[01:34] bdmurray: sorry to pester you always. blackboxsw and I just uploaded another cloud-init to xenial and zesty. [01:35] cloud-init 17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 and cloud-init 17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 [01:35] if you could take a look in your sru time tomorrow we'd appreciate it. its just one *very* tiny code change compared to what was already in -proposed. [01:36] bug 1724354 [01:36] bug 1724354 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "WARNING in logs due to missing python-jsonschema" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1724354 === BrAsS_mOnKeY is now known as g2 === NCommander is now known as KD2JRT === infinity0_ is now known as infinity0 [06:40] xnox: ack [06:41] tsimonq2: so let's plan Qt 5.9.3 and OpenSSL 1.0 for now [06:52] hey, if a former proposed upload failed (due to gcc7 now making it an FTBFS) is that one of the cases to buildpackage with -v ? [06:53] to pick up in the changes file all effective changes that will hit the archive? [06:57] I'm rather sure it is corrct for this case, so uploading like that for now [06:58] but feel free to let me know if you tihnk otherwise would be better (and why) [08:38] cpaelzer: Yep. [08:53] hi all, could someone have a look at this Steam issue and give me a hint where I should raise another issue please? Not sure how to help the Valve guys: https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/3301#issuecomment-337832330 === infinity changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Artful Released | Archive: closed | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-zesty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: === StevenK is now known as Guest25792 === Guest25792 is now known as StevenK === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Artful Released | Archive: closed | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-artful | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: [13:32] :-) [13:42] +1 [13:42] "next please" [13:44] * xnox is betting on Brisk Bustard [13:46] xnox: What sort of animal is a Bustard? [13:47] infinity, a bird [13:47] https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bustard&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjm_bPs6PzWAhXLJMAKHXUyCLEQiR4IrwE&biw=1920&bih=990 [13:47] infinity, looks like a heron to me [13:48] * mitya57 hopes 18.04 won't look like 8.04 because of that [13:48] but i'm not into birds [14:32] breezier badger [14:32] edgier eft [14:33] too bad it doesn't well work for dapperer [14:34] * Laney is going to lobby for Dabbing [14:34] the first 2 LTS were birds, I was thinking it was going to be a pattern, but nope [14:42] Laney: <3 [14:45] Boring Bull? [14:55] hello, it looks like the mirrors serving 17.10 images don't support zsync :( https://pastebin.canonical.com/201018/ [14:56] I don't think we've ever pushed the zsync files to cloudfront [14:56] it's probably a bug on the IS side that they're redirecting .iso.zsync as well as .iso [14:57] cjwatson: ugh - should I report this somewhere? [14:58] roadmr: either IS on IRC or RT, I guess [14:58] cjwatson: will do, thanks! [14:58] roadmr: I mean it'll be a short-lived problem, but maybe a process bug somewhere [14:58] yep, I guess once the thundering herd dies down things will point where they should [15:17] (for completeness: I totally misread the pastebin, this is probably unfixable at our end) [16:41] Who updates this file? http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release Also,d oes Dean H. (Beret) hang out here anymore? [16:45] Sicnus: it will get updated [16:45] Beret --^ [16:45] Sicnus: feels like you could just look at who is in the channel [16:46] Beret: oheya Dean ;) (Trae) [17:08] now updated [17:09] yeah thanks, ;) Just noticed. [17:18] slangasek: would it be appropriate for me to SRU a MRE for php7.1 to artful, and not fix it in BB, given an intention to update to php7.2 in BB? That is, I could wait for BB to open, and do the fix there, then SRU, but I'm going to be replacing php7.1 with php7.2 in BB evenually anyways [17:23] nacc: what do you mean, "and not fix it in BB"? [17:24] nacc: if this is just about SRUing before BB is open, it's fine to start an SRU