=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mythtv (artful-proposed/multiverse) [2:29.0+fixes.20170728.696806310a-0ubuntu1 => 2:29.0+fixes.20171012.44dac01b21-manualbuildubuntu1] (mythbuntu) | 02:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: profnet (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.22-4build1 => 1.0.22-4build2] (no packageset) | 04:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted profnet [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.22-4build2] | 04:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-biocgenerics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-1build1 => 0.22.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 04:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-biocgenerics [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.22.1-1] | 04:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (artful-proposed/main) [2:1.19.4-1ubuntu2 => 2:1.19.5-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg) | 05:53 | |
tjaalton | ^ new xserver, one regression revert, 12 cve fixes and one other fix | 05:54 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (artful-proposed/main) [2.5.54 => 2.5.55] (core) (sync) | 06:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-biocgenerics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.1-1 => 0.22.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 07:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-biocgenerics [source] (artful-proposed) [0.22.1-1ubuntu1] | 07:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsdl2 (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.6+dfsg1-2ubuntu2 => 2.0.6+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 07:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-s4vectors (artful-proposed/universe) [0.14.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.14.7-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 08:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-s4vectors [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.14.7-1] | 08:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsdl2 [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.6+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] | 09:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mythtv [source] (artful-proposed) [2:29.0+fixes.20171012.44dac01b21-manualbuildubuntu1] | 09:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.5.55] | 09:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (artful-proposed) [2:1.19.5-0ubuntu1] | 09:01 | |
xnox | infinity, there will be d-i rebuild to pick up debian-installer-utils among other things? | 09:03 |
xnox | and netcfg | 09:03 |
xnox | and i guess all the things. | 09:03 |
infinity | xnox: There was a d-i 11 hours ago, was that too soon? | 09:04 |
xnox | i think so, let me double check | 09:04 |
infinity | xnox: Certainly looks newer than both d-i-utils and netcfg. | 09:04 |
* xnox was looking at release pocket, doh | 09:04 | |
xnox | infinity, looks good the one in proposed =) | 09:05 |
infinity | \o/ | 09:05 |
infinity | xnox: It'll meander out to release when Andy's happy with his kernel. | 09:05 |
apw | serendipidy | 09:05 |
infinity | (Which might be never, because is Andy really ever happy with the kernel?) | 09:06 |
apw | infinity, heh a point indeed. this one is less terrible than average | 09:07 |
infinity | apw: Never go into sales. | 09:07 |
infinity | "Buy our product because it's 23% less crap than the competitors." | 09:07 |
apw | oh i think i would like sales people to be like that | 09:08 |
smb | sounds at least more honest that "we got shiny and flawless" | 09:08 |
apw | 23% less crap would be marvelous | 09:08 |
infinity | smb: I suspect that level of honesty would only work if universally applied. When others focus on why they're better and you focus on why you're less bad, you just look negative. | 09:09 |
xnox | is this is where i was going wrong in my dating life?! | 09:10 |
infinity | xnox: We could probably make a list. | 09:10 |
xnox | *stack overflow* ? | 09:10 |
infinity | If you're asking stackoverflow for dating advice, that's your first mistake. | 09:11 |
smb | infinity, I find "less mad than <insert-scary-name>" rather positive | 09:11 |
infinity | smb: You've been hanging out with too many Brits. ;) | 09:11 |
* smb pleads guilty | 09:12 | |
infinity | smb: But okay, <insert-scary-name> is an exception to the rule, I suppose. This may be the one time in (my) political history, when I'd consider voting for someone because they're "not the other guy". | 09:12 |
apw | isn't less crazy than xnox some kind of invariant ? :) | 09:13 |
infinity | smb: Usually, "not the other guy" is the most insulting platform/position you can put to your voters, customers, whatever. | 09:13 |
infinity | "I'm glad you're not the guy I dislike, but tell me why I should LIKE you, doofus." | 09:13 |
smb | Oh I wish they would start giving hints about that and not look like just a different colour of the shed | 09:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu3 => 1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:44 | |
seb128 | ^ could that gnome-conctrol-center upload be considered for the iso? it fixes a quite visible theming regression in the settings that was created by another fix this week (and include as trivial fix that was pending as well) | 09:46 |
infinity | seb128: I'll consider it after LP graces me with a diff. | 09:48 |
seb128 | infinity, thanks | 09:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-h5netcdf (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.3-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-h5netcdf [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.4.3-1] | 10:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4] | 10:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5] | 10:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dupload (artful-proposed/main) [2.9.0ubuntu2 => 2.9.1ubuntu1] (core) | 10:18 | |
