| jbicha | valorie: can we quote you on that? | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| wxl | this buds for you, cyphermox https://imgflip.com/i/1xsh02 | 00:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: audit (zesty-proposed/main) [1:2.6.6-1ubuntu1 => 1:2.6.6-1ubuntu1.1] (core) | 00:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: audit (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.4.5-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.4.5-1ubuntu2.1] (core) | 00:14 | |
| cyphermox | wxl: \m/ | 00:46 |
| valorie | lol | 01:28 |
| valorie | yes, I got both new spins perfectly | 01:28 |
| cyphermox | valorie: great | 01:46 |
| valorie | once I finish my backups, I will start testing | 01:47 |
| cyphermox | I'm off to bed, will do testing in the early morning. | 01:47 |
| cyphermox | I did find https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1724417 on the way, that broke the install completely (duh) | 01:48 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1724417 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "grub-install /dev/dm-0 fails for "Erase entire disk" install type" [Undecided,New] | 01:48 |
| cyphermox | but it's very much environment-specific it seems. something in having a previous LVM install broke ubiquity there. | 01:48 |
| cyphermox | if I reinstall again with "erase entire disk", it's good. I'd be very interested to know if someone else finds this | 01:49 |
| jibel | cyphermox, I saw an instance of this issue reported on LP. | 05:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.477 => 2.478] (desktop-core) | 05:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (artful-proposed) [2.478] | 05:17 | |
| slangasek | Laney: the above livecd-rootfs fixes a bug specific to the subiquity images, no respins needed for anything else; would you be able to shepherd a respin once it's published to artful? | 05:40 |
| ouroumov__ | tsimonq2, xcalib hasn't been working at all since 16.10, can we remove it from the archive until the maintainer gets it fixed? | 05:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (artful-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.30-2~build1 => 5.1.30-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (artful-proposed) [5.1.30-2] | 06:06 | |
| sil2100 | jibel: hey, I wonder if LP: #1724417 is something that can potentially happen to others? | 07:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1724417 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "grub-install /dev/dm-0 fails for "Erase entire disk" install type" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1724417 | 07:25 |
| jibel | sil2100, it does, I saw another instance of this crash for it is lost in LP now. | 07:26 |
| jibel | s/for/but/ | 07:26 |
| jibel | er | 07:26 |
| sil2100 | jibel: for artful only, or is it something older? | 07:26 |
| jibel | sil2100, it was artful IIRC | 07:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fast5 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.3-1] (no packageset) | 07:27 | |
| jibel | i'll try to find it, it was filed against grub2 and marked invalid | 07:27 |
| jibel | and reported sometime last week | 07:27 |
| sil2100 | A bit worrying | 07:29 |
| sil2100 | I'd prefer not needing to wait for the investigation/fix and to do a full re-spin, we might re-spin the subiquity images though | 07:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fast5 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.6.3-1] | 07:30 | |
| jibel | sil2100, bug 1722594 | 07:31 |
| ubot5 | bug 1722594 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "Install crashed: Unable to install bootloader at specified location" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1722594 | 07:31 |
| sil2100 | jibel: thanks, let's mention it on the other bug | 07:32 |
| valorie | anyone know if there is a fix in the works for the "clicking doesn't work" in ubiquity? when I filed it tonight LP didn't find the previous bug | 07:39 |
| valorie | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1724467 | 07:41 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1724467 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "while installing the artful RC iso, could not click on anything" [Undecided,New] | 07:41 |
| valorie | I know it was reported previously because I've looked at it | 07:41 |
| sil2100 | hm, didn't see this bug happening to me | 07:47 |
| smb | sil2100, it seems to happen to me too. but only if grub install fails. the dialog that comes up has non-working ok or cancel buttons | 07:48 |
| smb | so one cannot graphically escape | 07:48 |
| smb | sil2100, for the install fails when lvm is present: I had that with maas but it might be only similar but not the same reasons. curtin erases something then fails to write something to a disk which I don't know would exist. | 07:49 |
| smb | jibel, ^ | 07:50 |
| sil2100 | Ok, so that looks like the bug cyphermox encountered | 07:50 |
