21:16] <slangasek> ah so the issue is that it is currently marked required and it shouldn't be
[21:17] <slangasek> cyphermox, sil2100, tsimonq2: fixed; needs an archive publish cycle before it takes effect
[21:17] <slangasek> ah I suspect this is NBS
[21:18] <slangasek> hmmm strangely not
[21:18] <slangasek> but yeah, libsemanage1 seems to have dropped a runtime dep on it
[21:18] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ack
[21:19] <sil2100> \o/
[21:20] <sil2100> slangasek: thanks!
[21:21] <sil2100> So I was looking at the right direction, but didn't check the bin-dependencies, only source ones
[21:22] <sil2100> Invalidly assumed that since libsemanage-dev was still depping on ustr-dev it was all fine ;) Anyway, it looks like I also should have just looked at the cdimage build logs for the 20th image
[21:22] <sil2100> cyphermox pointed out it had additional info as it had a task change diff
[21:23]  * sil2100 learned a lot through this
[21:30] <cyphermox> so do I
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (artful-proposed/main) [2.18-0ubuntu2 => 2.18-0ubuntu3] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Artful Final Beta] has been updated (20170926)
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.18-0ubuntu3]
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (artful-proposed) [234-2ubuntu11]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slof (artful-proposed/main) [20161019+dfsg-1 => 20170724+dfsg-1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)