| popey | ahoneybun: some cc meetings are private, but usually public in #ubuntu-meeting. | 11:16 |
|---|---|---|
| ahoneybun | Alright thanks popey and jose | 13:19 |
| ahoneybun | popey: do we have a UCC meeting this thursday? | 16:09 |
| popey | I am not on the CC :) | 16:09 |
| ahoneybun | mm well the meeting logs are kinda light lately so no idea if someone is planning a meeting soon or what | 16:10 |
| popey | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncilAgenda has the details | 16:10 |
| popey | so yeah, 1st thursday looks good | 16:10 |
| ahoneybun | depends who is going to come tho lol | 16:10 |
| popey | well, the new cc should :) | 16:11 |
| ahoneybun | *should* | 16:11 |
| popey | maybe you could fire a mail at the cc and ensure they do :) | 16:12 |
| ahoneybun | good idea lol | 16:13 |
| popey | <- ideas man | 16:18 |
| tsimonq2 | (or as Chris Fisher likes to put it, "Canonical's Secret Weapon" :P) | 16:32 |
| knome | popey, where have you imagined flavors would appear at the new https://community.ubuntu.com/ ? | 19:41 |
| popey | knome: great question. how do you think flavours would want to use it? I anticipated that some already have their own tools. | 20:19 |
| knome | i was thinking from xubuntu's point of view and i think we would at least want to show up there | 20:20 |
| knome | probably not use it very actively | 20:20 |
| knome | or at least - not as the main platform for anything | 20:20 |
| popey | Right, that's what I thought. I figured some might want to use it but the branding might put people off, because it's not flavour specific branding | 20:21 |
| popey | but, as a project resource, I'm super keen to have anyone in the wider Ubuntu family use it in whatever way they want, within the overall remit of the site | 20:22 |
| popey | (i.e. not tech support) | 20:22 |
| knome | of course | 20:22 |
| knome | did discourse support subcategories again? | 20:22 |
| popey | yes | 20:22 |
| popey | look in the documentation category | 20:22 |
| popey | there are two (hidden from the main page) sub-categories in there | 20:22 |
| knome | so maybe a "Flavors" category and subcategories for each | 20:23 |
| popey | Yeah, maybe opt in, I wouldn't want to create a bunch of categories which end up with zero content | 20:23 |
| knome | absolutely | 20:23 |
| popey | But if you have some ideas for what might be posted there, I ca | 20:23 |
| popey | *can set them up | 20:24 |
| popey | happy to set you guys as moderators of the area etc | 20:24 |
| knome | i'll take this to the team devel list, but i think we could use it for some testing calls and other (probably more one-off) calls/announcements we want to spread as much as possible | 20:24 |
| knome | like a call for submissions to a wallpaper contest for the next LTS | 20:25 |
| popey | Yeah, we're gonna do a similar wallpaper thing for ubuntu i think | 20:26 |
| popey | we have an "announcements" category, we could put flavour announcements in there too? | 20:26 |
| popey | up to you, let me know what you guys/girls want and we'll accomodate it | 20:26 |
| knome | yeah, i'm not sure | 20:27 |
| popey | The good thing is it's super flexible so we can move posts around later | 20:27 |
| knome | if the flavors have their own (sub)categories, it might just be confusing to have the announcements elsewhere | 20:27 |
| popey | agreed | 20:27 |
| popey | the flipside being it's nice having one place for all announcements | 20:28 |
| popey | (although it's a complete lie that it's one place, of course, there's the social networks, ubuntu-announce mailing list, fridge, etc) | 20:28 |
| knome | yep | 20:29 |
| tsimonq2 | Really like how it looks so far popey :D | 20:31 |
| popey | <3 | 20:31 |
| popey | Suggestions for improvements always welcome. | 20:31 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: So it seems like on the Ubuntu MATE one at least I am part of "teams" which show up as badges when I post something | 20:33 |