| smb | sil2100, but it would be two completely different environments | 07:50 |
| jibel | i can reproduce the non-working ok/canel buttons | 07:58 |
| jibel | for example when you force a non-uefi install on a uefi system | 07:58 |
| Laney | righto | 08:03 |
| Laney | should I action Steve's request? | 08:03 |
| jibel | slightly different bug than valorie's | 08:04 |
| * sil2100 hates installer bugs | 08:04 | |
| jibel | that's a way to prevent grub installer from failing later :) | 08:05 |
| sil2100 | Steve's request? | 08:09 |
| Laney | subiquity respin for livecd-rootfs | 08:10 |
| sil2100 | Laney: yeah, you want to push the button? | 08:11 |
| Laney | ok | 08:11 |
| jibel | bug 1724482 | 08:13 |
| ubot5 | bug 1724482 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) ""Force UEFI installation" dialog has non-working Go Back/Continue buttons" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1724482 | 08:13 |
| sil2100 | jibel: thanks for filling it in! | 08:18 |
| jibel | it's different from valorie's bug | 08:18 |
| === inaddy is now known as tinoco | ||
| === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-welcome (artful-proposed/universe) [17.10.14 => 17.10.15] (ubuntu-mate) | 08:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.28.5+17.04] | 08:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.28.5] | 09:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018) | 09:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu6] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-3ubuntu2 => 3.26.1-3ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux (artful-proposed/primary) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1] | 09:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.28.5~14.04] | 09:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] | 09:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 09:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 09:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-opencontainers-selinux [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1] | 09:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1] (no packageset) | 09:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-opencontainers-selinux [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0~rc1+git20170621.5.4a2974b-1] | 09:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptstate (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1build1 => 2.2.5-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 09:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fast5 (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.3-1 => 0.6.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fast5 [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.3-1ubuntu1] | 09:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-16.19~16.04.3] (kernel) | 10:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-16.19~16.04.3] | 10:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ppc64-diag [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [2.7.4-1~16.04] | 10:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ppc64-diag [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [2.7.4-1~16.04] | 10:29 | |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Tell me about this mate-welcome thing. | 10:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-3ubuntu3] | 10:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu6] | 10:45 | |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: ubuntu-mate-welcome is just an bug fix update. | 12:18 |
| flexiondotorg | Post release update. Not needed for the image. | 12:18 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Kay. | 12:18 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: Could you sync mate-settings-daemon from Debian unstable please? | 12:19 |
| flexiondotorg | 1.18.3-1 | 12:19 |
| flexiondotorg | It is a bug fix release. | 12:19 |
| flexiondotorg | Again, not required for the image. Post release update is fine. | 12:19 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Post-release implies SRU. I'd rather not have a sync as an SRU. | 12:21 |
| apw | which implies you need an sru bug with all the trimmings for both of those too | 12:22 |
| flexiondotorg | So I need to SRU something even though the release is not released yet? | 12:23 |
| flexiondotorg | These can be staged in updates ready to be installed post iso imnstall? | 12:24 |
| flexiondotorg | *can't | 12:24 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: I mean, you either want it in the release pocket (and on images), or it's an SRU. | 12:24 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: And given it's a two point release bump, it probably wouldn't be acceptable to jam in last minute. | 12:24 |
| flexiondotorg | I would prefer to have them on images and respin and test that SRU both of them. | 12:24 |
| flexiondotorg | *than SRYU | 12:25 |