LocutusOfBorg | infinity, do you mind updating force-badtest udisks2/2.6.5-2ubuntu1/ppc64el to ubuntu2? thanks! | 10:23 |
LocutusOfBorg | oops s/infinity/ slangasek /g | 10:23 |
infinity | Only one of those people is awake. | 10:24 |
apw | (and it isn't infinity) | 10:24 |
LocutusOfBorg | I usually grep on hints repo for the person who "owns" the hint | 10:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 10:25 | |
LocutusOfBorg | and I forget to translate vorlon in the right correct nick :p | 10:25 |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, do you have a way to fix that ABI failure in my kernel ppa build? or alternatively, do you think we can get vbox merged and enabled again? | 10:26 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, yes, you can either disble abi checks by adding ignore files in the right place | 10:27 |
infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Done. | 10:27 |
infinity | Easier to just not have a new changelog entry. | 10:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | infinity, <3 this will help glibc a little bit | 10:27 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, or you can stop making a new top changelog entry and just modify the top one | 10:27 |
infinity | Disabling ABI checks is hard. | 10:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | seriously, not bumping changelog entry works? smart! | 10:28 |
infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Basically, the ABI checker will look at your ABI version, check if there's a previous one of the same ABI, and then trip. If you just alter the top level entry (so there's only one -16.foo), then all is well. | 10:28 |
infinity | LocutusOfBorg: I mean, you want to change the version so it's not the same as the archive one, to avoid breaking your brain, but change it instead of adding a new one. | 10:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh ok, | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | I would also make sure that the ubuntu/vbox is not built, but probably it doesn't matter | 10:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libimobiledevice (artful-proposed/main) [1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu2 => 1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 10:31 | |
infinity | nacc: Around? | 10:31 |
infinity | rbasak: Or you? | 10:32 |
infinity | jamespage: Or maybe you? :P | 10:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sane-backends [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu1] | 10:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dupload [source] (artful-proposed) [2.9.1ubuntu1] | 10:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libimobiledevice [source] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu3] | 10:35 | |
LocutusOfBorg | infinity, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/340734141/linux_4.13.0-16.20_4.13.0-16.21.diff.gz hopefully I did it right | 10:37 |
infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Should o. | 10:38 |
infinity | do. | 10:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 10:38 |
rbasak | infinity: o/ | 10:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xchat-gnome (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu10 => 1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xchat-gnome [source] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 10:44 | |
infinity | rbasak: Hi! | 10:45 |
infinity | rbasak: You guys are the proud owners of the only outstanding node on component-mismatches. | 10:45 |
infinity | rbasak: And to make things more fun, it's a seeded package (tomcat8), so needs action pretty much now. | 10:45 |
* rbasak thought we were holding back on updating tomcat8 | 10:46 | |
infinity | Evidently not. | 10:46 |
rbasak | Looks like doko synced it | 10:47 |
infinity | rbasak: Anyhow, the simple fix would just be dmoting that recommends back to a suggests and revisiting for Boris Bike. | 10:47 |
infinity | rbasak: Or you can try to push an MIR in 12 hours, if you're feeling confident. :P | 10:47 |
rbasak | That's fine, but I remember being told to not sync it because it would break things | 10:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | Boris Bike... do we have a CODENAME? | 10:48 |
rbasak | So if it's indeed broken things, peraps the right thing to do is to gobackwards. | 10:48 |
rbasak | We have an infinityname | 10:48 |
rbasak | I'm sure we will have infinitely more :) | 10:48 |
infinity | LocutusOfBorg: If we had a codename, it wouldn't be a joke about London's public bike service. | 10:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | :) | 10:48 |
infinity | rbasak: I see no evidence anything's broken. | 10:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:48 | |
LocutusOfBorg | I found it after a googling | 10:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:48 | |
infinity | rbasak: Just a recommends that used to be a suggests. | 10:48 |
rbasak | 17:21 <nacc> cpaelzer: if we migrate tomcat8 to 8.5, dogtag-pki and tomcatjss will immediately break again | 10:49 |
rbasak | Perhaps that's now fixed | 10:49 |
infinity | Do either of them have tests? | 10:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | dogtag-pki -> * control: Use tomcat8.0. | 10:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | I would say broken, tjaalton ^^ | 10:50 |
infinity | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcatjss/7.2.4-0ubuntu1 <-- Seems tomcat8 specific. | 10:50 |
infinity | Oh, we have tomcat8.0 as well as tomcat8. | 10:51 |
infinity | That's not confusing AT ALL. | 10:51 |
infinity | rbasak: I guess that was the compromise. | 10:51 |
infinity | rbasak: tomcat8.0 satisfies the two broken things. | 10:52 |
tjaalton | didn't doko sync tomcat8 already? | 10:52 |
infinity | tjaalton: Yes. | 10:52 |
infinity | tjaalton: rbasak was just trying to unwind if that was thought-out. | 10:52 |
infinity | And it seems like it was, given your tomcat8.0 uploads. | 10:52 |
tjaalton | the sync happened first | 10:52 |
tjaalton | then panic :) | 10:52 |
