/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/10/18/#ubuntu-release.txt

jbichavalorie: can we quote you on that?00:03
wxlthis buds for you, cyphermox https://imgflip.com/i/1xsh0200:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: audit (zesty-proposed/main) [1:2.6.6-1ubuntu1 => 1:2.6.6-1ubuntu1.1] (core)00:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: audit (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.4.5-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.4.5-1ubuntu2.1] (core)00:14
cyphermoxwxl: \m/00:46
valorielol01:28
valorieyes, I got both new spins perfectly01:28
cyphermoxvalorie: great01:46
valorieonce I finish my backups, I will start testing01:47
cyphermoxI'm off to bed, will do testing in the early morning.01:47
cyphermoxI did find https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1724417 on the way, that broke the install completely (duh)01:48
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1724417 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "grub-install /dev/dm-0 fails for "Erase entire disk" install type" [Undecided,New]01:48
cyphermoxbut it's very much environment-specific it seems. something in having a previous LVM install broke ubiquity there.01:48
cyphermoxif I reinstall again with "erase entire disk", it's good. I'd be very interested to know if someone else finds this01:49
jibelcyphermox, I saw an instance of this issue reported on LP.05:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.477 => 2.478] (desktop-core)05:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (artful-proposed) [2.478]05:17
slangasekLaney: the above livecd-rootfs fixes a bug specific to the subiquity images, no respins needed for anything else; would you be able to shepherd a respin once it's published to artful?05:40
ouroumov__tsimonq2, xcalib hasn't been working at all since 16.10, can we remove it from the archive until the maintainer gets it fixed?05:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (artful-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.30-2~build1 => 5.1.30-2] (no packageset) (sync)06:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (artful-proposed) [5.1.30-2]06:06
sil2100jibel: hey, I wonder if LP: #1724417 is something that can potentially happen to others?07:25
ubot5Launchpad bug 1724417 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "grub-install /dev/dm-0 fails for "Erase entire disk" install type" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172441707:25
jibelsil2100, it does, I saw another instance of this crash for it is lost in LP now.07:26
jibels/for/but/07:26
jibeler07:26
sil2100jibel: for artful only, or is it something older?07:26
jibelsil2100, it was artful IIRC07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fast5 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.3-1] (no packageset)07:27
jibeli'll try to find it, it was filed against grub2 and marked invalid07:27
jibeland reported sometime last week07:27
sil2100A bit worrying07:29
sil2100I'd prefer not needing to wait for the investigation/fix and to do a full re-spin, we might re-spin the subiquity images though07:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fast5 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.6.3-1]07:30
jibelsil2100, bug 172259407:31
ubot5bug 1722594 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "Install crashed: Unable to install bootloader at specified location" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172259407:31
sil2100jibel: thanks, let's mention it on the other bug07:32
valorieanyone know if there is a fix in the works for the "clicking doesn't work" in ubiquity? when I filed it tonight LP didn't find the previous bug07:39
valoriehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/172446707:41
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1724467 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "while installing the artful RC iso, could not click on anything" [Undecided,New]07:41
valorieI know it was reported previously because I've looked at it07:41
sil2100hm, didn't see this bug happening to me07:47
smbsil2100, it seems to happen to me too. but only if grub install fails. the dialog that comes up has non-working ok or cancel buttons07:48
smbso one cannot graphically escape07:48
smbsil2100, for the install fails when lvm is present: I had that with maas but it might be only similar but not the same reasons. curtin erases something then fails to write something to a disk which I don't know would exist.07:49
smbjibel, ^07:50
sil2100Ok, so that looks like the bug cyphermox encountered07:50
smbsil2100, but it would be two completely different environments07:50
jibeli can reproduce the non-working ok/canel buttons07:58
jibelfor example when you force a non-uefi install on a  uefi system07:58
Laneyrighto08:03
Laneyshould I action Steve's request?08:03
jibelslightly different bug than valorie's08:04
* sil2100 hates installer bugs08:04
jibelthat's a way to prevent grub installer from failing later :)08:05
sil2100Steve's request?08:09
Laneysubiquity respin for livecd-rootfs08:10
