/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/10/13/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mythtv (artful-proposed/multiverse) [2:29.0+fixes.20170728.696806310a-0ubuntu1 => 2:29.0+fixes.20171012.44dac01b21-manualbuildubuntu1] (mythbuntu)02:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: profnet (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.22-4build1 => 1.0.22-4build2] (no packageset)04:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted profnet [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.22-4build2]04:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-biocgenerics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-1build1 => 0.22.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)04:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-biocgenerics [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.22.1-1]04:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (artful-proposed/main) [2:1.19.4-1ubuntu2 => 2:1.19.5-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg)05:53
tjaalton^ new xserver, one regression revert, 12 cve fixes and one other fix05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (artful-proposed/main) [2.5.54 => 2.5.55] (core) (sync)06:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-biocgenerics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.1-1 => 0.22.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-biocgenerics [source] (artful-proposed) [0.22.1-1ubuntu1]07:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsdl2 (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.6+dfsg1-2ubuntu2 => 2.0.6+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu)07:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-s4vectors (artful-proposed/universe) [0.14.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.14.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-s4vectors [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.14.7-1]08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsdl2 [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.6+dfsg1-3ubuntu1]09:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mythtv [source] (artful-proposed) [2:29.0+fixes.20171012.44dac01b21-manualbuildubuntu1]09:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.5.55]09:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (artful-proposed) [2:1.19.5-0ubuntu1]09:01
xnoxinfinity, there will be d-i rebuild to pick up debian-installer-utils among other things?09:03
xnoxand netcfg09:03
xnoxand i guess all the things.09:03
infinityxnox: There was a d-i 11 hours ago, was that too soon?09:04
xnoxi think so, let me double check09:04
infinityxnox: Certainly looks newer than both d-i-utils and netcfg.09:04
* xnox was looking at release pocket, doh09:04
xnoxinfinity, looks good the one in proposed =)09:05
infinity\o/09:05
infinityxnox: It'll meander out to release when Andy's happy with his kernel.09:05
apwserendipidy09:05
infinity(Which might be never, because is Andy really ever happy with the kernel?)09:06
apwinfinity, heh a point indeed.  this one is less terrible than average09:07
infinityapw: Never go into sales.09:07
infinity"Buy our product because it's 23% less crap than the competitors."09:07
apwoh i think i would like sales people to be like that09:08
smbsounds at least more honest that "we got shiny and flawless"09:08
apw23% less crap would be marvelous09:08
infinitysmb: I suspect that level of honesty would only work if universally applied.  When others focus on why they're better and you focus on why you're less bad, you just look negative.09:09
xnoxis this is where i was going wrong in my dating life?!09:10
infinityxnox: We could probably make a list.09:10
xnox*stack overflow* ?09:10
infinityIf you're asking stackoverflow for dating advice, that's your first mistake.09:11
smbinfinity, I find "less mad than <insert-scary-name>" rather positive09:11
infinitysmb: You've been hanging out with too many Brits. ;)09:11
* smb pleads guilty09:12
infinitysmb: But okay, <insert-scary-name> is an exception to the rule, I suppose.  This may be the one time in (my) political history, when I'd consider voting for someone because they're "not the other guy".09:12
apwisn't less crazy than xnox some kind of invariant ?  :)09:13
infinitysmb: Usually, "not the other guy" is the most insulting platform/position you can put to your voters, customers, whatever.09:13
infinity"I'm glad you're not the guy I dislike, but tell me why I should LIKE you, doofus."09:13
smbOh I wish they would start giving hints about that and not look like just a different colour of the shed09:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu3 => 1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)09:44
seb128^ could that gnome-conctrol-center upload be considered for the iso? it fixes a quite visible theming regression in the settings that was created by another fix this week (and include as trivial fix that was pending as well)09:46
infinityseb128: I'll consider it after LP graces me with a diff.09:48
seb128infinity, thanks09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-h5netcdf (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)10:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-h5netcdf [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.4.3-1]10:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dupload (artful-proposed/main) [2.9.0ubuntu2 => 2.9.1ubuntu1] (core)10:18
