[02:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mythtv (artful-proposed/multiverse) [2:29.0+fixes.20170728.696806310a-0ubuntu1 => 2:29.0+fixes.20171012.44dac01b21-manualbuildubuntu1] (mythbuntu)
[04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: profnet (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.22-4build1 => 1.0.22-4build2] (no packageset)
[04:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted profnet [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.22-4build2]
[04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-biocgenerics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-1build1 => 0.22.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-biocgenerics [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.22.1-1]
[05:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (artful-proposed/main) [2:1.19.4-1ubuntu2 => 2:1.19.5-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[05:54] <tjaalton> ^ new xserver, one regression revert, 12 cve fixes and one other fix
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (artful-proposed/main) [2.5.54 => 2.5.55] (core) (sync)
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-biocgenerics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.1-1 => 0.22.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-biocgenerics [source] (artful-proposed) [0.22.1-1ubuntu1]
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsdl2 (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.6+dfsg1-2ubuntu2 => 2.0.6+dfsg1-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-s4vectors (artful-proposed/universe) [0.14.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.14.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-s4vectors [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.14.7-1]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsdl2 [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.6+dfsg1-3ubuntu1]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mythtv [source] (artful-proposed) [2:29.0+fixes.20171012.44dac01b21-manualbuildubuntu1]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.5.55]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (artful-proposed) [2:1.19.5-0ubuntu1]
[09:03] <xnox> infinity, there will be d-i rebuild to pick up debian-installer-utils among other things?
[09:03] <xnox> and netcfg
[09:03] <xnox> and i guess all the things.
[09:04] <infinity> xnox: There was a d-i 11 hours ago, was that too soon?
[09:04] <xnox> i think so, let me double check
[09:04] <infinity> xnox: Certainly looks newer than both d-i-utils and netcfg.
[09:04]  * xnox was looking at release pocket, doh
[09:05] <xnox> infinity, looks good the one in proposed =)
[09:05] <infinity> \o/
[09:05] <infinity> xnox: It'll meander out to release when Andy's happy with his kernel.
[09:05] <apw> serendipidy
[09:06] <infinity> (Which might be never, because is Andy really ever happy with the kernel?)
[09:07] <apw> infinity, heh a point indeed.  this one is less terrible than average
[09:07] <infinity> apw: Never go into sales.
[09:07] <infinity> "Buy our product because it's 23% less crap than the competitors."
[09:08] <apw> oh i think i would like sales people to be like that
[09:08] <smb> sounds at least more honest that "we got shiny and flawless"
[09:08] <apw> 23% less crap would be marvelous
[09:09] <infinity> smb: I suspect that level of honesty would only work if universally applied.  When others focus on why they're better and you focus on why you're less bad, you just look negative.
[09:10] <xnox> is this is where i was going wrong in my dating life?!
[09:10] <infinity> xnox: We could probably make a list.
[09:10] <xnox> *stack overflow* ?
[09:11] <infinity> If you're asking stackoverflow for dating advice, that's your first mistake.
[09:11] <smb> infinity, I find "less mad than <insert-scary-name>" rather positive
[09:11] <infinity> smb: You've been hanging out with too many Brits. ;)
[09:12]  * smb pleads guilty
[09:12] <infinity> smb: But okay, <insert-scary-name> is an exception to the rule, I suppose.  This may be the one time in (my) political history, when I'd consider voting for someone because they're "not the other guy".
[09:13] <apw> isn't less crazy than xnox some kind of invariant ?  :)
[09:13] <infinity> smb: Usually, "not the other guy" is the most insulting platform/position you can put to your voters, customers, whatever.
[09:13] <infinity> "I'm glad you're not the guy I dislike, but tell me why I should LIKE you, doofus."
[09:14] <smb> Oh I wish they would start giving hints about that and not look like just a different colour of the shed
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu3 => 1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:46] <seb128> ^ could that gnome-conctrol-center upload be considered for the iso? it fixes a quite visible theming regression in the settings that was created by another fix this week (and include as trivial fix that was pending as well)
[09:48] <infinity> seb128: I'll consider it after LP graces me with a diff.
[09:50] <seb128> infinity, thanks
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-h5netcdf (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-h5netcdf [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.4.3-1]
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4]
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dupload (artful-proposed/main) [2.9.0ubuntu2 => 2.9.1ubuntu1] (core)
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, do you mind updating force-badtest udisks2/2.6.5-2ubuntu1/ppc64el to ubuntu2? thanks!
