[00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] [00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (artful-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] [00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sane-backends [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu3] [00:45] jbicha: Yeah, versioning the Provides should work (now that versioned Provides *do* work ☺) and would save a trip through NEW. [01:14] versioning the provides how? [01:15] jbicha: Provides: libsane (= version) [01:15] but how do we know which version to use? [01:16] jbicha: Either binary:Version or a static version less than the current would be fine. [01:16] jbicha: binary:Version would result in the same thing you got with your metapackage, but without the cruft. [01:16] ok, I'll give that a try [01:18] jbicha: You also would want to replace the Breaks/Replaces with Conflicts/Replaces. Breaks/Provides/Replaces doesn't have any higher level meaning, while P/C/R does. [01:19] (C/R will hint for frontends to remove the old one in favour of the new one, while the versioned Provides should continue to satisfy deps) [01:20] And C/R should be unversioned in that case (though it probably makes little difference in this specific scenario) [01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.26.1-0ubuntu5] [01:23] I've been told that Conflicts (instead of Breaks) is usually overkill [01:23] They each have their place. [01:23] C/R is what you want when you want to force a package off. [01:24] A versioned Breaks is what you want when you want to force a package to be upgraded. [01:24] Versioned B/R is for overwriting files that moved between versions. [01:24] Conflicts alone is when the two packages will always conflict but neither is preferred. [01:25] do you really want me to switch breaks with conflicts in this sru? [01:25] P/C/R is for when two packages provide the same interface (like this), but also if the C/R only exists in one direction, that one will take precedence and force the other off (again, like this). [01:25] I want the relationships correct, yes. === wgrant__ is now known as wgrant [01:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [01:59] RAOF: just re-uploaded cloud-init with correct changes (sorry for the noise) [01:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 => 17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [02:00] smoser: thanks, just saw this go up. Did I need to re-upload a new MP (for next time)? I've also added the related bugs to the SRU processbug per per comment here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1721847/comments/25, [02:00] Ubuntu bug 1721847 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "sru cloud-init 2017-10-06 (17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1)" [Medium,Fix committed] [02:01] I'll add that recent changelogs to the top of that bug description too I suppose [02:01] blackboxsw: i uploaded just now [02:01] * blackboxsw just got back from dinner [02:01] blackboxsw: just for your notes... what i did was [02:01] git checkout ubuntu/xenial [02:01] build-package -- -S -d -v0.7.9-233-ge586fe35-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 [02:01] where that version is the version that is in -updates currently. [02:01] they want the .changes to have the delta versus what is in -updates [02:02] no changes, just had to build-package with the '-v' [02:02] * smoser is out now. [02:02] night [02:02] manana [02:02] and i pinged in ubuntu-release for raof, but might have missed him [02:02] :-( [02:02] Hey! [02:03] No, haven't missed me :) [02:03] oh. sorry fo the double ping. [02:03] i thought i was in a different channel :) [02:03] :) [02:03] * smoser really shoudl go sleep now. thanks for your help. [02:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2 => 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [02:41] thanks for the help, this is only the 2nd time I've dealt with versioned provides [02:42] I didn't understand it the previous time either! [03:02] jbicha: when I do something technical like that, i blog it [03:02] so next time I can look for my blog [03:02] I've done that once [03:03] if I hadn't done it many times, I would be lost! [03:03] <--- slow learner [03:03] people like to hear about bugs getting fixed so maybe I will blog about it [03:04] eh, I blog for me; if other's appreciate it, fine [03:12] Laney: I think I've mostly gotten the autopkgtest bits done for bionic, except for the armhf lxd containers; I can't find a straightforward way to modify the scripts to bootstrap from the existing artful images, maybe you have a trick there [03:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] [03:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [17.1-25-g17a15f9e-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [03:30] woot will test THX! [05:12] infinity: I need the first wave of packages for artful hwe backport in xenial-proposed, because 16.04osp1 final base image will be built on friday, apparently.. [05:17] tjaalton: What is 16.04osp1? [05:17] tjaalton: And why does it need stuff that's usually meant for the point release in 3 months? [05:18] oem service pack 1 [05:18] base image for next wave of oem systems [05:18] yes the schedule doesn't match [05:19] because of intel gemini lake, coffee lake etc [05:19] amd raven ridge [05:19] the queue has had libdrm, wayland-protocols, llvm-5 for mesa, libclc will be uploaded once llvm-5 is built [05:20] tjaalton: Well, the idea that we'll fasttrack this all through in 3 days seems a bit unreasonable. [05:20] just to proposed [05:20] no need to push it to updates [05:20] they already use ppa's for the image, which is kinda bad [05:21] they can stay on proposed until the whole stack is ready [05:22] "kinda bad"? [05:22] Very bad. [05:22] Especially if those PPAs are enabled on customer systems. [05:22] Yay undue post-release maintenance burden. [05:22] But okay, I can try to find some review cycles after the archive opening is done. [05:23] great, thanks [05:23] noone else seems to touch these uploads ;) [05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.36 => 0.37] (core) (sync) [05:29] oh and the ppa's are only used when building the image, but still.. [06:20] thanks rbasak and apw, looking into build status, verification and more safety regression checks now [06:26] apw: so the race I was afraid of happened with libvirt 3.6.0-1ubuntu6 in a-p and 3.6.0-1ubuntu5 now. [06:26] should I make an 3.6.0-1ubuntu6 to bionic now instead and prep an identical 3.6.0-1ubuntu5.1? [06:27] or can on the acceptance of 3.6.0-1ubuntu6 that be copyied to Bionic as well? [06:35] cpaelzer: Anything accepted in artful before bionic is completely open will be copied forward by me. [06:35] cpaelzer: After that, it's a bit more of a crapshoot, but you can always copy yourself if you have upload rights to the series. [06:36] * infinity goes to find some food to fuel the home stretch on the opening. [06:37] infinity: ok, to be sure please define "accepted" in that regard - being in proposed (waiting for it's SRU proposed days to pass) - will that be copied over by you when it completely opens? [06:38] want to avoid the crapshooting :-) [06:38] but enjoy your meal first [07:04] if I want to revert to an older source to fix an issue that is going to take some time upstream to adapt to on new sources, is versioning like that acceptable for a SRU? [07:04] i.e. versioning a source laterversion+really.olderversion [07:06] cpaelzer, yes the contents of -proposed gets copied forward, if it has binaries then those