LocutusOfBorginfinity, do you mind updating force-badtest udisks2/2.6.5-2ubuntu1/ppc64el to ubuntu2? thanks!10:23
LocutusOfBorgoops s/infinity/ slangasek /g10:23
infinityOnly one of those people is awake.10:24
apw(and it isn't infinity)10:24
LocutusOfBorgI usually grep on hints repo for the person who "owns" the hint10:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)10:25
LocutusOfBorgand I forget to translate vorlon in the right correct nick :p10:25
LocutusOfBorgapw, do you have a way to fix that ABI failure in my kernel ppa build? or alternatively, do you think we can get vbox merged and enabled again?10:26
apwLocutusOfBorg, yes, you can either disble abi checks by adding ignore files in the right place10:27
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Done.10:27
infinityEasier to just not have a new changelog entry.10:27
LocutusOfBorginfinity, <3 this will help glibc a little bit10:27
apwLocutusOfBorg, or you can stop making a new top changelog entry and just modify the top one10:27
infinityDisabling ABI checks is hard.10:27
LocutusOfBorgseriously, not bumping changelog entry works? smart!10:28
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Basically, the ABI checker will look at your ABI version, check if there's a previous one of the same ABI, and then trip.  If you just alter the top level entry (so there's only one -16.foo), then all is well.10:28
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I mean, you want to change the version so it's not the same as the archive one, to avoid breaking your brain, but change it instead of adding a new one.10:29
LocutusOfBorgoh ok,10:30
LocutusOfBorgI would also make sure that the ubuntu/vbox is not built, but probably it doesn't matter10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libimobiledevice (artful-proposed/main) [1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu2 => 1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)10:31
infinitynacc: Around?10:31
infinityrbasak: Or you?10:32
infinityjamespage: Or maybe you? :P10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sane-backends [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu1]10:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dupload [source] (artful-proposed) [2.9.1ubuntu1]10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libimobiledevice [source] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu3]10:35
LocutusOfBorginfinity, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/340734141/linux_4.13.0-16.20_4.13.0-16.21.diff.gz hopefully I did it right10:37
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Should o.10:38
infinitydo.10:38
LocutusOfBorgthanks10:38
rbasakinfinity: o/10:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xchat-gnome (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu10 => 1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xchat-gnome [source] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]10:44
infinityrbasak: Hi!10:45
infinityrbasak: You guys are the proud owners of the only outstanding node on component-mismatches.10:45
infinityrbasak: And to make things more fun, it's a seeded package (tomcat8), so needs action pretty much now.10:45
* rbasak thought we were holding back on updating tomcat810:46
infinityEvidently not.10:46
rbasakLooks like doko synced it10:47
infinityrbasak: Anyhow, the simple fix would just be dmoting that recommends back to a suggests and revisiting for Boris Bike.10:47
infinityrbasak: Or you can try to push an MIR in 12 hours, if you're feeling confident. :P10:47
rbasakThat's fine, but I remember being told to not sync it because it would break things10:47
LocutusOfBorgBoris Bike... do we have a CODENAME?10:48
rbasakSo if it's indeed broken things, peraps the right thing to do is to gobackwards.10:48
rbasakWe have an infinityname10:48
rbasakI'm sure we will have infinitely more :)10:48
infinityLocutusOfBorg: If we had a codename, it wouldn't be a joke about London's public bike service.10:48
LocutusOfBorg:)10:48
infinityrbasak: I see no evidence anything's broken.10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:48
LocutusOfBorgI found it after a googling10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:48
infinityrbasak: Just a recommends that used to be a suggests.10:48
rbasak17:21 <nacc> cpaelzer: if we migrate tomcat8 to 8.5, dogtag-pki and tomcatjss will immediately break again10:49
rbasakPerhaps that's now fixed10:49
infinityDo either of them have tests?10:50
LocutusOfBorgdogtag-pki ->   * control: Use tomcat8.0.10:50
LocutusOfBorgI would say broken, tjaalton ^^10:50
infinityhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcatjss/7.2.4-0ubuntu1 <-- Seems tomcat8 specific.10:50
infinityOh, we have tomcat8.0 as well as tomcat8.10:51
infinityThat's not confusing AT ALL.10:51
infinityrbasak: I guess that was the compromise.10:51
infinityrbasak: tomcat8.0 satisfies the two broken things.10:52
tjaaltondidn't doko sync tomcat8 already?10:52
infinitytjaalton: Yes.10:52
infinitytjaalton: rbasak was just trying to unwind if that was thought-out.10:52
infinityAnd it seems like it was, given your tomcat8.0 uploads.10:52
tjaaltonthe sync happened first10:52
tjaaltonthen panic :)10:52