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> oops s/infinity/ slangasek /g
[10:24] <infinity> Only one of those people is awake.
[10:24] <apw> (and it isn't infinity)
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> I usually grep on hints repo for the person who "owns" the hint
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> and I forget to translate vorlon in the right correct nick :p
[10:26] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, do you have a way to fix that ABI failure in my kernel ppa build? or alternatively, do you think we can get vbox merged and enabled again?
[10:27] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, yes, you can either disble abi checks by adding ignore files in the right place
[10:27] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Done.
[10:27] <infinity> Easier to just not have a new changelog entry.
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, <3 this will help glibc a little bit
[10:27] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, or you can stop making a new top changelog entry and just modify the top one
[10:27] <infinity> Disabling ABI checks is hard.
[10:28] <LocutusOfBorg> seriously, not bumping changelog entry works? smart!
[10:28] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Basically, the ABI checker will look at your ABI version, check if there's a previous one of the same ABI, and then trip.  If you just alter the top level entry (so there's only one -16.foo), then all is well.
[10:29] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: I mean, you want to change the version so it's not the same as the archive one, to avoid breaking your brain, but change it instead of adding a new one.
[10:30] <LocutusOfBorg> oh ok,
[10:30] <LocutusOfBorg> I would also make sure that the ubuntu/vbox is not built, but probably it doesn't matter
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libimobiledevice (artful-proposed/main) [1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu2 => 1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:31] <infinity> nacc: Around?
[10:32] <infinity> rbasak: Or you?
[10:32] <infinity> jamespage: Or maybe you? :P
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sane-backends [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dupload [source] (artful-proposed) [2.9.1ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libimobiledevice [source] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3.1ubuntu3]
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/340734141/linux_4.13.0-16.20_4.13.0-16.21.diff.gz hopefully I did it right
[10:38] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Should o.
[10:38] <infinity> do.
[10:38] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[10:43] <rbasak> infinity: o/
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xchat-gnome (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu10 => 1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xchat-gnome [source] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[10:45] <infinity> rbasak: Hi!
[10:45] <infinity> rbasak: You guys are the proud owners of the only outstanding node on component-mismatches.
[10:45] <infinity> rbasak: And to make things more fun, it's a seeded package (tomcat8), so needs action pretty much now.
[10:46]  * rbasak thought we were holding back on updating tomcat8
[10:46] <infinity> Evidently not.
[10:47] <rbasak> Looks like doko synced it
[10:47] <infinity> rbasak: Anyhow, the simple fix would just be dmoting that recommends back to a suggests and revisiting for Boris Bike.
[10:47] <infinity> rbasak: Or you can try to push an MIR in 12 hours, if you're feeling confident. :P
[10:47] <rbasak> That's fine, but I remember being told to not sync it because it would break things
[10:48] <LocutusOfBorg> Boris Bike... do we have a CODENAME?
[10:48] <rbasak> So if it's indeed broken things, peraps the right thing to do is to gobackwards.
[10:48] <rbasak> We have an infinityname
[10:48] <rbasak> I'm sure we will have infinitely more :)
[10:48] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: If we had a codename, it wouldn't be a joke about London's public bike service.
[10:48] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[10:48] <infinity> rbasak: I see no evidence anything's broken.
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:48] <LocutusOfBorg> I found it after a googling
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:48] <infinity> rbasak: Just a recommends that used to be a suggests.
[10:49] <rbasak> 17:21 <nacc> cpaelzer: if we migrate tomcat8 to 8.5, dogtag-pki and tomcatjss will immediately break again
[10:49] <rbasak> Perhaps that's now fixed
[10:50] <infinity> Do either of them have tests?
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> dogtag-pki ->   * control: Use tomcat8.0.
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I would say broken, tjaalton ^^
[10:50] <infinity> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcatjss/7.2.4-0ubuntu1 <-- Seems tomcat8 specific.
[10:51] <infinity> Oh, we have tomcat8.0 as well as tomcat8.
[10:51] <infinity> That's not confusing AT ALL.
[10:51] <infinity> rbasak: I guess that was the compromise.
[10:52] <infinity> rbasak: tomcat8.0 satisfies the two broken things.
[10:52] <tjaalton> didn't doko sync tomcat8 already?
[10:52] <infinity> tjaalton: Yes.
[10:52] <infinity> tjaalton: rbasak was just trying to unwind if that was thought-out.
[10:52] <infinity> And it seems like it was, given your tomcat8.0 uploads.
