[06:30] <knome> a wild micahg appears
[06:31] <flocculant> reminded by knome's early morning appearance, flocculant checks dev tracker for qa blueprint and is sad 
[06:32] <knome> hmm
[06:32] <knome> interesting then
[06:32] <knome> and meh
[06:32] <flocculant> yup not sure there :)
[06:32] <flocculant> wonder if it's because not tasks on that yet?
[06:32] <flocculant> just whiteboard
[06:32] <knome> oh
[06:33] <knome> yes, very likely
[06:33] <knome> :P
[06:33] <flocculant> that's easy then - we can keep the bp off the tracker \o/
[06:33] <flocculant> back to waking up
[06:34] <knome> i don't remember much any more, but i think there was something about LP not mentioning the whole blueprint in an API call if only the whiteboard existed
[06:34] <knome> but i might remember wrong...
[06:35] <knome> one thing that has been broken for a bit is the assignee dropdown
[06:35] <knome> and i have again no idea why
[06:36] <flocculant> will check again - got tasks now
[06:36] <knome> yup
[06:36] <knome> let me run the script manually
[06:38] <knome> now this gets interesting
[06:39] <flocculant> you've broken it?
[06:39] <knome> i have no idea
[06:39] <knome> again it's a long time since i touched this
[06:40] <flocculant> :)
[06:43] <knome> well there it si
[06:43] <knome> is
[06:43] <knome> i'll call it on LP API slowness this time
[06:43] <knome> but the assignee stuff is still borked
[06:44] <flocculant> yup 
[06:44] <knome> but that's no surprise :P
[06:44] <knome> oh hello password
[06:44] <flocculant> didn't use that bit much (if ever other than testing) personally
[06:45] <knome> yeah
[06:45] <knome> the filtering works though
[06:45] <knome> and the data is correctly in the db...
[06:45] <flocculant> probably more useful :)
[06:45] <flocculant> and it's not like we never have meetings
[06:45] <knome> yes
[06:46] <flocculant> or at least talk to each other :D
[06:46] <knome> mhm
[06:46] <knome> and interesting
[06:57] <knome> sigh
[06:57] <knome> just sigh
[06:58] <knome> le sigh of the sighs
[06:58] <knome> now it works
[06:58] <knome> no wonder it wasn't working
[06:58] <knome> i was poking at code that wasn't ran on production
[06:58] <knome> because... i just was
[06:58] <knome> oh well!
[06:59] <flocculant> you fed it didn't you :p
[06:59] <knome> mhm
[07:23] <knome> flocculant, contr docs should be fixed now...
[07:24] <knome> next fix the logo in them
[07:24] <knome> ..
[07:24] <flocculant> ok - thanks 
[07:24] <knome> well actually hmm
[07:24] <knome> nvm that comment
[07:24] <knome> that's for 1804 :P
[07:24] <knome> anyway, if you see anything weird there, let me know
[07:25] <flocculant> re that - not doing facebook till I have a cover image for it - seems wrong to have different logos next to each other
[07:25] <knome> yes
[07:25] <flocculant> phew
[07:25] <flocculant> we agreed :D
[07:25] <knome> so you'll need a logo and a cover photo
[07:25] <flocculant> yup
[07:25] <knome> let me check how it looks now in full
[07:26] <knome> right
[07:27] <knome> so the new logo didn't make *any* splash on twitter
[07:27] <knome> good i guess
[07:29] <flocculant> :)
[07:29] <knome> flocculant, if you try to make this the cover photo, does it look bad or good? https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_banners/430282295/1453414413/1500x500
[07:29] <flocculant> no time now - just off to work, will check later - after I've got the current one to revert to :)
[07:30] <knome> :)
[07:30] <knome> that then -> https://scontent.fhel1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/523898_392463877469192_753070295_n.jpg?oh=c9c2cb328f7250cbf2b2b2ea6d033ada&oe=5A7734DC
[07:31] <flocculant> ok - thanks - will look this afternoon :)
[07:31] <knome> sure, no hurry
[07:31] <knome> i could theoretically make sure the image works by then too
[07:40] <knome> flocculant, ygm re: fb images
[11:15] <flocculant> knome: ack
[11:15] <flocculant> why that cover?
[11:24] <flocculant> other than it not needing to be changed because something in 'it' changes
[11:30] <flocculant> knome: did you want to lose the text in the current cover?
[14:35] <knome> flocculant, we have the same on twitter
[14:35] <knome> flocculant, we can revisit at some point
[14:35] <flocculant> knome: ack - doing that now then
[14:36] <knome> ta :)
[14:37] <flocculant> https://www.facebook.com/xubuntuusers/
[14:51] <knome> the logo looks like the old one on my phone
[14:53] <knome> å
[14:53] <flocculant> downloaded what you mailed me then uploaded it there 
[14:53] <flocculant> no idea what it is other than that :D
[14:53] <knome> i'll lookon desktop lter :P
[14:54] <flocculant> okey doke 
[19:57] <flocculant> knome: didja look?