infinityHeh.10:53
infinityrbasak: Okay, so, the above has me convinced that panic and revert isn't necessary, just dealing with that recommends.10:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:53
rbasaktjaalton: what's the expecatation around upgrade path for users?10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:54
infinityrbasak: And I think the right answer is probably "demote to Suggests and then push for an MIR in 18.04 as soon as it opens and revert back to Recommends".10:54
rbasaktjaalton: you expect most of them to move to 8.5?10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)10:54
tjaaltonrbasak: these are coinstallable, just that tomcatjss depends on 8.010:55
tjaaltonit only ships a subset of tomcat10:55
tjaaltonwe'll get rid of it in 18.04, with upstream support or without10:56
rbasakOK thanks10:56
* rbasak wonders why he can't find a tomcat-native binary10:57
rbasakOh, a virtual package?10:57
rbasakSeemingly not10:57
infinityrbasak: tomcat-native is the source.10:57
infinityrbasak: libtcnative-1 is the binary.10:58
rbasakOh10:58
infinitytjaalton: Since you're around.  sssd-kcm.  Demote to universe, or should it be seeded somewhere?10:58
tjaaltoninfinity: universe is fine10:59
infinityTa.10:59
tjaaltonno rdeps10:59
infinitytjaalton: Indeed, if it had rdeps, component-mismatches wouldn't be telling me to demote. :)11:00
tjaaltonright11:00
rbasakinfinity: OK, all understood now. I'll do as you suggest.11:00
infinityrbasak: As I Suggests?  Eh, eh?11:00
rbasak:-)11:01
infinity(It's 5am, pretend I'm funny)11:01
rbasaklibtcnative-1 is a Build-Depends-Indep as well as a Recommends. The former is fine with the new rules, right?11:03
infinityrbasak: Yep.11:03
infinityAlso, weird.11:04
infinityDo they know what "indep" means? :)11:04
infinity(Does it really need libtcnative-1 to build the docs? :P)11:04
infinityOh, maybe they use it to accelerate building and testing the JARs, which are arch:all.11:04
infinityJava is silly.11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (artful-proposed/main) [8.5.21-1 => 8.5.21-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)11:17
infinityseb128: Did you mean to also revert the pinyin->sunpinyin change with that fix?11:18
seb128no11:19
infinityseb128: That change looked correct to me (ibus-sunpinyin is in the live seed, ibus-pinyin is not)11:19
seb128thanks for pointing that11:19
seb128must be a problem with the packaging vcs11:19
seb128let me look11:20
infinityseb128: Kay, rejecting.11:20
seb128thanks11:20
infinityseb128: Please debdiff against the archive before the next upload. :)11:20
seb128right11:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]11:20
seb128k, reuploaded without the revert11:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)11:30
infinityseb128: Shiny.11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [source] (artful-proposed) [8.5.21-1ubuntu1]11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.2-2ubuntu1]11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (artful-proposed/main) [1.385 => 1.386] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphicsmagick (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.26-13 => 1.3.26-14] (ubuntustudio) (sync)12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caribou (artful-proposed/main) [0.4.21-1 => 0.4.21-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)12:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (artful-proposed) [1.386]13:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-iranges (artful-proposed/universe) [2.10.2-1ubuntu2 => 2.10.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-iranges [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.10.5-1]13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-vpnaas (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-gpu-tools (artful-proposed/main) [1.20-1 => 1.20-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)13:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:5.0-3~ubuntu16.04.1]14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numactl (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.11-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.11-1ubuntu1.1] (core)14:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-2 => 3.26.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)14:09
infinityLaney: armhf autopkgtest seems to have gone kablooey.14:17
infinityslangasek: ^-- If you remember how those bits work and get there first.14:17
slangasekarmhf autopkgtest stuff as a whole?14:18
infinityslangasek: As in, no jobs being dispatched, no runners.14:19
infinity06:40 <apw> Stderr: ssh: connect to host 10.100.0.23 port 22: No route to host14:19
infinityThat sounds ungood.14:19
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, "CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER=OFF" was it needed?14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-gpu-tools [source] (artful-proposed) [1.20-1ubuntu1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-2ubuntu1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caribou [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.4.21-2]14:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted graphicsmagick [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.3.26-14]14:26
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: yep14:31