[10:52] <tjaalton> the sync happened first
[10:52] <tjaalton> then panic :)
[10:53] <infinity> Heh.
[10:53] <infinity> rbasak: Okay, so, the above has me convinced that panic and revert isn't necessary, just dealing with that recommends.
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:54] <rbasak> tjaalton: what's the expecatation around upgrade path for users?
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:54] <infinity> rbasak: And I think the right answer is probably "demote to Suggests and then push for an MIR in 18.04 as soon as it opens and revert back to Recommends".
[10:54] <rbasak> tjaalton: you expect most of them to move to 8.5?
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xchat-gnome [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11] (no packageset)
[10:55] <tjaalton> rbasak: these are coinstallable, just that tomcatjss depends on 8.0
[10:55] <tjaalton> it only ships a subset of tomcat
[10:56] <tjaalton> we'll get rid of it in 18.04, with upstream support or without
[10:56] <rbasak> OK thanks
[10:57]  * rbasak wonders why he can't find a tomcat-native binary
[10:57] <rbasak> Oh, a virtual package?
[10:57] <rbasak> Seemingly not
[10:57] <infinity> rbasak: tomcat-native is the source.
[10:58] <infinity> rbasak: libtcnative-1 is the binary.
[10:58] <rbasak> Oh
[10:58] <infinity> tjaalton: Since you're around.  sssd-kcm.  Demote to universe, or should it be seeded somewhere?
[10:59] <tjaalton> infinity: universe is fine
[10:59] <infinity> Ta.
[10:59] <tjaalton> no rdeps
[11:00] <infinity> tjaalton: Indeed, if it had rdeps, component-mismatches wouldn't be telling me to demote. :)
[11:00] <tjaalton> right
[11:00] <rbasak> infinity: OK, all understood now. I'll do as you suggest.
[11:00] <infinity> rbasak: As I Suggests?  Eh, eh?
[11:01] <rbasak> :-)
[11:01] <infinity> (It's 5am, pretend I'm funny)
[11:03] <rbasak> libtcnative-1 is a Build-Depends-Indep as well as a Recommends. The former is fine with the new rules, right?
[11:03] <infinity> rbasak: Yep.
[11:04] <infinity> Also, weird.
[11:04] <infinity> Do they know what "indep" means? :)
[11:04] <infinity> (Does it really need libtcnative-1 to build the docs? :P)
[11:04] <infinity> Oh, maybe they use it to accelerate building and testing the JARs, which are arch:all.
[11:05] <infinity> Java is silly.
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (artful-proposed/main) [8.5.21-1 => 8.5.21-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:18] <infinity> seb128: Did you mean to also revert the pinyin->sunpinyin change with that fix?
[11:19] <seb128> no
[11:19] <infinity> seb128: That change looked correct to me (ibus-sunpinyin is in the live seed, ibus-pinyin is not)
[11:19] <seb128> thanks for pointing that
[11:19] <seb128> must be a problem with the packaging vcs
[11:20] <seb128> let me look
[11:20] <infinity> seb128: Kay, rejecting.
[11:20] <seb128> thanks
[11:20] <infinity> seb128: Please debdiff against the archive before the next upload. :)
[11:20] <seb128> right
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]
[11:30] <seb128> k, reuploaded without the revert
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:32] <infinity> seb128: Shiny.
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [source] (artful-proposed) [8.5.21-1ubuntu1]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.2-2ubuntu1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (artful-proposed/main) [1.385 => 1.386] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphicsmagick (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.26-13 => 1.3.26-14] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caribou (artful-proposed/main) [0.4.21-1 => 0.4.21-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (artful-proposed) [1.386]
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-iranges (artful-proposed/universe) [2.10.2-1ubuntu2 => 2.10.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-iranges [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.10.5-1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-vpnaas (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1 => 2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-gpu-tools (artful-proposed/main) [1.20-1 => 1.20-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:5.0-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numactl (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.11-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.11-1ubuntu1.1] (core)
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-2 => 3.26.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:17] <infinity> Laney: armhf autopkgtest seems to have gone kablooey.
[14:17] <infinity> slangasek: ^-- If you remember how those bits work and get there first.
[14:18] <slangasek> armhf autopkgtest stuff as a whole?
[14:19] <infinity> slangasek: As in, no jobs being dispatched, no runners.
[14:19] <infinity> 06:40 <apw> Stderr: ssh: connect to host 10.100.0.23 port 22: No route to host
[14:19] <infinity> That sounds ungood.
