[00:44] <tsimonq2> valorie: Uploaded peruse to Bionic.
[00:44] <tsimonq2> Let's see how I did irt copyright review.
[02:24] <valorie> tsimonq2: thank you!
[02:37] <tsimonq2> valorie: yw :)
[02:38] <valorie> one more reason to update to bionic!
[07:00] <ahoneybun> morning folks
[07:46] <acheronuk> morning!
[10:34] <IrcsomeBot> <acheronuk> (Photo, 1280x721) https://irc-attachments.kde.org/YZnHn1cU/file_3545.jpg
[10:46] <IrcsomeBot> <acheronuk> Getting story ready: https://kubuntu.org/?p=3525&preview=true
[10:52] <mparillo> acheronuk: "While we believe that these packages represent a beneficial and stable update, please bear in mind that they have not been tested as comprehensively as those in the main ubuntu archive"
[10:52] <mparillo> In that context is ubuntu correct in lower case?
[10:52] <mparillo> ", and are supported only on a limited and informal basis. Should any issues occur, please provide feedback on our mailing list [1], IRC [2], file a bug against our PPA packages [3], or optionally contact us via social media."
[10:53] <acheronuk> I can change to U if you like
[10:54] <mparillo> I think pushing notices out via social media is great, but I worry if we create an expectation that we can effectively monitor it. Not to make me the typical person, but I avoid signing into FB for any longer than the occasional Kubuntu post.
[10:54] <acheronuk> fair point
[10:56] <acheronuk> mparillo: both tweaked
[10:56] <mparillo> Based on this page, https://www.ubuntu.com/about it seems to me that the few times they use Ubuntu in mid-sentence, it is capitalized. Thanks.
[10:56] <mparillo> Now that I have your attention, last night I tested the XX backports.
[10:58] <mparillo> After applying regular backports, and full-upgrade -y, the kicker Leave > Reboot did not work. But, in a Konsole, a systemctl reboot did.
[10:59] <mparillo> Is that normal for big plasma upgrades (I did not get it with the backports-landing upgrade)? Do we think our audience for backports thinks this is a papercut? Do they know the work-around?
[10:59] <acheronuk> mparillo: that's a common issue with plasma updates. or at least, not uncommon
[11:03] <mparillo> P.S. I like how your screenshot showed kio-gdrive, but with a blurred gmail ID. Is that latte dock? Maybe you need to post to https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/
[11:10] <acheronuk> mparillo: yep, latte dock on the left :)
[11:37] <mparillo> It is based on Plasma, but upstream is github instead of being a KDE project, right? https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/latte-dock/
[12:02] <acheronuk> mparillo: it's now a KDE project https://cgit.kde.org/latte-dock.git/
[12:05] <mparillo> First Qupzilla, now latte-dock. More KDE projects to consider for the BB cycle. A good problem to have.
[12:06] <acheronuk> indeed :)
[12:07] <mparillo> And blame google for making arch the source of truth on the upstream source.
[15:45] <clivejo> would it be worth asking the community if anyone could manage Facebook for u?
[15:45] <clivejo> us
[16:28] <IrcsomeBot> * acheronuk yawns
[16:34] <IrcsomeBot> * tsimonq2 slides Rik a coffee
[16:35] <IrcsomeBot> <tsimonq2> I'm having one also because ever since I've had my learner's permit I've been driving everyone around!
[16:36] <IrcsomeBot> <tsimonq2> I need at least 30 hours of driving during the 6 month minimum I have my temps. I'm already through 10 of those in the first week!
[21:50] <IrcsomeBot> <ahoneybun> Yay a nice boring sunday
[23:31] <acheronuk> yofel: I notice now we get output: dpkg-gensymbols: warning: no debian/symbols file used as basis for generating debian/libgc1c2/DEBIAN/symbols
[23:32] <acheronuk> whereas used to get: debian/libname/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libname.symbols
[23:33] <acheronuk> so KCI is failing to match thegensymbols_regex
[23:34] <acheronuk> so failing all in bionic where there are new symbols