too [07:07] acheronuk, it is something like .is.oldversion [07:07] apw: well, looking at archive packages, I see several variation on a theme, of haow people do it [07:10] acheronuk, yeah am trying to find if there is a definative source and recommendation for names [07:13] question was really if that reversion to a quite a bit earlier source is ok for a SRU [07:13] or whether just patch out the commits since the last good commit in the current source is better [07:14] both are mildly evil [07:15] a major version bump in any direction is not lightly taken as a SRU [07:15] but the primary issue is the size and scope of the delta regardless of versioning [07:16] well, in this case, only KDE uses the package now (signon-ui), and it is utterly broken in artful [07:16] i am glad to see we tested artful before release [07:18] well, it's a feature that has limited scope for use by an end user by default in artful, so went under the radar a bit [07:19] well if it is utterly broken, and noone uses it, the scope for regression is low so you would have more lattitude in fixing it [07:19] but will be wanting to fix for 18.04, and backports, as the new Google drive integration in our file manager that we want to include requires it [07:20] apw: yes, just wanted to check what was acceptable, and what might be a preferred way to jump [07:21] acheronuk, it doesn't sounds like either of those will be a different delta, and it is the delta we care about from a regression perspective [07:21] personally would would re-upload the old source, as then it's quite clear what has been done in it's version string [07:21] * I would [07:22] acheronuk, to get to a working place, it makes more sense you would do it the way is most sensible to you as you have to maintain it going forward i guess [07:22] just expect lots of gagging from teh reviewrs when you upload either way [07:24] indeed. well, it would not be super critical if it got rejected for artful. going to include it in our updates ppa anyway. just an archive fix is better [07:24] apw: ok. thanks for all that :) I will ponder it [07:24] np [07:39] Laney: Poke me when you're up. [08:04] infinity: STAB [08:04] Laney: Ow. [08:04] Laney: If you could double-check Steve's work on autopkgtest stuff and figure out how to make armhf love bionic, that would be lovely. [08:05] ok [08:05] do we have an archive now? [08:06] Laney: Yep. [08:07] sehr gut [08:18] infinity: when is the mass copy of artful to bionic planned? [08:19] sil2100: Yes. [08:19] sil2100: Sometime after Laney assures me that autopkgtests are going to work, so we don't miss any triggers. [08:19] (Or, I guess, if he assures me that the queue is ready to accept triggers, even if the runners won't be firing yet) [08:19] Laney: ^ [08:19] Oh, meaning quite soon I suppose [08:20] Gimme a bit [08:20] Yeah, soonish. [08:20] Certainly during today's London work day. [08:20] I'm not in a huge rush to do it RIGHT NOW, but definitely today. [08:23] Was asking since I want to push stuff into the artful queue, was wondering if I should aim for making it before the copy or not [08:25] sil2100: *shrug* [08:25] sil2100: If you don't make it, you can copy things later. It's not rocket surgery. [08:25] Anyone with upload rights can copy forward. [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (artful-proposed/main) [0.7 => 0.7.1] (no packageset) [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (artful-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-cloud) [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (zesty-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.2 => 1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server) [09:51] any sru team members around? ^^ pacemaker update stops the packaging shooting pacemaker in the head and then not restarting on upgrade which we've seen due to the recent security update [09:51] if that could be processes asap and if possible pushed to -updates and -security once verified we might save users some pain [09:51] not sure if we can push it to -security [09:52] jamespage, needs to be built in the security-ppa if it is going to -security [09:52] (well against -security only, but you get the idea) [09:53] apw: hmm ok - who's around who I can talk to about that? [09:53] if you want to shove it out to -security you might want to ask them about sponsoring it [09:53] arround is an interesting question ... /me thinks [09:54] apw: yeah that was my worry - unattended security updates are gradually killing bits of HA openstack clouds atm [09:55] I have gnuoy running around restarting pacemaker atm [09:55] but he can't do that for the rest-of-the-world [09:55] (this was what killed lgw01 this morning, FWIW) [09:56] i guess i could build it in the kernel security PPA [09:56] Seems to me it should go to -security. Otherwise users who get -security and not -updates will still be broken, and the bug is being triggered by something new being published into -security. [09:56] indeed [09:56] Yeah [09:57] rbasak: yeah its specifically security auto-updates (which default to on) causing the pain here [09:57] so I want to superceed the one in -security ASAP [09:57] We don't have any security people around in our timezone? [09:57] ratliff is in the #ubuntu-hardened topic. Or infinity? [09:58] pinged ratliff [09:58] I suspect she's not up yet [09:58] * apw will try and build it in the kernel security PPA in parallel [09:58] apw: can you pull from unapproved? [10:01] i can ... [10:01] I'm here. [10:01] Lemme slam it through the proper channels. [10:02] infinity: ta [10:03] I'm aware that I've done my own testing via the PPA as well as having prepared the update [10:03] I can do testing once in proposed but a second pair of eyes on the test case would be good [10:04] jamespage: How did this regress in the security update? [10:04] Or was it just the act of updating that breaks it. [10:04] infinity: its not a regression - its just the first update to pacemaker since xenial release-ish [10:04] and its just the act that breaks things [10:05] Right, so updating "regressed" it, just by virtue of updating sucking. [10:05] * infinity nods. [10:05] I'm good enough with calling that a security regression. [10:07] awesome [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pacemaker [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3] [10:26] apw: source upload rejected, binary copy in queue, deal with it as you see fit. [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (artful-proposed) [20171019+dfsg1-0ubuntu1] [10:26] apw: Permission granted in advance to "sru-release --security" when you and jamespage agree it's good. [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.2 => 1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server) (sync) [10:26] apw: The team can sort out the regression USN in the US morning. [10:26] infinity, ack thanks ... [10:27] apw, infinity: I've tested from the security-proposed PPA and updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1727063 [10:27] Ubuntu bug 1727063 in pacemaker (Ubuntu Xenial) "Pacemaker package upgrades stop but fail to start pacemaker resulting in HA outage" [Critical,Triaged] [10:27] I'd like a co-pilot on the testing if possible - its pretty easy to reproduce [10:27] (and you can do so in a LXD container btw) [10:28] * infinity goes back to bionic and lets you two deal with this. [10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-4ubuntu1 => 2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core) [10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icu (bionic-proposed/main) [57.1-6 => 59.1-3] (core) (sync) [10:35] mmm people uploading to bionic... [10:36] Toolchain [10:36] LocutusOfBorg, just the beginings of the toolchain i hope [10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.3] [10:36] jamespage, ok i've accpeted the security sync, so that should appeare in -proposed shortly ^^ [10:39] apw: ok documented my testing on bug 1727063 [10:39] bug 1727063 in pacemaker (Ubuntu Xenial) "Pacemaker package upgrades stop but fail to start pacemaker resulting in HA outage" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1727063 [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.7 (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.4-2ubuntu1 => 1.7.4-2ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [10:39] apw: dosaboy is also upgrading some of his cloud which broke am this morning with the proposed update [10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.2.0-8ubuntu3 => 7.2.0-12ubuntu1] (core) [10:44] infinity: should be good to go [10:44] britney needs updating before I can try with run-autopkgtest though [10:46] * Laney does the needful [10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5.0-1ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-2ubuntu1] (core) [10:50] accepted binutils, will end up in NEW anyway [10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.37] [10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] [10:51] Laney: britney should be updated. [10:51] Unless I failed to commit. [10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu102 => 10ubuntu1] (core) [10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10ubuntu1] [10:56] * infinity wonders who accepted base-files. [10:56] doko: If that's you, please stop accepting stuff until Laney and I are sure britney's working. [10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.2.0-12ubuntu1] [10:57] infinity: ok [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core) [11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.2.0-8ubuntu3 => 7.2.0-12ubuntu1] (core) [11:04] infinity: Argh, no, I forgot s390x is a special snowflake [11:05] * Laney eyes 106122 [11:06] Laney: Yeeees, 106122... [11:06] Laney: Also, did I actually miss something with britney, or did you just end up checking my work? :P [11:09] jamespage, touch testing of that pacemaker update is good here ... [11:09] jamespage, did dosaboy succeeed ... [11:09] apw: he did and commented in the bug [11:09] apw: lets get this releases [11:09] jamespage, yep just waiting on the publisher, will get it out shortly [11:10] apw: awesome [11:11] infinity: Umm, dunno, I made the .bionic configuration files myself - can't remember how they're created right now [11:11] I didn't update the excuses/output symlinks yet [11:12] Laney: Oh, right, the config files. Derp. [11:13] run-autopkgtest grubs around in those to find the stuff it needs [11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core) [11:15] so [11:15] la [11:15] Temporary failure resolving ‘squid.internal’ [11:16] Laney, we _so_ love those [11:17] I guess something nplannish needs to happen ... [11:18] Oh, this is in your shiny new guests? [11:19] jamespage, ok buttons pushed, will be out "soon" [11:19] Didn't just copy and hack up artful ones? [11:19] maybe I can do that [11:19] I was just trying to make new lxc container [11:19] s [11:19] apw: +1 ta [11:26] ok, that works [11:26] apw: thanks for dealing with that! [11:26] seems good to me now [11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core) [11:29] infinity: thanks for pacemaker [11:30] Laney: Seems good as in, we should enable archive-reports and watch the world burn? [11:33] infinity: If they're otherwise ready, goferit [11:33] bit of a queue backlog on x86 due to snapd, but that should clear out soon enough [11:33] Laney: I mean, I always forget/miss something, but I think they're ready. :P [11:34] So, let's see what happens. [11:34] Whee. [11:34] * apw looks out the window to see if he can see smoke yet ... [11:34] FWIW we'll be stopping buildd-manager for a bit in the process of initialising translations, so builds will queue for a bit longer than usual [11:35] cjwatson: Mmkay. [11:35] and also build logs not update etc. but it'll all catch up. [11:36] wget -q --mirror -nH --cut-dirs=3 -np -R *index.html* -P /home/ubuntu-archive/mirror/phone-overlay -X /*/*/*/*/*/*/i18n http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/stable-phone-overlay/ubuntu/dists/ [11:36] Yeah, that needs to go away from archive-reports. [11:36] Ick. [11:36] Oh god [11:36] Was that still around? [11:36] my excuse is I couldn't think of a better way [11:36] but yes [11:37] though I don't think that can all have been me - I'd have quoted better [11:37] There's a bunch of phone overlay and RTM and other cruft on snakefruit that needs careful removal. [11:37] Today's not the day I'm doing that. [11:37] cjwatson: That was from ps(1), it may well be quoted pretty in the original script. [11:38] * apw hands infinity a very large and sharp machette [11:40] britney runneth [11:41] Yea verily. [11:42] Hrm, I should have copied forward before the first run. Now I'll have to mangle the copied-forward britney state again, I think. [11:42] Maybe. [11:44] buildd-manager is back up. [11:52] Oh, no, looks like I didn't lose any state. Yay. [11:54] Laney: So, I guess let's see how these tests triggered from base-files and distr-info-data do, and call it good. [11:56] Kool Beanz [11:56] some of them seem to be in already, and look OK to me [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (artful-proposed) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3] [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core) [12:09] infinity, ^^ something just got accpeted in artful ... [12:09] apw: I noticed. Not terribly concerned. [12:25] infinity: on our discussion this morning - I have a bunch of FTBFS fixes in Artful for a while - they are still in unapproved [12:26] infinity: now that bionic is close do we have to reroll those, or would you think you let them in and copy them over as well as part of opening binoic? [12:28] cpaelzer: I'm sure we can manage the latter. [12:29] infinity: ok, in case this does not work out - just update the associated bugs or ping me or whatever you find appropriate [12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.1.0-3ubuntu0.2] [12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.4ubuntu1.3] [12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2] [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (trusty-proposed) [3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1] [13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.5.6-2 => 1.6.5-1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) (sync) [13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ocaml (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.04.0-2ubuntu4 => 4.05.0-10ubuntu1] (kubuntu) (sync) [13:33] doko, can you please reject both of ocaml syncs from bionic queues? one is in bionic unapproved, the other one is in bionic new -> both syncs are bad, as they include binaries. [13:33] or maybe apw ? [13:34] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ocaml & https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=ocaml [13:34] xnox: Done. [13:34] infinity, tah [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ocaml [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1] [13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ocaml [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1] [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ocaml (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.04.0-2ubuntu4 => 4.05.0-10ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [13:38] infinity: I see the first packages did migrate. so can we go on with accepting packages? [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.2.0-12ubuntu1] [13:38] doko: I rejected gcc-7 due to rules.conf not mentioning bionic. [13:38] (Well, you can read the reject message) [13:39] doko: But yes, you should be good in general to start building toolchain things, and prep early transitions and such. [13:41] infinity: ok [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-2ubuntu1] [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ocaml [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.05.0-10ubuntu1] [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icu [sync] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinx [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.5-1] [13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core) [13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core) [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core) [13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (artful-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core) [13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (artful-proposed/main) [3.22.24-0ubuntu2 => 3.22.24-0ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core) [14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [59.1-3] (core) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (bionic-proposed) [59.1-3] [14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: automake-1.15 (bionic-proposed/main) [1:1.15-6ubuntu1 => 1:1.15.1-3ubuntu1] (core) [14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted automake-1.15 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.15.1-3ubuntu1] [14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu2 => 1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-1ubuntu3] [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5.0-1ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-2ubuntu2] (core) [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-2ubuntu2] [14:27] doko: Due to a circular dep/breaks issue with debhelper/dpkg, they'll need a bit of care, so I'll do both after I've slept. [14:28] doko: If someone uploads one or the other, reject them if you don't want the archive to break. :P [14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu5 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] (core) [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5.0-2ubuntu2 => 5.5.0-2ubuntu3] (core) [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.29.1-6ubuntu1] [15:22] Laney: I was seeing that 'failure to resolve squid.internal' on the s390x containers, and it did *not* seem to be a netplan problem... the containers had a resolv.conf pointing at the upstream gateway... did you figure out what was goin on there? [15:22] [16:03:28] Opened #879762 (serious) in src:debhelper 10.10 by James Cowgill (jcowgill) «debhelper: fails to parse debian/control files with leading blank lines». https://bugs.debian.org/879762 [15:22] Debian bug 879762 in src:debhelper "debhelper: fails to parse debian/control files with leading blank lines" [Serious,Open] [15:22] infinity: tsimonq2 via telegram asks if he can 'steal your debhelper merge later'? [15:22] slangasek: nope - I copied the artful contianers and dist-upgraded those instead [15:23] if you feel like digging in, be my guest [15:23] whatever the hell means. don't shoot the messenger [15:25] Laney: yeah, probably not; I'm hopeful that the RT will be resolved and we don't have to do this again for cacophonic [15:26] * Laney had the same thoughts :-) [15:26] acheronuk: the answer is no, infinity needs to bootstrap dpkg+debhelper due to breaks, needs an AA to do that [15:27] slangasek: understood. I will pass that to tsimonq2 [15:28] slangasek, please have a look at https://bugs.debian.org/879762 [15:28] Debian bug 879762 in src:debhelper "debhelper: fails to parse debian/control files with leading blank lines" [Serious,Open] [15:28] infinity, ^^^ [15:28] don't break the archive :) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dcmtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.2-2 => 3.6.2-2build1] (no packageset) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ledger (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.2~pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-5 => 3.1.2~pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-5build1] (no packageset) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ncmpcpp (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-1build3 => 0.7.4-1build4] (no packageset) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.26.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-1ubuntu2] (desktop-extra) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvmime (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-3 => 0.9.2-3build1] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (bionic-proposed/universe) [8u141-b14-3 => 8u141-b14-3build1] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mapnik (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build1 => 1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build2] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dcmtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.2-2build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-2ubuntu3] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvmime [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.2-3build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjfx [source] (bionic-proposed) [8u141-b14-3build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.1-1ubuntu2] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ncmpcpp [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.4-1build4] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ledger [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.2~pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-5build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mapnik [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build2] [15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: widelands (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:19+repack-4 => 1:19+repack-4build1] (no packageset) [15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted widelands [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:19+repack-4build1] [15:35] slangasek, apt remove --purge libnss-resolve ? [15:38] xnox: interesting, why would that have been installed in a freshly bootstrapped bionic container? anyway, I'm not going back to check it out :) [15:38] slangasek, freshly installed should be fine, but i see above mentions of upgraded one too. [15:39] slangasek, also failure to resolve squid.internal -> is the container booted and running? e.g. there is nothing fishy done, like chrooting to it with starting systemd-resolved and expecting things to work? [15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mapnik (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:0.0~20170120-8139e5c-1~exp1build1 => 1:0.0~20170621-0cd7493f2-1] (no packageset) (sync) [15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mapnik [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.0~20170621-0cd7493f2-1] [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: boost1.65.1 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.65.