/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/10/25/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]00:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1]00:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (artful-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.10.1]00:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sane-backends [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu3]00:42
RAOFjbicha: Yeah, versioning the Provides should work (now that versioned Provides *do* work ☺) and would save a trip through NEW.00:45
jbichaversioning the provides how?01:14
infinityjbicha: Provides: libsane (= version)01:15
jbichabut how do we know which version to use?01:15
infinityjbicha: Either binary:Version or a static version less than the current would be fine.01:16
infinityjbicha: binary:Version would result in the same thing you got with your metapackage, but without the cruft.01:16
jbichaok, I'll give that a try01:16
infinityjbicha: You also would want to replace the Breaks/Replaces with Conflicts/Replaces.  Breaks/Provides/Replaces doesn't have any higher level meaning, while P/C/R does.01:18
infinity(C/R will hint for frontends to remove the old one in favour of the new one, while the versioned Provides should continue to satisfy deps)01:19
infinityAnd C/R should be unversioned in that case (though it probably makes little difference in this specific scenario)01:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu5]01:22
jbichaI've been told that Conflicts (instead of Breaks) is usually overkill01:23
infinityThey each have their place.01:23
infinityC/R is what you want when you want to force a package off.01:23
infinityA versioned Breaks is what you want when you want to force a package to be upgraded.01:24
infinityVersioned B/R is for overwriting files that moved between versions.01:24
infinityConflicts alone is when the two packages will always conflict but neither is preferred.01:24
jbichado you really want me to switch breaks with conflicts in this sru?01:25
infinityP/C/R is for when two packages provide the same interface (like this), but also if the C/R only exists in one direction, that one will take precedence and force the other off (again, like this).01:25
infinityI want the relationships correct, yes.01:25
=== wgrant__ is now known as wgrant
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)01:58
smoserRAOF: just re-uploaded cloud-init with correct changes (sorry for the noise)01:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)01:59
blackboxswsmoser: thanks, just saw this go up. Did I need to re-upload a new MP (for next time)? I've also added the related bugs to the SRU processbug per per comment  here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1721847/comments/25,02:00
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1721847 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "sru cloud-init 2017-10-06 (17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1)" [Medium,Fix committed]02:00
blackboxswI'll add that recent changelogs to the top of that bug description too  I suppose02:01
smoserblackboxsw: i uploaded just now02:01
* blackboxsw just got back from dinner02:01
smoserblackboxsw: just for your notes... what i did was02:01
smosergit checkout ubuntu/xenial02:01
smoserbuild-package -- -S -d -v0.7.9-233-ge586fe35-0ubuntu1~16.04.202:01
smoserwhere that version is the version that is in -updates currently.02:01
smoserthey want the .changes to have the delta versus what is in -updates02:01
smoserno changes, just had to build-package with the '-v'02:02
* smoser is out now.02:02
blackboxswnight02:02
smosermanana02:02
smoserand i pinged in ubuntu-release for raof, but might have missed him02:02
smoser:-(02:02
RAOFHey!02:02
RAOFNo, haven't missed me :)02:03
smoseroh. sorry fo the double ping.02:03
smoseri thought i was in a different channel :)02:03
RAOF:)02:03
* smoser really shoudl go sleep now. thanks for your help.02:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)02:18
jbichathanks for the help, this is only the 2nd time I've dealt with versioned provides02:41
jbichaI didn't understand it the previous time either!02:42
valoriejbicha: when I do something technical like that, i blog it03:02
valorieso next time I can look for my blog03:02
jbichaI've done that once03:02
valorieif I hadn't done it many times, I would be lost!03:03
valorie<--- slow learner03:03
jbichapeople like to hear about bugs getting fixed so maybe I will blog about it03:03
valorieeh, I blog for me; if other's appreciate it, fine03:04
slangasekLaney: I think I've mostly gotten the autopkgtest bits done for bionic, except for the armhf lxd containers; I can't find a straightforward way to modify the scripts to bootstrap from the existing artful images, maybe you have a trick there03:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1]03:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]03:29
blackboxswwoot will test THX!03:30
tjaaltoninfinity: I need the first wave of packages for artful hwe backport in xenial-proposed, because 16.04osp1 final base image will be built on friday, apparently..05:12
infinitytjaalton: What is 16.04osp1?05:17
infinitytjaalton: And why does it need stuff that's usually meant for the point release in 3 months?05:17
tjaaltonoem service pack 105:18
tjaaltonbase image for next wave of oem systems05:18
tjaaltonyes the schedule doesn't match05:18
tjaaltonbecause of intel gemini lake, coffee lake etc05:19
tjaaltonamd raven ridge05:19
tjaaltonthe queue has had libdrm, wayland-protocols, llvm-5 for mesa, libclc will be uploaded once llvm-5 is built05:19
infinitytjaalton: Well, the idea that we'll fasttrack this all through in 3 days seems a bit unreasonable.05:20
tjaaltonjust to proposed05:20
tjaaltonno need to push it to updates05:20
tjaaltonthey already use ppa's for the image, which is kinda bad05:20
tjaaltonthey can stay on proposed until the whole stack is ready05:21
infinity"kinda bad"?05:22
infinityVery bad.05:22
infinityEspecially if those PPAs are enabled on customer systems.05:22
infinityYay undue post-release maintenance burden.05:22
infinityBut okay, I can try to find some review cycles after the archive opening is done.05:22
tjaaltongreat, thanks05:23
tjaaltonnoone else seems to touch these uploads ;)05:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.36 => 0.37] (core) (sync)05:27
tjaaltonoh and the ppa's are only used when building the image, but still..05:29
cpaelzerthanks rbasak and apw, looking into build status, verification and more safety regression checks now06:20
cpaelzerapw: so the race I was afraid of happened with libvirt 3.6.0-1ubuntu6 in a-p and  3.6.0-1ubuntu5 now.06:26
cpaelzershould I make an  3.6.0-1ubuntu6 to bionic now instead and prep an identical  3.6.0-1ubuntu5.1?06:26
cpaelzeror can on the acceptance of  3.6.0-1ubuntu6 that be copyied to Bionic as well?06:27
infinitycpaelzer: Anything accepted in artful before bionic is completely open will be copied forward by me.06:35
infinitycpaelzer: After that, it's a bit more of a crapshoot, but you can always copy yourself if you have upload rights to the series.06:35
* infinity goes to find some food to fuel the home stretch on the opening.06:36
cpaelzerinfinity: ok, to be sure please define "accepted" in that regard - being in proposed (waiting for it's SRU proposed days to pass) - will that be copied over by you when it completely opens?06:37
cpaelzerwant to avoid the crapshooting :-)06:38
cpaelzerbut enjoy your meal first06:38
acheronukif I want to revert to an older source to fix an issue that is going to take some time upstream to adapt to on new sources, is versioning like that acceptable for a SRU?07:04
acheronuki.e. versioning a source laterversion+really.olderversion07:04
apwcpaelzer, yes the contents of -proposed gets copied forward, if it has binaries then those too07:06
apwacheronuk, it is something like .is.oldversion07:07