sil2100Laney: yeah, you want to push the button?08:11
Laneyok08:11
jibelbug 172448208:13
ubot5bug 1724482 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) ""Force UEFI installation" dialog has non-working Go Back/Continue buttons" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172448208:13
sil2100jibel: thanks for filling it in!08:18
jibelit's different from valorie's bug08:18
=== inaddy is now known as tinoco
=== sil2100_ is now known as sil2100
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-welcome (artful-proposed/universe) [17.10.14 => 17.10.15] (ubuntu-mate)08:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.28.5+17.04]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.28.5]09:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018)09:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu6] (ubuntu-desktop)09:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-3ubuntu2 => 3.26.1-3ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)09:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux (artful-proposed/primary) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1]09:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.28.5~14.04]09:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]09:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-opencontainers-selinux [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1]09:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1] (no packageset)09:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-opencontainers-selinux [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1]09:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptstate (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1build1 => 2.2.5-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fast5 (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.3-1 => 0.6.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fast5 [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.3-1ubuntu1]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-16.19~16.04.3] (kernel)10:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-16.19~16.04.3]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ppc64-diag [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [2.7.4-1~16.04]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ppc64-diag [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [2.7.4-1~16.04]10:29
infinityflexiondotorg: Tell me about this mate-welcome thing.10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-3ubuntu3]10:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu6]10:45
flexiondotorginfinity: ubuntu-mate-welcome is just an bug fix update.12:18
flexiondotorgPost release update. Not needed for the image.12:18
infinityflexiondotorg: Kay.12:18
flexiondotorginfinity: Could you sync mate-settings-daemon from Debian unstable please?12:19
flexiondotorg1.18.3-112:19
flexiondotorgIt is a bug fix release.12:19
flexiondotorgAgain, not required for the image. Post release update is fine.12:19
infinityflexiondotorg: Post-release implies SRU.  I'd rather not have a sync as an SRU.12:21
apwwhich implies you need an sru bug with all the trimmings for both of those too12:22
flexiondotorgSo I need to SRU something even though the release is not released yet?12:23
flexiondotorgThese can be staged in updates ready to be installed post iso imnstall?12:24
flexiondotorg*can't12:24
infinityflexiondotorg: I mean, you either want it in the release pocket (and on images), or it's an SRU.12:24
infinityflexiondotorg: And given it's a two point release bump, it probably wouldn't be acceptable to jam in last minute.12:24
flexiondotorgI would prefer to have them on images and respin and test that SRU both of them.12:24
flexiondotorg*than SRYU12:25
infinitySo, I don't see how it would be more acceptable post-release without some process behind it.12:25
flexiondotorginfinity: How can we proceed with landing them in the release pocket and respinning?12:26
infinityOr maybe you meant 1.18.1-3, not 1.18.3-112:26
flexiondotorgYes, correct. 1.18.1-3 for mate-settings-daemon.12:27
infinityYour numerical dyslexia made it sound worse. :P12:27
flexiondotorg:-)12:27
infinityflexiondotorg: Anyhow, "staging it for right after release" is a 0-day SRU.  It should obviously be tested to fix the bug it claims to fix.12:27
flexiondotorgIt has been tested.12:28
infinityflexiondotorg: Pushing it to the release pocket today and respinning would, IMO, have exactly the same requirement.  Pushing in last minute fixes implies testing that they're not crap.12:28
infinityflexiondotorg: Like any other SRU, testing it after it's built, not before.12:28
apwflexiondotorg, if that ubuntu-mate-welcome is going to be an SRU it doesn't appear to have a bug associaited12:28
flexiondotorgubuntu-mate-welcome fixes issues identified from community feedback. No associated LP bugs.12:29
apwrigth but to SRU it we would have to file a bug to process it against, and normally that is in the changelog12:30
infinityAnyhow, you also have 0 test results on your current images, so I'm not against pushing this stuff in and respinning.12:30
infinityThat's up to you.12:30