| infinity | So, I don't see how it would be more acceptable post-release without some process behind it. | 12:25 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: How can we proceed with landing them in the release pocket and respinning? | 12:26 |
| infinity | Or maybe you meant 1.18.1-3, not 1.18.3-1 | 12:26 |
| flexiondotorg | Yes, correct. 1.18.1-3 for mate-settings-daemon. | 12:27 |
| infinity | Your numerical dyslexia made it sound worse. :P | 12:27 |
| flexiondotorg | :-) | 12:27 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Anyhow, "staging it for right after release" is a 0-day SRU. It should obviously be tested to fix the bug it claims to fix. | 12:27 |
| flexiondotorg | It has been tested. | 12:28 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Pushing it to the release pocket today and respinning would, IMO, have exactly the same requirement. Pushing in last minute fixes implies testing that they're not crap. | 12:28 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Like any other SRU, testing it after it's built, not before. | 12:28 |
| apw | flexiondotorg, if that ubuntu-mate-welcome is going to be an SRU it doesn't appear to have a bug associaited | 12:28 |
| flexiondotorg | ubuntu-mate-welcome fixes issues identified from community feedback. No associated LP bugs. | 12:29 |
| apw | rigth but to SRU it we would have to file a bug to process it against, and normally that is in the changelog | 12:30 |
| infinity | Anyhow, you also have 0 test results on your current images, so I'm not against pushing this stuff in and respinning. | 12:30 |
| infinity | That's up to you. | 12:30 |
| flexiondotorg | We have been testing the isos. But that was lost after the rebuild yesterday. We have bodies ready to test a respin. | 12:31 |
| flexiondotorg | If you can sync/release those infinity, we can get the tests completed. | 12:32 |
| flexiondotorg | By this evening. | 12:32 |
| infinity | Oh. It's you and kylin. Hrm. | 12:33 |
| infinity | Didn't realise they switched to mate this cycle. | 12:33 |
| jibel | infinity, for info, for the moment we are blocking the release of Ubuntu Desktop on bug 1723577 | 12:33 |
| ubot5 | bug 1723577 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "Artful won't start with Wayland activated (AMD?)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1723577 | 12:33 |
| jibel | infinity, regression in gnome-shell 3.26.1-0ubuntu1 | 12:34 |
| infinity | jibel: Yeah, I'm aware. | 12:34 |
| jibel | k | 12:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lshw (trusty-proposed/main) [02.16-2ubuntu1.3 => 02.16-2ubuntu1.4] (core) | 12:34 | |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: Kylin switched to MATE (or their customised version UKUI) in 17.04. | 12:34 |
| didrocks | we found it's due to GNOME Shell | 12:34 |
| didrocks | sorry, multi-plexing :p | 12:35 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Yeah, I missed that memo. Anyhow, my point was that if I accept mate-settings-daemon, it affects them too, not just you. | 12:35 |
| flexiondotorg | Oh, OK. | 12:35 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: You're probably best off just putting SRU paperwork on the bug and doing it as a 0-day. I'm not sure where the "if I have to do an SRU, I'll die a bit inside" thing comes from, but it's not that bad. :P | 12:36 |
| flexiondotorg | OK. I'll start the SRU process on Friday. No time prior to that. | 12:37 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: What ubuntu-mate-welcome? | 12:37 |
| flexiondotorg | *what about | 12:37 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: What "process"? I mean, literally, add the SRU template to the bug, and bam, it's an SRU. I can even accept it today, you can test, and we can release it tomorrow, if your testing appears sane. | 12:38 |
| flexiondotorg | There is no bug in LP. | 12:38 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: mate-welcome is only on your images, so we could respin for that, if you want. And given when mate-welcome is first seen (y'know, on first boot), that seems appropriate. | 12:38 |
| flexiondotorg | Yes please. | 12:39 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Oh, for the sync? Yeah. There's no bug for that, but unpacking, changing version number to -2ubuntu1 and adding a bug number would be trivial. :P | 12:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-welcome [source] (artful-proposed) [17.10.15] | 12:43 | |
| infinity | wxl: Should I be worried that there are no test results posted for lubuntu? | 12:47 |
| * sil2100 is running i386 ubuntustudio tests | 12:49 | |
| sil2100 | But it's slow, since my machine is thrashed with autopkgtest debugging as well | 12:49 |
| sil2100 | (and my laptop is really old and slow) | 12:50 |
| smb | infinity, apw, not sure this was brought up by others, I struggle with artful desktop install (via live) locking up on boot about the time of switching to gdm (amd cpu + older nvidia gpu) | 12:50 |