acheronukapw: well, looking at archive packages, I see several variation on a theme, of haow people do it07:07
apwacheronuk, yeah am trying to find if there is a definative source and recommendation for names07:10
acheronukquestion was really if that reversion to a quite a bit earlier source is ok for a SRU07:13
acheronukor whether just patch out the commits since the last good commit in the current source is better07:13
acheronukboth are mildly evil07:14
apwa major version bump in any direction is not lightly taken as a SRU07:15
apwbut the primary issue is the size and scope of the delta regardless of versioning07:15
acheronukwell, in this case, only KDE uses the package now (signon-ui), and it is utterly broken in artful07:16
apwi am glad to see we tested artful before release </sarcasm>07:16
acheronukwell, it's a feature that has limited scope for use by an end user by default in artful, so went under the radar a bit07:18
apwwell if it is utterly broken, and noone uses it, the scope for regression is low so you would have more lattitude in fixing it07:19
acheronukbut will be wanting to fix for 18.04, and backports, as the new Google drive integration in our file manager that we want to include requires it07:19
acheronukapw: yes, just wanted to check what was acceptable, and what might be a preferred way to jump07:20
apwacheronuk, it doesn't sounds like either of those will be a different delta, and it is the delta we care about from a regression perspective07:21
acheronukpersonally would would re-upload the old source, as then it's quite clear what has been done in it's version string07:21
acheronuk* I would07:21
apwacheronuk, to get to a working place, it makes more sense you would do it the way is most sensible to you as you have to maintain it going forward i guess07:22
apwjust expect lots of gagging from teh reviewrs when you upload either way07:22
acheronukindeed. well, it would not be super critical if it got rejected for artful. going to include it in our updates ppa anyway. just an archive fix is better07:24
acheronukapw: ok. thanks for all that :) I will ponder it07:24
apwnp07:24
infinityLaney: Poke me when you're up.07:39
Laneyinfinity: STAB08:04
infinityLaney: Ow.08:04
infinityLaney: If you could double-check Steve's work on autopkgtest stuff and figure out how to make armhf love bionic, that would be lovely.08:04
Laneyok08:05
Laneydo we have an archive now?08:05
infinityLaney: Yep.08:06
Laneysehr gut08:07
sil2100infinity: when is the mass copy of artful to bionic planned?08:18
infinitysil2100: Yes.08:19
infinitysil2100: Sometime after Laney assures me that autopkgtests are going to work, so we don't miss any triggers.08:19
infinity(Or, I guess, if he assures me that the queue is ready to accept triggers, even if the runners won't be firing yet)08:19
infinityLaney: ^08:19
sil2100Oh, meaning quite soon I suppose08:19
LaneyGimme a bit08:20
infinityYeah, soonish.08:20
infinityCertainly during today's London work day.08:20
infinityI'm not in a huge rush to do it RIGHT NOW, but definitely today.08:20
sil2100Was asking since I want to push stuff into the artful queue, was wondering if I should aim for making it before the copy or not08:23
infinitysil2100: *shrug*08:25
infinitysil2100: If you don't make it, you can copy things later.  It's not rocket surgery.08:25
infinityAnyone with upload rights can copy forward.08:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (artful-proposed/main) [0.7 => 0.7.1] (no packageset)08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (artful-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-cloud)09:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (zesty-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)09:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.2 => 1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server)09:48
jamespageany sru team members around? ^^ pacemaker update stops the packaging shooting pacemaker in the head and then not restarting on upgrade which we've seen due to the recent security update09:51
jamespageif that could be processes asap and if possible pushed to -updates and -security once verified we might save users some pain09:51
jamespagenot sure if we can push it to -security09:51
apwjamespage, needs to be built in the security-ppa if it is going to -security09:52
apw(well against -security only, but you get the idea)09:52
jamespageapw: hmm ok - who's around who I can talk to about that?09:53
apwif you want to shove it out to -security you might want to ask them about sponsoring it09:53
apwarround is an interesting question ... /me thinks09:53
jamespageapw: yeah that was my worry - unattended security updates are gradually killing bits of HA openstack clouds atm09:54
jamespageI have gnuoy running around restarting pacemaker atm09:55
jamespagebut he can't do that for the rest-of-the-world09:55
cjwatson(this was what killed lgw01 this morning, FWIW)09:55
apwi guess i could build it in the kernel security PPA09:56
rbasakSeems to me it should go to -security. Otherwise users who get -security and not -updates will still be broken, and the bug is being triggered by something new being published into -security.09:56
apwindeed09:56
sil2100Yeah09:56
jamespagerbasak: yeah its specifically  security auto-updates (which default to on) causing the pain here09:57
jamespageso I want to superceed the one in -security ASAP09:57
sil2100We don't have any security people around in our timezone?09:57
rbasakratliff is in the #ubuntu-hardened topic. Or infinity?09:57
jamespagepinged ratliff09:58
jamespageI suspect she's not up yet09:58
* apw will try and build it in the kernel security PPA in parallel09:58
jamespageapw: can you pull from unapproved?09:58
apwi can ...10:01
infinityI'm here.10:01
infinityLemme slam it through the proper channels.10:01
jamespageinfinity: ta10:02
jamespageI'm aware that I've done my own testing via the PPA as well as having prepared the update10:03
jamespageI can do testing once in proposed but a second pair of eyes on the test case would be good10:03
infinityjamespage: How did this regress in the security update?10:04
infinityOr was it just the act of updating that breaks it.10:04
jamespageinfinity: its not a regression - its just the first update to pacemaker since xenial release-ish10:04
jamespageand its just the act that breaks things10:04
infinityRight, so updating "regressed" it, just by virtue of updating sucking.10:05
* infinity nods.10:05
infinityI'm good enough with calling that a security regression.10:05
jamespageawesome10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pacemaker [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3]10:26
infinityapw: source upload rejected, binary copy in queue, deal with it as you see fit.10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (artful-proposed) [20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]10:26
infinityapw: Permission granted in advance to "sru-release --security" when you and jamespage agree it's good.10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.2 => 1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server) (sync)10:26
infinityapw: The team can sort out the regression USN in the US morning.10:26
apwinfinity, ack thanks ...10:26
jamespageapw, infinity: I've tested from the security-proposed PPA and updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/+source/pacemaker/+bug/172706310:27
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1727063 in pacemaker (Ubuntu Xenial) "Pacemaker package upgrades stop but fail to start pacemaker resulting in HA outage" [Critical,Triaged]10:27
jamespageI'd like a co-pilot on the testing if possible - its pretty easy to reproduce10:27
jamespage(and you can do so in a LXD container btw)10:27
* infinity goes back to bionic and lets you two deal with this.10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-4ubuntu1 => 2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core)10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icu (bionic-proposed/main) [57.1-6 => 59.1-3] (core) (sync)10:31