tjaaltonfirst batch of hwe pkgs for 16.04.4 is now on the queue (libdrm, wayland-protocols, llvm-5)14:32
LocutusOfBorgwhy, the non-linux build has not14:32
tjaaltonhuh?14:32
LocutusOfBorgifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS),linux))14:33
LocutusOfBorg        LIBFUZZER_ENABLE=no14:33
LocutusOfBorgendif14:33
LocutusOfBorgI woudl expected it to be the same, not with additional cmake flags14:33
LocutusOfBorgso, the second line seems useless14:33
LocutusOfBorggrep LLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER . -R returns nothing in the source tree...14:34
LocutusOfBorgmeh, doesn't hurt, but I want to know if non-linux builds are broken and needs it too14:34
tjaaltonah, well copied what was on the old release14:35
tjaalton3.8/4.0 show no hits either14:38
tjaaltonmust be magic then14:38
tjaaltonafk ->14:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.9 => 17.10.10] (core)14:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (artful-proposed/main) [4.9.0-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)15:05
naccrbasak: yes, sorry, it's my todo, we can demote for aa15:05
nacc(recommends -> suggests)15:05
rbasaknacc: already done ;)15:05
rbasakI left a MIR bug open15:05
=== ahasenack is now known as andreas
naccrbasak: err, yes -- we probably want to MIR it for bb15:06
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, problem is that we build fuzzer, but all the code is inside ifeq (LIBFUZZER_ENABLE) so the check is not run and no segfault no install15:11
LocutusOfBorgso again, that line is probably useless15:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.10]15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xen [source] (artful-proposed) [4.9.0-0ubuntu3]15:57
slangasekLaney: I went looking at armhf runners; the arm64 instance had unaligned access in dmesg and defunct lxd runners.  I rebooted, and lxd appears not to have come back up automatically16:07
slangasekLaney: I'm now rerunning the /var/tmp/setup scripts, is that what I should be doing?16:07
slangasek(and I've so far only looked at one of the instances)16:08
slangasekLaney: also, is it intended that we're using btrfs under lxd?16:08
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: what line?16:55
LocutusOfBorghttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/340751384/llvm-toolchain-5.0_1%3A5.0-3_1%3A5.0-3~ubuntu16.04.1.diff.gz16:57
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER=OFF16:57
LocutusOfBorgthat line16:57
tjaaltonok, why was it put there in the first place then.. I grepped through several releases and found no hits17:00
tjaaltonanyway, I can drop it17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-filehash (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3-1ubuntu2 => 2.4-1-2] (no packageset) (sync)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-filehash [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.4-1-2]17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (zesty-proposed/main) [3.4-4 => 3.4-4ubuntu0.1] (core)17:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (artful-proposed/main) [2.18-0ubuntu4 => 2.18-0ubuntu5] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)18:18
stgraber^ pretty small diff fixing a bunch of issues for people upgrading to LXC 2.1 (network patch) and those using a dir storage pool using a non-standard location (might affect juju)18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (artful-proposed/universe) [1.52 => 1.53] (no packageset)18:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (artful-proposed) [1.53]18:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.9 => 1:17.04.10] (core)18:54
andreasinfinity: hi, after some discussion, looks like they have settled on a final new alias for the "ubuntu-advantage" script in the ubuntu-advantage-tools package. If there is still time for artful, the bug has been updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/172127218:57
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1721272 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Create 'ua' symlink pointing at 'ubuntu-advantage'" [High,New]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.22 => 1:16.04.23] (core)19:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [i386] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (artful-proposed/main) [0.125ubuntu11 => 0.125ubuntu12] (core)19:43
apw^ this is a adding a boot critical device to the initramfs19:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu2 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu3] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.28.4~14.04 => 2.28.5~14.04] (no packageset)22:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.28.4+17.10 => 2.28.5+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)22:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.28.4+17.04 => 2.28.5+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)22:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.28.4 => 2.28.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)22:26
valorieany guesses as to when the RC will be spun? the list has nothing new23:38
jbichavalorie: I believe we're waiting for several packages to migrate first like ubiquity and the langpacks23:56
jbichahttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!