[11:23] <liam-r> @rbasak Sorry to bother you again but I tried omitting the first "dch -i" in my workflow and still can't get that man page to update. I can see that my change is recorded in util-linux_2.30.1-0ubuntu5_amd.changes but I still get the typo after running dpkg -i with the .deb on my artful system. Maybe I have something set up incorrectly or I'm not actually replacing the version on the artful system? I did track upstream to ke
[11:23] <liam-r> will patch there if it isn't already but I think I'll need to figure this out anyway for future bugs
[11:24] <rbasak> liam-r: you can run "debdiff <old dsc> <new dsc>" to see if your change actually made it into the source package
[11:24] <rbasak> liam-r: can you pastebin that?
[11:32] <liam-r> I messed about a bit so there's 3 files as I added a second changelog entry, I've tested building at all stages https://pastebin.com/8UHQBaHV
[11:32] <liam-r> thanks
[12:08] <liam-r> rbasak I just realized you probably meant to debdiff the .dsc in pbuilder/artful_result but I get some errors when I do that. New paste is at https://pastebin.com/z3Gqxy38 . I need to go back to the day job for a few hours but I'll leave the chat logged in.
[12:17] <rbasak> liam-r: util-linux_2.30.1-0ubuntu5.dsc looks fine to me
[14:41] <liam-r> rbasak: I ran dpkg -x on the generated .deb I've been installing and I can't find "mount.8" anywhere in the contents. Maybe I've been building or installing the wrong thing? There's a mount.txt note in Documentation that says "== Notes to developers ==
[14:41] <liam-r> 	The final solution will be libmount/mount.c as the
[14:41] <liam-r> 	mount(8) command implementation. So, let's keep the
[14:41] <liam-r> 	current mount/* code in maintenance mode and don't try to
[14:41] <liam-r> 	rewrite it :-)
[14:41] <liam-r> "
[14:42] <liam-r> so maybe it's to do with the package rather than my build of it?
[14:46] <rbasak> liam-r: the util-linux source package builds many binary packages with many different names. Are you installing the right one?
[14:47] <rbasak> liam-r: looks like you want mount....deb
[15:02] <liam-r> rbasak: Thanks, that's it. I had also just  thought to mangled the man for fsck and it shows when I install the util-linux deb.
[15:02] <liam-r> As a matter of interest how did you figure out that mount.....deb would be the package? Did you go through the build for util-linux or is there an easier way?
[15:06] <rbasak> $ dpkg -S mount.8
[15:06] <rbasak> mount: /usr/share/man/man8/umount.8.gz
[15:06] <rbasak> mount: /usr/share/man/man8/mount.8.gz
[15:06] <rbasak> It's a fair question :)
[15:08] <liam-r> Ah ok I had no idea that they could be built from another package and deployed like that. I'll need to sit down with some .deb documentation for a night or two I think :) Thanks again for helping me out so much I was going crazy trying to figure out what I was doing
[15:15] <rbasak> No problem.
[15:15] <rbasak> It's not built from another package.
[15:15] <rbasak> Source packages exist in a separate namespace from binary packages.
[15:15] <rbasak> One source package builds one or more binary packages.
[15:16] <rbasak> Collorary: each binary package is built from exactly one source package.
[15:19] <liam-r> Ah it begins to make sense. Thanks
[19:41] <cfs> Hello, I'm pinging about sponsorship for LP:1716047 (fix trusty's rustc control file).