LocutusOfBorgmmm people uploading to bionic...10:35
sil2100Toolchain10:36
apwLocutusOfBorg, just the beginings of the toolchain i hope10:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3]10:36
apwjamespage, ok i've accpeted the security sync, so that should appeare in -proposed shortly ^^10:36
jamespageapw: ok documented my testing on bug 172706310:39
ubot5bug 1727063 in pacemaker (Ubuntu Xenial) "Pacemaker package upgrades stop but fail to start pacemaker resulting in HA outage" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172706310:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.7 (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.4-2ubuntu1 => 1.7.4-2ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)10:39
jamespageapw: dosaboy is also upgrading some of his cloud which broke am this morning with the proposed update10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.2.0-8ubuntu3 => 7.2.0-12ubuntu1] (core)10:40
Laneyinfinity: should be good to go10:44
Laneybritney needs updating before I can try with run-autopkgtest though10:44
* Laney does the needful10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5.0-1ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-2ubuntu1] (core)10:50
dokoaccepted binutils, will end up in NEW anyway10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.37]10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1]10:51
infinityLaney: britney should be updated.10:51
infinityUnless I failed to commit.10:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu102 => 10ubuntu1] (core)10:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10ubuntu1]10:54
* infinity wonders who accepted base-files.10:56
infinitydoko: If that's you, please stop accepting stuff until Laney and I are sure britney's working.10:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.2.0-12ubuntu1]10:57
dokoinfinity: ok10:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core)10:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.2.0-8ubuntu3 => 7.2.0-12ubuntu1] (core)11:03
Laneyinfinity: Argh, no, I forgot s390x is a special snowflake11:04
* Laney eyes 10612211:05
infinityLaney: Yeeees, 106122...11:06
infinityLaney: Also, did I actually miss something with britney, or did you just end up checking my work? :P11:06
apwjamespage, touch testing of that pacemaker update is good here ...11:09
apwjamespage, did dosaboy succeeed ...11:09
jamespageapw: he did and commented in the bug11:09
jamespageapw: lets get this releases11:09
apwjamespage, yep just waiting on the publisher, will get it out shortly11:09
jamespageapw: awesome11:10
Laneyinfinity: Umm, dunno, I made the .bionic configuration files myself - can't remember how they're created right now11:11
LaneyI didn't update the excuses/output symlinks yet11:11
infinityLaney: Oh, right, the config files.  Derp.11:12
Laneyrun-autopkgtest grubs around in those to find the stuff it needs11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core)11:13
Laneyso11:15
infinityla11:15
LaneyTemporary failure resolving ‘squid.internal’11:15
apwLaney, we _so_ love those11:16
LaneyI guess something nplannish needs to happen ...11:17
infinityOh, this is in your shiny new guests?11:18
apwjamespage, ok buttons pushed, will be out "soon"11:19
infinityDidn't just copy and hack up artful ones?11:19
Laneymaybe I can do that11:19
LaneyI was just trying to make new lxc container11:19
Laneys11:19
jamespageapw: +1 ta11:19
Laneyok, that works11:26
sil2100apw: thanks for dealing with that!11:26
Laneyseems good to me now11:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core)11:26
mdeslaurinfinity: thanks for pacemaker11:29
infinityLaney: Seems good as in, we should enable archive-reports and watch the world burn?11:30
Laneyinfinity: If they're otherwise ready, goferit11:33
Laneybit of a queue backlog on x86 due to snapd, but that should clear out soon enough11:33
infinityLaney: I mean, I always forget/miss something, but I think they're ready. :P11:33
infinitySo, let's see what happens.11:34
infinityWhee.11:34
* apw looks out the window to see if he can see smoke yet ...11:34
cjwatsonFWIW we'll be stopping buildd-manager for a bit in the process of initialising translations, so builds will queue for a bit longer than usual11:34
infinitycjwatson: Mmkay.11:35
cjwatsonand also build logs not update etc.  but it'll all catch up.11:35
infinitywget -q --mirror -nH --cut-dirs=3 -np -R *index.html* -P /home/ubuntu-archive/mirror/phone-overlay -X /*/*/*/*/*/*/i18n http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/stable-phone-overlay/ubuntu/dists/11:36
infinityYeah, that needs to go away from archive-reports.11:36
infinityIck.11:36
sil2100Oh god11:36
sil2100Was that still around?11:36
cjwatsonmy excuse is I couldn't think of a better way11:36
cjwatsonbut yes11:36
cjwatsonthough I don't think that can all have been me - I'd have quoted better11:37
infinityThere's a bunch of phone overlay and RTM and other cruft on snakefruit that needs careful removal.11:37
infinityToday's not the day I'm doing that.11:37
infinitycjwatson: That was from ps(1), it may well be quoted pretty in the original script.11:37
* apw hands infinity a very large and sharp machette11:38
Laneybritney runneth11:40
infinityYea verily.11:41
infinityHrm, I should have copied forward before the first run.  Now I'll have to mangle the copied-forward britney state again, I think.11:42
infinityMaybe.11:42
cjwatsonbuildd-manager is back up.11:44
infinityOh, no, looks like I didn't lose any state.  Yay.11:52
infinityLaney: So, I guess let's see how these tests triggered from base-files and distr-info-data do, and call it good.11:54
LaneyKool Beanz11:56
Laneysome of them seem to be in already, and look OK to me11:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3]12:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core)12:00
apwinfinity, ^^ something just got accpeted in artful ...12:09
infinityapw: I noticed.  Not terribly concerned.12:09
cpaelzerinfinity: on our discussion this morning - I have a bunch of FTBFS fixes in Artful for a while - they are still in unapproved12:25
cpaelzerinfinity: now that bionic is close do we have to reroll those, or would you think you let them in and copy them over as well as part of opening binoic?12:26
infinitycpaelzer: I'm sure we can manage the latter.12:28
cpaelzerinfinity: ok, in case this does not work out - just update the associated bugs or ping me or whatever you find appropriate12:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.1.0-3ubuntu0.2]12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.4ubuntu1.3]12:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2]12:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (trusty-proposed) [3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1]12:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.5.6-2 => 1.6.5-1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) (sync)13:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ocaml (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.04.0-2ubuntu4 => 4.05.0-10ubuntu1] (kubuntu) (sync)13:33
xnoxdoko, can you please reject both of ocaml syncs from bionic queues? one is in bionic unapproved, the other one is in bionic new -> both syncs are bad, as they include binaries.13:33
xnoxor maybe apw ?13:33
xnoxhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ocaml & https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=ocaml13:34
infinityxnox: Done.13:34
xnoxinfinity, tah13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ocaml [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1]13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ocaml [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1]13:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ocaml (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.04.0-2ubuntu4 => 4.05.0-10ubuntu1] (kubuntu)13:38
