=== elky is now known as el
[06:37] <lubot> <Schyken> @Wolfenprey, Panel is a bit too small, but it looks good!
[06:37] <lubot> <Wolfenprey> @Schyken, Yeah, maybe with some more tweaks can do the work
[06:38] <lubot> <Schyken> I like it :D DamaDamas icons?
[06:38] <lubot> <Wolfenprey> @Schyken, Idk really, all it's from a "win10 transformation pack"
[06:39] <lubot> <Wolfenprey> i like to show it to windowed friends XD
[06:39] <lubot> <Schyken> Ah, looks great. It definitely does the trick, hah
[06:40] <lubot> <Wolfenprey> http://b00merang.weebly.com/windows-10.html it's from that web, no spam intended
=== JasonO- is now known as JasonO
[16:39] <gilir> hi agaida, I'm tring to fix the daily builds on the PPA, but I should be able build the packages directly from debian git
[16:40] <agaida> should work
[16:40] <gilir> agaida: but, currently lxqt-build-tools fail because there is no HEAD ref
[16:40] <gilir> and launchpad doesn't like it :-)
[16:41] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, Hey there, get my ping from the other day? :)
[16:41] <agaida> grr - wait a second
[16:41] <gilir> tsimonq2: yes, it's second in my TODO list, after the daily build stuff :-)
[16:42] <agaida> gilir: but there will be a problem
[16:42] <agaida> rigth now it will not work
[16:43] <agaida> aka you would need the head debian/experimental
[16:43] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, OK excellent :)
[16:43] <agaida> for 0.12.0
[16:43] <gilir> agaida: well I planned to build from experimental-snapshots/latest branch
[16:44] <agaida> ok - that would work - in that case we should kill the symbol files there
[16:44] <gilir> it seems to be the easiest way
[16:45] <agaida> because i suspect that slightly different versions of anything in ubuntu and sid would create a symbols mess
[16:45] <lubot> <tsimonq2> gilir: I wrote up some hacky tooling to do daily builds but the code is super ugly and hacky... I look forward to a better solution ;)
[16:45] <agaida> ok, back to lxqt-build-tools
[16:46] <gilir> possible :-) symbols files are not really nice for automated builds :-)
[16:47] <gilir> tsimonq2: I hope to use launchpad git support to do all the work for us, hopefully with 0 work for the builds / PPA / launchpad part :-)
[16:48] <agaida> gilir: is debian/sid ok for you
[16:48] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, Speaking of that, now that Artful is done with, I think we have a long overdue lubuntu-default-settings rework to do. ;)
[16:48] <agaida> as head?
[16:48] <gilir> agaida: yes, as long as HEAD ref exist, it's ok for me
[16:48] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, And if at all possible I'd like to move away from Bazaar... Thoughts?
[16:48] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Oh and hi agaida ;)
[16:48] <agaida> hi tsimonq2
[16:49] <gilir> tsimonq2: +1 for a git migration :-)
[16:49] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, Awesome :) so what's the plan for Lubuntu-default-settings reorganization then?
[16:51] <gilir> tsimonq2: is Qt finally support the custom directories for config files ?
[16:52] <agaida> Qt: better, LXQt - we will see :D
[16:53] <agaida> https://pb.5id.eu/d-KY
[16:53] <gilir> tsimonq2: you are added to the lubuntu-dev team, don't mess with it please ;-)
[16:54] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, Oh thanks!
[16:54] <gilir> agaida: thanks :-) let's see if it's working now
[16:54] <agaida> gilir: i talked also with tsimonq2 about the configs - Qt should handle them better, in case something is missed we should solve it "the right way"™ upstream
[16:54] <agaida> gilir: no problem, yw
[16:54] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, And yes, I did some playing and I have a patch that loads our default settings by default
[16:55] <lubot> <tsimonq2> I'll work with upstream As Much As Possible
[16:56] <gilir> agaida: yes, we should keep only branding and ubuntu specific stuff in default settings
[16:56] <lubot> <tsimonq2> I'm at school but tonight I'll submit anything relevant to upstream and get a patch to look at for Lubuntu-default-settings
[16:56] <agaida> long standing bug
[16:58] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @agaida, True.