[19:58] <knome> no
[19:58] <knome> but looking now
[19:59] <knome> nope, it's still the old one
[19:59] <knome> or to be clear: the cover photo is ok
[19:59] <knome> the profile picture not
[20:03] <flocculant> loks the same to me as the one in the Updated Xubuntu logo mail
[20:04] <knome> you mean *exactly* same or sameish?:P
[20:04] <flocculant> send it me again 
[20:04] <flocculant> sameish
[20:04] <knome> heh
[20:04] <flocculant> eg the whiskers look right
[20:04] <knome> yep
[20:04] <knome> but they look wrong to me
[20:04] <knome> ygm
[20:05] <flocculant> we can play the game till one of us dies - all I'm doing is uploading what you send :D
[20:05] <knome> in the mail they look fine
[20:05] <knome> but in fb they look not fine
[20:05] <knome> so maybe it can be some weeeeird fb thingy
[20:05] <flocculant> ha ha ha ha 
[20:05] <flocculant> got the mail
[20:05] <knome> eg. because i'm not logged in...
[20:06] <flocculant> oh maybe 
[20:06] <knome> but why would they show me "your" old profile pic even then?
[20:07] <flocculant> who knows
[20:07] <knome> the who?
[20:07] <flocculant> what about now?
[20:07] <flocculant> doubtful - they are all older than my mum ... 
[20:07] <knome> yep!
[20:07] <knome> now i also see a message saying you updated your profile pic
[20:07] <knome> ta
[20:08] <flocculant> yea - worked it out - not concentrating earlier - some crop stuff cropped up
[20:08] <flocculant> then I think I might have not saved it cos didn't want to crop
[20:08] <knome> so while you are there
[20:08] <knome> go edit the about thing
[20:08] <flocculant> anyway - done that
[20:08] <knome> make everything say https:// instead of http://
[20:09] <flocculant> where's the about thing lol
[20:09] <knome> https://www.facebook.com/pg/xubuntuusers/about/?ref=page_internal
[20:09] <flocculant> oh nvm
[20:09] <knome> and for the story, i'd probably lean towards the website intro...
[20:09] <knome> Xubuntu is a community developed operating system that combines elegance and ease of use.
[20:09] <knome> Xubuntu is an elegant and easy to use operating system. Xubuntu comes with Xfce, which is a stable, light and configurable desktop environment.
[20:09] <knome> Xubuntu is perfect for those who want the most out of their desktops, laptops and netbooks with a modern look and enough features for efficient, daily usage. It works well on older hardware too.
[20:09] <knome> and something about reading more at website ;)
[20:10] <knome> now you have one finished work item ;)
[20:11] <flocculant> instead of the really long description?
[20:11] <knome> yes
[20:11] <knome> and if we feel like there is some interesting and important information
[20:11] <knome> that isn't on the website...
[20:11] <knome> well you know what we should do in that case ;)
[20:12] <flocculant> heh
[20:14] <flocculant> knome: what about adding something about contributing - where the 'For Support' bit is?
[20:17] <flocculant> also I guess https://xubuntu.org/ instead of https://www.
[20:20] <knome> yes please for the latter
[20:20] <knome> and yes, a contribution link would be nice too
[20:21] <flocculant> I'll point to the simple webpage one for that 
[20:22] <knome> yep
[20:22] <flocculant> knome: ok - anything else?
[20:22] <knome> not for fb
[20:22] <knome> but want to proofread something $else?
[20:22] <flocculant> ok - all done then
[20:22] <flocculant> can do :)
[20:22] <knome> let me send you a quick mail then
[20:22] <flocculant> yep
[20:23] <knome> ygm
[20:23] <knome> Fro contributing
[20:23] <knome> aFro?
[20:23] <knome> i'd probably say "To get involved, see"
[20:24] <knome> that's kind of the thing we keep saying
[20:24] <knome> or at least i do :D
[20:24] <flocculant> done
[20:26] <flocculant> not a little bit of proofreading then lol
[20:26] <knome> nope...
[20:27] <knome> i didn't say the task was quick... :P
[20:27] <flocculant> you in a hurry? 
[20:27] <knome> mostly to check there aren't any loose ends in the thought
[20:27] <knome> nah
[20:27] <knome> whenever you have time
[20:27] <flocculant> get it to you tomorrow then :)
[20:27] <flocculant> not easy to strikethrough in tbird :p
[20:27] <knome> the first draft of this article was written october 4th
[20:27] <flocculant> aah ok :p
[20:28] <knome> and this has progressed quickly to this stage compared to what articles usually take :P
[20:28] <knome> and i've published part of it... as a separate article
[20:28] <knome> because i had to get that out :P
[20:28] <knome> for other reasons
[20:28] <flocculant> heh
[20:33] <flocculant> had a quick run through - not much to do, will look again tomorrow and no doubt find something else - getting a bit shot now :)
[20:33] <knome> oki
[20:33] <knome> thanks already
[20:33] <flocculant> np as always :)
[20:37] <knome> \o/
[20:38] <knome> i have no pending commits for the website
[20:38] <knome> woooot
[20:38] <flocculant> heh
[20:38] <knome> usually they rot from a few months to half a year
[20:38] <knome> that said,
[20:38] <knome> let's create some
[20:38] <knome> (:
[20:40] <flocculant> bluesabre: can we set some time by soonish to talk package testing/ppa's and stuff? 
[20:41]  * flocculant wanders off into the night for now 
[20:41] <knome> nighty night!
[20:41] <flocculant> night knome 
[21:03] <knome> slickymaster, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/xubuntu-b-documentation is set up for you
[23:12] <bluesabre> flocculant: predictably, our schedules do not align
[23:12] <bluesabre> :D