[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.0 (xenial-proposed/main) [7.0.22-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 7.0.24-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[00:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.0 (zesty-proposed/main) [7.0.22-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 7.0.24-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.1 (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.8-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.10-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[06:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (artful-proposed/main) [5.5.1-4ubuntu2 => 5.5.1-4ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tgt (artful-proposed/main) [1:1.0.71-1ubuntu1 => 1:1.0.71-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-2ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-2ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:15] <doko> mapreri: please upload the debhelper merge to a ppa when you're ready
[09:15] <doko> ahh, no, that's tsimonq2. sorry
[09:15] <doko> tsimonq2: ^^^
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, did you get the automake one?
[09:31] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: yes, thanks
[09:35]  * mapreri was confused for a second there
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04.10]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.23]
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> does anybody think that we can blacklist haskell so I can manually sync it?
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (zesty-proposed/main) [1:2.8+dfsg-3ubuntu2.6 => 1:2.8+dfsg-3ubuntu2.7] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmemcached (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.18-4.1 => 1.0.18-4.1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[12:53] <mdeslaur> could someone please delete gnutls26 in the trusty upload queue?
[12:53] <mdeslaur> actually, wait a sec
[12:54] <mdeslaur> yes, please delete it from the trusty upload queue
[12:55] <infinity> mdeslaur: Reason?
[12:55] <infinity> (You don't seem to be in the changelog... Unless you sponsored it?)
[12:55] <mdeslaur> it includes a second SRU which was verified-failed, I want to upload a new one with a single fix in it
[12:56] <slashd> apw, ddstreet have re-submitted the lshw patch (re (LP: #1471983)) for Xenial (already in -proposed) and trusty is waiting for approval in the upload queue. Since you did the first review, would you like to take care of the 2nd ? I understand that you may not want to build a new package on Friday. I'm totally fine to wait for next week if you prefer.
[12:56] <mdeslaur> infinity: ie. the patch for 1709193 is wrong
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnutls26 [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.12.23-12ubuntu2.10]
[12:58] <mdeslaur> infinity: thanks
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnutls26 (trusty-proposed/main) [2.12.23-12ubuntu2.9 => 2.12.23-12ubuntu2.10] (core)
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> mdeslaur, <3
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:48] <jbicha> please reject the older gnome-shell/artful proposed SRU, the new one fixes an extra bug
[13:50] <didrocks> doin
[13:50] <didrocks> doing*
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]
[13:53] <apw> jbicha, ^^
[13:58] <apw> jbicha, can you confirm that that first bug number is correct?  but bug doesn't sound like anything to do with headless
[14:02] <jbicha> didrocks: ^
[14:02] <didrocks> argh
[14:02] <didrocks> nicely picked apw
[14:02] <didrocks> probably middle copy/paste issue
[14:03] <didrocks> fixing/reuploading
[14:03] <didrocks> correct bug is bug #1725153 for reference
[14:04] <apw> ddstreet, that replacement lswh for trusty seems to still have the use of char isn't that meant to be uint8_t (cc: slashd)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:05] <didrocks> apw: ^ (correct bug # this time)
[14:10] <slashd> apw, the patch include 2 upstream bug, one that presumably fix upstream bug #653 (which introduce the char) and then upstream fix #701 (which replace char by uint8. So the occurence of char you see are probably the one in the 653 patch
[14:11] <apw> slashd, ahh will double check, ta
[14:11] <slashd> apw, thanks for looking
[14:11] <apw> slashd, one of teh problems with only seeing a diff of patches
[14:11] <slashd> apw, yeah ;) I know not always obvious
[14:13] <tsimonq2> dk
[14:13] <tsimonq2> l
[14:13] <apw> damn that cat
[14:14] <tsimonq2> grr mobile keyboard with a wrapped up thumb, going to find my laptop...
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-2ubuntu2]
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu5]
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lshw [source] (trusty-proposed) [02.16-2ubuntu1.4]
[14:22] <apw> slashd, thanks and yes that was it, the patches are in the opposite order so i spaced it ... now ^
[14:40] <slashd> apw, thanks
[14:49] <tsimonq2> Oh, there. Hello doko, who I actually wanted to ping. ;)
[14:52] <doko> tsimonq2: ?