[16:58] <lubot> <tsimonq2> And gilir, LXQt 0.12 is the best release yet
[16:59] <lubot> <tsimonq2> In my honest opinion it's ready for a little more than a test image once we get this settings bug worked out ;)
[16:59] <lubot> <tsimonq2> I think we should get the LTS out of the way and go from there with discussions. What do you think gilir?
[17:01] <gilir> tsimonq2: step by step :-) first daily build, second 0.12 in bionic, third list the missing parts between the LXDE and the LXQt
[17:01] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Yep
[17:02] <lubot> <tsimonq2> My point is that seems to be doable in this cycle
[17:02] <lubot> <tsimonq2> agaida: How's LXQt 0.12 stability in Experimental?
[17:02] <gilir> well, like always, it depends on the available time of everyone
[17:02] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @gilir, True.
[17:03] <agaida> tsimonq2: you are joking, right? :P
[17:03] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @agaida, Kinda :P
[17:03] <agaida> but to be true - i run the finished parts on my production machine
[17:03] <lubot> <tsimonq2> (yes I know Debian NEW is slow :P)
[17:03] <lubot> <tsimonq2> And so do I.
[17:04] <agaida> faked lxqt-themes
[17:05] <lubot> <tsimonq2> What did you fake?
[17:05] <agaida> and there is no difference to any other release - the only thing about experimental is: we need a place to gather the packages and prepare the transition to sid
[17:05] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Yeah
[17:05] <agaida> lxqt-theme - try to install something if a dependency can't fulfilled
[17:07] <agaida> but now to something completely different - i guess it would be cool to kill the symbols right now in snapshots
[17:07] <gilir> agaida: is there something not-safe on https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-lxqt, or I can grap all of them for the PPA ?
[17:08] <agaida> what do you mean with not safe?
[17:09] <agaida> the packaging is one day before the official release, so i should sync to experimental - thats all
[17:10] <gilir> agaida: I mean something which is a work-in-progress, and should not be shipped yet on the PPA
[17:14] <agaida> pkg-lxqt/featherpad	Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor for Linux - not yet in debian
[17:14] <agaida> pkg-lxqt/sddm-config-editor	SDDM config editor
[17:14] <agaida> pkg-lxqt/trojita	trojita packaging
[17:14] <agaida> dito
[17:15] <agaida> but planned
[17:15] <agaida> pkg-lxqt/lxqt-themes-extra	LXQt Themes for debian and derivatives -- not implemented yet
[17:16] <agaida> pkg-lxqt - standard repo - empty
[17:18] <gilir> agaida: ok thanks :-)
[17:18] <agaida> trojita, sddm-config-edior and featherpad will go in step by step, featherpad first, then sddm-config-editor and trojita if upstream improve the stability somewhen
[17:19] <gilir> general annoucement: I'll probably break the daily PPA for lxqt components in a few minutes / hours :-p
[17:21]  * agaida think - and whats the difference to the current state?
[17:21]  * agaida duck, crawls away and hidew
[17:22] <gilir> the current state is not-updated-for-too-long, not broken (I think) :-)
[17:23] <gilir> also it may break lxqt install from official repo, for people who have the daily PPA
[17:23] <agaida> right
[17:24] <agaida> the adventage will be that we could break and replace old things and make the ppa compatible to the current packaging
[18:04] <gilir> agaida: missing HEAD ref also on lxqt-l10n
[18:05] <gilir> and yes, symbol files break some of the builds on missing symbols :-)
[18:05] <agaida> the symbols should be gone
[18:07] <agaida> lxqt-l10n HEAD done#