=== wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
=== Guest5394 is now known as Laney | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.1 => 17.10.2] (no packageset) | 08:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-135.184] (core, kernel) | 08:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-135.184] | 08:45 | |
oSoMoN | good morning release team | 09:14 |
---|---|---|
oSoMoN | can gdm3 3.26.1-3ubuntu3 migrate from -proposed to -updates? | 09:15 |
oSoMoN | the SRU has been verified and marked as such | 09:15 |
apw | oSoMoN, is that safe to release on its own ? | 09:17 |
apw | oSoMoN, and as it has not yet hit its SRU minimum age, do we ahve a justification for expediting it | 09:18 |
* apw notes that he believe that gdm3 and gnome-session must move together | 09:21 | |
didrocks | oSoMoN: apw: FYI, I just saw the first report of people upgrading and getting fallback to gnome classic (can impact some users on upgrade, which is what the gdm/gnome-session fixes are for) | 11:02 |
oSoMoN | apw, sorry I somehow missed your questions earlier… gdm3 and gnome-session should move together indeed | 11:08 |
sil2100 | Yeah, I'm about to publish those two now | 11:09 |
oSoMoN | apw, and as pointed out by Didier, this SRU addresses an upgrade path, so the sooner the better | 11:09 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, excellent, thanks! | 11:09 |
sil2100 | apw: I'll handle it, I more-or-less approve of the skip-aging exception and I know the context | 11:10 |
apw | sil2100, ack thanks | 11:13 |
andreas | rbasak: hi,where is your merges report for the server team again? Somewhere in reports.qa.ubuntu.com, but I lost the link | 11:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.14] | 11:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.14] | 11:58 | |
xnox | sil2100, can you release systemd from xenial-proposed into xenial-updates? | 12:04 |
sil2100 | xnox: I'm in the middle of reviewing the bugs just now | 12:04 |
sil2100 | ;) | 12:05 |
xnox | ah, thanks. | 12:05 |
xnox | sil2100, although some bugs affect nplan too, systemd & nplan srus can land independent of each other. | 12:05 |
sil2100 | Ok, good to know, since I see 2 still unverified for the nplan one | 12:06 |
rbasak | andreas: http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/merges.html | 12:25 |
andreas | yep, thx | 12:25 |
sil2100 | xnox: could you take a look at the autopkgtests related to systemd on zesty? | 12:28 |
sil2100 | xnox: I didn't look at them yet but I see there's quite some, wonder if any are related | 12:28 |
xnox | sil2100, yes, but not now. it took me a while to resolve all of tests on xenial. | 12:29 |
sil2100 | ACK | 12:29 |
xnox | sil2100, none are related as far as i can tell, but needs hints / overrides / bugs filed. which is what i did for xenial. | 12:29 |
xnox | but not yet on zesty. | 12:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apturl (artful-proposed/main) [0.5.2ubuntu12 => 0.5.2ubuntu13] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:48 | |
slashd | sil2100, good day, are you guys accepting patch in Artful, even if 'Bb' not totally publicly define yet ? | 13:57 |
clivejo | when does the Busty Booby archive open? | 14:07 |
jbicha | clivejo: it can't open without a name, and then usually it takes a few days to update the toolchain (compiler, dpkg, etc.) | 14:09 |
clivejo | someone not poke Mark with a big stick? | 14:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | mark stopped giving names a few releases ago IIRC | 14:11 |
jbicha | I believe he still picked artful, he just didn't blog about it | 14:12 |
clivejo | who picks now? | 14:12 |
clivejo | he hasn't blogged in over a year | 14:13 |
clivejo | is he still alive? | 14:13 |
jbicha | he still picks name and he is very much still alive, he posted on twitter last week https://twitter.com/sabdfl | 14:14 |
acheronuk | he was on BBC News 24 the other week | 14:16 |
acheronuk | clivejo: https://youtu.be/eGj7eagbUNg | 14:18 |
clivejo | could be a robot impersonating him :/ | 14:21 |
sil2100 | slashd: that's a hard question! I'm a bit too much of a freshman in the SRU/release teams to say what's the rule here, but I'd say it's possible if the fix is important | 14:22 |
slashd | sil2100, ack tks ;) | 14:23 |
ogra_ | clivejo, yeah, it is actualy an IoT robot running UbuntuCore, if we dont put the sabdfl costume on it, it looks like http://media.pennlive.com/food/photo/robot-1ca28a1d05691962.jpeg | 14:23 |
sil2100 | slashd: anyway, I'd say yes if it matches the SRU standards ;) | 14:23 |
slashd | sil2100, anyway 'Bb' will be copied over artful right ? | 14:24 |
slashd | so 'Bb' will have the SRU'd patch anyway if my understanding is good | 14:24 |
cjwatson | ogra_: I'm pretty sure that if I walked into a store and saw that, I'd turn around and walk right out again and look for a pub instead | 14:24 |
cjwatson | in order to forget | 14:24 |
