babbageclunk | thumper: can you review this please? https://github.com/juju/1.25-upgrade/pull/49 | 01:18 |
---|---|---|
thumper | ack | 01:19 |
babbageclunk | thumper: testing the final tweaks of the container systemd/upstart rewriting | 01:19 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: thumper: PTAL - https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7911 | 01:31 |
wallyworld | ok | 01:31 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: thumper: i think this is less confusing. tyvm :D | 01:31 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: replied but m so happy u liking me fixing this one! | 01:40 |
wallyworld | looking | 01:41 |
wallyworld | just "2.3" could imply only "2.3" and not "2.3.minor" | 01:42 |
wallyworld | once we hit 2.3, there are no more betas etc | 01:43 |
wallyworld | just point releases | 01:43 |
anastasiamac | k, so just for clarity - 2 is major, 3 is minor, everything else is a "patch" :D | 01:43 |
anastasiamac | so maybe the phrasing can be along "2.3 point releases"? | 01:44 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: ^^ | 01:44 |
wallyworld | ok, i'm not married to point vs patch | 01:45 |
wallyworld | whatever sounds correct | 01:46 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: or "this client can only bootstrap agents using any of the 2.3 Juju versions".... wordy but then avoids ambiguitites... | 01:48 |
wallyworld | sgtm | 01:49 |
thumper | wallyworld: I was thinking, we should skip our 1:1 in a few minutes and just have a joint one with jam later | 01:51 |
thumper | wallyworld: sound good? | 01:51 |
wallyworld | sgtm | 01:51 |
thumper | k | 01:51 |
wallyworld | anastasiamac: here's a micro PR to fix a test race https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7912 | 02:16 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: looking | 02:18 |
wallyworld | ta | 02:18 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: neat! i like explicit accessors and mutators by default :D | 02:20 |
wallyworld | that's your java beackground :-) | 02:20 |
anastasiamac | sh | 02:21 |
anastasiamac | wallyworld: or just pendatic "don't assume u know what i want, be explicit" | 02:21 |
anastasiamac | :D | 02:22 |
babbageclunk | thumper: what's a sensible default for when updated on a status record is nil? https://github.com/juju/1.25-upgrade/blob/master/juju1/state/migration_export.go#L1310 | 02:53 |
babbageclunk | thumper: 0? | 02:53 |
thumper | hmm.. | 02:59 |
thumper | no you don't want zero | 02:59 |
thumper | what does the rest of the record look like? | 03:00 |
babbageclunk | thumper: don't know, it's in IS | 03:00 |
babbageclunk | https://pastebin.canonical.com/199884/ | 03:01 |
thumper | hmm.. | 03:04 |
thumper | babbageclunk: perhaps defaulting it to the time of the export | 03:04 |
babbageclunk | thumper: yeah, that seems good to me. | 03:05 |
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
mup | Bug #1721555 opened: juju bootstrap node tries to reach manually added machines through private IPs instead of public <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1721555> | 14:37 |
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
mup | Bug #1721629 opened: No tools available via streams.canonical.com for 1.25.13 on i386 <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1721629> | 20:11 |
babbageclunk | thumper: take another look at https://github.com/juju/1.25-upgrade/pull/49 ? And also https://github.com/juju/1.25-upgrade/pull/50 | 21:12 |
balloons | can I get a review for version bump? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7917 | 21:16 |
mup | Bug #1721629 changed: No tools available via streams.canonical.com for 1.25.13 on i386 <juju:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1721629> | 21:20 |
babbageclunk | balloons: approved | 21:35 |
babbageclunk | thumper: hey thanks! | 22:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!