 I mean if you look at it like that we bottom feed too
[01:07] <mparillo> from Italian amatore, from Latin amator ‘lover,’ from amare ‘to love.’
 @ahoneybun, No we don't, we're a supported member of the community
 they know how to code just not security stuff
 which they should have at this scale
[01:53] <valorie> Partimus, so you work with Lyz, tsimonq2?
 @valorie, More or less
 @ahoneybun, They don't do security stuff?
 Idk ask them
[01:58] <valorie> ISOs are spinning up
 @ahoneybun, I know they don't
[02:40] <valorie> https://kubuntu.org/news/kubuntu-artful-aardvark-17-10-final-rc-images-now-available/ -- any feedback?
[02:42] <valorie> if not, please spread
[03:02] <ahoneybun> did you post that yet?
[03:02] <ahoneybun> valorie:
[03:19] <valorie> yes, but we can still fix
[03:19] <valorie> if necessary
 Oh ok
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41627442
 clive better buy more screws!
[11:42] <acheronuk> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2017-October/004224.html
[11:43] <acheronuk> article that jumped the gun a bit amended to note these are not 'final' RC images
[11:46] <acheronuk> valorie: well, it gets syndicated elsewhere like https://planet.kde.org/ which won't show any changes afterwards AFAIK, so I think we really need to wait for the release team to announce things like RCs before we put our own story live
[12:00]  * acheronuk heads for Sunday lunch
[12:07] <mparillo> Though by definition, a release candidate is not final until it becomes the release. This is special because this RC has known items to fix and a re-spin already planned as opposed to 'we will re-spin if somebody finds a stop-ship issue'.
 we should still wait for the release to to state they are happy with the builds though
 and make the iso links a bit more generic (as I just did) so that if respins are done, people find those instead
 I'm screwing as hard and fast as I can
[19:19] <valorie> thanks for fixing @acheronuk
[19:19] <valorie> apologies for jumping the gun
[19:20] <valorie> there was no announcement for beta 2, but I should have waited for the RC one anyway
[19:20] <valorie> :/
[19:23] <acheronuk> valorie: no harm done. didn't mean to make that sound like a moan either
[19:26] <acheronuk> valorie: if we get a respin in the morning, I will do another post, highlighting that, and the ubuntu-on-air iso testing hangout tommorow
[19:26] <acheronuk> https://community.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-17-10-community-iso-testing/458
[19:39] <valorie> nono, we're a team
[19:39] <valorie> thanks for covering it
[19:39] <valorie> your article looks good with the quoted email, etc.
[19:40] <valorie> you might reply all to my email to the lists
[19:40] <valorie> clarifying
[19:42] <acheronuk> will do. it's all a bit wishy washy with the RCs, as mparillo pointed out
[19:46] <valorie> 'tis indeed, and I should have caught that "final" and expunged it
[19:46] <valorie> still learning on the job
[19:57] <acheronuk> we all are!
[19:59] <valorie> yep!
[20:00] <valorie> that's actually what makes this fun
 very very true
[20:58]  * valorie goes out into possibly the last sunny day to plant bulbs
 Website updates to pages complete
 @Sick_Rimmit small issue "This site is independent, of but good friends, with the Kubuntu developers."
[23:16] <valorie> ? that is terrible english and use of commas!
[23:38]  * valorie zsyncs some images
[23:44] <mparillo> valorie: Are those the re-spins we were expecting per Adam's e-mail earlier?
[23:44] <valorie> I don't think so
[23:45] <valorie> but I'll re-zsync when they show up
[23:45] <valorie> just trying to get things started
[23:46] <valorie> not taking too long, so maybe a lot of people are holding off