flexiondotorgWe have been testing the isos. But that was lost after the rebuild yesterday. We have bodies ready to test a respin.12:31
flexiondotorgIf you can sync/release those infinity, we can get the tests completed.12:32
flexiondotorgBy this evening.12:32
infinityOh.  It's you and kylin.  Hrm.12:33
infinityDidn't realise they switched to mate this cycle.12:33
jibelinfinity, for info, for the moment we are blocking the release of Ubuntu Desktop on bug 172357712:33
ubot5bug 1723577 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "Artful won't start with Wayland activated (AMD?)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172357712:33
jibelinfinity, regression in gnome-shell 3.26.1-0ubuntu112:34
infinityjibel: Yeah, I'm aware.12:34
jibelk12:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lshw (trusty-proposed/main) [02.16-2ubuntu1.3 => 02.16-2ubuntu1.4] (core)12:34
flexiondotorginfinity: Kylin switched to MATE (or their customised version UKUI) in 17.04.12:34
didrockswe found it's due to GNOME Shell12:34
didrockssorry, multi-plexing :p12:35
infinityflexiondotorg: Yeah, I missed that memo.  Anyhow, my point was that if I accept mate-settings-daemon, it affects them too, not just you.12:35
flexiondotorgOh, OK.12:35
infinityflexiondotorg: You're probably best off just putting SRU paperwork on the bug and doing it as a 0-day.  I'm not sure where the "if I have to do an SRU, I'll die a bit inside" thing comes from, but it's not that bad. :P12:36
flexiondotorgOK. I'll start the SRU process on Friday. No time prior to that.12:37
flexiondotorginfinity: What ubuntu-mate-welcome?12:37
flexiondotorg*what about12:37
infinityflexiondotorg: What "process"?  I mean, literally, add the SRU template to the bug, and bam, it's an SRU.  I can even accept it today, you can test, and we can release it tomorrow, if your testing appears sane.12:38
flexiondotorgThere is no bug in LP.12:38
infinityflexiondotorg: mate-welcome is only on your images, so we could respin for that, if you want.  And given when mate-welcome is first seen (y'know, on first boot), that seems appropriate.12:38
flexiondotorgYes please.12:39
infinityflexiondotorg: Oh, for the sync?  Yeah.  There's no bug for that, but unpacking, changing version number to -2ubuntu1 and adding a bug number would be trivial. :P12:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-welcome [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.15]12:43
infinitywxl: Should I be worried that there are no test results posted for lubuntu?12:47
* sil2100 is running i386 ubuntustudio tests12:49
sil2100But it's slow, since my machine is thrashed with autopkgtest debugging as well12:49
sil2100(and my laptop is really old and slow)12:50
smbinfinity, apw, not sure this was brought up by others, I struggle with artful desktop install (via live) locking up on boot about the time of switching to gdm (amd cpu + older nvidia gpu)12:50
sil2100smb: not sure if it's related to the issues the desktop guys are debugging, but did you try downgrading gnome-shell to 3.26.0-1ubuntu2 ?12:51
smbsil2100, not yet as its hard to do that when you have no place to type12:52
infinitysmb: "struggle", as in it occasionally works, or "struggle", as in you hang out with too many Brits, and you really mean "it's completely broken"?12:52
sil2100Since from the current debugging and bisecting it seems that later versions of g-s seem to have issues with some cards12:52
smbinfinity, rather the latter. I think I had one half working where gdm came up in low-gfx mode but then shell would not come up (segfaulting)12:53
sil2100infinity: I think he means it doesn't work, since he said he has no place to type ;p12:53
smball my other attempts (about 5) were locking up before12:54
smband I am too old to get grub screen up12:54
* smb resorts to tweak stuff from live-image12:56
flexiondotorginfinity: mate-settings-daemon_1.18.1-2ubuntu1 just uploaded. Here is the SRU bug http://pad.lv/172456912:59
ubot5Launchpad bug 1724569 in mate-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "XRandR applet crashes on restart" [High,Fix committed]12:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-2 => 1.18.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)12:59
infinityflexiondotorg: You built that source on Debian, didn't you?13:03
infinityflexiondotorg: (The bug closure didn't get parsed in .changes)13:03
andreaswhere do I file a bug against the ubuntu server installer? What's the project in lp?13:04
infinityandreas: Which installer?13:04
andreasubuntu-server, I think it's "d-i"?13:04
andreasthe text mode installer, not subiquity13:04
infinityandreas: subiquity is also text mode.13:05
andreasok, but it's not subiquity13:05
infinityandreas: But if you mean the classic images, then yes, debian-installer13:05
sil2100Depends what images you used13:05
andreashttp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current/13:05
andreasserver amd6413:05
flexiondotorginfinity: Reject it. Built with my Debian environment variables set. I'll build again ith DEB_VENDOR=Ubuntuy13:05
infinityandreas: debian-installer is the installer on those images, yes.13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.1-2ubuntu1]13:06