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1] [15:51] xnox: my test was fresh creation of a container; /etc/resolv.conf was not pointing at resolved but at the upstream resolver. [15:52] xnox: but again, I'm not going to chase this further, Laney JFDI and we should just get this moved into scalingstack [15:52] slangasek, oh, but you must be using obsolete lxc-templates. [15:53] slangasek, artful lxc1 can make artful lxc1 containers using fixed up templates. [15:53] slangasek, lxd just works, as we control the LXD image overrides hence they just work on any lxd version. [15:54] ¯\(シ)/¯ [15:54] so xenial's lxc1 cannot create artful+ containers at the moment. [15:54] using the old e.g. download-ubuntu or debootstrap variants. [15:55] i think it will be resolved with the next backport / point rleease, or some such. [16:04] slangasek: Could we release apport to artful early? [16:19] bdmurray: y [16:23] bdmurray, apw, rbasak: distro-info-data has caused a regression in juju; I'd like to get a second set of SRU eyes on my proposed plan in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-info-data/+bug/1727355/comments/4 [16:23] Ubuntu bug 1727355 in distro-info-data (Ubuntu) "no matching agent binaries available with 2.2.5" [High,Triaged] [16:26] ... or simply revert the last update? [16:26] xnox: that will break users of all the dev tools that need distro-info-data to match LP [16:26] (e.g. pull-lp-source; dch) [16:27] balloons: btw, it's obviously wrong for juju to bootstrap to bionic by default while bionic is not released, but the other part that exposed this bug is the lack of agent binaries for bionic... when will that piece be fixed? [16:28] slangasek, yea, there hadn't been a release yet, so we didn't have agents of course [16:29] because the client and agent are tied together, 2.2.5 for instance will never run on bionic as it was released before it [16:29] oh? [16:29] why would you not copy the agents forward? [16:30] in order to support bionic on 2.2.5, we'd have to build an agent for it, then add it to streams. Not impossible to do, but we would have to do it for every old version [16:30] juju lives on the upgrade treadmill; this is an example [16:31] I think that's categorically broken [16:31] slangasek, well, it would be more hallarious if people started to successfully deploy bionic instances instead of xenial in production. [16:31] the agent should copy forward by default, just like everything in the Ubuntu archive does [16:31] if the agent / client was separated or the client always bootstrapped the latest (as 1.25 did) things would be different [16:31] xnox: absolutely [16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.4 => 0.33ubuntu0.3] (core) [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.33ubuntu0.3] [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.4 => 0.28ubuntu0.5] (core) [16:33] slangasek, you probably can won't fix for trusty [16:33] slangasek, though hmmm [16:33] balloons: is that because you don't intend to fix the client in trusty? [16:33] or because the client isn't broken in trusty? [16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (zesty-proposed/main) [0.33ubuntu0.2 => 0.33ubuntu0.3] (core) [16:33] slangasek, there isn't a juju-2 client in trusty, so indeed. That said, juju-1 client on trusty probably is broken too. I should check [16:34] is trusty juju1 or juju-core? [16:34] balloons: please do :) [16:34] juju-core [16:34] ack [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.8 => 0.18ubuntu0.9] (core) [16:36] apw, bdmurray, rbasak: so, I don't want to just self-accept the above given its irregularity, but I'm dealing with a sick kiddo and will be afk from ~now for most of the day. It would be great if one of you could review and potentially accept + fast-track the above today [16:37] slangasek, trusty is fine with 0.18ubuntu0.8 [16:37] balloons: ok, thanks [16:37] slangasek, juju-2 on it will be broken though, but that's not in the archive [16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.9] [16:38] looks good, ty [16:38] balloons: can you update the bug with a test case (what command to run, expected output vs. failure output)? [16:39] slangasek, yep [16:39] slangasek: I can have look see [16:39] bdmurray: ta! [16:40] slangasek: How will the work to add LTS back be tracked? [16:40] bdmurray: I'm intending to upload the revert SRU to the queue as soon as this version is accepted [16:41] slangasek: And how will it not be accepted accidentally? [16:42] bdmurray: if you prefer I can wait until this version is in -updates so it doesn't accidentally get accepted over it [16:42] bdmurray: and then I would pre-emptively mark the bug v-failed [16:43] slangasek: Oh, so the reall distro-info-data will live in -proposed until juju ends up in -updates? [16:44] bdmurray: that's the idea yes [16:44] bdmurray: I would also add a Breaks: against the un-fixed juju-core versions [16:44] really afk now, sorry [16:52] balloons: slangasek's comment about juju 2.2.4 already being in the SRU stream lead me to believe it was already in -proposed which it isn't. Why can't the one waiting in the -proposed queue be fixed? [16:52] bdmurray, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1718213 [16:52] Ubuntu bug 1718213 in juju-core (Ubuntu Zesty) "[SRU] Juju 2.2.4" [Undecided,In progress] [16:54] bdmurray, ohh you mean, why isn't the fix in the proposed stream? or why we would want to push 2.2.6 as the fix? [16:54] balloons: Yeah, why not just fix 2.2.4? [16:54] Its not anywhere real yet. [16:55] bdmurray, we would have to distro patch it into 2.2.4. It would be ok in this case though as the change is purely client side, so the existing agents are fine to be fair [16:56] imho makes more sense to just rev the source so we don't have to carry patches [16:57] since it's not released [16:57] "carry patches" where are you carrying it if 2.2.6 is coming out? [16:59] I guess it really doesn't matter as we'd still need the distro-info-data SRU for the existing version of juju and we can fast track that SRU more quickly than juju. The argument about not fixing 2.2.4 is still odd to me though. [17:00] bdmurray, I'm not following you, I'm sorry. I'm working to rev a 2.2.6 version of juju. We'll want to include the change in the SRU version of juju. Since 2.2.4 is already in proposed, i thought it made sense to just rev that to the new version, since we didn't release it. Since 2.2.X was in the SRU pipeline already, it doesn't make sense to push a [17:00] specific SRU for this to the 2.0.2 package in xenial currently [17:01] The end result is juju 2.2.6 and distro-info-data sitting in proposed tonight/tomorrow happily working together. Then we can land them both [17:01] or my thoughts anyway [17:06] infinity: is the migration block still intended to be in place? [17:08] balloons: 2.2.4 is not already in -proposed though [17:10] bdmurray, am I missing something? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/. I tested it from proposed [17:10] it's been in there for a bit [17:11] balloons: Ah, I also saw 2.2.4-0ubuntu0.17.04.2 in the queue [17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.33ubuntu0.3] [17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.5] [17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (artful-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu1] [17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) [17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (zesty-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset) [17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20171016.