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, "CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER=OFF" was it needed?
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-gpu-tools [source] (artful-proposed) [1.20-1ubuntu1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-2ubuntu1]
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caribou [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.4.21-2]
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted graphicsmagick [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.3.26-14]
[14:31] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: yep
[14:32] <tjaalton> first batch of hwe pkgs for 16.04.4 is now on the queue (libdrm, wayland-protocols, llvm-5)
[14:32] <LocutusOfBorg> why, the non-linux build has not
[14:32] <tjaalton> huh?
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS),linux))
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg>         LIBFUZZER_ENABLE=no
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> endif
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I woudl expected it to be the same, not with additional cmake flags
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> so, the second line seems useless
[14:34] <LocutusOfBorg> grep LLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER . -R returns nothing in the source tree...
[14:34] <LocutusOfBorg> meh, doesn't hurt, but I want to know if non-linux builds are broken and needs it too
[14:35] <tjaalton> ah, well copied what was on the old release
[14:38] <tjaalton> 3.8/4.0 show no hits either
[14:38] <tjaalton> must be magic then
[14:38] <tjaalton> afk ->
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.9 => 17.10.10] (core)
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (artful-proposed/main) [4.9.0-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)
[15:05] <nacc> rbasak: yes, sorry, it's my todo, we can demote for aa
[15:05] <nacc> (recommends -> suggests)
[15:05] <rbasak> nacc: already done ;)
[15:05] <rbasak> I left a MIR bug open
[15:06] <nacc> rbasak: err, yes -- we probably want to MIR it for bb
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, problem is that we build fuzzer, but all the code is inside ifeq (LIBFUZZER_ENABLE) so the check is not run and no segfault no install
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> so again, that line is probably useless
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.10]
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xen [source] (artful-proposed) [4.9.0-0ubuntu3]
[16:07] <slangasek> Laney: I went looking at armhf runners; the arm64 instance had unaligned access in dmesg and defunct lxd runners.  I rebooted, and lxd appears not to have come back up automatically
[16:07] <slangasek> Laney: I'm now rerunning the /var/tmp/setup scripts, is that what I should be doing?
[16:08] <slangasek> (and I've so far only looked at one of the instances)
[16:08] <slangasek> Laney: also, is it intended that we're using btrfs under lxd?
[16:55] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: what line?
[16:57] <LocutusOfBorg> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/340751384/llvm-toolchain-5.0_1%3A5.0-3_1%3A5.0-3~ubuntu16.04.1.diff.gz
[16:57] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_ENABLE_FUZZER=OFF
[16:57] <LocutusOfBorg> that line
[17:00] <tjaalton> ok, why was it put there in the first place then.. I grepped through several releases and found no hits
[17:00] <tjaalton> anyway, I can drop it
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-filehash (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3-1ubuntu2 => 2.4-1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-filehash [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.4-1-2]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (zesty-proposed/main) [3.4-4 => 3.4-4ubuntu0.1] (core)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (artful-proposed/main) [2.18-0ubuntu4 => 2.18-0ubuntu5] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[18:37] <stgraber> ^ pretty small diff fixing a bunch of issues for people upgrading to LXC 2.1 (network patch) and those using a dir storage pool using a non-standard location (might affect juju)
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (artful-proposed/universe) [1.52 => 1.53] (no packageset)
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (artful-proposed) [1.53]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.9 => 1:17.04.10] (core)
[18:57] <andreas> infinity: hi, after some discussion, looks like they have settled on a final new alias for the "ubuntu-advantage" script in the ubuntu-advantage-tools package. If there is still time for artful, the bug has been updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1721272
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.22 => 1:16.04.23] (core)
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xchat-gnome [i386] (artful-proposed) [1:0.30.0~git20141005.816798-0ubuntu11]
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (artful-proposed/main) [0.125ubuntu11 => 0.125ubuntu12] (core)
[19:44] <apw> ^ this is a adding a boot critical device to the initramfs
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu2 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu3] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.28.4~14.04 => 2.28.5~14.04] (no packageset)
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.28.4+17.10 => 2.28.5+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.28.4+17.04 => 2.28.5+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.28.4 => 2.28.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:38] <valorie> any guesses as to when the RC will be spun? the list has nothing new
[23:56] <jbicha> valorie: I believe we're waiting for several packages to migrate first like ubiquity and the langpacks
[23:56] <jbicha> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html