| sil2100 | smb: not sure if it's related to the issues the desktop guys are debugging, but did you try downgrading gnome-shell to 3.26.0-1ubuntu2 ? | 12:51 |
| smb | sil2100, not yet as its hard to do that when you have no place to type | 12:52 |
| infinity | smb: "struggle", as in it occasionally works, or "struggle", as in you hang out with too many Brits, and you really mean "it's completely broken"? | 12:52 |
| sil2100 | Since from the current debugging and bisecting it seems that later versions of g-s seem to have issues with some cards | 12:52 |
| smb | infinity, rather the latter. I think I had one half working where gdm came up in low-gfx mode but then shell would not come up (segfaulting) | 12:53 |
| sil2100 | infinity: I think he means it doesn't work, since he said he has no place to type ;p | 12:53 |
| smb | all my other attempts (about 5) were locking up before | 12:54 |
| smb | and I am too old to get grub screen up | 12:54 |
| * smb resorts to tweak stuff from live-image | 12:56 | |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: mate-settings-daemon_1.18.1-2ubuntu1 just uploaded. Here is the SRU bug http://pad.lv/1724569 | 12:59 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1724569 in mate-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "XRandR applet crashes on restart" [High,Fix committed] | 12:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-2 => 1.18.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) | 12:59 | |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: You built that source on Debian, didn't you? | 13:03 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: (The bug closure didn't get parsed in .changes) | 13:03 |
| andreas | where do I file a bug against the ubuntu server installer? What's the project in lp? | 13:04 |
| infinity | andreas: Which installer? | 13:04 |
| andreas | ubuntu-server, I think it's "d-i"? | 13:04 |
| andreas | the text mode installer, not subiquity | 13:04 |
| infinity | andreas: subiquity is also text mode. | 13:05 |
| andreas | ok, but it's not subiquity | 13:05 |
| infinity | andreas: But if you mean the classic images, then yes, debian-installer | 13:05 |
| sil2100 | Depends what images you used | 13:05 |
| andreas | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current/ | 13:05 |
| andreas | server amd64 | 13:05 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity: Reject it. Built with my Debian environment variables set. I'll build again ith DEB_VENDOR=Ubuntuy | 13:05 |
| infinity | andreas: debian-installer is the installer on those images, yes. | 13:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.1-2ubuntu1] | 13:06 | |
| andreas | infinity: and our project in lp for it? | 13:07 |
| infinity | andreas: ... | 13:07 |
| andreas | https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian-installer is really the debian one, not our fork I presume | 13:07 |
| infinity | andreas: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer | 13:07 |
| infinity | andreas: It's a package. | 13:07 |
| andreas | thanks | 13:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-2 => 1.18.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) | 13:10 | |
| cyphermox | sil2100: you said some other bug looked like what I had seen yesterday? | 13:16 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: yeah, left the link in the comments of your bug, jibel passed that bug to me | 13:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.1-2ubuntu1] | 13:24 | |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018) | 14:33 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: infinity: so, a GNOME Shell near you in few minutes | 14:34 |
| didrocks | we found the revert needed, it doesn't really impact us (headless mode) | 14:34 |
| didrocks | the contributor confirmed it works for him | 14:34 |
| didrocks | seb128 and I did try on a VM, the Shell still starts | 14:34 |
| didrocks | and willcooke tried suspend/resume | 14:34 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 14:36 |
| sil2100 | This is excellent news | 14:36 |
| sil2100 | Will review it as soon as it appears in the queue | 14:36 |
| willcooke | thanks didrocks sil2100 | 14:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu3 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu4] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:41 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: and here we go ^ | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | Taking care of that one | 14:41 |
| didrocks | I'm letting that in good hands :) | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | didrocks, infinity: ^ accepted | 14:43 |
| sil2100 | Will need to get it through -proposed | 14:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4] | 14:43 | |
| smb | sil2100, just for info (I see the new version is already coming) downgrading gnome-shell did not help in my case | 14:49 |
| sil2100 | hmmm, so unrelated then | 14:52 |
| sil2100 | smb: could you fill in a bug in this case? | 14:52 |
