/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/09/28/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
=== Sir_Gallantmon is now known as Son_Goku
guest12345hello room, i tried to get help from the ubuntu channel but i can't get in. it says im banned. can someone please help or lift the ban13:28
RAOFrobert_ancell: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1720131 is the logind bug I filed13:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1720131 in systemd (Ubuntu) "logind holds open file descriptor to DRI nodes, preventing nvidia suspend" [Undecided,New]13:33
LocutusOfBorgguest12345, register your nick13:34
LocutusOfBorgguests are not allowed in some channels13:34
robert_ancellRAOF: didn't file upstream?13:34
RAOFrobert_ancell: Not initially, no.13:34
RAOFI guess I can if you want.13:34
robert_ancellplease :)13:36
RAOFrobert_ancell: Hah! I'm three days late: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/690813:41
robert_ancell:)13:41
guest12345it appears to be an ip ban13:44
guest12345we have a static here at the office13:44
LocutusOfBorgso go on #freenode and ask there13:49
=== SpamapS is now known as Zuulv2
=== Zuulv2 is now known as SpamapS
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, boinc mostly syncd :/14:50
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: thank you14:54
dokostgraber: sru team meeting in the ballroom15:03
cjwatsonjuliank: I know it wasn't you who made the change (https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=cbaf353ead58aa9eefe51542b6ad91e69b6289ce), but do you know why this new bit of config is different from APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated?15:11
juliankcjwatson: no15:12
juliankcjwatson: But I know that it's older than 3 years, so I'm not sure we can figure out why15:13
cjwatsonhmmm15:13
cjwatsonwe just noticed that allow-unauthenticated recently stopped being effective on buildds15:13
cjwatsone.g. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/339016030/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-amd64.node-babel_6.25.0+dfsg-7_BUILDING.txt.gz despite APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated "1"15:14
cjwatson(I'm fixing this particular case in another way, but it seems unexpected)15:14
juliankcjwatson: Well, it's an unrelated setting, we just flipped the default for AllowInsecureRepositories to 0 recently15:14
cjwatsonmm.  so AllowInsecureRepositories affects update, AllowUnauthenticated affects other acquisition?15:15
juliankcjwatson: mvo split allow-insecure-repositories and AllowDowngradeToInsecureRepositories off from unauthenticated in Oct 1, 201415:15
juliankcjwatson: I think to be complete AllowInsecureRepositories affects downloading unsigned Release files15:16
juliankand the rest stuff with missing trust root from a release file15:16
cjwatsonhm, right15:16
cjwatsonthanks15:16
cjwatsoninfinity1: ^- so maybe chroots should start setting Acquire::AllowInsecureRepositories as well?15:17
juliankYou can also set these options per sources.list entry15:17
cjwatsonYeah I know15:18
cjwatsonAnd we're moving towards that (and indeed to dispatching necessary keys so that it mostly stops mattering)15:18
cjwatsonWe're just not completely there15:18
cjwatsonIn this particular case, https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/external-dependencies-trusted/+merge/331490 (plus a bootstrap-package change) should make it not a problem15:18
cjwatson(or I guess here [allow-insecure=yes] rather than [trusted=yes] - will experiment)15:20
LocutusOfBorgrbalint, unattended-upgrades new merge?15:37
LocutusOfBorgand why can't you apply for PPU?15:38
rbalintLocutusOfBorg: I applied for core dev15:41
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: he is applying for Core Dev now https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BalintReczey/CoreDeveloperApplication15:41
rbalintLocutusOfBorg: would be nice to have an other endorsement as two seems not to be not enough :-)15:42
rbalintLocutusOfBorg: regarding unattended-upgrades I wanted to give it a few days in unstable but i plan filing the merge this week15:44
kyrofatkamppeter, https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/165512515:46
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1655125 in snapd "Missing interface: content sharing in the other direction" [Undecided,Triaged]15:46
rbasakbdmurray: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25634196/16:02
naccjuliank: how should i loop properly on `apt update`/`apt-get update` completing successfully? It returns 0 (it seems) when it fails to download all index files16:20
julianknacc: You can't, really16:20
naccjuliank: sigh :/16:21
naccjuliank: ok16:21
nacccjwatson: how do the buildd's ensure they have a valid apt cache?16:21