| tsimonq2 | For example, I'm in an Ubuntu Members team (I think). | 20:33 |
| tsimonq2 | Could we maybe try something like that out? | 20:34 |
| tsimonq2 | (maybe have it authenticate with Launchpad teams or something to ease maintenance) | 20:34 |
| popey | We did discuss this with IS, and it's certainly an interesting thing that we could potentially do | 20:34 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: One more thing, is it ready enough to link in the topic here? :)) | 20:34 |
| tsimonq2 | Cool cool | 20:35 |
| popey | but we had to get the site up quickly, so didn't have time during the initial deployment | 20:35 |
| popey | totally! :D | 20:35 |
| popey | GO GO TOPIC! | 20:35 |
| === tsimonq2 changed the topic of #ubuntu-community-team to: Welcome to the IRC Home of the Ubuntu Community Team | Visit our new Ubuntu Community Hub, the place to get the latest happenings in the Ubuntu Community: https://community.ubuntu.com/ | Home page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BuildingCommunity | This channel is LOGGED: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | No Spoilers | ||
| tsimonq2 | Bam | 20:35 |
| tsimonq2 | Lil' marketing bit there :3 | 20:36 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: One thing I've been working on is helping reduce the number of exploitable CVEs in Universe packages | 20:39 |
| tsimonq2 | I've always just said something on my Twitter when an update is released | 20:40 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: Would that be something I can put under Announcements? | 20:40 |
| popey | If it's tweet sized, then maybe it's ideal for twitter :) | 20:41 |
| popey | Not sure we want to replicate things like artful-changes | 20:41 |
| tsimonq2 | Well the community CVE updates are somewhat low volume | 20:42 |
| tsimonq2 | A couple a week, maybe | 20:42 |
| tsimonq2 | But the point is to let people know that updates have been done to keep their systems secure. | 20:42 |
| * tsimonq2 shrugs | 20:42 | |
| popey | Yeah, they have value, totally | 20:42 |
| popey | Wondering where the best place for that is, and in what form. | 20:42 |
| tsimonq2 | Because ideally the goal is to help onboard more contributors to help. | 20:43 |
| tsimonq2 | It's a good (and easy) way to get involved with packaging, it's nothing complex (usually), just patch the upstream source and test it in a PPA to make sure it works. :) | 20:44 |
| tsimonq2 | Here's the list that I've (sort of) been following: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/universe.html | 20:44 |
| popey | You know what would be cool. Is a piece by piece guide to getting started helping fix these things | 20:45 |
| popey | not a 22 page packaging guide ;D | 20:45 |
| tsimonq2 | heh well the packaging guide has its uses ;) | 20:46 |
| tsimonq2 | But I agree. | 20:46 |
| tsimonq2 | Something super easy and quick someone can do. | 20:46 |
| * acheronuk nods | 20:46 | |
| popey | I'd love to see a simple guide for SRUs too - I mean, testing them | 20:47 |
| popey | that's a super simple way to help. Install this package - make sure the thing reported no longer happens - mark it fixed | 20:47 |
| tsimonq2 | And maybe once they've done the simple packaging tasks over and over and over again, they'll want to move on to something more complex. ;) | 20:47 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: Hm, I thought we already had one of those? | 20:47 |
| popey | We do? | 20:47 |
| tsimonq2 | Bam: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification | 20:48 |
| tsimonq2 | Maybe a bit outdated, though. | 20:48 |
| popey | I reckon most people don't know that page exists (as with much of the wiki) | 20:48 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: ooh that's something else I've been thinking about | 20:49 |
| tsimonq2 | Once the outstanding MediaWiki CVEs are dealt with... I think we actually need to focus on having a good, working wiki... | 20:49 |
