[03:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uhd [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.10.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[03:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uhd [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.10.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[03:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uhd [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.10.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[03:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uhd [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.10.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[03:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uhd [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.10.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uhd [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.10.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[04:05] <slangasek> xnox: so what's the deal with systemd/xenial/s390x failing every time in the past 2 days?
[05:55] <acheronuk> slangasek or anyone else; is it possible to get existing qtwebkit 5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu1 rebuilt against the new qtdeclarative 5.9.1-6ubuntu1 upload? even though there is a qtwebkit 5.212.0~alpha2-4 dep waiting in proposed against Qt 5.9.2?
[05:57] <acheronuk> the ABI bump in that qtdeclarative upload has left a lot of KDE/Qt build and test dependencies unsatisfiable
[05:59] <infinity> acheronuk: Yeah, I was looking at removing that 5.212.0 upload for other reasons.
[06:00] <infinity> acheronuk: But the real question is if 5.9.1 will build against icu95 (guessing not without patching, but we'll see)
[06:00] <infinity> s/95/59/
[06:01] <infinity> On the flipside, it seems I've just fixed one webkit variant for that, so what's three moe?
[06:05] <acheronuk> aha. if that can work, good. at the moment I can't even test build our most basic frameworks dependency, extra-cmake-modules :/
[06:06]  * infinity grabs a build log from 5.9.1+dfsg-5ubuntu2 to see why it failed.
[06:06] <infinity> Oh, FFS, it just failed due to symbols issues (likely relating to that ABI bump you were talking about).
[06:07] <infinity> If that's true on all 6 arches, I'll just pull in the symbols changes and reupload.
[06:08]  * acheronuk hopes so
[06:08] <infinity> Hrm.  Except it built against an old qtdeclarative, so that's not what caused the change.
[06:10] <infinity> God, I hate trying to decipher C++ symbols.
[06:30] <infinity> acheronuk: Kay, going to throw this at my staging PPA, and if it actually works, copy it over.
[06:30] <infinity> Confidence++
[06:31] <acheronuk> cool. hoping
[06:32] <infinity> s390x builds pretty quickly, so I'll know soonish.
[06:32] <infinity> Unless I fall asleep. :P
[06:39] <acheronuk> qttools5-dev-tools : Depends: libqt5webkit5 (>= 5.6.0~rc) but it is not going to be installed
[06:40] <acheronuk> libqt5webkit5 : Depends: qtdeclarative-abi-5-9-0
[06:40]  * acheronuk rolls eyes
[06:41] <infinity> Oh, FFS, it can't build?
[06:41] <infinity> The qtdeclarative upload seems to have been poorly thought out.
[06:42] <acheronuk> plus maybe a bit pointless as a Qt 5.9.2 transition is imminent
[06:42] <infinity> Yeah, I think I'll just delete this.
[06:42] <infinity> The 5.9.2 transition will overwrite it.
[06:43] <infinity> Alternately, it could be replaced with a version that provides both those virtual packages.
[06:44] <infinity> But it still needs to be deleted in order to build that new upload.
[06:44] <infinity> Because lol circular deps.
[06:44] <acheronuk> that circular dep issue is likely resolved with bootstrapping more Qt builds with 'nodoc' builds 1st, as will likely happen with the full transition
[06:45] <infinity> Probably.  Right now, I'm in no mood to have this random broken package holding up my ICU transition and the archive opening.
[06:45] <infinity> So deleted.
[06:45] <acheronuk> ok. thanks for sorting :)
[06:45] <infinity> s/archive opening/auto-sync enabling/
[06:46] <infinity> It should go poof from ftpmaster in half an hour or so.
[06:46]  * acheronuk goes to make more coffee (morning here)
[06:46] <infinity> Erm, and I should kill all these builds.
[06:46] <infinity> Before they get a dep on the wrong thing.
[06:52] <infinity> My local webkitgtk build is 2.5 hours in, which is 50 minutes longer than I've managed before, that must be a good sign.
[06:52] <infinity> Or it's a sign that my laptop is dying and going half as slow as it was this morning.
