/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/10/24/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (artful-proposed/main) [1:17.10.7 => 1:17.10.8] (core)00:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (artful-proposed/main) [2.20.7-0ubuntu3 => 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.2] (core)00:59
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (xenial-proposed/main) [3.1.0-3ubuntu0.1 => 3.1.0-3ubuntu0.2] (core)06:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.7 (zesty-proposed/main) [1.7.4-2ubuntu1 => 1.7.4-2ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)06:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.5 => 1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.6] (core)07:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (artful-proposed/partner) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 176.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (zesty-proposed/partner) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 176.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (no packageset)09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 176.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (trusty-proposed/partner) [169.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 176.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (no packageset)10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu2 => 1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1007.8] (no packageset)10:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1007.8]10:32
=== Guest99060 is now known as med_
=== med_ is now known as medberry
cpaelzerHi - can I still upload Artful SRU fixes today incrementing ubuntu1, ubuntu2, ubuntu3 - or is BB close enough (or ongoing in background) already that it has to be ubuntu1.1 ?14:08
apwcpaelzer, i don't think it is uber immenent, i am sure there will be a warning, and things blocked for the copy up14:12
cpaelzerok, gogin on as usual for now then14:14
=== medberry is now known as med_
rbasakI know uploading to the release pocket for an SRU automatically redirects to the proposed pocket. Is this true also for -updates? Asking for sponsorship - OK to accept and upload a debdiff targetting -updates?14:32
LaneyNo, they'll go to -updates straight away if accepted (AFAIK)14:38
rbasakOK I'll modify before uploading, thanks.14:39
xnoxrbasak, imho everyone should just target "release" without any suffixes, as that goes into the right queue, always, both during devel-time and SRU-time14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeplane (artful-proposed/universe) [1.6.6-1build1 => 1.6.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:42
rbasakI agree14:42
acheronukbionic beaver! O_O14:42
* clivejo giggles14:43
clivejoso rude14:43
rbasakBut I want to be a little more liberal in what I accept, particularly for new contributors, because in the past a much wider range of things was acceptable in general. But I would like all sponsors to be consistent in what they recommend in order to make life easier for newcomers.14:43
acheronuksounds like a sex toy14:43
apwyou owuld never upload to -updates ... that is always a -proposed first scenario, as is -release in devel14:43
rbasak^ I sponsored freeplane so cannot accept the SRU. If someone else is around, it's trivial.14:43
apwi concur with xnox that just uploading to "artful" is the right thing14:43
apwand works in a PPA too14:43
rbasakMy idea is that the git ubuntu lint tool will always recommend one thing only.14:44
rbasakAnd I'd like to get contributors to use it locally as well as have a CI bot for MPs.14:44
rbasakBut we're not quite there yet :)14:44
apwwell it should be either foo, or foo-proposed at all times, i prefer the former14:44
rbasakI prefer the former also.14:44
rbasakOtherwise it's "wrong" as soon as it lands.14:45
apwits not wrong per-see, it is where it was uploaded to14:46
rbasakI know; hence the quotes :)14:46
cpaelzeracheronuk: from now on it will all be beavers until we hit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombeavers14:50
clivejorbasak: are the plans for that git thingie fixed, or can we ask for features?14:57
naccclivejo: you can ask :)14:58
naccclivejo: what kind of features are you looking for?14:58
rbasakHe wants dput wrapping :)14:59
naccoh ok14:59
nacci need a spec on the changes file implementation you and cjwatson want and then we can do that :)14:59
naccwell, sort of can14:59
rbasakclivejo: I'm quite interested in making sure that our design accomodates stuff that we could add in the future. IOW, that we don't rule out the implementation of particular desired features in the future.15:00
rbasakI won't want to add anything more to our plans for a 1.0 though.15:00
rbasakBut you can try and convince us :)15:00
clivejoalso wondering if there is flexiblity on source code hosted elsewhere, ie KDE15:00
rbasakI think that may conflict with our goals depending on exactly what you mean.15:01