| smb | sil2100, yeah, well I fist want to try the ubuntu4 one to be sure, then I file one | 14:53 |
| chrisccoulson | I've still got flashplugin/partner packages sat in the queue for trusty -> zesty. Can anyone approve them? (Usually it's Jamie but he's not around) | 14:55 |
| sil2100 | chrisccoulson: slangasek, when he's up, should be able to help you | 14:55 |
| sil2100 | hmmm, or maybe I should try checking if I don't have the power to approve those | 14:56 |
| * sil2100 waits impatiently for the publisher to do its job | 14:57 | |
| sil2100 | chrisccoulson: ok, I tried accepting the zesty one, let's see if it worked correctly | 15:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] | 15:01 | |
| sil2100 | chrisccoulson: looks like it worked, let me take a look at the others | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: hope you don't mind me doing those? I guess I should be good since I'm part of canonical-partner-dev + SRU? | 15:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 15:05 | |
| sil2100 | chrisccoulson: all looked good, accepted | 15:06 |
| chrisccoulson | sil2100, thanks | 15:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] | 15:06 | |
| chrisccoulson | sil2100, they do need copying from -proposed shortly as well | 15:06 |
| slangasek | sil2100: ah, I hadn't given thought to the fact that this intersection of permissions gives you queue access; I'm ok with you reviewing the unapproved queue on partner, yes | 15:13 |
| sil2100 | chrisccoulson: this I think I cannot do, only slangasek ;p | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: btw. since I never did this before, how do I tag a package to ignore the britney lock during such a freeze? | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: I'm asking since we're waiting for the gnome-shell regression to be fixed, the package is in -proposed and once it gets tested we'd like to get it released and images re-built | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | smb: new gnome-shell in artful-proposed! Could you test if it also fixes your case? | 15:21 |
| sil2100 | didrocks, jibel: ^ can you guys also do testing on the -proposed gnome-shell? | 15:21 |
| smb | sil2100, sure | 15:21 |
| slangasek | sil2100: 'unblock' hint | 15:27 |
| smb | sil2100, pass! \o/ we have a gui | 15:28 |
| smb | now "only" network-manager should answer dns queries on 127.0.1.1 ... | 15:33 |
| sil2100 | smb: wow, nice! | 15:35 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: thanks! | 15:35 |
| xnox | smb, artful? on artful there should be no 127.0.1.1... | 15:38 |
| smb | xnox, but that is what I have in /etc/resolv.conf | 15:39 |
| xnox | smb, is that clean install or upgrade? | 15:39 |
| smb | xnox, iso testing fresh install | 15:39 |
| xnox | smb, server or desktop? ifupdown or network-manager? default config? | 15:39 |
| smb | desktop | 15:39 |
| xnox | that can't be good | 15:39 |
| * xnox syncs latest image | 15:40 | |
| smb | xnox, file gnerated by networkmanager (it says) | 15:41 |
| xnox | smb, yeah, it should not do that.... | 15:41 |
| sil2100 | gnome-shell autopkgtests in progress, hope those finish quick | 15:42 |
| smb | xnox, if that is helping any, this is an installation made from the live image. have not tried direct install yet | 15:48 |
| xnox | smb, well, i synced artful ubuntu desktop iso, booted into live session, did check that in the life session resolv.conf is a symlink to stub-resolve.conf | 15:49 |
| xnox | currently launched install ubuntu 17.10 and running that at the moment. | 15:49 |
| xnox | smb, in-target at the moment still has /target/etc/resolv.conf pointing at the right thing. | 15:51 |
| xnox | smb, is this VM or laptop? did you have networking during install? wifi or ethernet? | 15:52 |
| * xnox is in a VM with ethernet auto-dhcp connected | 15:52 | |
| smb | xnox, desktop and had ethernet | 15:52 |
| xnox | ack | 15:52 |
| smb | xnox, ugh maybe it was accidentally me | 15:53 |
| xnox | smb, what's your NetworkManager -printconfig? or some such? | 15:54 |
| smb | xnox, sorry I think I know what happened and its user fault | 15:54 |
| xnox | smb, what was it? i'm curious now =) | 15:55 |
| smb | xnox, I had to manually mount the disk to do a chroot install of sshd (because of the gnome-shell problem) | 15:55 |
| smb | xnox, so for that to work I added a nameserver manually and then removed resolv.conf assuming it would regenerate itself correctly | 15:56 |
| xnox | ha | 15:56 |
| xnox | if there is no resolv.conf yes networkmanager takes over it | 15:56 |
| xnox | i guess we could make it create the symlink to stub-resolv.conf | 15:56 |
| xnox | regular install works fine, it seems. | 15:57 |
| smb | xnox, some automatic habit from before when having a resolv.conf would prevent the right new resolvconf ways of things | 15:57 |
| xnox | resolvconf is dead | 15:59 |
| xnox | resolved is the new world order | 15:59 |
| xnox | smb, however resolvconf on boot would check its stampfiles and would re-generate the symlink. horum. | 16:03 |
