=== pfsmorigo is now known as Guest68552
=== Guest68552 is now known as pfsmorigo2
=== JanC is now known as Guest74037
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== infinity0 is now known as Guest97342
=== infinity0_ is now known as infinity0
=== pfsmorigo2 is now known as pfsmorigo
=== pfsmorigo is now known as Guest35006
=== Guest35006 is now known as pfsmorigo2
[13:43] <pisi2> jbicha: Hi, #1725821 This bug still affecting me. Will there be update for artful?
[13:44] <pisi2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1725821
[13:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1725821 in mutter (Ubuntu Artful) "mutter 3.26 doesn't properly unredirect windows" [Low,Incomplete]
[13:46] <jbicha> pisi2: yes, there is a proposed SRU in the unapproved queue. Once it's approved by the SRU team (later this week I hope), it will be built as a proposed update
[13:46] <jbicha> and then if testing goes well, it well be released as a regular update a week or so later
[13:46] <jbicha> I wasn't able to figure out a Test Case I could reproduce here with Intel graphics, so I used LP: #1725649 as the tracking bug for that issue
[13:46] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1725649 in mutter (Ubuntu Artful) "Fullscreen games lose "fullscreen" after an Alt+Tab" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1725649
[13:49] <pisi2> jbicha: thank you for information 😊
[13:50] <jbicha> pisi2: if you subscribe to 1725649 you'll get notified when the SRU team approves the proposed update
[13:53] <jbicha> if you have a good test case, feel free to fill in 1725821
[13:53] <pisi2> jbicha: is there way to help test team?
[13:59] <infinity> jbicha: A test case would be nice, but a description would also be nice.
[14:00] <infinity> jbicha: I suspect only a handful of people know what the title means.
[14:00] <infinity> (And I'm not one of them)
[14:00] <jbicha> infinity: but I can't reproduce the issue…
[14:22] <jbicha> I added a basic description with question marks, anyone actually affected should feel free to add more details
[15:34] <z3ntu> Hey, is there any chance that debhelper 10.3+ is getting backported to xenial?
[15:34] <z3ntu> Currently xenial-backports only has 10.2.2
[15:48] <jbicha> z3ntu: what feature of the newer debhelper do you need?
[15:49] <z3ntu> jbicha: meson build support
[15:51] <jbicha> z3ntu: file a bug and ask Laney about maybe backporting it from artful (like was done for zesty)
[15:55] <z3ntu> jbicha: filed a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1728423
[15:55] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1728423 in debhelper (Ubuntu) "Backport debhelper 10.3+ to xenial" [Undecided,New]