dokoinfinity: I see the first packages did migrate. so can we go on with accepting packages?13:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.2.0-12ubuntu1]13:38
infinitydoko: I rejected gcc-7 due to rules.conf not mentioning bionic.13:38
infinity(Well, you can read the reject message)13:38
infinitydoko: But yes, you should be good in general to start building toolchain things, and prep early transitions and such.13:39
dokoinfinity: ok13:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-2ubuntu1]13:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ocaml [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1]13:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icu [sync] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]13:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinx [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.5-1]13:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core)13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core)13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core)13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (artful-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)13:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core)13:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (artful-proposed/main) [3.22.24-0ubuntu2 => 3.22.24-0ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop)13:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core)13:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core)14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: automake-1.15 (bionic-proposed/main) [1:1.15-6ubuntu1 => 1:1.15.1-3ubuntu1] (core)14:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted automake-1.15 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.15.1-3ubuntu1]14:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu2 => 1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3]14:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5.0-1ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-2ubuntu2] (core)14:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-2ubuntu2]14:26
infinitydoko: Due to a circular dep/breaks issue with debhelper/dpkg, they'll need a bit of care, so I'll do both after I've slept.14:27
infinitydoko: If someone uploads one or the other, reject them if you don't want the archive to break. :P14:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu5 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)14:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5.0-2ubuntu2 => 5.5.0-2ubuntu3] (core)15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1]15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1]15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1]15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1]15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1]15:18
slangasekLaney: I was seeing that 'failure to resolve squid.internal' on the s390x containers, and it did *not* seem to be a netplan problem... the containers had a resolv.conf pointing at the upstream gateway... did you figure out what was goin on there?15:22
LocutusOfBorg[16:03:28] <BTS> Opened #879762 (serious) in src:debhelper 10.10 by James Cowgill (jcowgill) «debhelper: fails to parse debian/control files with leading blank lines». https://bugs.debian.org/87976215:22
ubot5Debian bug 879762 in src:debhelper "debhelper: fails to parse debian/control files with leading blank lines" [Serious,Open]15:22
acheronukinfinity: tsimonq2 via telegram asks if he can 'steal your debhelper merge later'?15:22
Laneyslangasek: nope - I copied the artful contianers and dist-upgraded those instead15:22
Laneyif you feel like digging in, be my guest15:23
acheronukwhatever the hell means. don't shoot the messenger15:23
slangasekLaney: yeah, probably not; I'm hopeful that the RT will be resolved and we don't have to do this again for cacophonic15:25
* Laney had the same thoughts :-)15:26
slangasekacheronuk: the answer is no, infinity needs to bootstrap dpkg+debhelper due to breaks, needs an AA to do that15:26
acheronukslangasek: understood. I will pass that to tsimonq215:27
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, please  have a look at https://bugs.debian.org/87976215:28
ubot5Debian bug 879762 in src:debhelper "debhelper: fails to parse debian/control files with leading blank lines" [Serious,Open]15:28
LocutusOfBorginfinity, ^^^15:28
LocutusOfBorgdon't break the archive :)15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dcmtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.2-2 => 3.6.2-2build1] (no packageset)15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ledger (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.2~pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-5 => 3.1.2~pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-5build1] (no packageset)15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ncmpcpp (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-1build3 => 0.7.4-1build4] (no packageset)15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.26.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-1ubuntu2] (desktop-extra)15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvmime (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-3 => 0.9.2-3build1] (no packageset)15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (bionic-proposed/universe) [8u141-b14-3 => 8u141-b14-3build1] (no packageset)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mapnik (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build1 => 1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build2] (no packageset)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dcmtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.2-2build1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-2ubuntu3]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvmime [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.2-3build1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjfx [source] (bionic-proposed) [8u141-b14-3build1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.1-1ubuntu2]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ncmpcpp [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.4-1build4]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ledger [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.2~pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-5build1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mapnik [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build2]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: widelands (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:19+repack-4 => 1:19+repack-4build1] (no packageset)15:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted widelands [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:19+repack-4build1]15:34
xnoxslangasek, apt remove --purge libnss-resolve ?15:35
slangasekxnox: interesting, why would that have been installed in a freshly bootstrapped bionic container?  anyway, I'm not going back to check it out :)15:38
xnoxslangasek, freshly installed should be fine, but i see above mentions of upgraded one too.15:38
xnoxslangasek, also failure to resolve squid.internal -> is the container booted and running? e.g. there is nothing fishy done, like chrooting to it with starting systemd-resolved and expecting things to work?15:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mapnik (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build1 => 1:0.0~20170621-0cd7493f2-1] (no packageset) (sync)15:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mapnik [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.0~20170621-0cd7493f2-1]15:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: boost1.65.1 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.65.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1]15:46
slangasekxnox: my test was fresh creation of a container; /etc/resolv.conf was not pointing at resolved but at the upstream resolver.15:51