nacc(e.g., start a container, apt update which may or may not update but returns 0 no matter what, ... but we want apt install to work)16:21
cjwatsonnacc: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~canonical-launchpad-branches/launchpad-buildd/trunk/view/head:/lpbuildd/target/apt.py#L5916:22
nacccjwatson: thanks!16:22
cjwatsoncrude, but good enough16:22
nacccjwatson: but wait, do you get a CalledProcessError?16:22
cjwatsonit certainly used to return non-zero when it failed to download all index files16:22
nacccjwatson: i thought that only got raised on non-zero?16:22
nacccjwatson: ah ok :)16:22
cjwatsonor at least in the relevant categories of failure16:22
nacccjwatson: on xenial it does not (in a lxd)16:23
cjwatsonmaybe you're hitting something a bit different than buildds generally do16:23
naccmaybe, yeah16:23
nacci can adapt your backoff logic16:23
nacc(we have other network retry/backoff stuff anyways)16:23
cjwatsonit was a while ago, but when we did that our relatively frequent chroot failures basically went away16:24
naccyeah it makes sense16:24
nacccjwatson: juliank: thanks!16:25
tsimonq2So I don't want to make Snaps and the backports policy isn't 100% clear... how would I go about requesting a 0 day Backports release of several LXQt components that saw a new upstream release recently?16:48
tsimonq2Or rather, can something like that be done?16:49
tsimonq2(Backports before a new devel release opens)16:50
persiatsimonq2: I'm not sure what you mean by 0-day.  My experience has always been a) get new upstream version in Debian, b) sync to Ubuntu development repo, c) request backport (and providing testing feedback, etc.)16:50
tsimonq2persia: Similar to the concept of a 0-day SRU16:50
persiaAh.  I don't recall that happening, but I'll defer to someone paying closer attention these days.16:51
tsimonq2Ok16:51
tsimonq2Because if I test the packages in a PPA now, and they'll be synced when devel opens anyways, but the timing doesn't match up for artful-release, how would that go down?16:52
tsimonq2And there's features in the packages.16:52
=== Sir_Gallantmon is now known as Son_Goku
=== NCommander is now known as KD2JRT
naccdoko: is there any intention for ubuntu-dev-tools to become pythonn3? the wrapper scripts are *all* python2 :(19:10
naccdoko: which it turns out when you try to snap them, means you need to build python2 and python3 and build the part twice19:11
nacconce to get a python3 lib and once to get the python2 scripts19:11
sarnoldnacc: while you're fixing things maybe apport scripts too pls <319:11
sarnoldhey est31 :)19:11
dokonacc: feel free to update them ;) afaik most of them depend on launchpadlib ...19:12
naccdoko: sigh :) ok19:12
est31hello sarnold19:12
naccsarnold: heh19:12
dokocjwatson: ^^^ is there a python3 replacement for launchpadlib?19:13
naccdoko: launchpadlib works with python319:13
naccdoko: we use it heavily in git-ubuntu :)19:13
dokoohh, then this changed19:14
dokothis and bzr keeps python2 for me on my laptop19:14
naccdoko: it'd be a simple tweak to setup.py for the scripts to install on python3, but then they all nneed updates to not use /usr/bin/python19:14
cjwatsonpython3-launchpadlib is mostly OK now in artful19:15
cjwatsonit was a bit dodgy in xenial19:15
naccyeah, i'm referring to the one on pypi19:15
cjwatsonright, it's up to date there now19:15
nacccjwatson: thanks for that :) helped enalbe the git-ubuntu snap19:15
cjwatsonI have a load of ubuntu-archive-tool updates which I need to get round to landing19:16
cjwatson+s19:16
est31wow someone on #ubuntu really wondered about TOR browser20:11
naccest31: they had an offensive nick and were being helped20:11
naccunclear why it escalated from there20:11
est31I've got about 20 PMs from different nicks20:11
naccyep20:12
pfsmorigoI only got two20:12
naccit was basically random, it seems20:12
=== infinity1 is now known as infinity
ppisati_doko: am i correct saying that we don't have a cross-compile toolchain from (!x86) to x86? e.g. cross-compile from arm64 host to i386 target?20:59
ricotzdoko, any chance to get this patch into arful? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874276#2521:14
ubottuDebian bug 874276 in ca-certificates-java "ca-certificates-java: fails to install on armhf: Error: missing `server' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-armhf/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so'" [Grave,Open]21:14
manjomeet @6:30 in the lobby for team dinner21:51
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Zesty Released, Artful Beta 2 Released | Archive: final beta freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-zesty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots:

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!