liam-r | @rbasak Sorry to bother you again but I tried omitting the first "dch -i" in my workflow and still can't get that man page to update. I can see that my change is recorded in util-linux_2.30.1-0ubuntu5_amd.changes but I still get the typo after running dpkg -i with the .deb on my artful system. Maybe I have something set up incorrectly or I'm not actually replacing the version on the artful system? I did track upstream to ke | 11:23 |
---|---|---|
liam-r | will patch there if it isn't already but I think I'll need to figure this out anyway for future bugs | 11:23 |
rbasak | liam-r: you can run "debdiff <old dsc> <new dsc>" to see if your change actually made it into the source package | 11:24 |
rbasak | liam-r: can you pastebin that? | 11:24 |
liam-r | I messed about a bit so there's 3 files as I added a second changelog entry, I've tested building at all stages https://pastebin.com/8UHQBaHV | 11:32 |
liam-r | thanks | 11:32 |
liam-r | rbasak I just realized you probably meant to debdiff the .dsc in pbuilder/artful_result but I get some errors when I do that. New paste is at https://pastebin.com/z3Gqxy38 . I need to go back to the day job for a few hours but I'll leave the chat logged in. | 12:08 |
rbasak | liam-r: util-linux_2.30.1-0ubuntu5.dsc looks fine to me | 12:17 |
liam-r | rbasak: I ran dpkg -x on the generated .deb I've been installing and I can't find "mount.8" anywhere in the contents. Maybe I've been building or installing the wrong thing? There's a mount.txt note in Documentation that says "== Notes to developers == | 14:41 |
liam-r | The final solution will be libmount/mount.c as the | 14:41 |
liam-r | mount(8) command implementation. So, let's keep the | 14:41 |
liam-r | current mount/* code in maintenance mode and don't try to | 14:41 |
liam-r | rewrite it :-) | 14:41 |
liam-r | " | 14:41 |
liam-r | so maybe it's to do with the package rather than my build of it? | 14:42 |
rbasak | liam-r: the util-linux source package builds many binary packages with many different names. Are you installing the right one? | 14:46 |
rbasak | liam-r: looks like you want mount....deb | 14:47 |
liam-r | rbasak: Thanks, that's it. I had also just thought to mangled the man for fsck and it shows when I install the util-linux deb. | 15:02 |
liam-r | As a matter of interest how did you figure out that mount.....deb would be the package? Did you go through the build for util-linux or is there an easier way? | 15:02 |
rbasak | $ dpkg -S mount.8 | 15:06 |
rbasak | mount: /usr/share/man/man8/umount.8.gz | 15:06 |
rbasak | mount: /usr/share/man/man8/mount.8.gz | 15:06 |
rbasak | It's a fair question :) | 15:06 |
liam-r | Ah ok I had no idea that they could be built from another package and deployed like that. I'll need to sit down with some .deb documentation for a night or two I think :) Thanks again for helping me out so much I was going crazy trying to figure out what I was doing | 15:08 |
rbasak | No problem. | 15:15 |
rbasak | It's not built from another package. | 15:15 |
rbasak | Source packages exist in a separate namespace from binary packages. | 15:15 |
rbasak | One source package builds one or more binary packages. | 15:15 |
rbasak | Collorary: each binary package is built from exactly one source package. | 15:16 |
liam-r | Ah it begins to make sense. Thanks | 15:19 |
cfs | Hello, I'm pinging about sponsorship for LP:1716047 (fix trusty's rustc control file). | 19:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!