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flatpak-builder [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flatpak-builder [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flatpak-builder [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uhd [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uhd [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uhd [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flatpak-builder [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flatpak-builder [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uhd [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flatpak-builder [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uhd [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uhd [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2.0-2]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boinc [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.8.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boinc [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.8.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[10:02] <infinity> slangasek: Deleting your postgresql-common from -proposed for now.  It sort of depends on a new psql.
[10:02] <infinity> slangasek: Which doesn't exist yet.
[10:03] <infinity> slangasek: Feel free to copy --force-same-destination over itself when it's actually sane to do so.
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuradio [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.11-2] (no packageset)
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuradio [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.11-2] (no packageset)
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuradio [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.11-2] (no packageset)
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuradio [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.11-2] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: remmina [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.24-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: remmina [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.24-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: remmina [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.24-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: remmina [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.24-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: remmina [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.24-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: remmina [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.24-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuradio [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.11-2] (no packageset)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casablanca [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1~build2] (no packageset)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected casablanca [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.0-1~build1]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected casablanca [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.0-1~build1]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected casablanca [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.0-1~build1]
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casablanca [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1~build2] (no packageset)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casablanca [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1~build2] (no packageset)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuradio [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.11-2] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casablanca [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1~build2] (no packageset)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casablanca [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1~build2] (no packageset)
[13:27] <teward> is Bionic open for uploads and such yet?
[13:27] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, ^^ ready to go (casablanca)
[13:39]  * LocutusOfBorg does some syncs before the world explodes
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.13.0+dfsg-6] (no packageset)
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.13.0+dfsg-6] (no packageset)
[16:55] <slangasek> teward: yes: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2017-October/001231.html
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.13.0+dfsg-6] (no packageset)
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.13.0+dfsg-6] (no packageset)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.13.0+dfsg-6] (no packageset)
[19:36] <tsimonq2> infinity: Question with your AA hat on. Let's say package foo needs to go through NEW, but has some upstream copyright issues. If those were solved in upstream, but upstream won't tag for months if not years from now, is it acceptable to cherry pick the commit changing the license to one that can go in the archive, or do I have to use a whole Git snapshot?
[21:36] <jbicha> slangasek: (or anyone) please bump the flatpak badtest for ppc64el
[21:56] <infinity> tsimonq2: Copyright is very much about intent and will of the authors, so if they say the new license covers things retroactively (which is implied if they change the license without otherwise changing the content), cherry-pick away.
[21:57] <infinity> tsimonq2: If they "fix" the license by, say, removing problematic code/files, you'll need to repack to follow suit.
[21:57] <infinity> tsimonq2: I can't think of many situations where you'd need a whole new snapshot just to fix the license.
[22:02] <tsimonq2> infinity: No, they just do a license change to make it more permissive (no removing of files), so I'll cherry pick and go from there then.
[22:03] <tsimonq2> infinity: Thank you for the clarification.
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-science [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:23] <tsimonq2> infi/win 44
[23:23] <tsimonq2> Whoooooooops
[23:24]  * tsimonq2 plans on doing an LXQt transition immediately following the Qt transition, fwiw
[23:26]  * tsimonq2 also wonders how long it will take src:icu to migrate, but won't complain
[23:37] <infinity> tsimonq2: icu is tied up with netcdf, so any help you want to lend there won't go amiss.
[23:37] <infinity> tsimonq2: Also, I had to delete an upload of yours that made pretty much all things Qt uninstallible.
[23:38] <infinity> tsimonq2: qtdeclarative-opensource-src changed the provides, which broke all the rdeps.  Need to be a bit more careful on merges like that.
[23:38] <infinity> (But I imagine it all becomes moot with 5.9.2 anyway)
[23:46] <tsimonq2> infinity: Yes, Rik pinged me on Telegram this morning and I realized that the qtdeclarative upload was probably a bad idea.
[23:46] <tsimonq2> infinity: And you're right.
[23:47] <tsimonq2> infinity: I'll see what I can do to poke that, if there is anything I CAN do.
[23:51]  * tsimonq2 shakes head at src:blender
[23:51] <tsimonq2> "Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity"