krytarik | Rosco2: Hehe, I see you're editing the download page already. :P | 15:35 |
---|---|---|
Rosco2 | Yeah - first time | 15:36 |
Rosco2 | Would like a 2nd set of eyes before it is published though | 15:36 |
Rosco2 | krytarik, wasn't sure who was around :) | 15:39 |
krytarik | I'm generally always here - but you aren't. :P | 15:40 |
Rosco2 | Yeah - normally just for release coordination | 15:41 |
krytarik | I guess we should drop the mention of 14.04 alongside then. | 15:44 |
Rosco2 | I have put the download page to "pending review" if you would like to do a proof read for me | 15:46 |
Rosco2 | Not sure about the mention of 14.04 | 15:46 |
Rosco2 | It is still available, but of course we don't support ity | 15:46 |
Rosco2 | So maybe you are right. | 15:47 |
krytarik | Yes, and except for that part, I've already reviewed it. | 15:47 |
Rosco2 | Excellent - I will drop that text then and press go. | 15:48 |
Rosco2 | Can you have a read of the release post? | 15:48 |
Rosco2 | It is just a copy of the last one, but I often make silly mistakes :P | 15:48 |
krytarik | Yeah, I already had a quick look at it - and it looks fine as well. | 15:51 |
Rosco2 | Great - thanks for your help | 15:52 |
krytarik | Thank you as well! | 15:52 |
Rosco2 | Do you know who normally takes care of all the other meia - facebook - google+ etc? | 15:52 |
Rosco2 | media | 15:52 |
krytarik | Not quite, no. Think maybe eylul, or cfhowlett. | 15:53 |
Rosco2 | I thought so | 15:53 |
krytarik | Which is rather moot right now. | 15:53 |
Rosco2 | I will ping them by mail and hopefully they can sort it out later | 15:54 |
krytarik | Uh oh, I forgot to update the support page the last time too. :P | 15:56 |
Rosco2 | Aah - that's hidden away! | 15:57 |
krytarik | Pretty much yeah. :D | 15:57 |
* Rosco2 quickly checking for other pages | 15:59 | |
krytarik | Can you remove the tags (!) 'news' and 'release-notes' from the release post? Because we are using categories for this. | 16:00 |
Rosco2 | Yeah - can do | 16:00 |
krytarik | Also, should we start favoring HTTPS links to the website now? | 16:02 |
krytarik | I'd say yes - while it isn't enforced yet. | 16:02 |
krytarik | Rosco2: Thanks for updating the support page too - but we should add Zesty to it still. :P | 16:09 |
Rosco2 | Sorry - distracted my a phnecall mid-edit. | 16:10 |
Rosco2 | GLad you are watching :-) | 16:10 |
krytarik | Glad you're doing most of the work. :P | 16:10 |
Rosco2 | Do you mean https for our site, or just the links? | 16:11 |
krytarik | I mean when I was about to copy-paste the release post link into the topic of #ubuntustudio, I noticed - like the last time - that I have HTTP in the browser while it actually supports HTTPS and which should be preferred. :) | 16:15 |
Rosco2 | Yes - if supported I think we should convert them all as we spot them | 16:15 |
Rosco2 | Will - send a mail to the mailing list, write to ejlul & cfhowlett - then celebrate :) | 16:17 |
krytarik | "ZestyZapus 17.04" on the support page - plz to add a space. :P | 16:26 |
krytarik | And the old, dedicated Ubuntu Forums section appears to be archived by now (https://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=335) - so we should drop references to it sometime too - e.g. on the support page and in the sidebar. | 16:31 |
Rosco2 | Thanks - space added | 16:32 |
Rosco2 | I must eat know - before I faint! | 16:32 |
Rosco2 | Will check back in a bit | 16:33 |
krytarik | Yep, I've just organized something too. :P | 16:33 |
Rosco2 | I might sniff around for other potential updates later | 16:33 |
krytarik | I'll adapt the occurrence on the support page to the 'Multimedia Software' section on the forums instead (https://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=334) | 16:48 |
Rosco2 | I had forgotten about that | 16:50 |
Rosco2 | I have been meaning to look at the revamped community website too - to see if we should create something there | 16:51 |
Rosco2 | Alan Pope blogged about it | 16:51 |
krytarik | Yeah. | 16:51 |
studio-devel504 | hello... i tried to use ubuntu studio some time ago... but i wasnt experienced enough to use it... now i am studying electronic music and i wanted to know which ubuntu studio version i should install? | 20:35 |
krytarik | studio-devel504: I would think 'the most recent' is good for all the updated software it provides - unless someone can be bothered to backport them to earlier (LTS) releases. | 20:39 |
studio-devel504 | ok thx.i wanted also to know if it is possible to use a programm for coding synths like vst.... i have experience with pure data and max/msp... but my dream was always to develop my own plugin/synth... i have basic knowledge about synthesis (currently additive,subtractive and fm(learning it now)) and i started to develop a plugin in reaper.... the coding language is jsfx and i wanted to know if i can contribute so | 20:40 |
studio-devel504 | is this the best to use? Ubuntu Studio 16.04.3 LTS (Xenial Xerus) | 20:41 |
krytarik | Support in #ubuntustudio btw - probably more eyes there. | 20:41 |
studio-devel504 | ok thank you | 20:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!