rbasakI think it's important that drive-by contributors (or newcomers to any Ubuntu development team) get a consistent view.15:01
naccrbasak: depending on where we land with upload tags, we can probably ship a wrapper script in the snap for 1.015:01
rbasakHosting elsewhere and with a different scheme for branches and tags and the working tree layout (eg. debian/ only) would contradict that goal I think.15:02
rbasakHowever we absolutely don't preclude a team from maintaining a primary git tree elsewhere with a different layout.15:03
rbasakA drive-by contributor wouldn't be forced to use that repo; that's all.15:04
clivejowe want/need drive-bys15:04
rbasakThen you don't want to be forcing them to use a git layout that's different from other packages.15:04
clivejois there no way to rope them, or deploy a stinger?15:04
rbasakIHO15:04
rbasakIMHO15:04
rbasakI'm not saying the answer is simple.15:05
rbasakThere are teams that use debian/ only for good reason.15:05
rbasakBut it does mean that it makes sense to consider these cases out of scope for now.15:05
clivejowell that is why I wanted to talk to you about it15:06
clivejoit has some nice pro's and some con's15:06
naccour scope is very specific, IMO: if you want to find the current source for any package in ubuntu, you can, and you can get the full publishinng history, as presented by LP, for it15:07
naccit does not reflect development methodologies, necessarily, external sources of information, necessarily, etc.15:07
bdmurraysil2100: Could you review my artful SRUs? apport and ubuntu-release-upgrader15:09
sil2100bdmurray: sure15:09
naccclivejo: probably the easiest thing to do is file a bug, so we can track similar requests15:09
clivejoKubuntu is a large packageset, and like a oil tanker to maneuver, so we have to plan in advance.  But the prospect of a dput wrapper is very appealing.15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (artful-proposed) [1:17.10.8]15:13
sil2100bdmurray: hm, something's fishy with the apport one, I think you were missing a -v when building the package15:14
sil2100bdmurray: since the changes file only includes 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.2 while there's .1 as well15:15
sil2100bdmurray: could you change that? I'll reject the current one15:15
sil2100Will re-review it once we're back from the dentist visit15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (artful-proposed) [2.20.7-0ubuntu3.2]15:17
bdmurraysil2100: Ah, my bad the 3.1 upload was rejected. Thanks for catching that.15:17
naccclivejo: good to know, I suppose what would be best is what all you'd want in a dput wrapper for Kubuntu development https://bugs.launchpad.net/usd-importer/+filebug15:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (artful-proposed/main) [2.20.7-0ubuntu3 => 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.1] (core)15:24
smoserRAOF: if you're still around, and could look at an sru upload in queue for cloud-init i'd appreciate it.15:31
smoseror if bdmurray wanted to do that... not significant changes since the one that is in -proposed.15:31
smoseronly 2 bug fixes and test related chagnes.15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu5]15:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu4 => 1:3.26.1-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)15:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (artful-proposed/main) [3.6.0-1ubuntu5 => 3.6.0-1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server, virt)16:13
bdmurrayinfinity: Could I get queue permissions for artful?16:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (artful-proposed/main) [2.20.7-0ubuntu3 => 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.1] (core)16:21
* rbasak has just been asked for a review of libvirt (^) so will want queue permissions too16:21
apwrbasak, in the short term feel free to use my fingers16:22
rbasakThanks. I'll report shortly following review.16:23
* rbasak is called away for dinner; will finish review later.16:27
tsimonq2cjwatson: Bionic Beaver, can has graph update? ;)16:31
cjwatsontsimonq2: done16:35
tsimonq2cjwatson: Thanks!16:35
blackboxswbdmurray: I saw your comments on the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1722564. I just posted a comment and updated branch that I'm going to test now17:06
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1722564 in apport (Ubuntu Artful) "apport question will not accept multi-character responses" [Medium,In progress]17:06
blackboxswthanks17:06
rbasakapw: +1 for libvirt in artful unapproved; please accept.17:09
rbasakcpaelzer: ^.17:09
rbasakcpaelzer: and thank you for comprehensively documenting everything; that made it easy to review even though it was three bugs.17:10
rbasakcpaelzer: (~ubuntu-sru haven't been handed the ACL bits for artful yet it seems)17:11
* tumbleweed will do distro-info-data for bionic. I see a Release Schedule targetting the 26th. I guess that's plausible? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseSchedule17:11