| smb | xnox, so why does resolvd not create the right link when its missing =:P Systemd people are not that shy in other cases | 16:04 |
| smb | hah beat me to say it | 16:04 |
| bdmurray | The Release Notes make include a link to "Less Popular Ubuntu Images" is there a better way to describe those? | 16:04 |
| xnox | smb, hm, i guess i could include a tmpfiles.d snippet to do that. | 16:05 |
| xnox | l /etc/resolv.conf ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf | 16:05 |
| xnox | or some such | 16:05 |
| smb | xnox, yeah, I can confirm that doing that is preventing nm from interfering and the network icon finally is without that question mark... | 16:06 |
| smb | At least as a positive, once the ISOs are regenerated with the updated gnome-shell I won't get tempted to mess with the installation | 16:08 |
| sil2100 | Ok, autopkgtests for gnome-shell finished successfully - anyone can do a quick dogfood run of it before I hint it in? | 16:33 |
| wxl | infinity: tsimonq2 is primarily running the show. have you asked him? | 16:40 |
| tsimonq2 | Huh what? :) | 16:40 |
| smb | sil2100, does me pick it ok, count? | 16:42 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh. infinity, don't be worried :) | 16:44 |
| sil2100 | Ok, let me try hinting it in then! | 16:55 |
| sil2100 | (this will take a minute) | 16:56 |
| sil2100 | gnome-shell unblocked | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | smb, jibel: thanks for the tests! And didrocks thanks for the fixed package ;) | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | infinity: are you ok with me re-building the desktop images with the new gnome-shell? | 16:59 |
| sil2100 | (once it migrates) | 16:59 |
| didrocks | great! | 17:06 |
| jibel | sil2100, go ahead, rebuild the desktop images. | 17:14 |
| jibel | once g-s is puvlished | 17:14 |
| sil2100 | Why is this taking so long... | 17:25 |
| * sil2100 grows impatient | 17:32 | |
| apw | sil2100, its the publisher, you are watching it ... therefore it is hiding | 17:34 |
| sil2100 | But I see in the britney logs: "Copying: gnome-shell/3.26.1-0ubuntu4" so yay | 17:36 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I guess soon I'll be able to kick the new image | 17:39 |
| sil2100 | We'll probably have to wait for the final publisher tick | 17:40 |
| sil2100 | This publisher is killing me | 18:07 |
| flocculant | sil2100: found an issue with friendly recovery - a missing file warning, bug 1724643 . Doubt it's a great problem in the scheme of things, just makes friendly-recovery more abitunfriendly-recovery :) | 18:09 |
| ubot5 | bug 1724643 in friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) "Root prompt from recovery mode gives warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1724643 | 18:09 |
| sil2100 | flocculant: does it still work then? Or does this warning cause it to exit? | 18:10 |
| sil2100 | I'm fine with it just giving this warning, non-critical, a bit ugly but yeah | 18:11 |
| flocculant | it works ok - just shows the warning - forgot to put that in bug - will do now | 18:11 |
| flocculant | yea - was my impression, just thought I would mention it :) | 18:11 |
| * sil2100 sees the new gnome-shell in the release pocket as per rmadison | 18:11 | |
| flocculant | sil2100: if it had not worked I would have started with - Sorry but :) | 18:12 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I think it's safe enough to kick a rebuild | 18:25 |
| sil2100 | jibel, infinity: ^ | 18:25 |
| sil2100 | Rebuild requested | 18:26 |
| jibel | sil2100, thanks | 18:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Final] has been updated (20171018) | 18:54 | |
| sil2100 | Rebuild finished o/ | 19:06 |
| sil2100 | Let me check the manifest | 19:06 |
| sil2100 | Ok, it has the right gnome-shell so we're good | 19:07 |
| * sil2100 goes AFK for a bit to do life™ | 19:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (artful-proposed/universe) [3.7.0~a1-1 => 3.7.0~a2-1] (no packageset) | 19:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (artful-proposed) [3.7.0~a2-1] | 19:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu MATE i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Lubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Kubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade UbuntuKylin i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu i386 [Artful Final] (20171018) has been added | 20:52 | |
| === med_ is now known as Guest99060 | ||
| bdmurray | infinity: so just test whatever catches my fancy? | 22:45 |
| tsimonq2 | Test Lubuntu. <3 | 22:46 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Things without results, ideally. | 22:48 |
| bdmurray | Okay I forget was there a way for people to communicate what they plan on testing? | 22:49 |
| bdmurray | Oh, there it is "In Progress" | 22:49 |
| === enick_852 is now known as RAOF | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!