infinity | Heh. | 10:53 |
infinity | rbasak: Okay, so, the above has me convinced that panic and revert isn't necessary, just dealing with that recommends. | 10:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:53 | |
rbasak | tjaalton: what's the expecatation around upgrade path for users? | 10:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:54 | |
infinity | rbasak: And I think the right answer is probably "demote to Suggests and then push for an MIR in 18.04 as soon as it opens and revert back to Recommends". | 10:54 |
rbasak | tjaalton: you expect most of them to move to 8.5? | 10:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset) | 10:54 | |
tjaalton | rbasak: these are coinstallable, just that tomcatjss depends on 8.0 | 10:55 |
tjaalton | it only ships a subset of tomcat | 10:55 |
tjaalton | we'll get rid of it in 18.04, with upstream support or without | 10:56 |
rbasak | OK thanks | 10:56 |
* rbasak wonders why he can't find a tomcat-native binary | 10:57 | |
rbasak | Oh, a virtual package? | 10:57 |
rbasak | Seemingly not | 10:57 |
infinity | rbasak: tomcat-native is the source. | 10:57 |
infinity | rbasak: libtcnative-1 is the binary. | 10:58 |
rbasak | Oh | 10:58 |
infinity | tjaalton: Since you're around. sssd-kcm. Demote to universe, or should it be seeded somewhere? | 10:58 |
tjaalton | infinity: universe is fine | 10:59 |
infinity | Ta. | 10:59 |
tjaalton | no rdeps | 10:59 |
infinity | tjaalton: Indeed, if it had rdeps, component-mismatches wouldn't be telling me to demote. :) | 11:00 |
tjaalton | right | 11:00 |
rbasak | infinity: OK, all understood now. I'll do as you suggest. | 11:00 |
infinity | rbasak: As I Suggests? Eh, eh? | 11:00 |
rbasak | :-) | 11:01 |
infinity | (It's 5am, pretend I'm funny) | 11:01 |
rbasak | libtcnative-1 is a Build-Depends-Indep as well as a Recommends. The former is fine with the new rules, right? | 11:03 |
infinity | rbasak: Yep. | 11:03 |
infinity | Also, weird. | 11:04 |
infinity | Do they know what "indep" means? :) | 11:04 |
infinity | (Does it really need libtcnative-1 to build the docs? :P) | 11:04 |
infinity | Oh, maybe they use it to accelerate building and testing the JARs, which are arch:all. | 11:04 |
infinity | Java is silly. | 11:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (artful-proposed/main) [8.5.21-1 => 8.5.21-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 11:17 | |
infinity | seb128: Did you mean to also revert the pinyin->sunpinyin change with that fix? | 11:18 |
seb128 | no | 11:19 |
infinity | seb128: That change looked correct to me (ibus-sunpinyin is in the live seed, ibus-pinyin is not) | 11:19 |
seb128 | thanks for pointing that | 11:19 |
seb128 | must be a problem with the packaging vcs | 11:19 |
seb128 | let me look | 11:20 |
infinity | seb128: Kay, rejecting. | 11:20 |
seb128 | thanks | 11:20 |
infinity | seb128: Please debdiff against the archive before the next upload. :) | 11:20 |
seb128 | right | 11:20 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5] | 11:20 | |
seb128 | k, reuploaded without the revert | 11:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:30 | |
infinity | seb128: Shiny. | 11:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [source] (artful-proposed) [8.5.21-1ubuntu1] | 11:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5] | 11:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.2-2ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (artful-proposed/main) [1.385 => 1.386] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphicsmagick (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.26-13 => 1.3.26-14] (ubuntustudio) (sync) | 12:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caribou (artful-proposed/main) [0.4.21-1 => 0.4.21-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 12:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (artful-proposed) [1.386] | 13:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-iranges (artful-proposed/universe) [2.10.2-1ubuntu2 => 2.10.5-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-iranges [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.10.5-1] | 13:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-vpnaas (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-gpu-tools (artful-proposed/main) [1.20-1 => 1.20-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 13:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:5.0-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numactl (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.11-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.11-1ubuntu1.1] (core) | 14:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-2 => 3.26.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:09 | |
infinity | Laney: armhf autopkgtest seems to have gone kablooey. | 14:17 |
infinity | slangasek: ^-- If you remember how those bits work and get there first. | 14:17 |
slangasek | armhf autopkgtest stuff as a whole? | 14:18 |
infinity | slangasek: As in, no jobs being dispatched, no runners. | 14:19 |
infinity | 06:40 <apw> Stderr: ssh: connect to host 10.100.0.23 port 22: No route to host | 14:19 |
infinity | That sounds ungood. | 14:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, "CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER=OFF" was it needed? | 14:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-gpu-tools [source] (artful-proposed) [1.20-1ubuntu1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-2ubuntu1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caribou [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.4.21-2] | 14:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted graphicsmagick [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.3.26-14] | 14:26 | |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: yep | 14:31 |
tjaalton | first batch of hwe pkgs for 16.04.4 is now on the queue (libdrm, wayland-protocols, llvm-5) | 14:32 |
LocutusOfBorg | why, the non-linux build has not | 14:32 |
tjaalton | huh? | 14:32 |