sil2100 | Yeah, but best if you also ask someone from SRU+release with more experience | 14:24 |
ogra_ | lol | 14:24 |
sil2100 | I mean, it will have it then but I'm not sure if it's all formally acceptable | 14:25 |
slashd | sil2100, sure I'll wait then, it's not critical ;) | 14:25 |
slashd | thanks sil2100 | 14:25 |
apw | slashd, artful is open for SRUs, when BB opens it will start from whatever is in A | 14:45 |
slashd | apw, sil2100 ^ thanks | 14:46 |
slashd | ddstreet, ^ | 14:46 |
ddstreet | great! | 14:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, also -proposed pocket? | 15:13 |
LocutusOfBorg | what happens if it gets rejected? | 15:13 |
apw | -propsoed gets copied to bb-proposed too yes | 15:13 |
apw | if somethign getrs rejected it might have gotten into bb, and you get to fix that too | 15:14 |
apw | much as you would now if bb was open, you'd upload it there, upload a backport to aa, that would fail, you would fix bb and re-upload aa | 15:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 1:3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:28 | |
LocutusOfBorg | ack thanks | 15:31 |
bdmurray | slangasek: Could you review my cracklib2 SRU? | 16:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (xenial-proposed/main) [1.78ubuntu4 => 1.78ubuntu5] (core) | 16:47 | |
slangasek | bdmurray: yep, looking | 16:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cracklib2 [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.9.2-3ubuntu1] | 16:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cracklib2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.9.2-1ubuntu1] | 16:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lshw (artful-proposed/main) [02.18-0.1ubuntu3 => 02.18-0.1ubuntu4] (core) | 16:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lshw (zesty-proposed/main) [02.18-0.1ubuntu3 => 02.18-0.1ubuntu3.1] (core) | 17:12 | |
bdmurray | slangasek: I'm seeing some upgrade failures due to unity being blacklisted - that seems like a no brainer right? | 17:26 |
slangasek | bdmurray: blacklisted? | 17:38 |
bdmurray | slangasek: blacklisted for removal | 17:38 |
slangasek | ah | 17:38 |
slangasek | unity, not unity8? | 17:39 |
bdmurray | https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-release-upgrader/trunk/view/head:/data/removal_blacklist.cfg | 17:39 |
bdmurray | slangasek: yes, just unity | 17:39 |
slangasek | I agree that it should no longer be in the blacklist; I am surprised that having it blacklisted is causing upgrade problems | 17:40 |
bdmurray | Yeah it was fine in my testing | 17:40 |
slangasek | example failure? | 17:41 |
bdmurray | But is it worth digging into? | 17:41 |
slangasek | it's probably worth a small amount of digging | 17:41 |
bdmurray | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1726255 | 17:41 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1726255 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "do-release-upgrade failed to upgrade from 17.04 to 17.10" [Undecided,New] | 17:41 |
slangasek | bdmurray: looks like ubuntu-session Breaks: on old hud/unity packages is what's causing the unexpected removal; I'd suggest logging a bug against ubuntu-session for the desktop team to look at, and get their sign-off on dropping the blacklist | 17:45 |
bdmurray | slangasek: bug 1681231 is v-done for zesty if you want to fast track it | 19:49 |
ubot5 | bug 1681231 in apt (Ubuntu) "package cracklib-runtime 2.9.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681231 | 19:49 |
slangasek | bdmurray: agreed, releasing, thanks | 20:07 |
smoser | hey. so if i was going to upload cloud-init to x, z, a i could/should do that ? | 20:45 |
smoser | and then just deal with anything about 'b' later on ? | 20:46 |
nacc | smoser: in theory, if it gets into aa before bb opens, it'll get copied forward | 20:47 |
slangasek | yes | 20:49 |
smoser | k. | 20:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (artful-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 21:17 | |
blackboxsw | here we go for real | 21:17 |
blackboxsw | :) | 21:17 |
nacc | heh | 21:19 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 21:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 21:28 | |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
bdmurray | slangasek: durh, the unity blacklist issue is due to not having universe enabled. | 22:13 |
slangasek | bdmurray: oh, wellthen | 22:15 |
slangasek | bdmurray: sounds like a valid user setup and that unity should be removed in that case, no? | 22:16 |
bdmurray | slangasek: Yes. | 22:16 |
jbicha | personally, I think we *should* have marked unity for autoremoval, but we'll need the rest of the Desktop Team to weigh in on that | 22:20 |
bdmurray | slangasek: I'm going test and upgrade w/ universe enabled and unity not blacklisted just to be safe before thinking about an SRU. | 22:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!