slangasekxnox: but again, I'm not going to chase this further, Laney JFDI and we should just get this moved into scalingstack15:52
xnoxslangasek, oh, but you must be using obsolete lxc-templates.15:52
xnoxslangasek, artful lxc1 can make artful lxc1 containers using fixed up templates.15:53
xnoxslangasek, lxd just works, as we control the LXD image overrides hence they just work on any lxd version.15:53
slangasek¯\(シ)/¯15:54
xnoxso xenial's lxc1 cannot create artful+ containers at the moment.15:54
xnoxusing the old e.g. download-ubuntu or debootstrap variants.15:54
xnoxi think it will be resolved with the next backport / point rleease, or some such.15:55
bdmurrayslangasek: Could we release apport to artful early?16:04
slangasekbdmurray: y16:19
slangasekbdmurray, apw, rbasak: distro-info-data has caused a regression in juju; I'd like to get a second set of SRU eyes on my proposed plan in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-info-data/+bug/1727355/comments/416:23
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1727355 in distro-info-data (Ubuntu) "no matching agent binaries available with 2.2.5" [High,Triaged]16:23
xnox... or simply revert the last update?16:26
slangasekxnox: that will break users of all the dev tools that need distro-info-data to match LP16:26
slangasek(e.g. pull-lp-source; dch)16:26
slangasekballoons: btw, it's obviously wrong for juju to bootstrap to bionic by default while bionic is not released, but the other part that exposed this bug is the lack of agent binaries for bionic... when will that piece be fixed?16:27
balloonsslangasek, yea, there hadn't been a release yet, so we didn't have agents of course16:28
balloonsbecause the client and agent are tied together, 2.2.5 for instance will never run on bionic as it was released before it16:29
slangasekoh?16:29
slangasekwhy would you not copy the agents forward?16:29
balloonsin order to support bionic on 2.2.5, we'd have to build an agent for it, then add it to streams. Not impossible to do, but we would have to do it for every old version16:30
balloonsjuju lives on the upgrade treadmill; this is an example16:30
slangasekI think that's categorically broken16:31
xnoxslangasek, well, it would be more hallarious if people started to successfully deploy bionic instances instead of xenial in production.16:31
slangasekthe agent should copy forward by default, just like everything in the Ubuntu archive does16:31
balloonsif the agent / client was separated or the client always bootstrapped the latest (as 1.25 did) things would be different16:31
slangasekxnox: absolutely16:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.4 => 0.33ubuntu0.3] (core)16:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.33ubuntu0.3]16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.4 => 0.28ubuntu0.5] (core)16:32
balloonsslangasek, you probably can won't fix for trusty16:33
balloonsslangasek, though hmmm16:33
slangasekballoons: is that because you don't intend to fix the client in trusty?16:33
slangasekor because the client isn't broken in trusty?16:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (zesty-proposed/main) [0.33ubuntu0.2 => 0.33ubuntu0.3] (core)16:33
balloonsslangasek, there isn't a juju-2 client in trusty, so indeed. That said, juju-1 client on trusty probably is broken too. I should check16:33
xnoxis trusty juju1 or juju-core?16:34
slangasekballoons: please do :)16:34
balloonsjuju-core16:34
xnoxack16:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.8 => 0.18ubuntu0.9] (core)16:34
slangasekapw, bdmurray, rbasak: so, I don't want to just self-accept the above given its irregularity, but I'm dealing with a sick kiddo and will be afk from ~now for most of the day.  It would be great if one of you could review and potentially accept + fast-track the above today16:36
balloonsslangasek, trusty is fine with 0.18ubuntu0.816:37
slangasekballoons: ok, thanks16:37
balloonsslangasek, juju-2 on it will be broken though, but that's not in the archive16:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.9]16:38
balloonslooks good, ty16:38
slangasekballoons: can you update the bug with a test case (what command to run, expected output vs. failure output)?16:38
balloonsslangasek, yep16:39
bdmurrayslangasek: I can have look see16:39
slangasekbdmurray: ta!16:39
bdmurrayslangasek: How will the work to add LTS back be tracked?16:40
slangasekbdmurray: I'm intending to upload the revert SRU to the queue as soon as this version is accepted16:40
bdmurrayslangasek: And how will it not be accepted accidentally?16:41
slangasekbdmurray: if you prefer I can wait until this version is in -updates so it doesn't accidentally get accepted over it16:42
slangasekbdmurray: and then I would pre-emptively mark the bug v-failed16:42
bdmurrayslangasek: Oh, so the reall distro-info-data will live in -proposed until juju ends up in -updates?16:43
slangasekbdmurray: that's the idea yes16:44
slangasekbdmurray: I would also add a Breaks: against the un-fixed juju-core versions16:44
slangasekreally afk now, sorry16:44
bdmurrayballoons: slangasek's comment about juju 2.2.4 already being in the SRU stream lead me to believe it was already in -proposed which it isn't. Why can't the one waiting in the -proposed queue be fixed?16:52
balloonsbdmurray, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/171821316:52
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1718213 in juju-core (Ubuntu Zesty) "[SRU] Juju 2.2.4" [Undecided,In progress]16:52
balloonsbdmurray, ohh you mean, why isn't the fix in the proposed stream? or why we would want to push 2.2.6 as the fix?16:54
bdmurrayballoons: Yeah, why not just fix 2.2.4?16:54
bdmurrayIts not anywhere real yet.16:54
balloonsbdmurray, we would have to distro patch it into 2.2.4. It would be ok in this case though as the change is purely client side, so the existing agents are fine to be fair16:55
balloonsimho makes more sense to just rev the source so we don't have to carry patches16:56
balloonssince it's not released16:57
bdmurray"carry patches" where are you carrying it if 2.2.6 is coming out?16:57
bdmurrayI guess it really doesn't matter as we'd still need the distro-info-data SRU for the existing version of juju and we can fast track that SRU more quickly than juju. The argument about not fixing 2.2.4 is still odd to me though.16:59
balloonsbdmurray, I'm not following you, I'm sorry. I'm working to rev a 2.2.6 version of juju. We'll want to include the change in the SRU version of juju. Since 2.2.4 is already in proposed, i thought it made sense to just rev that to the new version, since we didn't release it. Since 2.2.X was in the SRU pipeline already, it doesn't make sense to push a17:00
balloons specific SRU for this to the 2.0.2 package in xenial currently17:00
balloonsThe end result is juju 2.2.6 and distro-info-data sitting in proposed tonight/tomorrow happily working together. Then we can land them both17:01
balloonsor my thoughts anyway17:01
dokoinfinity: is the migration block still intended to be in place?17:06
bdmurrayballoons: 2.2.4 is not already in -proposed though17:08
balloonsbdmurray, am I missing something? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/. I tested it from proposed17:10
balloonsit's been in there for a bit17:10
bdmurrayballoons: Ah, I also saw 2.2.4-0ubuntu0.17.04.2 in the queue17:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.33ubuntu0.3]17:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.5]17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (artful-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu1]17:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset)17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (zesty-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset)17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)17:58
LocutusOfBorgI have prepared dpkg and debhelper18:02
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, ^^18:02