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted numactl [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.11-1ubuntu1.1]
[14:54] <tsimonq2> doko: ppa:tsimonq2/debhelper is my merge
[15:16] <doko> tsimonq2: ta
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, shouldn't it also build?
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[15:27] <oSoMoN> hey release masters, can the SRU for bug #1718446 be given a higher priority so that it migrates to update soon-ish? it was meant as a 0-day SRU since the main use case is upgrades
[15:29] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: oh
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> missing runtime dpkg foo?
[15:31] <tsimonq2> hmm, no?
[15:32]  * tsimonq2 scratches head
[15:36] <tsimonq2> I'm wondering how this built in Debian but not Ubuntu...
[15:37] <LocutusOfBorg> got it
[15:37] <LocutusOfBorg> you won't know why
[15:38] <LocutusOfBorg> somewhat the merge deleted the lib directory
[15:38] <LocutusOfBorg> readding works probably
[15:38] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/8377053/+listing-archive-extra take from there without my changelog new entry
[15:40]  * tsimonq2 kicks grab-merge
[15:41] <tsimonq2> This is why I don't trust you!
[15:41] <tsimonq2> :P
[15:41] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: But it failed again
[15:41] <LocutusOfBorg> Can't exec "dh_builddeb.pkgbinarymangler": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_builddeb line 27.
[15:41] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh
[15:42] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: You plan on continuing working on it or can I try and figure this bit out? :)
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> no I don't plan
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[15:42] <tsimonq2> Ok
[15:42] <tsimonq2> :)
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> it is beerday, mostly leaving dailyjob
[15:43] <tsimonq2> Ok cool
[15:43] <tsimonq2> Have fun
[15:48] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[15:50] <nacc> tsimonq2: LocutusOfBorg: if it helps, I am updating the debhelper repo at https://code.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+git/debhelper
[15:50] <nacc> should be done in a few minutes
[15:50] <tsimonq2> nacc: Ooh ok
[15:51] <nacc> tsimonq2: and note that we are able to import uploads from a PPA (offline). It can be a bit weird, but it should work (so you can see what exactly LocutusOfBorg uploaded to their PPA)
[15:52] <tsimonq2> nacc: oooooh
[15:52] <tsimonq2> Nice!
[15:52] <nacc> specifically `git ubuntu import-ppa ... `
[15:52] <nacc> tsimonq2: the debhelper import is current now
[15:52] <tsimonq2> Ok cool.
[15:53]  * tsimonq2 doesn't have upload access to debhelper so I'd like to try out doing a merge proposal...
[15:55] <LocutusOfBorg> nice
[15:55] <LocutusOfBorg> btw I fixed it probably
[15:55] <LocutusOfBorg> chmod +x dh_builddeb
[15:56] <LocutusOfBorg> ok, Merge O Matic, you are making me so mad
[15:56] <LocutusOfBorg> deleting stuff, changing permissions... something is wrong
[15:57] <LocutusOfBorg> nacc, https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/13599184
[15:57] <LocutusOfBorg> please import this one then
[15:58]  * tsimonq2 notes to never use MoM for debhelper merges...
[16:00] <tsimonq2> doko, LocutusOfBorg: I also pushed it to my PPA, and a run through sbuild actually works this time ;)
[16:00] <tsimonq2> Thank you LocutusOfBorg!
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> I changed also the versioning, see the latest upload
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> and deleted my references
[16:01] <tsimonq2> Oh cool, so then *actually* take from LocutusOfBorg ;)
[16:03] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: so the way the PPA imports work, they are basically offline (local only)
[16:03] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: they are a way for developers to grab what someone else uploaded to their PPA to see, not for use by the official repo
[16:06] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: I'll throw a good amount of packages at a PPA with the debhelper upload as a deb and see if anything breaks
[16:06] <tsimonq2> s/ deb / dep /
[16:13] <oSoMoN> sil2100, hey, are you still around? the SRU for bug #1718446 was meant to be published asap after release (because it affects upgrades only), and it's been verified, can it be published?
[16:16] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg, doko: Yep, I can confirm that the new debhelper works. Things in my PPA are failing for unrelated reasons. :)
[16:21] <sil2100> oSoMoN: hey, around, but I'm still reluctant to release anything on a Friday
[16:21] <sil2100> I can understand that it's upgrade-related, but in the unlikely case of causing any regressions we won't have people to revert it or see what's going on
[16:22]  * sil2100 seriously treats the rule of "no releases on Friday"
[16:45] <sil2100> doko: ppp merge prepared in a PPA, will push it to bb once it's open
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (trusty-proposed/main) [3.12.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1] (core)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (xenial-proposed/main) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.1 => 4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2] (core)
[18:22] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: You might want to update this ;)  http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/tmp/release-name-notice.png
[18:38] <andreas> do we have a name?
[19:30] <valorie> google says no
[20:22] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: traditionally I do so after the correct value of the next data point becomes clear
[20:22] <tumbleweed> :P
[20:22] <cjwatson> oh although apparently I forgot to do it in April
[20:25] <cjwatson> done, although possibly at some point I should arrange to be at less risk of being fired :P
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deja-dup (artful-proposed/main) [36.2-0ubuntu1 => 36.3-0ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:02] <slangasek> infinity: linux/armhf, if the rebuild test doesn't fail due to ENOSPC, it fails due to timeout of the build; and the ubuntu-regression-testsuite does get skipped because "doesn't work under isolation".  So we have zero linux/armhf tests we expect to pass there for the foreseeable future
[21:05] <infinity> slangasek: Okay.  But of course, you already badtested them, so xnox's MP still makes no sense. :P
[21:05] <infinity> vorlon:force-badtest linux/armhf/all
[21:05] <infinity> vorlon:force-badtest linux-hwe/armhf/all
[21:05] <slangasek> infinity: I only badtested them just now as part of resolving that MP :)
[21:05] <infinity> Oh, or that literally just... Yeah.
[21:08] <infinity> slangasek: My comment still stands, mind you.  The ENOSPC thing is transient and affects the whole archive.
[21:08] <slangasek> sure
[21:08] <slangasek> but again, if we don't ENOSPC, we timeout instead
[21:09] <slangasek> maybe we need to poke autopkgtest-cloud to let linux armhf autopkgtests run to completion
[21:09] <infinity> Which is also an infra bug, if it's timing out with input.
[21:09] <infinity> s/input/output/
[21:09] <slangasek> yes
[21:09] <infinity> Anyhow, I propose we solve it by dropping armhf.
[21:09] <slangasek> but it's a bug in autopkgtest since inception (it has an absolute time limit rather than timeout-without-output), and we should not waste time on the linux*/armhf autopkgtest failures
[21:10] <infinity> Good thing no one is quoted in recent interviews about how awesome Ubuntu and raspi2 are.
[21:10] <slangasek> what we need to do is adjust the autopkgtest infrastructure so that it churns the separated liquid back down into the bottom of the queue
[21:11] <infinity> Your metaphor might be too opaque for my sleep schedule.
[23:24] <xnox> slangasek, bdmurray - omg omg systemd is green with no autopkgtest regressions in xenial-proposed now =) please release =)
[23:24] <xnox> i guess on monday.
[23:24]  * xnox hopes nothing regresses in autopkgtest infra by then.
[23:25] <nacc> heh
[23:25] <nacc> xnox: ^5 nicely done :)
[23:26] <bdmurray> xnox: Take a screenshot
[23:26] <nacc> and attach it to the bug :)
[23:27] <xnox> bdmurray, frame it and put it on the wall, right? Just like https://framedtweets.com/
[23:28] <xnox> i think bdmurray needs https://framedtweets.com/products/thats-hot-parishilton =)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (xenial-proposed/main) [1.18.4ubuntu1.2 => 1.18.4ubuntu1.3] (core)
[23:29] <bdmurray> xnox: Do you know where those are made?
[23:29] <xnox> bdmurray, portland metropolitan area, no?
[23:29] <bdmurray> statistical area!
[23:30] <xnox> bdmurray, wait are you in statistical area but outside the metropolitan area?
[23:30] <xnox> bdmurray, also same thing!
[23:30] <xnox> Portland–Vancouver–Hillsboro, OR–WA Metropolitan Statistical Area
[23:31] <bdmurray> See I go by the official naming
[23:33] <bdmurray> Oh, I didn't realize Skamania county was a part of it
[23:40] <slangasek> it's metro-"adjacent"