bdmurrayblackboxsw: Okay, thanks!17:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (artful-proposed) [176.0.0-0ubuntu1]17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (zesty-proposed) [176.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]17:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [176.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]17:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (trusty-proposed) [176.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]17:47
=== elopio1 is now known as elopio
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (artful-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu6]18:44
bdmurrayslangasek: Could you review artful-proposed's apport upload? I made a goof.18:44
slangasekbdmurray: queue shows two uploads; review newer, reject older?18:47
bdmurrayslangasek: Yeah, I would have rejected the older but I can't yet.18:47
slangasekk, done18:47
slangasekinfinity: ^^ I guess you're driving the archive opening; want any help?18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (artful-proposed) [2.20.7-0ubuntu3.1]18:48
slangasek(no idea where we are in the checklist currently)18:48
bdmurrayActually, the apport change is on the ReleaseProcess checklist. I wonder if Martin was pinged. ;-)18:49
slangaseksil2100: ^^ ?18:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (artful-proposed) [2.20.7-0ubuntu3.1]18:51
bdmurrayslangasek: the apport SRU has been verified if you want to release it quickly19:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (artful-proposed/main) [0.36 => 0.36ubuntu0.1] (core)20:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (zesty-proposed/main) [0.33ubuntu0.1 => 0.33ubuntu0.2] (core)20:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.7 => 0.18ubuntu0.8] (core)20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.3 => 0.28ubuntu0.4] (core)20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (precise-proposed/main) [0.8ubuntu0.12 => 0.8ubuntu0.13] (ubuntu-server)20:42
blackboxswRAOF: I may have missed the response, there is an SRU upload in queue for cloud-init if there is a chance to look at that today it'd be awesome21:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: juju-core (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.4-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 2.2.4-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] (ubuntu-server)21:15
blackboxswwe added 3  fixes referenced here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1721847/comments/25, one of those fixes a potential regression in our previous SRU attempt21:15
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1721847 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "sru cloud-init 2017-10-06 (17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1)" [Medium,Fix committed]21:15
LocutusOfBorgplease accept distro-info-data!21:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: juju-core (zesty-proposed/main) [2.2.4-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 2.2.4-0ubuntu0.17.04.2] (ubuntu-server)21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (artful-proposed/main) [1.404 => 1.405] (core)21:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (artful-proposed) [0.36ubuntu0.1]21:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.33ubuntu0.2]21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ocaml (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1]21:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.4]22:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.8]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 6673 entries have been added or removed22:34
sil2100 /quit23:23
sil2100eh23:23
RAOFblackboxsw: The cloud-init upload is meant to supercede an upload already in -proposed, I take it?23:24
RAOFblackboxsw: It needs to include the previous changelog entry in the .changes file in that case.23:25
jbichaRAOF: do I need to re-upload sane-backends then?23:34
slangasekLaney: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess line 46, seed-new-release expects autopkgtest.db to be on the host; this command was previously run on wendigo, but autopkgtest.db no longer exists there.  And the unit that does have autopkgtest.db doesn't have the module deps23:35
slangasekLaney: I think I'm safe to copy autopkgtest.db back to wendigo and just run it there, in line with the documentation; but I wonder if you want to do something different for next cycle23:36
RAOFjbicha: If it supercedes an upload that never made it out of -proposed, yes.23:37
RAOFThe changes file should list *all* changes since the package in -updates (or release, if there are no previous updates).23:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:41
infinityjbicha: Would versioning the Provides not work just as well?23:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!