LocutusOfBorgI'm testing some rebuilds in my ppa https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+build/1361930318:03
LocutusOfBorgso far so good18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (bionic-proposed/main) [10.7.2ubuntu2 => 10.10.4ubuntu1] (core)18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (bionic-proposed/main) [1.18.24ubuntu1 => 1.19.0.4ubuntu1] (core)18:03
LocutusOfBorgI still need to do some more testing, but so far the merge is correct18:04
LocutusOfBorgI need to check for ddeb creation18:04
LocutusOfBorgactually kbuild is good and it produced ddebs correctluu18:05
LocutusOfBorgso, if any AA wants to accept them together...18:05
LocutusOfBorgbinutils is good, and it provides old -dbg packages18:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]18:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1]18:06
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: ack, although I thought infinity wanted to do those...18:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1]18:07
LocutusOfBorginfinity, whants somebody to accept them together18:08
LocutusOfBorgfor obvious reasons18:08
LocutusOfBorg(bootstrap)18:08
LocutusOfBorgthey need to be published in the same cycle18:08
tsimonq2cyphermox: Were the slideshow updates for Lubuntu not merged or was the MP not updated?18:11
tsimonq2(for Artful)18:11
cyphermoxtsimonq2: maybe I missed pushing18:11
tsimonq2cyphermox: ok, please let me know18:12
cyphermoxtsimonq2: lp:ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu corresponds to what was uploaded in 13318:13
tsimonq2cyphermox: And it has the Lubuntu slideshow updates right?18:15
tsimonq2(if so could you please update the MP?)18:16
cyphermoxtsimonq2: I don't know, only guess so18:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 0ad (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0.21-2 => 0.0.21-2build1] (no packageset)18:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 389-adminutil (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.23-1build1 => 1.1.23-1build2] (no packageset)18:20
cyphermoxI have no idea where that MP is, it looks to me like there are no open to-review MP except Gunnar's18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 389-ds-base (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.7.5-1 => 1.3.7.5-1build1] (no packageset)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aegisub (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.2+dfsg-3build6 => 3.2.2+dfsg-3build7] (no packageset)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 389-dsgw (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.11-2build3 => 1.1.11-2build4] (no packageset)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: an (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2-1build2 => 1.2-1build3] (no packageset)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost1.62 (bionic-proposed/main) [1.62.0+dfsg-4build3 => 1.62.0+dfsg-4build4] (core)18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost1.63 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.63.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3 => 1.63.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calibre (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0+dfsg-2 => 3.7.0+dfsg-2build1] (edubuntu)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cg3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~r12254-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.0~r12254-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dee (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.7+17.10.20170616-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.7+17.10.20170616-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brltty (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4-7ubuntu4 => 5.4-7ubuntu5] (core)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: couchdb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-0ubuntu8 => 1.6.0-0ubuntu9] (no packageset)18:23
tsimonq2cyphermox: ok thanks18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dwdiff (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-1 => 2.1.1-1build1] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firebird3.0 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.2.32703.ds4-9 => 3.0.2.32703.ds4-9build1] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnustep-base (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.24.9-3ubuntu1 => 1.24.9-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grcompiler (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2-6build1 => 4.2-6build2] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haskell-text-icu (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.0.1-6build2 => 0.7.0.1-6build3] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (bionic-proposed/main) [3.26.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnustep-gui (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.25.0-4build1 => 0.25.0-4build2] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hfst-ospell (bionic-proposed/main) [0.4.5~r343-2.1 => 0.4.5~r343-2.1build1] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: frog (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.7-1 => 0.13.7-1build1] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: harfbuzz (bionic-proposed/main) [1.4.2-1 => 1.4.2-1build1] (core)18:24
cyphermoxtsimonq2: sorry :)18:24
cyphermoxtsimonq2: that said, I just pushed lp:ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/artful to capture the current state of artful, and created a bionic series (though we'll still work on trunk for now)18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hhvm (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.21.0+dfsg-2 => 3.21.0+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset)18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdb (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.2-1 => 3.0.2-1build1] (kubuntu)18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-1 => 1.3.3-1build1] (input-methods, kubuntu)18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kopanocore (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-3ubuntu5 => 8.1.0-3ubuntu6] (no packageset)18:25
cyphermoxand now I'm thinking if we shouldn't move that to git.18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcdr (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.3-3 => 0.1.3-3build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libe-book (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.2-4 => 0.1.2-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libical (bionic-proposed/main) [2.0.0-0.5 => 2.0.0-0.5build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libphonenumber (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.0-5ubuntu2 => 7.1.0-5ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcolumbus (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+15.10.20150806-0ubuntu8 => 1.1.0+15.10.20150806-0ubuntu9] (ubuntukylin)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmspub (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.2-4 => 0.1.2-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfolia (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-2 => 1.6-2build1] (no packageset)18:26
tsimonq2cyphermox: np, thanks :)18:26
