[00:06] <Aison> is there some tool that shows some informations on the console before login?
[00:06] <Aison> like ip address and such?
[00:08] <nacc> Aison: you can put whatever you want in the motd
[00:08] <nacc> which I believe is shown before the login prompt
[00:10] <sarnold> /etc/issue
[00:10] <sarnold> motd is shown after login
[00:10] <nacc> sarnold: ah thanks
[00:10] <nacc> sarnold: duh :/
[00:10] <sarnold> see agetty(8)
[00:10] <sarnold> nacc: heh I nearly wrote 'motd' before gettnig confused by pam_motd and then had to go hunting :)
[00:13] <nacc> sarnold: it *feels* like the right word to use, even though I totally realize it's not :)
[00:14] <sarnold> nacc: yeah :)
[05:18] <cpaelzer> good morning
[05:53]  * Olanzapin is back -( bbl )- gone 6 hr 56 min 27 s
[06:01] <lordievader> Good morning
[09:58] <crtcji> Hello. Does anybody know what are the minimal requirements for the Canonical's Landscape in terms of CPU and RAM? I would like to run it in a VPS for maximum of 20 machines with the free license. Google did not helped me. Thank you.
[09:59] <crtcji> I found the info https://landscape.canonical.com/static/doc/user-guide/ch03.html
[11:56] <dduvnjak> If I have a custom systemd service running on Ubuntu Xenial on AWS, and that service depends on a script from user-data being executed, what should I set the 'After' in that service to: cloud-init.service, cloud-init-local.service or cloud-init.target?
[12:03] <dduvnjak> Think I found the answer: https://github.com/number5/cloud-init/blob/master/systemd/cloud-config.target
[13:01] <Aison> my ubuntu server have two LAN ports, one with static ip, one with dhcp. Normally, the dhcp one is not connected. Now my problem is, that the boot process is waiting multiple minutes for waiting for the dhcp port
[13:01] <Aison> how can I let ignore this?
[13:04] <mybalzitch> have you edited /etc/network/interfaces ?
[13:05] <Aison> mybalzitch, yes
[13:05] <Aison> there are two entries
[13:05] <Aison> one for eno1, one for eno2
[13:05] <Aison> but i'm just thinking about using systemd .network files
[13:44] <Aison> why is openvpn listen only on ipv4 port?
[13:45] <sdeziel> Aison: if you want it to listen on IPv6/IPv4, use "proto udp6" or "proto tcp6-server"
[13:55] <Aison> sdeziel, now it is listening only at udp6 ;)
[13:55] <sdeziel> Aison: it should still accept IPv4 connections
[13:56] <Aison> but netstat says udp6       0      0 :::1194                 :::*                                1622/openvpn
[13:56] <Aison> and there is no entry for udp
[13:56] <sdeziel> Aison: that looks good to me
[13:57] <sdeziel> Aison: you don't need one, the UDPv6 socket will accept IPv4 connections as well
[13:58] <Aison> ok
[13:59] <sdeziel> Aison: in your logs, the IPv4 clients will appear to come from an IPv4 mapped IPv6, like: ::ffff:1.2.3.4
[14:00] <Aison> ok
[14:59] <jamespage> wolsen: hi!
[14:59] <jamespage> wolsen: do you happen to know whether https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1669227 impacts >= jewel?
[14:59] <jamespage> wolsen: I see the upstream pull request got closed with a 'code-rewritten' type message
[15:00] <wolsen> jamespage: I wasn’t able to determine if the problem still exists in jewell or not as I never found a good reproducer
[15:02] <wolsen> reading the code, it was not clear if it was fixed or not
[16:24] <xpistos> Hy guys. I am having a problem with my /boot directory. I think I have to remove unused kernals but a bit confused as too how. http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25779714/  I checked but not sure if this applies.
[16:24] <xpistos> Currently I am using 4.4.0-96-generic
[16:25] <xpistos> can I just remove everyting that is older than 90?
[16:25] <sdeziel> xpistos: you are better off removing/purging the associated packages
[16:26] <xpistos> dpkg -l linux-{image,headers}-"[0-9]*" | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2 -d"-"` | grep -e '[0-9]' | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge
[16:26] <sdeziel> xpistos: a bunch of "apt-get purge linux-image-4.4.0-79-generic" should reclaim most space
[16:27] <sdeziel> xpistos: yeah, that ;)
[16:27] <xpistos> will that leave just the 96 ad 97 kernals?
[16:27] <xpistos> or will it take out the 97 as well?
[16:28] <sdeziel> easy way to tell, prefix your purge command with echo
[16:29] <xpistos> sdeziel: Damn. I should have remembered that. thanks!
[16:29] <sdeziel> or simply skip piping to xargs to see what is would get for real
[16:29] <sdeziel> np
[16:29] <xpistos> I know enough to be dangerous but I am actively trying to get better.
[16:30] <sdeziel> xpistos: I'm curious to see what "apt-get autoremove" would propose to remove?
[16:30] <xpistos> I have a test vm I could try it in, but it is CentOS not Ubunut
[16:30] <xpistos> Ubuntu
[16:31] <sdeziel> IIRC, there is something that should take care of pinning the current running kernel, newer ones and one older only
[16:32] <sdeziel> found it: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal
[17:03] <Guma> I was wondering if anyone knows how to setup local PPA on my server. Any good links/information?
[17:03] <Guma> I want to host my own build deb packages
[17:08] <andreas> what's the name again of that file in /usr/bin or /usr/sbin that can control whether a service should be started or not?
[17:08] <andreas> somtehing to do with "policy" I think, but I don't remember clearly
[17:09] <andreas>  /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d
[17:09] <andreas> got it
[17:15] <burningatrocity> afternoon
[19:33] <andreas> nacc: for xenial, the ubuntu-advantage-tools version should be 10~ubuntu0.16.04.1 or 10~0ubuntu0.16.04.1 you think? Artful has "10", and zesty will follow whatever pattern we decide for xenial
[19:40] <nacc> andreas: i think the former matches the security team, but the latter reads more naturally to me
[19:40] <nacc> andreas: maybe ask slangasek in #ubuntu-devel?
[19:40] <andreas> ok
[19:40] <sarnold> the security team version number guidelines are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging
[19:41] <andreas> sarnold: the version in artful is "10", and we want that available in t, x and z. T, X, and Z currently have "2"
[19:42] <andreas> just fyi :)
[19:42] <andreas> we need a ~ somewhere at least
[19:43] <nacc> sarnold: yep, that's what i was usinng as my reference (when i said "security team")
[19:43] <nacc> this is a weird package
[23:48] <truelai> Howdy folks. Trying to bond my 4 nics into two bonds and configure for LACP with Cisco switch. Getting packetloss when pinging Google.com. No loss when pinging internal resources. Am I wrong to have dns for both bridges?
[23:49] <truelai> https://dpaste.de/hb3C
[23:49] <truelai> My config above
[23:51] <sarnold> that seems like a huge number of dropped packets
[23:52] <sarnold> I've never done bonding, is that -really- how that's supposed to look?
[23:52] <truelai> Yesh
[23:52] <sarnold>  RX packets:2545 errors:0 dropped:65206 overruns:0 frame:0
[23:52] <sarnold> that just seems like a crazy ratio..
[23:52] <truelai> yup
[23:52] <truelai> well, one was down for a while
[23:52] <truelai> now they're both up
[23:53] <truelai> and I was working on configuring LACP