now and have us copy forward to BB when it opens [17:24] slangasek: well, yeah I guess I meant that -- as in do I need to wait for BB to open [17:24] slangasek: as my first plan of action for BB is to sync 7.2 and drop 7.1 anyways [17:30] nacc: y'all are targeting postgresql-10 for BB, right? [17:30] jbicha: yeah, i believe so [17:31] jbicha: it should line up well [17:31] Debian completed the transition so hopefully it'll be fairly smooth in BB too [17:32] jbicha: yep [17:37] slangasek: general development question; is 'devel' a valid changelog distribution only in ubuntu? [17:39] nacc: yes [17:39] slangasek: thanks [18:07] jbicha: In addition to commenting on bug 1721626, tagging it v-failed would have been helpful. [18:07] bug 1721626 in console-setup (Ubuntu Xenial) "Remove obsolete versioned dependency on initramfs-tools Edit" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1721626 [18:10] ok, not clear whether there is a regression there or not, but probably would have been better to tag it like that until it can be investigated [18:30] jbicha: Yes, because the report shows that SRU as releasable. [20:06] bdmurray: The bug isn't in console-setup anyway, I'm sure. [20:07] bdmurray: Pretty sure that's another manifestation of "sometimes plymouth --ping doesn't return". [20:11] infinity: right, I was commeting on the process [20:13] bdmurray: Oh yes, indeed. I was going to v-fail it after I sorted out it was to blame. And it clearly wasn't to blame, from a cursory view of the diff. So, the real process failure was not removing the regression tags from the other bug. [20:13] bdmurray: (That said, shouldn't a regression-proposed bug be scraped by sru-report and flagged up?) [20:16] infinity: There is a bot that looks for bugs about packages from -proposed but that filters on ones reported by apport. [20:23] bdmurray: Ahh, well. Yay tools. Another argument to push for britney-driven SRU migrations this cycle. That block-proposed tag would have actually been useful. :P [20:43] infinity: yeah, was discussed at the SRU team meeting in NYC, I think we're ready to push on that this cycle [21:10] Excuse my ignorance but will all the uploads that have been 0-day SRU'ed into Artful be automatically copied to Bubonic Baboon once it opens or will developers have to do this on a case-by-case basis? [21:15] I think the former [21:15] otherwise we will end up with big b00bs being with lower versions than artful-updates [21:19] True, I just didn't know if Bubonic Baboon when created would copy including -updates and -security. [21:19] (And what about -proposed?) [21:45] I'd expect all but -proposed [21:49] sarnold: But why not -proposed? Those have the potential to land and might be greater than the one in Big Bat... [21:49] tsimonq2: because they might not land.. presumably there's few enough of them for real trouble [21:51] sarnold: I guess my point is is that once they *do* land, the version will be greater than Big Bat... [21:52] note on the artful desktop installer - run from inside a VM, the display always seems wrong, such that the 'continue' button for choosing a keyboard layout is off the screen, so you can't click it, have to tab over to it and guess that it is highlighted. === Guest64203 is now known as RAOF [22:55] hrm, i'm getting a Hash Sum mismatch on xenial-updates from archive.ubuntu.com in a LXD container [22:55] any chance ss or netstat still tells you which IP was used? [22:55] anyone else seeing that (i'm seing it in autopkgtest) [22:56] sarnold: let me see if it goes away if i refresh my local build env [22:56] sarnold: autopkgtest-build-lxd didn't complain, so it must be something in my autopkgtest-lxd env [22:57] nacc: apt-cacher-ng? squid-deb-proxy? [22:57] everyone's reported one of them corrupts files and the other one works fine.. [22:57] yeah i think it must be acng [23:01] sarnold: yep, that was it [23:02] sorry for the noise, and thanks sarnold! [23:02] nacc: did you notice if it happened to serve up a different file than the one expected? i gave up on it when I saw that once.. [23:03] sarnold: I did not. Once i reran autopkgtest-build-lxd and used that image, it worked correctly [23:03] nacc: well, at least you're moving again :) [23:03] sarnold: yeah :)