[07:32] <doko> jamespage: ceph ftbfs with new boost on some archs
[07:32] <jamespage> doko: yeah working on an update for that this week
[07:32] <jamespage> doko: hmm - https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3006/+packages
[07:32] <jamespage> that's odd - I was expecting that to fail
[07:33] <jamespage> that's building against proposed
[07:33] <doko> hmm, transient, retrying
[07:33] <doko> the ftbfs didn't have any build log
[12:33] <mitya57> Whom should I ping about updating ubuntu-packaging-guide webpage? [ https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2017-October/040021.html ]
[12:33] <mitya57> According to IPs it is hosted on citrusnobilis.canonical.com and yangmei.canonical.com. Who has access to those servers?
[12:35] <rbasak> If no answer here, maybe try #canonical-sysadmin? They might be able to track it down to an owner.
[12:58] <niedbalski> RAOF, rbasak hello, any chance to sponsor the SRUs for bug 1657256? (they're already in unapproved, uploaded by cpaelzer).
[13:21] <LocutusOfBorg> niedbalski, probably this is a question for #ubuntu-release team
[13:21] <LocutusOfBorg> if it is already uploaded
[14:07] <dgadomski> hello doko, re bug #1638695, I've shared some more benchmarks in the spreadsheet
[14:07] <dgadomski> do you think any of the settings is worth considering of backporting to xenial?
[14:15] <andreas> sil2100: hi, this bug has the v13 tarball of ubuntu-advantage-tools attached for bionic. It runs the tests at package build time
[14:15] <andreas> sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1721272
[14:16] <andreas> and also fixes the bug, of course
[14:16] <andreas> I didn't file a bug specifically to have tests run at package build time
[15:00] <doko> dgadomski: yes, I think everything but the PyFPE changes. I'll have a look until next week
[15:03] <dgadomski> doko: ok, thank you
[15:08] <coreycb> hello release team, python-monasca-statsd in bionic NEW is a source package replacement of monasca-statsd
[15:31] <jbicha> acheronuk: there are 2 KDE autopkgtests holding up dbus in bionic-proposed but I expect the autopkgtest queue to be full for a couple days
[15:32] <jbicha> from the initial autosync and perl, etc. so I guess you might not be able to do much with it soon
[15:40] <acheronuk> jbicha: nope. I doubt I can. one is on armhf, that we scarcely care much about, and will get a new version soon anyway. the other has a new frameworks upload ready and I would try to fix in that, but I can't do that until the just kicked off Qt uploads/transition are at least all built, if not through
[15:41] <acheronuk> jbicha: so if you are in any hurry, I can see good reason there for asking for a version specific hint/skip from the release team on those tests
[15:43] <jbicha> no hurry, I'm guessing the new versions will end up fixing the issue or something
[15:52] <seb128> could somebody from the SRU team review the unity-control-center/xenial upload that was just uploaded? it's one the oem team is waiting on for a while and that would be nice to let it today if we can
[15:56] <rbasak> niedbalski: I'm aware but I can't take an interrupt right now, sorry.
[18:12] <niedbalski> ^^ any other SRU team member has any cycles to review it?
[20:02] <seb128> bdmurray, hey, could you maybe have a look to the unity-control-center SRU in the xenial queue? the oem team is waiting on it
[20:27] <xnox> popey, i have a few tasks that might be suitable for Google Cod In
[20:28] <popey> Great!
[20:28] <xnox> popey, it is circa 200 bite size tasks
[20:28] <xnox> popey, can we chat about it? if they are suitable?/
[20:28] <popey> Golly! That's great.
[20:28] <popey> Yeah, I'm on vacation today, tomorrow?
[20:28] <xnox> popey, sure! just ping me whenever you are free
[20:28] <popey> kk will do
[20:30] <sarnold> we're teaching fish to program?
[20:30] <bdmurray> Only Cod though
[20:30] <bdmurray> No Salmon
[20:32] <xnox> bdmurray, indeed salmon is bad, salmon has too many lice in scotland right now.
[20:32] <xnox> sarnold, i'm just going to get minions to write systemd units for me =) to replace all the init.d scripts =)
[20:32] <sarnold> xnox: YES
[20:44] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks
[21:02] <acheronuk> jbicha: on some retries, those KDE tests have now passed
[21:04] <jbicha> acheronuk: I appreciate it! ⭐
[21:04] <acheronuk> just wish I had a good reason why :/
[21:06] <acheronuk> Apparently successful
[21:06] <acheronuk> final: dbus,libsdl2-gfx,libsdl2-image
[22:33] <LaurenceLumi> any clues on how to use backports with pbuilder-dist?
[22:33] <LaurenceLumi>  I have xenial set up with pbuilder-dist, but I want to build a package from zesty that needs a later version of debhelper that is available in xenial-backports
[22:35] <nacc> LaurenceLumi: don't use pbuilder? :) sbuild at least supports adding extra repositories
[22:38] <LaurenceLumi> :-) I was just following the packaging guide, the must be a way
[22:40] <nacc> LaurenceLumi: i really dont' know anythig about pbuilder myself, sorry
[22:48] <HeadlessHorseman> LaurenceLumi: Certainly is.
[22:49] <LaurenceLumi> thought so
[22:50] <HeadlessHorseman> Do you use a hook to refresh the repositories?  If so, it's just another option. I simply have it in my pbuilderrc though.
[22:51] <LaurenceLumi> I tried something like I found some instructions here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto#Using_backport_repositories_in_pbuilder
[22:52] <LaurenceLumi> but it didn't work
[22:52] <LaurenceLumi> could you post the lines from your pbuildrecc?
[22:54] <HeadlessHorseman> https://sigma.unit193.net/~unit193/pbuilderrc - https://sigma.unit193.net/~unit193/D99RefreshRepositories (remove the first two lines at least.)
[23:09] <LaurenceLumi> thanks HeadlessHorseman the guide I posted has the lines to append to /etc/app/source.list but it does include a line to apt-get upgrade
[23:09] <LaurenceLumi> so I understand no why it didn;t work
[23:09] <LaurenceLumi> thanks
[23:17] <HeadlessHorseman> I presume you know about the hookdir?  And not to use my pbuilderrc directly unless you know what it does? :P
[23:22] <LaurenceLumi> Yes I think so, I actually set hook.d with E01file with lines to modify /etc/app/sources
[23:23] <LaurenceLumi> but It did not work as expected as there was no apt-get upgrade