tsimonq2And yes Git :D18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 0ad [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.0.21-2build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 389-ds-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.7.5-1build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aegisub [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.2+dfsg-3build7]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boost1.62 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.62.0+dfsg-4build4]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 389-adminutil [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.23-1build2]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted an [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2-1build3]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 389-dsgw [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.11-2build4]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boost1.63 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.63.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brltty [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.4-7ubuntu5]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cg3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~r12254-1ubuntu2]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dee [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.7+17.10.20170616-0ubuntu2]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.1-1ubuntu2]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted frog [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.7-1build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnustep-gui [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.25.0-4build2]18:29
powersjis this stream of messages around the unapproved queue? and do they mean pulling stuff into bionic?18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted harfbuzz [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.2-1build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hfst-ospell [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.5~r343-2.1build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calibre [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0+dfsg-2build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dwdiff [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.1-1build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnustep-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.24.9-3ubuntu2]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haskell-text-icu [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.0.1-6build3]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted couchdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-0ubuntu9]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grcompiler [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2-6build2]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firebird3.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.2.32703.ds4-9build1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hhvm [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.21.0+dfsg-2build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.2-1build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcdr [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.3-3build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libe-book [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2-4build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libical [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-0.5build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libphonenumber [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.0-5ubuntu3]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvisio (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.5-4 => 0.1.5-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus-qt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3-1build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcolumbus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+15.10.20150806-0ubuntu9]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmspub [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2-4build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kopanocore [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.1.0-3ubuntu6]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:5.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.4.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfolia [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-2build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxml2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.9.4+dfsg1-4ubuntu1 => 2.9.4+dfsg1-4ubuntu2] (core)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mapnik (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.15+ds-1 => 3.0.15+ds-1build1] (no packageset)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mpd (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.20.9-2 => 0.20.9-2build1] (no packageset)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-stringprep (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build1 => 0.8.0-3build2] (no packageset)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzmf (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0.2-1 => 0.0.2-1build1] (no packageset)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: msort (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.53-2.1 => 8.53-2.1build1] (no packageset)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs38 (bionic-proposed/universe) [38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu1 => 38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu)18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: odil (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2:10.1.10-3 => 2:10.1.10-3build1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openttd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1 => 1.7.0-1build1] (no packageset)18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php-pecl-http (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.0+2.6.0-4build2 => 3.1.0+2.6.0-4build3] (no packageset)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poedit (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.4-1 => 2.0.4-1build1] (no packageset)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: prelude-lml (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-5.3ubuntu4 => 1.0.0-5.3ubuntu5] (no packageset)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.1 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.8-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.8-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyicu (bionic-proposed/main) [1.9.5-1build2 => 1.9.5-1build3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2.3-1 => 3.2.3-1build1] (core)18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.1+dfsg-10ubuntu1 => 5.9.1+dfsg-10ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtwebengine-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.1+dfsg-4 => 5.9.1+dfsg-4build1] (kubuntu)18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtwebkit-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu1 => 5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-charlock-holmes (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.3+dfsg-2build3 => 0.7.3+dfsg-2build4] (no packageset)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subtitlecomposer (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.4-2 => 0.6.4-2build1] (no packageset)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: taglib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-0.2 => 1.11.1+dfsg.1-0.2build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: texlive-bin (bionic-proposed/main) [2017.20170613.44572-5build1 => 2017.20170613.44572-5build2] (ubuntu-desktop)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-stringi (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-1build1 => 1.1.2-1build2] (no packageset)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sword (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.3+dfsg-9.1 => 1.7.3+dfsg-9.1build1] (no packageset)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tin (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2.4.1-1 => 1:2.4.1-1build1] (no packageset)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slop (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.3.49-1 => 7.3.49-1build1] (no packageset)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tesseract (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.04.01-6 => 3.04.01-6build1] (kubuntu)18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ucto (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1 => 0.9.6-1build1] (no packageset)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (bionic-proposed/main) [2.18.0-2 => 2.18.0-2build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xerces-c (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.4+debian-2 => 3.1.4+debian-2build1] (kubuntu)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zimlib (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2 => 2.0.0-2build1] (no packageset)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.ucol (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-2ubuntu9 => 1.0.2-2ubuntu10] (zope)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unar (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-2 => 1.10.1-2build1] (no packageset)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaz (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1 => 5.19.