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) [18:02] I have prepared dpkg and debhelper [18:02] tsimonq2, ^^ [18:03] I'm testing some rebuilds in my ppa https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+build/13619303 [18:03] so far so good [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (bionic-proposed/main) [10.7.2ubuntu2 => 10.10.4ubuntu1] (core) [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (bionic-proposed/main) [1.18.24ubuntu1 => 1.19.0.4ubuntu1] (core) [18:04] I still need to do some more testing, but so far the merge is correct [18:04] I need to check for ddeb creation [18:05] actually kbuild is good and it produced ddebs correctluu [18:05] so, if any AA wants to accept them together... [18:06] binutils is good, and it provides old -dbg packages [18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] [18:07] LocutusOfBorg: ack, although I thought infinity wanted to do those... [18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20171025.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] [18:08] infinity, whants somebody to accept them together [18:08] for obvious reasons [18:08] (bootstrap) [18:08] they need to be published in the same cycle [18:11] cyphermox: Were the slideshow updates for Lubuntu not merged or was the MP not updated? [18:11] (for Artful) [18:11] tsimonq2: maybe I missed pushing [18:12] cyphermox: ok, please let me know [18:13] tsimonq2: lp:ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu corresponds to what was uploaded in 133 [18:15] cyphermox: And it has the Lubuntu slideshow updates right? [18:16] (if so could you please update the MP?) [18:20] tsimonq2: I don't know, only guess so [18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 0ad (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0.21-2 => 0.0.21-2build1] (no packageset) [18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 389-adminutil (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.23-1build1 => 1.1.23-1build2] (no packageset) [18:21] I have no idea where that MP is, it looks to me like there are no open to-review MP except Gunnar's [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 389-ds-base (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.7.5-1 => 1.3.7.5-1build1] (no packageset) [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aegisub (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.2+dfsg-3build6 => 3.2.2+dfsg-3build7] (no packageset) [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 389-dsgw (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.11-2build3 => 1.1.11-2build4] (no packageset) [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: an (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2-1build2 => 1.2-1build3] (no packageset) [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost1.62 (bionic-proposed/main) [1.62.0+dfsg-4build3 => 1.62.0+dfsg-4build4] (core) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost1.63 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.63.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3 => 1.63.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4] (no packageset) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calibre (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0+dfsg-2 => 3.7.0+dfsg-2build1] (edubuntu) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cg3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~r12254-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.0~r12254-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dee (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.7+17.10.20170616-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.7+17.10.20170616-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brltty (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4-7ubuntu4 => 5.4-7ubuntu5] (core) [18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: couchdb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-0ubuntu8 => 1.6.0-0ubuntu9] (no packageset) [18:23] cyphermox: ok thanks [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dwdiff (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-1 => 2.1.1-1build1] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firebird3.0 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.2.32703.ds4-9 => 3.0.2.32703.ds4-9build1] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnustep-base (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.24.9-3ubuntu1 => 1.24.9-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grcompiler (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2-6build1 => 4.2-6build2] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haskell-text-icu (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.0.1-6build2 => 0.7.0.1-6build3] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (bionic-proposed/main) [3.26.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnustep-gui (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.25.0-4build1 => 0.25.0-4build2] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hfst-ospell (bionic-proposed/main) [0.4.5~r343-2.1 => 0.4.5~r343-2.1build1] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: frog (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.13.7-1 => 0.13.7-1build1] (no packageset) [18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: harfbuzz (bionic-proposed/main) [1.4.2-1 => 1.4.2-1build1] (core) [18:24] tsimonq2: sorry :) [18:25] tsimonq2: that said, I just pushed lp:ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/artful to capture the current state of artful, and created a bionic series (though we'll still work on trunk for now) [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hhvm (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.21.0+dfsg-2 => 3.21.0+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset) [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdb (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.2-1 => 3.0.2-1build1] (kubuntu) [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-1 => 1.3.3-1build1] (input-methods, kubuntu) [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kopanocore (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-3ubuntu5 => 8.1.0-3ubuntu6] (no packageset) [18:25] and now I'm thinking if we shouldn't move that to git. [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcdr (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.3-3 => 0.1.3-3build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libe-book (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.2-4 => 0.1.2-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libical (bionic-proposed/main) [2.0.0-0.5 => 2.0.0-0.5build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libphonenumber (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.0-5ubuntu2 => 7.1.0-5ubuntu3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcolumbus (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+15.10.20150806-0ubuntu8 => 1.1.0+15.10.20150806-0ubuntu9] (ubuntukylin) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmspub (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.2-4 => 0.1.2-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfolia (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-2 => 1.6-2build1] (no packageset) [18:26] cyphermox: np, thanks :) [18:26] And yes Git :D [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 0ad [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.0.21-2build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 389-ds-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.7.5-1build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aegisub [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.2+dfsg-3build7] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boost1.62 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.62.0+dfsg-4build4] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 389-adminutil [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.23-1build2] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted an [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2-1build3] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 389-dsgw [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.11-2build4] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boost1.63 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.63.