andreasinfinity: and our project in lp for it?13:07
infinityandreas: ...13:07
andreashttps://bugs.launchpad.net/debian-installer is really the debian one, not our fork I presume13:07
infinityandreas: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer13:07
infinityandreas: It's a package.13:07
andreasthanks13:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-2 => 1.18.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)13:10
cyphermoxsil2100: you said some other bug looked like what I had seen yesterday?13:16
sil2100cyphermox: yeah, left the link in the comments of your bug, jibel passed that bug to me13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.1-2ubuntu1]13:24
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018)14:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018)14:33
didrockssil2100: infinity: so, a GNOME Shell near you in few minutes14:34
didrockswe found the revert needed, it doesn't really impact us (headless mode)14:34
didrocksthe contributor confirmed it works for him14:34
didrocksseb128 and I did try on a VM, the Shell still starts14:34
didrocksand willcooke tried suspend/resume14:34
sil2100\o/14:36
sil2100This is excellent news14:36
sil2100Will review it as soon as it appears in the queue14:36
willcookethanks didrocks sil210014:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu3 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu4] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)14:41
didrockssil2100: and here we go ^14:41
sil2100\o/14:41
sil2100Taking care of that one14:41
didrocksI'm letting that in good hands :)14:41
sil2100didrocks, infinity: ^ accepted14:43
sil2100Will need to get it through -proposed14:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4]14:43
smbsil2100, just for info (I see the new version is already coming) downgrading gnome-shell did not help in my case14:49
sil2100hmmm, so unrelated then14:52
sil2100smb: could you fill in a bug in this case?14:52
smbsil2100, yeah, well I fist want to try the ubuntu4 one to be sure, then I file one14:53
chrisccoulsonI've still got flashplugin/partner packages sat in the queue for trusty -> zesty. Can anyone approve them? (Usually it's Jamie but he's not around)14:55
sil2100chrisccoulson: slangasek, when he's up, should be able to help you14:55
sil2100hmmm, or maybe I should try checking if I don't have the power to approve those14:56
* sil2100 waits impatiently for the publisher to do its job14:57
sil2100chrisccoulson: ok, I tried accepting the zesty one, let's see if it worked correctly15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1]15:01
sil2100chrisccoulson: looks like it worked, let me take a look at the others15:02
sil2100slangasek: hope you don't mind me doing those? I guess I should be good since I'm part of canonical-partner-dev + SRU?15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]15:05
sil2100chrisccoulson: all looked good, accepted15:06
chrisccoulsonsil2100, thanks15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1]15:06
chrisccoulsonsil2100, they do need copying from -proposed shortly as well15:06
slangaseksil2100: ah, I hadn't given thought to the fact that this intersection of permissions gives you queue access; I'm ok with you reviewing the unapproved queue on partner, yes15:13
sil2100chrisccoulson: this I think I cannot do, only slangasek ;p15:19
sil2100slangasek: btw. since I never did this before, how do I tag a package to ignore the britney lock during such a freeze?15:20
sil2100slangasek: I'm asking since we're waiting for the gnome-shell regression to be fixed, the package is in -proposed and once it gets tested we'd like to get it released and images re-built15:20
sil2100smb: new gnome-shell in artful-proposed! Could you test if it also fixes your case?15:21
sil2100didrocks, jibel: ^ can you guys also do testing on the -proposed gnome-shell?15:21
smbsil2100, sure15:21
slangaseksil2100: 'unblock' hint15:27
smbsil2100, pass! \o/ we have a gui15:28
smbnow "only" network-manager should answer dns queries on 127.0.1.1 ...15:33
sil2100smb: wow, nice!15:35
sil2100slangasek: thanks!15:35
xnoxsmb, artful? on artful there should be no 127.0.1.1...15:38
smbxnox, but that is what I have in /etc/resolv.conf15:39
xnoxsmb, is that clean install or upgrade?15:39
smbxnox, iso testing fresh install15:39
xnoxsmb, server or desktop? ifupdown or network-manager? default config?15:39
smbdesktop15:39
xnoxthat can't be good15:39
* xnox syncs latest image15:40
smbxnox, file gnerated by networkmanager (it says)15:41
xnoxsmb, yeah, it should not do that....15:41
sil2100gnome-shell autopkgtests in progress, hope those finish quick15:42
smbxnox, if that is helping any, this is an installation made from the live image. have not tried direct install yet15:48
xnoxsmb, well, i synced artful ubuntu desktop iso, booted into live session, did check that in the life session resolv.conf is a symlink to stub-resolve.conf15:49
xnoxcurrently launched install ubuntu 17.10 and running that at the moment.15:49
xnoxsmb, in-target at the moment still has /target/etc/resolv.conf pointing at the right thing.15:51