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkitgtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.11-3 => 2.4.11-3build1] (kubuntu)18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: znc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.5-2build2 => 1.6.5-2build3] (no packageset)18:35
tsimonq2powersj: No, looks like d o k o is no-change rebuilding things18:37
powersjtsimonq2: ah ok18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted odil [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openttd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.0-1build1]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.1 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.8-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.3-1build1]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyicu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.5-1build3]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:10.1.10-3build1]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poedit [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.4-1build1]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php-pecl-http [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.0+2.6.0-4build3]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prelude-lml [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-5.3ubuntu5]18:38
tsimonq2powersj: (toolchain updates but you likely know that :) )18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvisio [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.5-4build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libzmf [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.0.2-1build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs38 [source] (bionic-proposed) [38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu2]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxml2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.4+dfsg1-4ubuntu2]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mpd [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.20.9-2build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mapnik [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.15+ds-1build1]18:40
powersjtsimonq2: I actually didn't :) so I appreciate it18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted msort [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.53-2.1build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtwebengine-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.1+dfsg-4build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-stringprep [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0-3build2]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtwebkit-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu2]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.1+dfsg-10ubuntu2]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-stringi [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-1build2]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slop [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.49-1build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sword [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.3+dfsg-9.1build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tesseract [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.04.01-6build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.4.1-1build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unar [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.1-2build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkitgtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.11-3build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-charlock-holmes [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3+dfsg-2build4]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-0.2build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ucto [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subtitlecomposer [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.4-2build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.18.0-2build1]18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted texlive-bin [source] (bionic-proposed) [2017.20170613.44572-5build2]18:41
tsimonq2powersj: ;)18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xerces-c [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.4+debian-2build1]18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zimlib [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-2build1]18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zope.ucol [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.2-2ubuntu10]18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaz [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu2]18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted znc [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.5-2build3]18:42
tsimonq2powersj: bionic-changes at lists.u.c is a thing if you're curious why ;)18:42
tsimonq2I subscribed to it already18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:5.4.1-0ubuntu2]18:43
powersjtsimonq2: ah look at that! that would have answered my question18:44
tsimonq2powersj: Yeah it's pretty convenient :D18:45
LocutusOfBorgis transition page needing some hint for bionic? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/icu.html still shows everythign as bad20:52
LocutusOfBorgLaney, ^^20:52
LocutusOfBorgbtw let me know if you need something for debhelper+dpkg20:52
LocutusOfBorgso far so good20:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.4.11-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)21:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (zesty-proposed/main) [0.33ubuntu0.3 => 0.33ubuntu0.4] (core)21:14
slangasekbdmurray, balloons: ^^ the revert of distro-info-data, back in the queue and awaiting the juju-core side to land21:15
balloonsslangasek, ty21:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.5 => 0.28ubuntu0.6] (core)21:15
valorieslangasek: hope your kiddo is feeling better21:24
slangasekvalorie: it's nap time ;)21:24
balloonsslangasek, ahh glorious! rest for kiddo and you21:33
valorie:-)21:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (bionic-proposed/main) [1.4.0~beta3build2 => 1.4.0~beta3ubuntu1] (core)22:14
gaughenrbasak, arges  (re-asking on the right channel) With your SRU vanguard hat on (you two are listed as vanguards for today), would one of you please have a look at this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1711760 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=resolvconf) pretty please?23:25
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1711760 in resolvconf (Ubuntu Xenial) "[2.3] resolv.conf is not set (during commissioning or testing)" [Medium,Confirmed]23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.23-0ubuntu1 => 1.24-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!