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brltty [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.4-7ubuntu5] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cg3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~r12254-1ubuntu2] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dee [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.7+17.10.20170616-0ubuntu2] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.1-1ubuntu2] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted frog [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.13.7-1build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnustep-gui [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.25.0-4build2] [18:29] is this stream of messages around the unapproved queue? and do they mean pulling stuff into bionic? [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted harfbuzz [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.2-1build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hfst-ospell [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.5~r343-2.1build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calibre [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0+dfsg-2build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dwdiff [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.1-1build1] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnustep-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.24.9-3ubuntu2] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haskell-text-icu [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.0.1-6build3] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted couchdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-0ubuntu9] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grcompiler [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2-6build2] [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firebird3.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.2.32703.ds4-9build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hhvm [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.21.0+dfsg-2build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.2-1build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcdr [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.3-3build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libe-book [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2-4build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libical [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-0.5build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libphonenumber [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.0-5ubuntu3] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvisio (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.5-4 => 0.1.5-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus-qt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3-1build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcolumbus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+15.10.20150806-0ubuntu9] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmspub [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2-4build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kopanocore [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.1.0-3ubuntu6] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:5.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.4.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfolia [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-2build1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxml2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.9.4+dfsg1-4ubuntu1 => 2.9.4+dfsg1-4ubuntu2] (core) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mapnik (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.15+ds-1 => 3.0.15+ds-1build1] (no packageset) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mpd (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.20.9-2 => 0.20.9-2build1] (no packageset) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-stringprep (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build1 => 0.8.0-3build2] (no packageset) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzmf (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0.2-1 => 0.0.2-1build1] (no packageset) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: msort (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.53-2.1 => 8.53-2.1build1] (no packageset) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs38 (bionic-proposed/universe) [38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu1 => 38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: odil (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2:10.1.10-3 => 2:10.1.10-3build1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openttd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1 => 1.7.0-1build1] (no packageset) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php-pecl-http (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.0+2.6.0-4build2 => 3.1.0+2.6.0-4build3] (no packageset) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poedit (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.4-1 => 2.0.4-1build1] (no packageset) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: prelude-lml (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-5.3ubuntu4 => 1.0.0-5.3ubuntu5] (no packageset) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.1 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.8-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.8-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyicu (bionic-proposed/main) [1.9.5-1build2 => 1.9.5-1build3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2.3-1 => 3.2.3-1build1] (core) [18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.1+dfsg-10ubuntu1 => 5.9.1+dfsg-10ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) [18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtwebengine-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.1+dfsg-4 => 5.9.1+dfsg-4build1] (kubuntu) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtwebkit-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu1 => 5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-charlock-holmes (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.3+dfsg-2build3 => 0.7.3+dfsg-2build4] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subtitlecomposer (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.4-2 => 0.6.4-2build1] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: taglib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-0.2 => 1.11.1+dfsg.1-0.2build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: texlive-bin (bionic-proposed/main) [2017.20170613.44572-5build1 => 2017.20170613.44572-5build2] (ubuntu-desktop) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-stringi (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-1build1 => 1.1.2-1build2] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sword (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.3+dfsg-9.1 => 1.7.3+dfsg-9.1build1] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tin (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2.4.1-1 => 1:2.4.1-1build1] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slop (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.3.49-1 => 7.3.49-1build1] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tesseract (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.04.01-6 => 3.04.01-6build1] (kubuntu) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ucto (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1 => 0.9.6-1build1] (no packageset) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (bionic-proposed/main) [2.18.0-2 => 2.18.0-2build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xerces-c (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.4+debian-2 => 3.1.4+debian-2build1] (kubuntu) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zimlib (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2 => 2.0.0-2build1] (no packageset) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.ucol (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-2ubuntu9 => 1.0.2-2ubuntu10] (zope) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unar (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-2 => 1.10.1-2build1] (no packageset) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaz (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1 => 5.19.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkitgtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.11-3 => 2.4.11-3build1] (kubuntu) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: znc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.5-2build2 => 1.6.5-2build3] (no packageset) [18:37] powersj: No, looks like d o k o is no-change rebuilding things [18:37] tsimonq2: ah ok [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted odil [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu2] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openttd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.0-1build1] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.1 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.8-1ubuntu2] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.3-1build1] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyicu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.5-1build3] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:10.1.10-3build1] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poedit [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.4-1build1] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php-pecl-http [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.0+2.6.0-4build3] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prelude-lml [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-5.3ubuntu5] [18:39] powersj: (toolchain updates but you likely know that :) ) [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvisio [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.5-4build1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libzmf [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.0.2-1build1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs38 [source] (bionic-proposed) [38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu2] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxml2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.4+dfsg1-4ubuntu2] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mpd [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.20.9-2build1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mapnik [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.15+ds-1build1] [18:40] tsimonq2: I actually didn't :) so I appreciate it [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted msort [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.53-2.1build1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu2] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtwebengine-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.1+dfsg-4build1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-stringprep [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0-3build2] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtwebkit-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu2] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.1+dfsg-10ubuntu2] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-stringi [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-1build2] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slop [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.49-1build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sword [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.3+dfsg-9.1build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tesseract [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.04.01-6build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.4.1-1build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unar [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.1-2build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkitgtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.11-3build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-charlock-holmes [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3+dfsg-2build4] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-0.2build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ucto [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.6-1build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subtitlecomposer [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.4-2build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.18.0-2build1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted texlive-bin [source] (bionic-proposed) [2017.20170613.44572-5build2] [18:41] powersj: ;) [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xerces-c [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.4+debian-2build1] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zimlib [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-2build1] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zope.ucol [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.2-2ubuntu10] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaz [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu2] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted znc [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.5-2build3] [18:42] powersj: bionic-changes at lists.u.c is a thing if you're curious why ;) [18:42] I subscribed to it already [18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:5.4.1-0ubuntu2] [18:44] tsimonq2: ah look at that! that would have answered my question [18:45] powersj: Yeah it's pretty convenient :D [20:52] is transition page needing some hint for bionic? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/icu.html still shows everythign as bad [20:52] Laney, ^^ [20:52] btw let me know if you need something for debhelper+dpkg [20:52] so far so good [21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.4.11-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (zesty-proposed/main) [0.33ubuntu0.3 => 0.33ubuntu0.4] (core) [21:15] bdmurray, balloons: ^^ the revert of distro-info-data, back in the queue and awaiting the juju-core side to land [21:15]