xnoxsmb, is this VM or laptop? did you have networking during install? wifi or ethernet?15:52
* xnox is in a VM with ethernet auto-dhcp connected15:52
smbxnox, desktop and had ethernet15:52
xnoxack15:52
smbxnox, ugh maybe it was accidentally me15:53
xnoxsmb, what's your NetworkManager -printconfig? or some such?15:54
smbxnox, sorry I think I know what happened and its user fault15:54
xnoxsmb, what was it? i'm curious now =)15:55
smbxnox, I had to manually mount the disk to do a chroot install of sshd (because of the gnome-shell problem)15:55
smbxnox, so for that to work I added a nameserver manually and then removed resolv.conf assuming it would regenerate itself correctly15:56
xnoxha15:56
xnoxif there is no resolv.conf yes networkmanager takes over it15:56
xnoxi guess we could make it create the symlink to stub-resolv.conf15:56
xnoxregular install works fine, it seems.15:57
smbxnox, some automatic habit from before when having a resolv.conf would prevent the right new resolvconf ways of things15:57
xnoxresolvconf is dead15:59
xnoxresolved is the new world order15:59
xnoxsmb, however resolvconf on boot would check its stampfiles and would re-generate the symlink. horum.16:03
smbxnox, so why does resolvd not create the right link when its missing =:P Systemd people are not that shy in other cases16:04
smbhah beat me to say it16:04
bdmurrayThe Release Notes make include a link to "Less Popular Ubuntu Images" is there a better way to describe those?16:04
xnoxsmb, hm, i guess i could include a tmpfiles.d snippet to do that.16:05
xnoxl /etc/resolv.conf ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf16:05
xnoxor some such16:05
smbxnox, yeah, I can confirm that doing that is preventing nm from interfering and the network icon finally is without that question mark...16:06
smbAt least as a positive, once the ISOs are regenerated with the updated gnome-shell I won't get tempted to mess with the installation16:08
sil2100Ok, autopkgtests for gnome-shell finished successfully - anyone can do a quick dogfood run of it before I hint it in?16:33
wxlinfinity: tsimonq2 is primarily running the show. have you asked him?16:40
tsimonq2Huh what? :)16:40
smbsil2100, does me pick it ok, count?16:42
tsimonq2Oh. infinity, don't be worried :)16:44
sil2100Ok, let me try hinting it in then!16:55
sil2100(this will take a minute)16:56
sil2100gnome-shell unblocked16:58
sil2100smb, jibel: thanks for the tests! And didrocks thanks for the fixed package ;)16:58
sil2100infinity: are you ok with me re-building the desktop images with the new gnome-shell?16:59
sil2100(once it migrates)16:59
didrocksgreat!17:06
jibelsil2100, go ahead, rebuild the desktop images.17:14
jibelonce g-s is puvlished17:14
sil2100Why is this taking so long...17:25
* sil2100 grows impatient17:32
apwsil2100, its the publisher, you are watching it ... therefore it is hiding17:34
sil2100But I see in the britney logs: "Copying: gnome-shell/3.26.1-0ubuntu4" so yay17:36
sil2100Ok, I guess soon I'll be able to kick the new image17:39
sil2100We'll probably have to wait for the final publisher tick17:40
sil2100This publisher is killing me18:07
flocculantsil2100: found an issue with friendly recovery - a missing file warning, bug 1724643 . Doubt it's a great problem in the scheme of things, just makes friendly-recovery more abitunfriendly-recovery :)18:09
ubot5bug 1724643 in friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) "Root prompt from recovery mode gives warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172464318:09
sil2100flocculant: does it still work then? Or does this warning cause it to exit?18:10
sil2100I'm fine with it just giving this warning, non-critical, a bit ugly but yeah18:11
flocculantit works ok - just shows the warning - forgot to put that in bug - will do now18:11
flocculantyea - was my impression, just thought I would mention it :)18:11
* sil2100 sees the new gnome-shell in the release pocket as per rmadison18:11
flocculantsil2100: if it had not worked I would have started with - Sorry but :)18:12
sil2100Ok, I think it's safe enough to kick a rebuild18:25
sil2100jibel, infinity: ^18:25
sil2100Rebuild requested18:26
jibelsil2100, thanks18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018)18:54
sil2100Rebuild finished o/19:06
sil2100Let me check the manifest19:06
sil2100Ok, it has the right gnome-shell so we're good19:07
* sil2100 goes AFK for a bit to do lifeā„¢19:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (artful-proposed/universe) [3.7.0~a1-1 => 3.7.0~a2-1] (no packageset)19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (artful-proposed) [3.7.0~a2-1]19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added20:52
=== med_ is now known as Guest99060
bdmurrayinfinity: so just test whatever catches my fancy?22:45
tsimonq2Test Lubuntu. <322:46
infinitybdmurray: Things without results, ideally.22:48
bdmurrayOkay I forget was there a way for people to communicate what they plan on testing?22:49
bdmurrayOh, there it is "In Progress"22:49
=== enick_852 is now known as RAOF

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!