| tsimonq2 | (imho) | 20:49 |
| popey | That would be fun. I'd love to help migrate. | 20:49 |
| tsimonq2 | Here's the thing, we had this discussion at one point, did we not? | 20:50 |
| tsimonq2 | And then (I think) Jorge Castro offered to give people a tarball of all the data to run through a conversion script. | 20:50 |
| popey | Yup, but it fell on the floor due to lack of time | 20:50 |
| popey | I have it | 20:50 |
| tsimonq2 | Nobody stepped up to make that happen. | 20:50 |
| popey | yeah. it's a big job | 20:50 |
| popey | Now, the next question is, do we *really* want to move to moin | 20:51 |
| popey | discourse has the concept of wiki posts :) | 20:51 |
| popey | (all the documentation category are wiki posts) | 20:51 |
| popey | (the content I copy/pasta'ed over from the old static site is all there and editable) | 20:51 |
| tsimonq2 | Ooh, that might be workable... would be nice to have that integrated with the new Community Hub :D | 20:52 |
| popey | Be interesting to build a list of most visited and most edited pages | 20:52 |
| popey | to see what coverage we need | 20:52 |
| popey | I imagine converting moin to markdown wouldn't be _that_ hard | 20:52 |
| popey | famous last words :D | 20:52 |
| tsimonq2 | Exactly, famous last words... :P | 20:52 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: Small(ish) nitpick, the Ubuntu logo used in the favicon isn't transparent, I've just Telegramed you what I mean by that | 20:54 |
| tsimonq2 | It would certainly bug someone with a dark browser theme... | 20:54 |
| popey | yeah, lemme see how to fix that | 20:55 |
| tsimonq2 | usn.ubuntu.com does that as well, I just need to figure out who/what to poke to fix it :P | 20:55 |
| tsimonq2 | AaaaaHA, nvm, found the GitHub page :P | 20:56 |
| knome | the favicon doesn't have a transparent bg either. | 21:01 |
| knome | oh | 21:01 |
| knome | wait | 21:01 |
| tsimonq2 | yeah :) | 21:01 |
| knome | going to bed, good night | 21:02 |
| popey | o/ | 21:02 |
| tsimonq2 | o/ knome | 21:03 |
| popey | https://assets.ubuntu.com/v1/49a1a858-favicon-32x32.png | 21:04 |
| popey | is that transparent for you? | 21:04 |
| popey | because that's the currently set favicon | 21:05 |
| tsimonq2 | No | 21:05 |
| popey | it is in eog | 21:06 |
| tsimonq2 | Hmmmm, interesting... | 21:07 |
| popey | and that's the same one that's on ubuntu.com | 21:09 |
| tsimonq2 | O__o | 21:09 |
| tsimonq2 | Ahh | 21:09 |
| tsimonq2 | Except, ubuntu.com's favicon isn't transparent either | 21:09 |
| popey | hah, okay | 21:09 |
| popey | get me the url of another one that is good | 21:10 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: Every one of these on here ;) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IconsPage | 21:12 |
| popey | wow, there's some crusty old icons on there! | 21:13 |
| tsimonq2 | But the Ubuntu one on there is actually good | 21:13 |
| tsimonq2 | :P | 21:13 |
| popey | iconCircle32.png ? | 21:13 |
| tsimonq2 | This one, specifically: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IconsPage?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=iconCircle48.png | 21:13 |
| tsimonq2 | Or that too :) | 21:13 |
| popey | ok, set that as favicon, look right now? | 21:14 |
| popey | (I see no favicon in my browser) | 21:14 |
| popey | looks good in my bookmarks.. | 21:15 |
| tsimonq2 | First load takes a bit... (cleared my cache) | 21:16 |
| tsimonq2 | Hmm, still not good... | 21:16 |
| tsimonq2 | But wait a minute it's better in Qupzilla | 21:17 |
| * tsimonq2 blames Firefox for this one :P | 21:17 | |
| tsimonq2 | popey: All better :D | 21:17 |
| popey | hehe | 21:17 |
| popey | \o/ | 21:17 |
| popey | thanks! | 21:17 |
| tsimonq2 | :D | 21:17 |
| tsimonq2 | popey: I have to go get some stuff done, but this is looking great so far! | 21:19 |
| popey | o/ | 21:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