LocutusOfBorg | ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS),linux)) | 14:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | LIBFUZZER_ENABLE=no | 14:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | endif | 14:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | I woudl expected it to be the same, not with additional cmake flags | 14:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | so, the second line seems useless | 14:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | grep LLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER . -R returns nothing in the source tree... | 14:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | meh, doesn't hurt, but I want to know if non-linux builds are broken and needs it too | 14:34 |
tjaalton | ah, well copied what was on the old release | 14:35 |
tjaalton | 3.8/4.0 show no hits either | 14:38 |
tjaalton | must be magic then | 14:38 |
tjaalton | afk -> | 14:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.9 => 17.10.10] (core) | 14:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (artful-proposed/main) [4.9.0-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) | 15:05 | |
nacc | rbasak: yes, sorry, it's my todo, we can demote for aa | 15:05 |
nacc | (recommends -> suggests) | 15:05 |
rbasak | nacc: already done ;) | 15:05 |
rbasak | I left a MIR bug open | 15:05 |
=== ahasenack is now known as andreas | ||
nacc | rbasak: err, yes -- we probably want to MIR it for bb | 15:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, problem is that we build fuzzer, but all the code is inside ifeq (LIBFUZZER_ENABLE) so the check is not run and no segfault no install | 15:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | so again, that line is probably useless | 15:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.10] | 15:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xen [source] (artful-proposed) [4.9.0-0ubuntu3] | 15:57 | |
slangasek | Laney: I went looking at armhf runners; the arm64 instance had unaligned access in dmesg and defunct lxd runners. I rebooted, and lxd appears not to have come back up automatically | 16:07 |
slangasek | Laney: I'm now rerunning the /var/tmp/setup scripts, is that what I should be doing? | 16:07 |
slangasek | (and I've so far only looked at one of the instances) | 16:08 |
slangasek | Laney: also, is it intended that we're using btrfs under lxd? | 16:08 |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: what line? | 16:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/340751384/llvm-toolchain-5.0_1%3A5.0-3_1%3A5.0-3~ubuntu16.04.1.diff.gz | 16:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER=OFF | 16:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | that line | 16:57 |
tjaalton | ok, why was it put there in the first place then.. I grepped through several releases and found no hits | 17:00 |
tjaalton | anyway, I can drop it | 17:00 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-filehash (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3-1ubuntu2 => 2.4-1-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-filehash [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.4-1-2] | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (zesty-proposed/main) [3.4-4 => 3.4-4ubuntu0.1] (core) | 17:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (artful-proposed/main) [2.18-0ubuntu4 => 2.18-0ubuntu5] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 18:18 | |
stgraber | ^ pretty small diff fixing a bunch of issues for people upgrading to LXC 2.1 (network patch) and those using a dir storage pool using a non-standard location (might affect juju) | 18:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (artful-proposed/universe) [1.52 => 1.53] (no packageset) | 18:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (artful-proposed) [1.53] | 18:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.9 => 1:17.04.10] (core) | 18:54 | |
andreas | infinity: hi, after some discussion, looks like they have settled on a final new alias for the "ubuntu-advantage" script in the ubuntu-advantage-tools package. If there is still time for artful, the bug has been updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1721272 | 18:57 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1721272 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Create 'ua' symlink pointing at 'ubuntu-advantage'" [High,New] | 18:57 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.22 => 1:16.04.23] (core) | 19:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 19:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 19:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 19:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 19:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 19:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [i386] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] | 19:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (artful-proposed/main) [0.125ubuntu11 => 0.125ubuntu12] (core) | 19:43 | |
apw | ^ this is a adding a boot critical device to the initramfs | 19:44 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu2 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu3] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 20:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.28.4~14.04 => 2.28.5~14.04] (no packageset) | 22:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.28.4+17.10 => 2.28.5+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 22:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.28.4+17.04 => 2.28.5+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 22:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.28.4 => 2.28.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 22:26 | |
valorie | any guesses as to when the RC will be spun? the list has nothing new | 23:38 |
jbicha | valorie: I believe we're waiting for several packages to migrate first like ubiquity and the langpacks | 23:56 |
jbicha | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!